Mexico: Canal Catorce

20261012 03:30 UTC · 00:30:59 · 492 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 465 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:00the fourth transformation, I believe it has advanced in basic
00:00:03rights for young people, young people building the future, has a high
00:00:06percentage of young people who integrate into work, Benito Juárez scholarships,
00:00:10universities, I believe that this social base is a
00:00:14containment to easy discourses, although
00:00:18they exist in Mexico and are impacting, the other I think is economic, I think the
00:00:21economic integration we have with the United States is a and
00:00:25at the economic moment that the United States is experiencing, I think it is a
00:00:29dike. that prevents
00:00:32go stronger in these
00:00:35discourses and in these campaigns in our country, ah that the United States self-contains,
00:00:39I believe that at the moment it cuts ties basically with Europe, with Canada
00:00:43and and your really your only strong commercial partner left
00:00:47is Mexico, it is convenient for it to
00:00:50stability in the country and it self-contains
00:00:53from advancing more strongly against those discourses
00:00:57and I think there we have a an... oxygen space that we
00:01:01should not waste, we should not
00:01:06leaderships within
00:01:08and and in that of the that the risk, in that there is a risk of trust that the right does not have a political figure, we are seeing that my law is not a political figure, Flavio Bolsonaro does not come close to Lula
00:01:12at all and is one point away, so they don't need a political
00:01:15figure because they have the financing and they have the
00:01:18algorithm that can place anyone in a campaign, so they didn't have it, they
00:01:22converted Sochil Gálvez into a presidential candidate in 2024,
00:01:25exactly, but I think that
00:01:27well, aren't they finding out we cannot trust that for 2030. I think
00:01:30the legislative branch of reform of the fourth
00:01:34transformation that is Morena, that is, when
00:01:36legal modifications have to be made to improve the lives of
00:01:40workers and young people, they have to be made, for example, the
00:01:45the exhaustion of 40 hours cannot be haggled over, it was already done, but if there start to be demonstrations again, if there starts
00:01:48to be a push again from young people to improve their living
00:01:51conditions, they cannot be haggled over because the right will not wait and the right will sell them
00:01:55an easy discourse, so unfortunately, as we discussed, the
00:01:59left has to transform the material life of
00:02:02people, there Morena has a very important
00:02:05role and this has to push, keep pushing very hard
00:02:09and not hesitate when it comes to that and obviously there is also
00:02:13a very difficult role which is to balance the part of
00:02:17workers and and private initiative, but we also
00:02:20have to start changing the way we lead, that is, we work with
00:02:24young people, young people want to work, they are talented
00:02:27but they do not want to put their. mental health before work, nor
00:02:31their family, nor their free time, in
00:02:34Mexico, so we have to start as leaders to balance that part, for
00:02:38that technology works, that is, for that if you can have, I don't know, half
00:02:42a day free and the other day you have to work at home, let's do it, we have to start
00:02:45working on those parts as leaders, because otherwise the right will start
00:02:49selling easier discourses like get on your motorcycle and
00:02:53have your free time, which is the discourse of salida pliegos of
00:02:56self-employment exactly, so I think you agree. I
00:03:00think that also an important sector, that is, so that the
00:03:03right or rather because I think it's not just the right
00:03:07the core of racism, the core of but a certain type of far-right that is winning,
00:03:10no, that is not eh let's say that
00:03:13this agreement as of tolerable right-wing
00:03:16governments in Latin America, but it is
00:03:20about something else, no, that is, it has some
00:03:23ingredients of course that I think are similar in
00:03:26some cases to those of the United States, but I think that... that
00:03:30also to determine if that right-wing voter can grow in Mexico
00:03:33is precisely shared, so based on these premises, I see it as
00:03:36complicated because a good part of a
00:03:40vote, if we associate perhaps a conservative vote
00:03:43with the right, I think it is also within Morena and
00:03:47is within what is currently governed, that is, that could not
00:03:50be explained with the indices, you talk about the evangelicals of
00:03:54what, in general, that is, I think that socially
00:03:58eh, well Hugo Eric Flores now has. another party called Paz,
00:04:01no, which I don't think will be very
00:04:04average conservative voter is within, let's say
00:04:08this coalition, no,
00:04:10also eh, there is the voter of the Green Party, for example, I
00:04:14think that is a voter more associated, let's say
00:04:18to business groups, to another
00:04:21sector, no, but I think that also socially a conservative
00:04:24vote is within Morena, at a time when
00:04:28sovereignty and when nationalism, let's say, that discourse is
00:04:32exacerbated by the American threat and that the right cannot
00:04:35it will be a free-market
00:04:39right-wing that surrenders, that is, as Gustavo is describing, so I don't see
00:04:43the conditions for that electorate to
00:04:47grow, that voter eh, on
00:04:50the other hand, I think that
00:04:52how your experience at the fair younger generations, no, I think they
00:04:56should be looked at eh beyond
00:04:59a left, right or far-right, what they
00:05:02will vote for, rather I think it has to do with an
00:05:05issue of alienation that can
00:05:07generate certain platforms, technology,
00:05:11certain. digital issues eh that we are already
00:05:14seeing can lead to episodes of violence
00:05:17that for eh comparing them with the United States,
00:05:21they are really minor, no, in the United States, school shootings and socially
00:05:24episodes of violence are very large, no, at the same time that access to
00:05:28technology and these forums in the United States is much greater because
00:05:31of the same proportions of the country,
00:05:35no, so I think that this there is a very
00:05:38very small remnant, really, of of of
00:05:42this far-right of Milei or
00:05:45Bolsonaro that can be successful in Mexico, yes, son,
00:05:49let's see, eh, within this, that's what resonates a lot with what you say, Emerson, I think
00:05:53that eh currently this new right asks you, it
00:05:56tells you no, as if it were an advertisement, everything they did
00:05:59before they did very badly, don't worry, let it go and someone else will do it for you, no, that
00:06:03is like the message and the left is a responsibility, it is an act of
00:06:07responsibility for you in your community collectively to change the
00:06:10history of the world and the planet, so.
00:06:12eh, it's a much more complex bet, however, I affirm, as
00:06:16a former president would say, that we have the best president in the world, and
00:06:20that not only do we think so within our country, 80% of Mexico
00:06:23thinks so, but they think so worldwide, it is
00:06:27impressive to see the phenomenon that President Claudia Sheinbaum causes internationally
00:06:31and that it has generated a network, I would dare to
00:06:34say, of protection, not only because of the, because there is also
00:06:37collaboration with the United States, no, that is another part, yes there
00:06:41is, so there is a part. that has to do with elections, with mid-term
00:06:44elections, with discourses, of course, there is another part that has to do
00:06:48with direct real collaboration with the United States, and there is another part that is this
00:06:52international shield that is not the shield of
00:06:55what is the shield of the Americas, the shield of the
00:06:58Americas, this is a real
00:07:01many international leaders, of journalists, of
00:07:04people around the planet who see a president who is really changing the
00:07:08history of our country and it is very difficult to break that through social
00:07:12networks because there is no way, exactly what Emerson said, let's see, the right even
00:07:16also the strength of the president's
00:07:20leadership, what you consider is currently
00:07:23stopping the advancement of a presidential option and
00:07:27a team that has worked around that is really
00:07:31showing results, in addition to that, I do believe that social networks
00:07:35in Mexico and particularly institutional
00:07:37apparatuses in Mexico, some have a lot of sense of humor and have managed
00:07:41to sneak into the national conversation in a totally
00:07:45different way, something they cannot do in other countries, no matter how much they
00:07:48have tried, well, I'm not going to talk about the memes that the
00:07:51president has had regarding the Rita Cetina scholarship, but she herself
00:07:55goes with young people, does this, does this
00:07:5967, that is, it has been so simple that she did manage
00:08:02to connect, she did manage to do, what is that, the
00:08:0567, sorry for my ignorance, it's that we don't have to
00:08:09know, that's the great advantage of 67, simply. she
00:08:13says: I can do this with young people and I can connect, she is a
00:08:16president who has managed to transcend this
00:08:20intergenerational conversation for good, to cross those limits
00:08:23and really get in there, so yes, I am thinking
00:08:26that the digital right does not have that
00:08:30same opportunity, but let's not say, let's not say never because we don't know, so
00:08:34it's better to prevent,
00:08:37exactly, well, I disagree, the truth is
00:08:41and I disagree for several reasons. chan chan chan eh, the first and most
00:08:44important is that it is not that
00:08:47this is the case, here I think that since we are talking about cultural
00:08:51issues, the danger is the construction of meaning, that is, it is not whether the
00:08:55message, whether the logic, it is not the meaning and how meaning
00:08:59is constructed today, a good part with social networks, with traditional
00:09:03media and with the intersection between both, no,
00:09:06so we are seeing this, so much so that even former
00:09:10president López Obrador said it. a few days ago, social networks are
00:09:14no longer the social networks of a few years ago, social networks changed and
00:09:17within this change is the appropriation, or rather the
00:09:21takeover that the right made, these
00:09:24groups made, so the risk here is not exactly whether the
00:09:27message, whether the eh, whether
00:09:30the proposal goes, the problem is in the creation of meaning that
00:09:34is being made and if this creation of meaning jumps through
00:09:38this apparatuses like memes or
00:09:41others. well, it begins, it no longer matters who
00:09:44says it, but how this message moves,
00:09:48on the one hand, no, and on the other, I think that it is also important
00:09:52eh to make this distinction, no, on the one hand
00:09:55it is communicative work and digital work that the federal
00:09:59government is doing, which seems excellent to me, but on the other
00:10:02hand there is this work of the parties, the work of the
00:10:06parties themselves and the work that other public officials
00:10:09have, no, eh, it seems important to
00:10:12me, this, well,
00:10:15to consider this because in the end eh I think
00:10:19that the error here, that an error
00:10:22is to believe that there is a communication problem when the problem is an organizational
00:10:26problem, the organizational problem is
00:10:29eh, it replicates, it repeats in all
00:10:33networks, just enter any social network, that is,
00:10:37until recently TikTok was the least intoxicated, no longer,
00:10:39it is no longer the case, and it is an algorithmic
00:10:43takeover, it is a takeover of spaces and this takeover of spaces
00:10:46occurs yes due to the technical characteristics themselves, but
00:10:50it also occurs due to social interactions, no, so while I don't
00:10:54think that in the short term this will generate an electoral
00:10:57risk, perhaps it could generate certain
00:10:59problems eh in the short term
00:11:02and especially in cities in highly
00:11:06connected spaces and dependent on social networks, we also have to make this
00:11:09distinction, no, because there are spaces where social networks don't even smoke because
00:11:13that's not in their reality, that and they don't
00:11:16care eh and on the other hand, in the
00:11:20medium-long term, there I would find the risk, no, this
00:11:23specifically in Mexico. But in what do you specifically
00:11:26disagree? In
00:11:30las redes sociales
00:11:33digital right in Mexico, of the digital right in Mexico, yes, but
00:11:37we agree on that, no, well, that is, if there is a
00:11:40risk, the question is why
00:11:44have they not been as successful in Mexico as they have
00:11:47been in other Latin American countries, that is a fact, not from 2024 to
00:11:51date, let's say, no, well, but if we look at it on social networks,
00:11:55they basically dominate it, yes, but they don't determine
00:11:58anything in reality, that is, one thing is the, I think, the capacity for noise that
00:12:02you can generate on social networks, TikTok, whatever, and another thing
00:12:06is that it translates into social decisions or social movements or
00:12:10political decisions, that is, I do see a lot of noise, no, that is,
00:12:13in this intoxication of networks by
00:12:16the right, but I see that it has little support
00:12:20in public decisions, political decisions
00:12:23or or the pulse of the...
00:12:55right-wing objectives, the famous pendulum thesis never worked, the pendulum
00:12:59got stuck on the right side and the far-right almost
00:13:02arrived with Felipe Calderón, it didn't arrive, that is,
00:13:05the far-right arrived, that is,
00:13:08disguised as democratic transition and
00:13:11all this discourse that the transitologists
00:13:14have made in the style of Pepe Woldenberg, whom I respect
00:13:18very much, but they are absolutely
00:13:20wrong, that is, because the
00:13:23mechanisms. the rules of the game could have been
00:13:27improved, but the core of the matter, the core of contempt,
00:13:32poverty in Mexico was increasing in
00:13:35comparison with the rest of the countries of Latin America,
00:13:39yes, which also had very strong right-wing governments, but here it was
00:13:4236 years and
00:13:45that also there is a short-term memory in
00:13:49Mexican society that is influencing and well,
00:13:52we always had right-wing media, that is. Pisa
00:13:56was and is the kingdom of the
00:13:59right, yes, of a right that sets
00:14:02a canon of a white society,
00:14:06anti anti-feminist, that is, it is
00:14:09a very misogynistic television station that lives
00:14:13off melodrama, Brazil and Colombia also live off melodramas, but or
00:14:16Venezuela, but off some melodramas a little
00:14:19more realistic, no,
00:14:23here it was all said.
00:14:25Wrote bonsiz, that is, the first generation of Americans born in Mexico was the one that
00:14:29fed that idea
00:14:31of the eh media
00:14:34right that at the same time had an
00:14:37even more right-wing competition, of course, yes,
00:14:41that is, the issue is that here nobody rivaled
00:14:44until now Mexican
00:14:48electronic right,
00:14:51the discourse and narrative.
00:14:55until López Obrador arrived,
00:14:57no, so I think there is a context that is very
00:15:01different from that of other Latin American countries,
00:15:05two, on the other hand,
00:15:08the cultural transformation in Mexico
00:15:11did not necessarily
00:15:14networks, it happened through other things, it happened through migration, it happened
00:15:18through the situation of women,
00:15:21through a, well, the recent
00:15:25Inegi data is there, the accelerated
00:15:29growth of women's preparation, of women's academic
00:15:32preparation that is not compensated,
00:15:36let's say. with a higher
00:15:39income than men, but it also explains the
00:15:43phenomenon of Claudia Shaw, that is, the phenomenon of Claudia
00:15:47Shahman is not only that López Obrador gives
00:15:51her the staff of command and keeps it,
00:15:54no, Claudia Shaw has a fundamental
00:15:57political capital
00:16:00eh of her own that has to do with this silent revolution of
00:16:04women in Mexico, there is no, except.
00:16:08one single far-right
00:16:11trying to govern, so I think there is also a very
00:16:15important factor in this issue, because even
00:16:19the options of right-wing
00:16:23to the lady of
00:16:26the elatinas
00:16:29no, whom unfortunately not even her
00:16:32parties support her and
00:16:35three, I think there is a synchronicity issue
00:16:38or asynchronicity with the United
00:16:42States, that is, I was
00:16:45also listening to the testimonies
00:16:47in
00:16:50in Brazil where they still see and observe
00:16:54Trump as a savior saying well
00:16:57Lula fought with Trump over tariffs and that's why we are doing badly
00:17:00economically and you say
00:17:04what is happening in the United States. that
00:17:07is, what is happening is that on the one hand
00:17:11these far-right groups are ascending, which I don't give
00:17:14more than 4 years of misgovernment, look at my law,
00:17:18facing the decline of Trumpism, and facing the
00:17:21decline of Trumpism, Mexicans took a very intelligent
00:17:24attitude, the truth is, we have taken a very
00:17:28intelligent attitude, not to go headlong,
00:17:30yes, except for such ridiculous
00:17:33characters, neither so memeable, let's say, nor.
00:17:41who would be in any case the representative of a center-left
00:17:45or center-right alternative and he has already gone to the
00:17:48far-right, that is, Alito has already
00:17:52stolen that space from the
00:17:55PAN and Ricardo Salinas
00:17:57Pliego, Ricardo Salinas Pliego who is
00:18:00applying almost
00:18:02rigorously
00:18:05all.
00:18:07the ingredients that must be applied to become
00:18:11a true
00:18:13son of the che yes and that with
00:18:17that he will manage to be a
00:18:19candidate or a cub of the T or a cub of the
00:18:22T yes, that is what I think we are
00:18:26missing, now obviously and Ernesto is right about
00:18:29that, we must not lower our
00:18:32guard, the issue is very delicate because the
00:18:36digital rights
00:18:38are trying to enter with great
00:18:42force in Mexico, they have not succeeded, but they are there, I don't know what you think,
00:18:46well, all this reminds me of this phenomenon, social networks par excellence and we have
00:18:49commented on it at other times in public debate, they concentrate
00:18:53and fragment the conversation, they don't concentrate it, they fragment it, so
00:18:56we are talking about this right now and surely someone on the other side of the screen has
00:19:00no idea because they don't get the same information, no, that
00:19:04is, everyone has different fragments of this information, but... that
00:19:07in Mexico that experience
00:19:11what happens, for example, in Argentina is that this informative
00:19:14bubble generated by social networks leads to you suddenly
00:19:18voting for a Milei and when it's time
00:19:21to regret having voted for Milei, it's too late because
00:19:25anyway those informative bubbles concentrated votes and
00:19:28concentrated information, here there is a bit of that preventive
00:19:32brake, but we also don't know how far, that is, how far
00:19:36we can keep pressing. that brake, I mean, I think
00:19:39yes, but it can be something pernicious
00:19:43in the long run to trust that because of our own experience a more
00:19:46intelligent mechanism will not
00:19:50what already, I don't know, I sincerely am going to say something that I might
00:19:54mejor en algún día me arrepiento de eso, pero creo que hay que
00:19:57agradecerle a Salinas Piego, muchísimo, verdad, sea, está
00:20:01vacunando de una manera a la sociedad
00:20:06of the right. totally so
00:20:09effective because
00:20:12you say let's see, that's the, that's
00:20:16a typical social network message,
00:20:19no, where everything is reversed on him,
00:20:23that is, he couldn't even reverse that,
00:20:26he didn't want to, that's where you see his lack of strategy,
00:20:30no, when they yell that at a man who was
00:20:33following the by the book of everything, that is, following
00:20:37almost the rules of Cerimedo, he was
00:20:40stunned, no, and he still continues
00:20:44and continues and López Obrador is right, that is,
00:20:48Mexicans of any age and of any generation and of any gender
00:20:51do not like to be insulted
00:20:54for their physical
00:20:58and racist,
00:21:01moreover, as in the case of Salinas Priego, or for your sexual
00:21:05preference or, another
00:21:07so what Salinas Priego is doing is
00:21:11that his own television station is more right-wing
00:21:13than social networks and than digital
00:21:17platforms, so it's a fantastic vaccine.
00:21:22I don't know if I'll regret saying that someday, what do you think? I don't know
00:21:24because
00:21:26I mean, let's go to the case of Argentina
00:21:30with my law, what happened? Eh, I think two
00:21:33years, a year or so after
00:21:36started to be against him,
00:21:39started to turn around, started to go down
00:21:42in popularity, my law of Miley
00:21:46happened, this case of his sister who this the bribes that
00:21:49this corruption came to
00:21:53days before the election, but
00:21:56candidates won and he gained
00:21:59Congress, so it seems to me that, but don't you think that tells
00:22:03you more about the deep crisis of
00:22:06in the end, success that conditioned the
00:22:09vote with the issue of the IMF and repression, that is, people go out to
00:22:13protest and are repressed by the police, that is, no, but what
00:22:16I mean is, it seems to me that
00:22:21it is not replicable, that is, all phenomena are not replicable,
00:22:25no, of the contexts, ah no, yes, of course, of course social, in the case for
00:22:29example of Brazil, yes,
00:22:31I observe
00:22:35younger generations in the face
00:22:39of something that no longer tells them anything, yes, a bit like what
00:22:42Gustavo was commenting, no, there is an interesting phenomenon in Brazil that has nothing
00:22:46to do so much with Lula or with this election between Flavio and Lula, but rather it had to do with the.
00:22:50Congress with the chamber where two kids, two very very
00:22:53young people, two influencers ended up like peacock,
00:22:57peacock, Pavoleta Nick and who just
00:23:01have profiles like Charlie Kirk's, that is, you say well this
00:23:04type of characters are indeed sneaking in
00:23:08counterweights, they are, let's say,
00:23:12the media figures but they are not
00:23:15part, no,
00:23:18but I don't think they are describing
00:23:22Brazilian landscape, I think Brazil is very complex, I think
00:23:26we are still seeing it partially, I still think
00:23:29there is still a lot to digest,
00:23:32the political cunning of
00:23:34Lula is impressive when he says well
00:23:38let's go for the abstainers or he knows perfectly well
00:23:41that there is political capital there in which he
00:23:45can convince, especially with the electoral characteristics that
00:23:48Brazil has, that is, voting is mandatory.
00:23:50then there is
00:23:54still a margin of maneuver, now what is
00:23:57real is that even if Lula won in the second electoral
00:24:00round, which is becoming more and more difficult, there is a very clear
00:24:04right-wing shift in municipal
00:24:07governments, state governments, and Congress,
00:24:10no, and I think that also speaks
00:24:14to us, that is,
00:24:16in the case of Argentina, for example, he conditioned it, he
00:24:20said Donald Trump said I'm not going to
00:24:21give him
00:24:24the IMF loan if they don't vote for this guy, for my law,
00:24:28that is, and a little bit now offering the
00:24:32$500 if he wins, that is, he wants to buy the
00:24:35vote, basically, that is, money,
00:24:38big money, that is, and I think that's not
00:24:42sustainable, that is, uh, let's say, in the long
00:24:46term, that is, I think the serious
00:24:50thing, as in the case of the United States, if they get a setback next November 3rd in the
00:24:54United States, for Trump, in Congress, if he loses the
00:24:57presidency, uh, well, there will
00:25:00be a, well, a Trumpism, even if Donald
00:25:04Trump is no longer there, if Lula wins, there will be a
00:25:07Bolsonarism, that is, society is already,
00:25:10let's say, intoxicated in that sense too, that's right, that's
00:25:14right, well, just to continue with the vaccine, we have to make a campaign, the
00:25:18media, we have a very strong job to tell young people that this normality
00:25:22in Mexico is not normal, neither in our history nor in the world, no,
00:25:25that is, scholarships, support for young people building the future,
00:25:29that your grandfather has a pension, that you don't have to be worried about what your
00:25:33grandfather, your mother will eat so that you can go to study, it's not a normality in the
00:25:37country, it's not a normality in the world, we have a job to explain to
00:25:40young people how that struggle was reached and how those rights
00:25:43were achieved so that there is no setback, I think there is an important job for the
00:25:47media, we have one minute left, wrap up, I think there is also a
00:25:50very important job for political parties,
00:25:54uh, especially in building
00:25:57uh, structures, structures beyond communication and quick
00:26:01messages, and I think that... it can be done, it should
00:26:03be done, and there are parties that have social capital to move forward, the
00:26:07thing is to know how to organize and
00:26:11translate the organization, it seems to me that that is the most important challenge,
00:26:14but well, there are capacities, there are possibilities,
00:26:17and most importantly, there is hope, no, yes, very
00:26:21good, Luisa, they will not pass,
00:26:25that's right, they will not pass, no matter how many tweets, no matter how many
00:26:28comments, no matter how many networks, and the networks will also self-destruct.
00:26:34I hope they will return to being what they were 20 years ago,
00:26:38that is the desire, it will not
00:26:39happen,
00:26:42no, I am worried that they will happen, but within Morena, that
00:26:46is to say, the true danger of the digital right
00:26:50in Mexico is that it manages to enter the only political structure that is
00:26:54having success in this country, which is called Morena, that is
00:26:57the real risk, that is,
00:27:01the incapacity of Morena to generate
00:27:04alternative
00:27:08the progressive line will be occupied by right-wing
00:27:12figures, and that is real, it is
00:27:16on the table, and we must not underestimate
00:27:19this alert, I feel that I am not the only one, I am not
00:29:36Welcome, everyone, welcome to How was
00:29:40it at the fair, broadcasting from the
00:29:43International Book Fair of the Zócalo in this
00:29:4626th edition, celebrating
00:29:49books, celebrating readers, celebrating you for allowing
00:29:52us to accompany you, my name is Luisa Iglesias Arvide, that's the
00:29:56least of it because today we have a conference, a debate
00:29:59yesterday at the inauguration Paco Ignacio Taibo 2. director
00:30:02of the Economic Culture Fund said it as it is, this is a
00:30:06left-wing fair, whether you like it or not, and what is
00:30:10all this about debating, sharing,
00:30:13mixing ideas, today we have fundamental guests, in
00:30:17the main forum, here in the Federico García Lorca, none other
00:30:21than Gustavo Petro will be giving a very
00:30:24important conference, we are going to talk very closely
00:30:27with Alfonso Sagasta,
00:30:30historian, you can't miss it. Above all, we want
00:30:33to ask him what he is reading, what he is reading, what book he loves, what book he hates,
00:30:37what book he wants to buy and can't find, here we have more than
00:30:40350 publishing houses, more than 300
00:30:44national and international guests, and of course, as a gift,
00:30:4712 books for everyone, if you want to join us
00:30:51here, we will ask you again
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.