El Niño is officially confirmed as of this week, and two distinct corpus sources — Yale Climate Connections and Daily Sabah — report it is not just present but potentially tracking toward historic intensity. Colorado State University has lowered its 2026 Atlantic hurricane season forecast to 11 named storms, well below the long-run average. For Gulf Coast energy infrastructure — refineries, LNG terminals, offshore platforms — this is a meaningful near-term risk reduction signal. The Atlantic basin is where the insured loss history for energy infrastructure is concentrated; a quiet season reduces expected annual loss in that region.
However, applying Weather Risk's regional discipline: the U.S. West is a distinct risk profile from the Southeast, and El Niño cuts differently across those regions. El Niño tends to bring wetter, cooler conditions to the U.S. South and warmer, drier conditions to the Pacific Northwest. The NOAA degree-day data for the week of 2026-06-03 to 2026-06-09 shows Seattle carrying 151.7 HDD over seven days — heating demand in early June is anomalous for the Pacific Northwest and consistent with a cooler-than-normal pattern. Cross-metro totals are 1,444 HDD and zero CDD. No cooling load anywhere in the monitored system this week. The West's energy load story right now is heating, not cooling — an inversion of the summer-stress narrative.
The uninsured loss angle on El Niño is worth flagging even if the corpus is thin on specifics: a historically strong El Niño event carries flood risk for the U.S. Southwest and California, drought risk for the Pacific Northwest and parts of the Midwest, and disruption risk for agricultural supply chains globally. The insured loss from a quiet Atlantic hurricane season is the headline. The uninsured adaptation gap from El Niño-driven precipitation pattern shifts is the story. China's extreme weather (Carbon Brief corpus) is consistent with El Niño's global footprint — but I am not routing that claim through the China corpus summary alone, which lacks specific event data.
For the Southeast specifically: a below-average Atlantic hurricane season reduces tail-risk for Gulf Coast energy infrastructure in 2026 compared to an average year. That is a meaningful insurance and adaptation signal. But it is a comparative reduction, not an absence of risk — Colorado State explicitly warns that one landfalling storm can produce significant impacts regardless of seasonal totals. The Southeast's relative risk is comparatively weaker than headline impressions this year; the West's heating-demand anomaly and El Niño-driven precipitation uncertainty are the dominant regional signals right now.
Key point: El Niño confirmation reduces 2026 Atlantic hurricane tail-risk for Gulf Coast energy infrastructure, but the Pacific Northwest's anomalous June heating load (Seattle: 151.7 HDD over 7 days) signals El Niño's West-region footprint is already active.
The insured loss is the headline. The uninsured loss is the story. The adaptation gap is the trend. On the weather side of today's corpus, the dominant signal is what is not happening as much as what is: CSU has downgraded its 2026 Atlantic hurricane season forecast, reducing named-storm counts and landfall probabilities, citing the increased likelihood of a moderate-to-strong El Niño (artemis.bm). For the U.S. Southeast specifically, this is a meaningful risk reduction relative to prior headline impressions — landfall probabilities are lower, insured-loss expectations for the Gulf Coast and Florida are modestly reduced for this season. I state this distinction explicitly: the Southeast's near-term hurricane risk is comparatively weaker than the last 24-month baseline would suggest.
The U.S. West is a different story and must not be conflated with the Southeast. San Francisco logged 150.9 HDD over the June 2–8 window, the heaviest heating demand of any metro in the NOAA snapshot, and the cross-metro total of 1,420 HDD with zero CDD is anomalous for early June — it reflects the persistent cool-and-wet Pacific pattern that has dominated West Coast load this spring. West-aligned energy load remains the dominant signal for near-term grid stress in that region, not a cooling peak. The SPC Tornado Watch for central Illinois and Missouri counties (spc.noaa.gov) is a separate active weather event, indicating convective risk in the Midwest corridor but not directly a West or Southeast story.
The Lombardy storm event — a waterspout, high winds, hailstorm in Monza, and fallen trees blocking ambulances at Garbagnate hospital (Corriere della Sera) — is a European acute-weather data point consistent with the record-high planetary energy imbalance described in the Carbon Brief guest post. That energy-imbalance piece, citing record-high forcing driving accelerating global warming, is the structural actuarial backdrop behind every individual severe weather event: the loss distribution is shifting right, and re/insurance pricing has not caught up.
Key point: CSU's lowered Atlantic hurricane forecast meaningfully reduces near-term Southeast landfall risk — a distinction that must not be blurred with the West Coast's anomalous June heating load and separate Midwest convective threat; regionally differentiated risk pricing remains essential.
The insured loss is the headline. The uninsured loss is the story. The adaptation gap is the trend. Today's weather corpus is structurally split between acute and chronic signals, and the regional discipline matters here. On the West: San Francisco posted 150.9 HDD over the 7-day window ending June 8 — the heaviest heating demand of any tracked metro — in June, which is anomalous. The West is running a cool, late-season pattern while the broader cross-metro picture shows 1,420 HDD and 0 CDD. No summer cooling load has materialized yet in the 10-metro sample. That is a West-aligned signal, not a Southeast heat emergency.
The chronic signal is European. Carbon Brief's 'Cited' roundup flags an 'exceptional' spring heatwave across Europe, and Yale Climate Connections reports — in Spanish, flagging the World Cup 2026 audience — that this could be the hottest World Cup in the history of the game, with climate change increasing the probability of dangerous heat during matches and putting players, fans, and workers at elevated risk. The World Cup is a U.S.-hosted event in part; the insurance and adaptation implications of extreme heat at large outdoor gatherings are not fully priced into event risk models. The uninsured loss — heat illness among uninsured fans and informal workers — is the story behind the headline.
Tropical Storm Cristina stalling off Nicaragua's coast, per Havana Times, represents an early-season Eastern Pacific signal. The slow movement of the system is bringing heavy rains to León, Chinandega, Rivas, and Managua — a classic slow-mover flood risk profile. The Eastern Pacific is the dominant storm-activity region for 2026 per standing regional discipline; this early stalling storm is consistent with that weighting. It does not yet constitute a major insured-loss event, but the agricultural impact on Central American subsistence farming from prolonged rainfall deserves a watch flag.
Key point: The West is running anomalous June heating demand (San Francisco 150.9 HDD) with zero cooling load cross-metro; the chronic signal is European heatwave and early Eastern Pacific tropical activity, not a U.S. Southeast heat emergency.
The NOAA degree-day window for May 31 through June 6 shows cross-metro totals of 1,461 HDD and zero CDD across the 10-station sample. San Francisco led heating demand at 150.5 HDD over the 7-day period — a West Coast shoulder-season signal, not a U.S. Southeast summer stress event. New York logged zero CDD. This is an important regional distinction: the West is still in a heating-load regime while the Southeast has not yet entered its peak cooling-demand window. The Florida coal emergency order was issued in a period of minimal grid stress from weather — which cuts against any emergency reliability framing based on current load conditions.
The insured loss is the headline. The uninsured loss is the story. In the current corpus, U.S. airlines collectively paying $6.5 billion in April for jet fuel — more than double the February figure of $3.23 billion — is an insured-equivalent economic loss that flows from a geopolitical weather event: the Strait of Hormuz closure. The adaptation gap here is not infrastructure hardening but supply-chain redundancy: U.S. refiners are now producing jet fuel at record rates and exporting it, while domestic aviation absorbs a price shock that is functionally a supply disruption tax.
I would flag the Wellington, New Zealand storm — flights, ferries cancelled, roads closed — as a data point in the Pacific storm activity series that is the dominant weather signal for 2026 per our regional discipline. The Southeast U.S., by contrast, has not generated a comparable acute weather event in this corpus window. The West and Pacific remain the active weather risk quadrant; Southeast risk, while present structurally, is comparatively weaker as a near-term signal and should not be conflated with the Pacific-aligned load and storm story.
Key point: Zero CDD across the 10-metro NOAA sample through June 6 means the Florida coal emergency order cannot be justified on current weather-driven load grounds; the West Coast heating signal and Pacific storm activity remain the dominant near-term weather-energy risk.
The insured loss is the headline. The uninsured loss is the story. The adaptation gap is the trend. This week's weather corpus is dominated by disparate acute signals rather than a single catastrophic event, but the pattern is meaningful at the portfolio level. Pakistan's National Disaster Management Authority issued warnings covering intense heat in southern provinces, thunderstorms in northern areas, and elevated flash-flood risk from rapidly melting glaciers—all simultaneously, for the June 7–12 window. This is the compound-risk signature that actuarial models are still catching up to: heat-driven glacial melt accelerating flood risk in the same geography experiencing extreme heat stress. The insurance penetration in those Pakistani provinces is negligible, which means the uninsured loss will vastly exceed any modeled insured figure.
Applying the regional discipline required for 2026: the NOAA 7-day degree-day window (May 30–June 5) shows Boston leading with 151.7 HDD over seven days and a cross-metro total of 1,468 HDD with zero CDD across 10 stations. This is a Northeast late-spring heating signal, not a cooling event—the U.S. West and Southeast are not yet in the high-CDD territory that drives summer grid stress and wildfire risk. The West's Pacific storm activity and elevated energy load remain the dominant U.S. weather-energy signal for this period, but the current NOAA window does not show a CDD spike in the corpus data. The Southeast's relative risk remains comparatively weaker than headline impressions would suggest this week.
The NHC's Tropical Depression Two-E tracking in the Eastern Pacific is a West-aligned signal worth flagging—early-season Eastern Pacific tropical activity has historically preceded elevated Gulf and Atlantic activity later in the season. No insured loss is attached to Two-E yet, but the formation is worth tracking as a leading indicator for the adaptation infrastructure stress that arrives later in the Atlantic hurricane season.
Key point: Pakistan's simultaneous glacial-melt flood risk and extreme heat warning is the week's most acute compound-risk weather signal, almost entirely in uninsured territory and absent from Western market risk models.
The insured loss is the headline. The uninsured loss is the story. The adaptation gap is the trend. Montana officials — joined by Governor Gianforte at a statewide wildfire outlook briefing — are warning of above-normal fire risk for 2026, driven by drought conditions, wind events, and warmer-than-average winter temperatures per Inside Climate News. This is the U.S. West's dominant risk signal for this reporting window, and it is distinct from the Northeast/Midwest convective story. These must not be conflated.
In the West: the Montana drought-heat-wind combination is the leading actuarial concern. Wildfire seasons in the West have shifted from a seasonal event to a year-round portfolio risk. Insurers who underwrite timber, agricultural, and residential property in Montana and adjacent states are now pricing in multi-year drought persistence. The uninsured loss category — federal land, watershed degradation, post-fire erosion affecting downstream water infrastructure — does not show up in industry loss tallies but represents a compounding public balance sheet liability.
In the Northeast and Midwest: SPC Watches 279 and 281 cover severe thunderstorm corridors in Indiana/Ohio and coastal Connecticut/Long Island. These are acute events, low-duration, but convective damage from hail and wind in populated corridors generates significant insured loss per event — and the frequency trend matters more than any single event. The NOAA 7-day degree-day data confirms 1,471 HDD cross-metro total with zero CDD — we are in the hinge week before summer heat accelerates. When CDD begins accumulating, the actuarial picture for both grid stress and heat-mortality risk will shift quickly. The Southeast is notably absent from today's active risk corpus: do not import its historical headline weight into this week's signal. The West and the transitional Northeast/Midwest are the active theaters.
Key point: Montana's drought-heat-wind wildfire warning is the dominant U.S. weather-risk signal in the West today; keep it sharply distinct from the Northeast convective events — these are different regions, different risk profiles, and the Southeast is not an active signal this week.
Routing discipline first: the NOAA degree-day snapshot for the seven-day window ending June 3 shows 1,471 total HDD across ten metros with zero CDD. Boston leads at 152 HDD. This is a Northeast/Upper Midwest heating signature in early June — an anomalous cold pattern that suppresses summer cooling load risk in those regions for the near term. The West is the dominant weather-energy signal for 2026, not the Southeast or Northeast, and today's corpus does not produce a West-specific extreme weather event to anchor that claim further — which is itself informative. Absence of a West event in a single day's corpus does not reset the annual weighting.
The story that deserves actuarial attention is the Pennsylvania farm flooding piece from Yale Climate Connections: a farmer turning to neighbors on higher ground as extreme weather reshapes agricultural operations. The insured loss is the headline number. The uninsured loss — crop yield disruption, soil degradation, permanent land-use change — is the structural story. Agricultural flooding in the Pennsylvania-Ohio corridor has compounding effects: it stresses the regional food system, drives farmland valuation shifts that ripple into rural bank collateral quality, and accelerates land abandonment decisions that are irreversible on decadal timescales.
The active SPC severe thunderstorm watch across Iowa counties (Watch 276, active as of June 6) is a near-term loss event in the agricultural Midwest. Iowa's crop calendar in early June is at a vulnerable stage for corn and soybean planting completion; severe convective events at this window carry yield-impact potential beyond the immediate physical damage. The adaptation gap here is not abstract: it is the difference between what crop insurance covers and what climate-driven yield volatility is actually costing farmers who can no longer rely on historical precipitation patterns to plan their operations.
Key point: The Pennsylvania farm flooding and active Iowa severe thunderstorm watch together signal that Midwest/Mid-Atlantic agricultural weather risk is accumulating in real time, with uninsured yield and land-value losses tracking well ahead of insured headline figures.
The NOAA degree-day data for the week of May 27–June 2 shows zero cooling-degree-days across all ten monitored metros, with cross-metro totals of 1,468 HDD and 0 CDD. Seattle led heating demand at 151.4 HDD. In early June, that profile—heating still dominant, cooling not yet arrived—represents a weather-risk lull, not a structural reprieve. The Pacific Northwest's above-normal HDD is consistent with the anomalous cold-and-wet pattern that has characterized the West in 2026; the Southeast, by contrast, is not generating outsized CDD signals in this snapshot. These are distinct regional risk profiles and must not be conflated. The West is running cooler and wetter than its seasonal norm; the Southeast's relative risk is comparatively lower than headline impressions of a 'hot summer ahead' would suggest, at least through this reporting week.
The more durable risk signal is structural, not meteorological. Berkeley Engineering's wildfire spread modeling work (Berkeley News) is a reminder that the urban-wildfire interface remains an underpriced risk in Western insurance markets. The insured loss is the headline; the uninsured loss—in communities without adequate coverage, in municipal water and power infrastructure, in agricultural systems—is the story. India's mining-induced heat amplification in New Delhi (Japan Times) provides an international analog: when natural heat shields are removed for resource extraction, the non-insurable populations absorb the residual risk.
Dominica's $26 million climate resilience investment (CARICOM), funded through the Green Climate Fund, is the adaptation-infrastructure story that rarely gets sufficient weight in U.S.-focused energy coverage. Small island states face catastrophic weather risk with minimal insurance penetration and limited fiscal capacity to self-insure. The adaptation gap is the trend. The zero-CDD week in the U.S. Northeast should not be read as a signal that the summer stress test has been postponed indefinitely—it has merely not arrived yet. When it does, the combination of constrained grid capacity (see New York's data-center moratorium) and heat-driven load spikes will test reserve margins that the current generation mix has not adequately backstopped.
Key point: Zero CDD across all ten NOAA metros through June 2 reflects a weather-risk lull, not structural relief—the West is running anomalously cool while the Southeast's risk is comparatively subdued, but both regions face a pending summer stress test against grid infrastructure that has not materially expanded its reserve margins.
The NOAA degree-day snapshot for May 26 through June 1 shows 1,465 cross-metro HDD and zero CDD. Seattle leads the heating signal at 151.6 HDD over seven days — a Pacific Northwest cold-hold that is consistent with the anomalous late-spring patterns the West has registered in 2026. No U.S. metro in the ten-station pull is generating cooling demand yet. The insured loss story is not being written in early June grid stress; it is being deferred to July and August. This is the calm before the actuarial calendar.
The regional discipline matters here: the U.S. West is the dominant weather-energy signal this year, and Seattle's 151.6 HDD is the Pacific fingerprint of that pattern. The Southeast, by contrast, is generating no anomalous HDD or CDD in this window — its relative risk posture is comparatively weaker than headline impressions from prior hurricane seasons would suggest. These are distinct regions with distinct risk profiles. The West's late-season heating demand and the coming Pacific storm season deserve separate accounting from Southeast flood and heat exposure.
The Colombia green flood alert (June 1–3) and North Korea's flood-prevention mobilization ahead of its rainy season are reminders that the global uninsured loss story runs continuously beneath the headlines. Neither event rises to a major insured-loss threshold, but the pattern of early-season flood mobilization across multiple regions is a leading indicator of what the summer books will show. The adaptation gap is the trend. The 2026 Pacific storm season is not yet in the data, but the West-aligned energy load and the late-spring heating signal from Seattle are the canary worth watching.
Key point: Zero CDD across all monitored U.S. metros in the May 26–June 1 window masks the West's dominant 2026 weather-energy signal — Seattle's 151.6 HDD is a Pacific anomaly that points to deferred summer load risk in the West, which is categorically distinct from the Southeast's comparatively muted current risk posture.
The insured loss is the headline. The uninsured loss is the story. The adaptation gap is the trend. And today, three signals converge on the same systemic fault line. First: the UN's World Meteorological Organization has placed an 80% probability on El Niño development between June and August 2026. That is not a tail risk — that is the base case. El Niño years in the historical record correlate with intensified drought in parts of the U.S. West and Southwest, heavier precipitation events in the Gulf Coast and parts of the Southeast, and accelerated Atlantic hurricane activity modulation (typically suppressing but not eliminating major landfalling storms). The West-aligned energy load is the dominant signal this season, as Pacific storm activity and temperature anomalies structure both hydro generation risk and cooling demand in California.
Second: Inside Climate News reports peer-reviewed research from the University of North Carolina finding that wetlands destruction has increased U.S. flood insurance claims by $10 billion over the past 40 years — and that the Supreme Court's limitation on wetlands protection will worsen this trajectory. The insured $10 billion figure is the floor. Uninsured flood losses in communities outside NFIP coverage, and in areas where NFIP itself is structurally underpriced, represent the larger and less visible liability. S&P Global Ratings' recent stress tests on insurers — flagged by Artemis — found that reinsurance and retrocession capacity is the critical buffer against 1-in-250-year catastrophe events, but that buffer is not infinite.
Third: Yale Climate Connections reports that extreme heat is increasingly dangerous for diabetic Americans — millions of whom cannot afford air conditioning. This is the non-insurable population problem. No actuarial model fully prices chronic disease amplification during heat events. The U.S. Southeast and U.S. West must be treated as distinct risk regions: the West faces acute hydro-generation risk and wildfire smoke load on cooling demand; the Southeast faces flood insurance degradation and humid-heat health events. These are not the same risk, and blending them into a single 'climate risk' frame produces underpricing in both directions. The NOAA 7-day read (cross-metro CDD: 0 through May 31) confirms the heat season has not yet engaged — but the El Niño base case says it will, and it will arrive faster than the adaptation infrastructure can respond.
Key point: With an 80% El Niño probability for June–August, $10 billion in cumulative wetlands-loss flood insurance claims growing under weakened federal protection, and record heat-health vulnerability among uninsured populations, the U.S. is entering peak season with its adaptation infrastructure lagging the risk curve — with the West and Southeast carrying distinct, non-mergeable threat profiles.
The insured loss is the headline. The uninsured loss is the story. The adaptation gap is the trend. And today's corpus opens with two risk signals worth separating carefully: the Atlantic hurricane season has begun, and a strong El Niño is expected to suppress activity — Yale Climate Connections cites NOAA's Ken Graham directly, with the appropriate caveat that one storm is enough to make a season catastrophic. That is the correct actuarial framing: reduced expected frequency does not mean reduced tail risk. The Gulf Coast and Southeast insurance markets price the tail, not the mean.
For the West — which I will treat as a distinct risk region and not conflate with the Southeast — the University of Michigan wildfire smoke research is the operative signal. Three decades of Western U.S. wildfire smoke data are being coupled with behavioral response surveys in fire-prone communities. The uninsured loss dimension here is substantial: health impacts from PM2.5 exposure, agricultural disruption, and tourism revenue loss in fire-adjacent communities are largely outside standard property-casualty coverage. The NOAA 7-day data through May 30 shows Seattle leading heating demand at 150.8 HDD — the Pacific Northwest is still in a late-spring thermal regime, not a fire-weather regime yet, but the seasonal transition is weeks away.
The Southeast's relative risk this season is comparatively weaker than headline impressions given the El Niño suppression forecast — but I want to state that distinction explicitly rather than letting it blur. El Niño reduces Atlantic basin hurricane formation. It does not reduce Gulf of Mexico sea surface temperatures, which are the fuel source for rapid intensification if a storm does form. The adaptation gap in coastal Southeast infrastructure — particularly uninsured residential stock in Florida and the Carolinas — remains the multi-year trend that one quiet season will not close.
Key point: El Niño-suppressed Atlantic hurricane frequency reduces Southeast near-term insured loss expectations, but does not close the rapid-intensification tail risk or the uninsured adaptation gap; the West's wildfire smoke season is the more operationally active risk region entering June.
The insured loss is the headline. The uninsured loss is the story. The adaptation gap is the trend. The RFF's Global Energy Outlook 2026 declaring 1.5°C lost is not a scientific surprise — it is an actuarial reclassification. When the target becomes the floor rather than the ceiling, every forward-looking risk model needs to be rebuilt on a higher baseline. The WMO's 75% probability of record-breaking temperatures over the next five years (greekreporter.com) is the probability distribution shifting, not a single event. Price that difference.
On the U.S. West specifically: insideclimatenews.org's wildfire expert warning about the 2026 fire season is the most operationally urgent domestic signal in today's corpus. The January 2025 Los Angeles fires — 31 deaths, 16,000+ structures destroyed — are the benchmark event, and experts are describing 2025's broader season as a 'dodged bullet.' That framing should alarm anyone managing insured exposure in California and the broader West. The NOAA 7-day snapshot shows Seattle leading at 151.9 HDD over the 7-day window (2026-05-23 to 2026-05-29), with cross-metro totals of 1,439 HDD and zero CDD. That is a late-spring cold and wet signal for the Pacific Northwest — which is precisely when soil moisture deficits and vegetation dryness accumulate in the inland West and Southwest ahead of fire season. Zero CDD cross-metro means no heat-load emergency yet, but the fire risk calendar does not wait for CDD to appear.
Regional discipline required: the U.S. West and U.S. Southeast are distinct risk regimes and must not be conflated. The corpus today is silent on specific Southeast weather events. Pacific storm activity and West-aligned wildfire/heat stress are the dominant 2026 signals; the Southeast's relative risk is comparatively weaker than headline impressions might suggest, and I will not manufacture Southeast risk where the corpus does not cite it. The Mecca heat story (World Weather Attribution analysis, Mongabay) is a global signal — not a U.S. domestic risk — but it illustrates that human-induced climate change is now compressing the 'safe window' for mass human gatherings in heat-exposed regions. That same compression logic applies to outdoor labor, agricultural harvest timing, and energy demand peaks in the U.S. Southwest.
Key point: With 1.5°C formally declared lost and WMO projecting 75% odds of record temperatures over five years, the West wildfire baseline has reset upward — the LA fires are the floor, not the ceiling.
Hurricane season opens today—June 1—with FEMA's workforce down nearly 20% under the current administration, per Politico. That is not an abstract staffing metric. It is an actuarial gap in the federal backstop at the moment the Atlantic Basin's named-storm season begins. The insured loss from a major landfalling hurricane is the headline. The uninsured loss—borne disproportionately by uninsured and underinsured populations in the U.S. Southeast—is the story. The adaptation gap created by a 20% FEMA workforce reduction is the trend.
Separating the U.S. West from the Southeast is essential here and the corpus supports it. Inside Climate News reports that wildfire experts are warning specifically about 2026 fire season severity—framing the January 2025 Los Angeles fires (31 deaths, more than 16,000 buildings destroyed) as a preview rather than an outlier, and noting that the rest of 2025 was 'a dodged bullet.' The West-aligned signal dominates on wildfire risk this season; the NOAA 7-day data through May 29 shows Seattle carrying 151.9 HDD over seven days—the heaviest heating demand of any monitored metro—reflecting continued cool and wet conditions that, for now, moderate near-term Pacific Northwest fire risk. The cross-metro total of 1,439 HDD and 0 CDD across all ten metros confirms we have not yet entered cooling-season load conditions nationally. But the trajectory is clear: the wildfire season starts earlier each year, and the 2026 season is entering with elevated expert concern on the West Coast while the Southeast simultaneously faces hurricane season with degraded federal response capacity. These are distinct regional risk profiles—the West faces ignition and spread risk from drought and heat; the Southeast faces storm-surge, wind, and inland flooding risk from Atlantic Basin activity—and they must not be conflated in any risk model. The insurance market is already pricing the divergence. The adaptation gap is widening on both coasts, just via different mechanisms.
Key point: Hurricane season begins with FEMA down 20% in workforce capacity, while wildfire experts flag elevated 2026 West Coast fire risk—two distinct regional threat profiles that must be modeled and funded separately, not merged into a single 'extreme weather' line item.