Taiwan: China Television (CTV)

20261012 03:00 UTC · 00:31:00 · 131 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 465 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:01:30Nonsense. Frankly, why has Taiwan become
00:01:33like this today? It's because of the Democratic Progressive Party.
00:01:37Now they're turning around and telling you, "Actually,
00:01:41you know, the most disgusting thing they say is that actually death row is more expensive
00:01:45than advanced prisons." When I heard that, I was shocked.
00:01:47。
00:01:50They say that because of death row, according to our current regulations,
00:01:54we have to repeatedly allow them to appeal, and appeal again.
00:01:58So, what about the judicial costs incurred in the meantime?
00:04:00What does this mean?
00:04:02So, if someone comes and kills Yue Yuan Zhi today, I'll go out and join the party.
00:04:06Then it's just my bad luck. Is that what it means?
00:04:09Are you, the judge, suggesting that if someone wants to kill in the future, everyone should just get out of the way and let them
00:04:13be killed, and then you won't have any problems? Is that what the judge is suggesting?
00:04:17Or do you still want to save me?
00:05:00I think many people share my opinion, so do you want to force the people to do this?
00:05:03It's all because of you, Chen Boyang and his ilk,
00:05:07this group of leftists who have messed up the entire country.
00:05:11帐 气 。
00:05:12Judicial justice no longer exists.
00:05:15This is the current situation in Taiwan.
00:05:17So, how much longer will we tolerate this chaos?
00:05:23Actually, it's very simple. Ever since these
00:05:28grand justices preemptively
00:05:31ruled that our
00:05:34death penalty
00:05:36must be for the most serious crimes, I knew it was over.
00:05:39And then there are all the appeals and re-appeals.
00:06:12So I think we just abolished the citizen judge system ourselves.
00:06:16Because citizen judges are basically just helping you professional
00:06:19judges take the blame.
00:06:22So that day, you know, after the verdict came out, the citizen judges,
00:06:25six citizen judges, five of them didn't show up.
00:06:28。
00:06:31The only citizen judge who came out also looked distressed.
00:06:33Don't do this anymore.
00:06:37。
00:06:40Everyone might have the chance to be elected as a citizen judge.
00:08:12Why does the government get the most satisfaction from executing the death penalty? He explained,
00:08:14"Because as long as the death penalty is executed, votes will increase."
00:08:18Okay, so Shen Boyang said that abolishing the death penalty is not just
00:08:22because of wrongful convictions; the key is the deviation in the execution of the death penalty. This
00:08:26was an article written by Shen Boyang in 2014 at that time.
00:08:30Okay, so, was the judicial justice that the people originally hoped for
00:08:34just to make the government feel happy in Shen Boyang's eyes
00:08:37at that time?
00:08:39?
00:09:12Is that so? The state power has also done many things. The state can also
00:09:16take money from our pockets, because we have to pay taxes. So can you just
00:09:20take money from other people's pockets at will? Some people are not assigned to perform duties, some people are
00:09:23imprisoned. So can the state imprison people, and you can just lock people in the toilet for no reason?
00:09:27?
00:09:33And in fact, in the past, he was very proud of
00:09:37abolishing the death penalty. He was very proud of it. He often published articles to
00:09:41express his stance on abolishing the death penalty. It's as if abolishing the death penalty makes him very progressive,
00:09:45very enlightened. This is being leftist, thinking it's very radical.
00:09:48Now there's the death penalty, that's too conservative, how can there be a death
00:09:52penalty? We must abolish it. Or before, everyone discussed drugs a lot.
00:09:56Drugs, everyone thinks drug abuse harms others and themselves, so drugs should be criminalized.
00:10:00。
00:10:05He's that kind of person who takes a very radical path.
00:10:07This is his true self.
00:10:10。
00:10:25Actually, he is this kind of person.
00:10:27So I'm
00:10:30really surprised that after working with him for two or three years, he suddenly changed completely.
00:10:34An election can really change a person.
00:10:36。
00:10:42He knows that taking a moderate and rational path will get
00:10:46him votes. So he is completely different from his true self.
00:10:50。
00:11:25A very cruel person, just like in the past, or even worse, because
00:11:29he has changed for too long in the past.
00:12:26And this family has suffered endless pain. A good
00:12:30wife or a good mother is just gone. And
00:12:34this teacher was so contributive to society, just gone. Then
00:12:37, at first, he was sentenced to death, but later, because
00:12:41the grand justices nominated by the Democratic Progressive Party, a bunch of abolitionist grand justices, made the death penalty
00:12:45very difficult to implement. So this case was retried,
00:12:49and as a result, the murderer escaped death. Later,
00:12:52this teacher,
00:13:02in fact, the true victims are these victims'
00:13:05families, with endless pain in their hearts.
00:13:09。
00:13:13A good teacher lost her life. The murderer still has his life. And then, because the family
00:13:17did not get
00:13:20so, they fell into despair.
00:13:27Is that fair? Is Chen Boyang fair? You've always emphasized abolishing the death penalty,
00:13:31is that fair? Is this the society
00:13:34you want?
00:13:38And not to mention many other various cases. A drunk
00:13:42driver killed a New Taipei City employee.
00:13:46Similarly, that day at the anti-abolition event, his father was also
00:13:50there. Everyone thinks that the Democratic Progressive Party's self-proclaimed
00:13:53progressive ideology actually hurts how many
00:13:57kind people's hearts.
00:14:13You say you support the death penalty. Don't you know? The example I just gave
00:14:17is like this. When they couldn't argue anymore, they said they supported the current ruling.
00:14:20But I don't think this is what everyone wants. So
00:14:24if.
00:15:25But the problem is that in fact, these sisters were later
00:15:29murdered, weren't they even deprived of the chance to breathe?
00:15:32?
00:17:08Well, Chen Boyang's proposition, indeed, in his article, advocates
00:17:12for community activity centers.
00:17:14。
00:17:27government is also doing it.
00:17:28。
00:17:33Professional organizations, professional personnel to assist.
00:18:37In fact, they are, I think,
00:18:40as the court said, they believe that abolishing the death penalty,
00:18:44drug abuse, drugs, these are all progressive values,
00:18:48right? The progressive values of the Democratic Progressive Party.
00:19:06It doesn't matter. What you said originally is what it is. Taipei City is
00:19:10the capital region, and I think the people of Taipei are also very kind. And the people of Taipei
00:19:14City are also very wise. I believe the people will not elect someone
00:19:18who can tolerate and say that death row inmates should always be protected.
00:19:22This power. You must kill three people to be considered
00:19:26guilty of the death penalty.
00:19:28。
00:24:20I especially want to say that our Taiwanese law has the death penalty, it's you judges,
00:24:23it's our own Taiwanese government that has refrained from implementing the death penalty according to the law.
00:24:27This is your government's problem. On the contrary, the government we elected in Taiwan
00:24:31is breaking the law itself, not executing the death penalty. From the perspective of the victim,
00:24:35the death penalty is not the best conclusion. However, I specifically say that we are just ordinary people.
00:24:39From our perspective, it is to give the families
00:24:43of these victims psychological comfort,
00:24:47so that they can let go.
00:28:32As long as I don't kill the third person, or don't kill to death, then I won't be sentenced.
00:28:38Is that unfair to the stones?
00:28:41So we have a saying, "A life for a life." This is a fundamental principle of human beings. In Taiwan, I find it hard to imagine why 80-90% of people support the death penalty, but these 80-90% of people's names are often suppressed by those one or two percent who think they are educated.
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.