Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.
00:00:00Hello everyone, I'm Legislator Niu Xuting. Here,
00:00:04I strongly recommend the new Tree People's Great Head, who, as in the past, will bring you international
00:00:08and domestic analysis of the most professional shocking situations from Monday to Friday.
00:00:12Welcome our old friends to continue watching, and welcome our
00:00:16new friends to participate in the discussion.
00:03:02Naturally, the fire hasn't stopped, so who exactly made the decision on July 4th
00:03:05that if the problem was below 20%, there was no need to lower the price?
00:03:09Who decided this standard, and why were representatives from all parties
00:03:13present at the entire meeting? To be honest, this 20%
00:03:17was decided by him. And
00:03:21yesterday's 17-night expert meeting records were also revealed. The key
00:03:25point is that Xu Fu, the director of the Food Safety Office, stated at the meeting that a complete
00:03:29recall was implemented.
00:09:12How difficult was it? How did Chen Qi-mai scold Du You when he was a legislator?
00:09:16But both of them are now in this situation, and their bargaining chips are limited,
00:09:20so I think they should cherish them
00:09:36news you don't know, and guest lineups you can't see on other channels.
00:09:40来 宾 阵 容 。
00:13:56There is already one person arranged to say something like this,
00:13:59and then no matter what others say,
00:14:03the conclusion is that it's good to follow your calculation.
00:15:25The oil problem is not necessarily only added to salad
00:15:29oil.
00:15:30,
00:15:34The final product is not necessarily salad oil, it could be other food. So, what you mean is,
00:17:37on the same day, the news release came out, and the whole country
00:17:41did it this way.
00:18:05Just do it this way. Internally.
00:18:37conceal if they could. In fact, Taitang had already tested it for us in May, and Taitang had already made recommendations to us in May.
00:18:41But he still brought it up.
00:18:42In May, he still didn't report it.
00:18:46So until that time, the middle-aged did not
00:18:50report. They would deceive if they could
00:18:52and
00:19:00decision. So what is this now?
00:19:02?
00:23:20So netizens questioned why a few experts and officials, plus three
00:23:24industry players, held a meeting and could make a decision that
00:23:27if it's below 20%, there's no need to remove it from shelves, just keep eating and selling it?
00:23:31决 定 呢 ?
00:23:34The government demands that any product that has been used
00:23:38must be completely removed from shelves. All right, so now this kind of material is called an internationally recognized
00:23:42Class 1 carcinogen, so why is there room for discussion? Or
00:23:46even if the experts haven't reached a consensus, officials can make the final decision themselves.
00:24:20there is a huge discrepancy. Jiang Zhigang also said that
00:24:23the inspection data for this material has a huge discrepancy,
00:24:27and it even says that the crude oil from Brazil
00:24:31may have been detected at 10 to 300
00:24:34ppb. So what does that mean? At that time, you
00:24:38didn't even know whether only 8
00:24:41ppb was detected, and then it exceeded the standard by four
00:24:45times for this oil. What about the others? Will there be
00:24:49a next batch of 15 or 20,
00:24:53or 30? Didn't Taitang exceed the standard by seven times? So at that time, the entire
00:24:56scope of contamination of the parent body was also uncertain, and even the
00:25:00upper limit of concentration was uncertain. When you made the decision first,
00:25:04we used 8 to calculate 20%. This is extremely
00:25:07absurd and completely lacks a comprehensive scientific evaluation. And the
00:25:11second thing is, which 20% is this
00:25:1420%? They themselves don't even know. Expert G
00:25:18talked about packaged food.
00:25:21Expert A said the proportion of problem oil was 20%.
00:25:25Jiang finally said that 20% of the product problem oil.
00:25:31This is a completely different concept. There are at least three to four definitions of 20%. Is it the total quantity of the finished product, or the entirety of the product, or the weight of the problem product from the middle age, or the proportion of all used in the middle age? We don't know any of these.
00:25:47So even in the recording, they
00:25:50knew it, but they still rashly set the 20% standard.
00:25:53No wonder after the incident, they were condemned across Taiwan, and the Ministry of Health and Welfare
00:25:57itself had to withdraw the decision. Because during the meeting,
00:26:01everyone didn't know this.
00:26:11Expert B said we need to look at this
00:26:14KP time. Expert C said 25%.
00:26:17Expert G said 31, Expert A said 20%.
00:26:21Expert E objected, saying no, we need to consider it, and there will be others.
00:26:28As a result, they directly decided on 20%.
00:26:33So is it a so-called unanimous expert decision? No, it's
00:26:36the decision made by the Democratic Progressive Party itself. This is not an expert
00:26:40consensus. The Democratic Progressive Party packaged its own decision
00:26:44as a joint decision of scientists. It's completely absurd.
00:26:47The Executive Yuan even said that this was based on scientific standards.
00:26:51So is the Democratic Progressive Party itself science? There was no expert
00:26:55consensus, and no expert decision. In the end, it was the Democratic Progressive
00:26:59Party's own decision. So why did they... Expert C said that if they fully investigate, it will never end, and night markets are difficult to investigate. The hospital also said that this will go to the third and fourth levels. Expert F said that delisting is difficult, and it is easy for large businesses to manage, but it is difficult for restaurants to implement.
00:27:30So we asked, is 20%
00:27:32the limit that human health can withstand, or is it the limit that the government
00:27:36can tolerate? It says above that tracing
00:27:40will be endless. Is this science? Xu Fu said it would involve
00:27:44the third and fourth levels. Is this medicine? Is it toxicology?
00:27:48Night markets are hard to trace, difficult to implement,
00:27:51and difficult to remove from shelves. Is this medicine or science?
00:27:55No, it's not. They are just administrative considerations. To put it bluntly,
00:27:59what is it? It's that this group of people act.
00:28:32And fifth, the Minister of Health and Welfare initially stated unequivocally
00:28:36that during the second stage, the middle-aged were not present. This has now been proven to be a lie,
00:28:40so he lied in the parliamentary hall. Now he can only claim
00:28:44that the joint venture did not speak in the latter half. The point is not whether they spoke or not.
00:28:48This company, which is currently being investigated by the government
00:28:51and whose products have been returned, why can they fully participate in
00:28:55the expert meeting that determines the scope of product delisting?
00:28:59And if a major food safety decision
00:29:03has been discussed for a month, and everyone is also chasing the content of this meeting,
00:29:07the highest authority doesn't even know who
00:29:10sat in the meeting room. Then why should the people trust
00:29:14your grasp of information in other areas, or
00:29:17your management capabilities? And the entire
00:29:21meeting treated the joint venture with extreme favor. Now, the green camp
00:29:24always says, why do you dare to scold Taitang but not the joint venture? Why do you dare to scold the central government but not the joint venture? It's laughable. Of course, we will still scold the joint venture.
00:29:28中 联 , 笑 死 中 联 我 们 当 然 照 样 骂 ,
00:30:32First, it must be a local person, and it is only open to university students and teachers.
00:30:36Xu Jiaqing's son wanted to participate at the time, but he did not meet the qualifications.
00:30:40Later, Xu Jiaqing directly let the Qiao Committee and the Sea Patrol Administration
00:30:44co-organize a "Qiao Youth Dongsha Experience Camp", expanding
00:30:48the qualifications so that overseas Chinese students under 18 years old could participate.
00:30:52It was rumored that after Xu Jiaqing's son visited Dongsha,
00:30:55the Qiao Committee never again organized such an event for overseas Chinese to participate in.
00:30:59的 。