Pakistan: Pakistan TV

20261011 06:30 UTC · 00:30:59 · 467 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 465 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:00war, then uh that uh will further constrain
00:00:04that roughly 70% of President Trump in the options that he has. We've seen the
00:00:07depletion of critical munitions worldwide, the
00:00:10US has lost between half and
00:00:13two-thirds of its supplies of
00:00:16critical offensive and uh defensive munitions,
00:00:21slip, and members of Tomahawk missiles, Patriot Pack 3 interceptors,
00:00:24THAAD interceptors. These
00:00:26which which has been a are developments that have an impact not only with regard to this,
00:00:30but also with regard to the strength of the US military deterrent in Asia
00:00:42US can, you know, continue this war
00:00:45at least on the military front
00:00:47indefinitely? Or do you think that within these
00:00:51constraints, no, no, I
00:00:54don't think, I don't think that it's sustainable. I
00:00:58think that it can continue
00:01:00uh the blockade of Iranian ports for some period of
00:01:03time, but I think even
00:01:05an age-old argument in that um will be subject to a balancing test
00:01:08with regard to the impact of that operation on
00:01:12US capabilities in other theaters around the world and
00:01:16in particularly East Asia, um,
00:01:19where the US presence has been weakened
00:01:21significantly by this
00:01:24conflict. There
00:01:26our history, our is not currently a single uh US aircraft carrier strike
00:01:29group, uh deployed
00:01:32there were about six or seven anywhere in the Asia Pacific Theater. Um, that's a problem
00:01:35um, I would say half-heartedly, a uh when most of the American foreign policy
00:01:38establishment remains focused on the long-term strategic
00:01:42competition with China um, and uh
00:01:45spending spending taxpayer funds in a faces and the US and its
00:01:47also been uh declining because of allies face other threats in the Asia Pacific region, such as uh North
00:01:51Korea. Um, this this is a
00:01:55situation that can continue for some time and cannot continue
00:01:58indefinitely. And the options for a significant
00:02:02military
00:02:03me, the sincerity escalation such as the introduction of ground
00:02:06troops are limited by military capabilities
00:02:10and they're limited by lack of public
00:02:14reaction as far as a support. How pushed is Donald Trump knowing
00:02:17that he is losing support for the
00:02:20mid-terms?
00:02:23Well, that's a difficult question,
00:02:26because I I hesitate, I hesitate to try to get
00:02:30into the president's
00:02:32seen. head. Um, if you listen to him at his rallies, um,
00:02:35he doesn't seem to believe that he's losing public support. Uh,
00:02:38clearly he is. Um, unlike in his first
00:02:42term, where he seemed to retain
00:02:45a fairly diverse
00:02:48be. One of set of sources of information.
00:02:51Um, he seems to be
00:02:54um, locked inside a bubble where people largely
00:02:58tell him what he wants to hear.
00:03:00Uh, so um, I don't know how much of a surprise the mid-term
00:03:04elections are going to be for the president. Um, clearly,
00:03:07when he wakes up on the morning of November 4th,
00:03:11um, if uh, the situation is as it seems to
00:03:14be at the moment, um, he's going to be dealing with a very different
00:03:18political reality than the one that he's been uh living with for the past two
00:03:22years. So what if the Republicans lose
00:03:26control of Congress in
00:03:29terms of an electoral setback? Do you think that
00:03:34with sincerity. it could push Trump back to the diplomatic table or do you think
00:03:38that it could escalate the confrontation? There seem to be divided
00:03:41opinions on this, on which side do you, which
00:03:45side would you take?
00:03:48I think in the short term, I think President Trump's
00:03:51instinct will be to rely more on his
00:03:55own authority, on executive power that does not
00:03:58require consultation and authorization from Congress,
00:04:02and that we could see in the short term
00:04:04a move toward
00:04:08escalation. In the long-term, however, he's going to be
00:04:11dependent upon the constraints and the
00:04:15levels of funding that he gets from the Congress.
00:04:18And in terms of the impact of a
00:04:21Republican loss in November, it's going to
00:04:25depend to a large extent on the magnitude of the
00:04:28loss. I think most observers uh now
00:04:32assume that uh the Democrats will take control of the House of
00:04:36Representatives. That's going to have a major impact in
00:04:39terms of funding and in terms of
00:04:43oversight, but right now the
00:04:46betting is that it's more likely than not that the Democrats will also take
00:04:50control of the Senate, uh and that will put concrete
00:04:53constraints on uh President Trump's ability
00:04:57to staff his administration, uh
00:05:00to nominate federal judges.
00:05:03And I think if
00:05:06the magnitude of the
00:05:09electoral loss for the Republicans is significant and
00:05:13uh when combined with the fact that we're entering the last two
00:05:16years, um, of the second term of a presidential administration
00:05:20where President Trump is 80 years old and not
00:05:24eligible to run for re-election,
00:05:27we may see his control
00:05:30of his own party start to
00:05:33the Republican minorities in Congress start to
00:05:37diverge from his policy
00:05:39agenda.
00:05:42Um, is Washington pursuing a
00:05:46coherent endgame with Iran in your opinion? Um, you
00:05:49know, of course, it seems like Iran is maintaining its
00:05:53posture. So no, the
00:05:56simple, the simple answer is no. Washington was
00:05:59not pursuing a coherent start game and it is not pursuing a
00:06:03coherent endgame. I think uh President Trump would
00:06:06like to find um an exit strategy. I think that was the
00:06:10message that he was sending um with the... Islamabad memorandum of
00:06:13understanding, but it's
00:06:17become increasingly unclear what the
00:06:20substantive elements of that strategy would
00:06:23be. There may be some additional
00:06:27um flexibility
00:06:29um in accepting uh unpopular terms, uh
00:06:33after the mid-terms when there's not an immediate electoral consequence.
00:06:37Um, but um as of now, um
00:06:40they've they've tried a military solution, that's
00:06:43failed. Um, they've tried
00:06:48diplomatic route, that's also failed. Um,
00:06:51and right now, the the primary focus
00:06:55seems to be on economic pressure, which has the
00:06:58potential uh to have an impact, but will only work over the long
00:07:02term.
00:07:05US and Iran, do you think that there's a chance that that
00:07:09could also change after the midterm?
00:07:13Yes, you think that, you know, there would be a reaction to
00:07:17whatever happens in the polls. You think that, you know, if
00:07:20if the there is the results are what we expect, there's
00:07:24going to be some kind of
00:07:26relationship between the current administration and Netanyahu,
00:07:29Oh, you mean US and
00:07:33Israel? Um, yes, I
00:07:36think there there will be um,
00:07:40well there there may potentially be a change of administration in Israel as
00:07:44well. So I think before we get to the US
00:07:47mid-terms, we have to see what the results of the
00:07:50Israeli elections are, and what the
00:07:53approach of the new Israeli government,
00:07:57if there is one will
00:08:00the problems that we've been facing in this
00:08:03pre-electoral period is that the pre-electoral
00:08:07periods in Israel and the United States have overlapped, and
00:08:11the interests of uh President Trump and President
00:08:14Netanyahu have diverged. President
00:08:17Trump has had an interest in de-escalating and getting this
00:08:20conflict out of the headlines and easing pressure on world
00:08:24energy markets and an attempt to bring
00:08:28down energy costs and inflation for American
00:08:31voters, whereas Prime Minister Netanyahu has had
00:08:35an interest in escalating and highlighting the direct
00:08:39threat to Israel in an attempt to rally
00:08:43support for his own coalition. Um, after the election
00:08:46uh those pressures will ease, uh
00:08:49so um there there will be an opportunity
00:08:53uh for uh the two sides to try to uh
00:08:56harmonize their approaches again. Uh the problem
00:09:00is that um Prime Minister Netanyahu for a number of
00:09:04reasons uh has done tremendous damage uh to the
00:09:07image of Israel in the United States. And I think we've seen that
00:09:11um play out in the mid-term election campaign.
00:09:15And the incoming Congress, I think is going to be much more skeptical,
00:09:19particularly if Mr. Netanyahu prevails and remains Prime
00:09:22Minister, is going to be much more skeptical of that
00:09:25relationship. Right, fair enough. Please stay with us. I'm going
00:09:29to also introduce Dr. Jared Well, who's a former US diplomat,
00:09:32now joining us. Dr. Jared, when we look at the Trump
00:09:36administration, and of course, its permanent
00:09:40suspension of labor certificate applications
00:09:43for Microsoft, several major IT
00:09:46firms, while launching investigations into
00:09:50nine universities, what does this tell us about
00:09:53the administration's broader immigration strategy? And you
00:09:57know, how far could this crackdown really go in your
00:10:01opinion? Well, I think we have to look at the crackdown as what
00:10:05we're seeing in terms of larger US foreign policy in general. I
00:10:08would say this crackdown relates to economic
00:10:11nationalism, where President Trump is trying to move forward what
00:10:15what he sees as uh America First agenda, which is
00:10:18prioritizing Americans first. That
00:10:22that largely said, um, there still
00:10:25hasn't been necessarily a correlation to show that uh that these number of
00:10:29Microsoft workers are taking American jobs. This is something the administration hasn't yet
00:10:33proven. Um, but but more or less, I think one of the larger implications
00:10:37could be is that employers
00:10:41and as well as those seeking employment in the United States would be
00:10:44dissuaded from attracting any kind of international talent
00:10:48to the United States,
00:10:51um
00:10:53huge um advantage to the United States for for many, many decades
00:10:57now. Um, so I think that's a major risk to to what's happening
00:11:01on the part of the Trump
00:11:02administration.
00:11:05Vice President JD Vance has also accused
00:11:08Microsoft of benefiting from thousands of H1
00:11:12visas, um, green cards, while of course laying off
00:11:16American workers. How credible is the
00:11:19administration's argument that skilled workforce immigration
00:11:22programs are being used
00:11:25at the expense of US employees? Isn't it
00:11:30a sense? It
00:11:32is an age-old argument, and again, as I just said in my previous comment, that
00:11:36this is something that the administration hasn't actually proven in any
00:11:39causation between the number of actual uh
00:11:43green card workers or those who come on visas and actually and Microsoft
00:11:47and other companies laying Americans off.
00:11:49Another another key question would be uh the the the level of
00:11:53skill set. I mean, we we that currently in the United States, we we
00:11:56have a disenrollment in universities uh
00:11:59across the country as the cost of um the cost
00:12:03of um universities have skyrocketed, in addition to the job
00:12:07market even uh in in technological skills have have
00:12:12the growth of AI. So I think, you know, this could be
00:12:16a major concern moving forward uh for
00:12:19for uh American companies as they seek to look for tech
00:12:23talent.
00:12:25Microsoft says that about 80% of its H1
00:12:29B applications last physical year involved extending or
00:12:33changing the status of existing employees. Do you think that this
00:12:36complicates the administration's claim that companies are using
00:12:40these programs to replace American workers if they
00:12:43only, you know, changing them for example,
00:12:47extending them or changing the status?
00:12:50Well, again, I think it comes back to the idea that that facts matter here. In this
00:12:54particular instance, Microsoft is is making the case
00:12:58that uh that this isn't actually true, that they're just renewing visas. So they're making
00:13:01that clear distinction between renewing visas and bringing people back
00:13:05into uh to to work versus bringing
00:13:09people to work in the United States. So, um, so I
00:13:12definitely think it it complicates the
00:13:15the narrative from from the current administration.
00:13:17Definitely.
00:13:19But it but does it also sort of allow them to
00:13:23to justify what what is happening as far as, you know,
00:13:27Microsoft and these technological companies are
00:13:29concerned? No, I think I think it doesn't. It doesn't justify
00:13:33that. Fair enough. Let me come back. I think it doesn't justify
00:13:37this. I'm sorry. Come back. Let let me just come back to.
00:13:41I'm also going to go to Paul Frit.
00:13:44Paul, when we look at what what is being said, in your
00:13:47opinion, this argument versus the fact that
00:13:51it's impacting us citizens, how do you credit this situation
00:13:56um when we look at this crackdown?
00:13:59Well, I think, um, as as my colleague
00:14:03said, we see it as a part of a broader
00:14:06crackdown on immigration from all
00:14:09sources. Um, that is not
00:14:12particularly data driven. Um,
00:14:16there there is no evidence for the notion
00:14:20that the H1B
00:14:22program is diverting, is um, is is displacing
00:14:26large numbers of uh US-born um tech
00:14:30workers. Um, and in fact, uh this has been um
00:14:33a major source of strength to the US economy has been the ability to
00:14:37attract um and integrate and reward um
00:14:41talent from around the world. Um,
00:14:43the uh President Trump a couple of weeks ago hosted
00:14:47uh Xi Jinping um in Washington and he hosted a state
00:14:51dinner uh that included uh CEOs
00:14:54of uh tech companies, and
00:14:5780 to 90% of them were foreign born, were immigrants who
00:15:01themselves had uh come to the country through the
00:15:04H1B program. Um, foreign born talent uh has
00:15:08been a source of US leadership on uh on
00:15:11AI and and other uh cutting-edge uh
00:15:14tech sectors. Uh so um
00:15:18this uh approach, um, not only uh cracking down on
00:15:22H1Bs, but also on various forms of student visas, on
00:15:25F1s, on J1s, on cutting back research
00:15:29funds from the federal government, it all
00:15:32is going to have a very
00:15:35harmful effect on the US economy. And in the case of
00:15:38H1Bs, given the fact
00:15:42them come from India, it's going to become an
00:15:45irritant in that bilateral relationship as
00:15:47well. Fair enough. I know Dr. Jarod that you have
00:15:51limited time, but very quickly, the administration is also
00:15:55investigating nine leading universities, including Harvard,
00:15:59Yale, and Stanford over this
00:16:02alleged visa abuse and concerns about, of course, foreign
00:16:05influence as far as research particularly is concerned.
00:16:09Where should the government draw the line in your opinion between
00:16:13legitimate oversight and political interference in these
00:16:16cases? As far as particularly higher education
00:16:20is concerned. Well, I think that's an excellent question, and I
00:16:24think having been a former USAID, former
00:16:28foreign service officer who's managed US government funds, and also has been in also been in
00:16:32academia, I think it's particularly important to note that the government does have the right and we
00:16:36should be on the hook for how we spend US tax dollars. However, on the
00:16:39other side of that, there is such a notion in this country, and this is something that people come from all over the
00:16:43world to study here, is that we have academic freedom as which the
00:16:46government um doesn't interfere in what we can research,
00:16:49especially um on certain topics that that may be
00:16:52considered sensitive. Um, but this isn't the case. This this is it's a
00:16:56growing concern that the administration is trying to impact or or
00:17:00restrict what what can be funded or researched, again
00:17:04understanding that there there there are restrictions. How we can spend
00:17:08US taxpayer funds. But um, various critics
00:17:11have noted that there's this kind of dubious kind of connection to what the administration
00:17:15says, uh, the administration claims uh
00:17:18may infringe upon um
00:17:23responsible way, and also uh letting academics and student researchers
00:17:27have uh political freedom or or or have uh free academic
00:17:30freedom to be able to write about or do research on on these different
00:17:34topics. So I think we're seeing we're seeing something that that that has
00:17:37largely un unprecedented um here in the in in the United
00:17:41States where universities who um rely
00:17:45especially for certain research programs larger on federal funding either
00:17:48have to comply or they have to stop research, which is a major
00:17:51disadvantage to um the the American people. You one
00:17:55other aspect to add to this part is that, you know, lest we forget that
00:17:59American universities, um, and and those who come to study here are
00:18:02are it's a part of US soft power. Um, US
00:18:06American education as it's a huge part of that and those who are educated
00:18:10in the United States, um they when they finish their education,
00:18:13they go back to their native countries, um and they take that experience and they take living in
00:18:17the United States and they take those relationships with them. Um, and
00:18:21so when when we malign that relationship, that we're maligning these
00:18:24experiences, uh we're really doing long-term harm to American
00:18:28interest and to the American people
00:19:38came to the meeting. We haven't been able to hold a
00:19:42cabinet meeting for some time now. There
00:19:44are two reasons for this. I had to go to America for a
00:19:48UN session, and I was a bit busy
00:19:52there, and then I had some other engagements
00:19:55too.
00:19:58So, during this time, some important events took place
00:20:02that I would like to bring
00:20:03to your attention. First of all,
00:20:37the MD praised Pakistan for its efforts
00:20:41in these circumstances, as a team, to stabilize
00:20:45the economy. I consider
00:20:49these words as an acknowledgment
00:21:22that we all, including the political
00:21:26leadership and military leadership,
00:21:28worked day and night
00:21:32and brought a physical
00:21:35discipline to Pakistan
00:21:38that was long
00:21:40overdue.
00:21:43We brought in the structural
00:21:47changes that were due.
00:21:50But it's an old wound,
00:21:53an 80-year-old burden.
00:21:56You can't cover that distance overnight.
00:22:00But if we work day and night,
00:22:03Insha'Allah, we will reach our destination.
00:22:05In this regard, when I came to
00:22:09London, the CEO of the London Stock Exchange invited
00:22:13me. After the ceremony that you see every day
00:22:16on TV in New York, London, and Japan,
00:22:22delegations of
00:22:25top-class bankers during the opening ceremony of the Stock Exchange,
00:22:28including Barclays Bank. Various
00:22:31banks came, including Citi Bank
00:22:34and JP Morgan.
00:22:37And they said in various
00:22:40words, but one thing they said was, "Prime Minister,
00:22:44the economic reforms
00:22:47you have brought in Pakistan
00:23:20is being
00:23:22And in recent months,
00:23:25I have met many heads of state and international
00:23:29delegations. Not a single
00:23:32one of them started the conversation
00:23:34without first congratulating me and saying, "We
00:23:38highly appreciate Pakistan's diplomacy.
00:23:42We are
00:23:44well aware of it, and we are grateful to you for playing a big
00:23:48role in the ceasefire." The current situation
00:23:52in this regard is before you.
00:23:55Unfortunately, things got worse again
00:23:59and escalated. From the Strait of Hormuz, they
00:24:03went to Bab-el-Mandeb. There, the situation got even
00:24:06worse. So, Pakistan
00:24:09is still playing its role
00:24:12with full effort and sincerity. The rest is in
00:24:16Allah's hands. Other brotherly countries
00:24:20are fully contributing
00:24:24And today, I want to say
00:24:27again,
00:24:28please
00:24:33register this point that in this whole diplomacy,
00:24:36Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir has a pivotal role. There is no
00:24:40doubt about it. Absolutely. Deputy Prime Minister
00:24:44has made a great effort. Mohsin Naqvi is sitting here. He has made efforts regarding
00:24:47Iran. So, this is a great
00:25:20thing that even strangers cannot imagine
00:25:23such a thing.
00:25:27It became a story of destruction. There were ruins when
00:25:30we came into government. I don't
00:25:33want to boast. The entire
00:25:36team, the concerned ministers,
00:25:40secretaries, including Madam Shehza
00:25:43Khawaja, played a big role, and her secretary,
00:25:47Mr. Jiva, and gradually the Minister of Finance.
00:25:55Everyone worked together on this, but I think
00:25:58in my life, many big projects came that troubled
00:26:02me a lot. But this was one of those
00:26:05projects that caused a lot of weakness and pain,
00:26:08but Alhamdulillah, it is now complete, and
00:26:12Insha'Allah, we will now replicate it across
00:26:16Pakistan. I have told Ahsan Iqbal that he should
00:26:20be ready to build similar ones in Karachi,
00:26:24Lahore, Peshawar, Quetta, and other places,
00:26:27and in this way, not thousands, not lakhs, but
00:26:30crores of young boys and girls will get a start
00:27:09brotherly country of
00:27:11Pakistan
00:27:14and an extremely trusted friend.
00:27:18Just as China is an extremely trusted friend of Pakistan,
00:27:21Saudi Arabia is an extremely trusted friend of
00:27:24Pakistan. Throughout
00:27:28relations with them have been extremely affectionate.
00:27:33And you and some of the senior people sitting
00:27:37here are witnesses to how
00:27:40at various times the Saudi royal
00:27:44family, the Saudi government, and the Saudi people
00:27:47have always supported Pakistan.
00:27:50We, with full caution, played
00:27:53our role as a mediator.
00:27:56We have a brotherly country,
00:27:59Iran, which is our neighboring country. And believe
00:28:05and relationship with Iran have grown
00:28:09so much in these months during this government,
00:28:13I don't remember any other time like
00:28:16this. And this journey
00:28:20continues. The Deputy Prime Minister
00:28:22keeps talking to Mr. Rakesh. Mohsin Naqvi
00:28:26talks to his counterpart, they visit. The Field Marshal himself has made
00:28:30visits. He stays in contact. So, our only goal
00:28:34is to establish peace in the region.
00:28:37But after the Strait of Hormuz, the bloody game
00:28:40that is being played in Bab-el-Mandeb
00:28:43is extremely regrettable. And for this,
00:28:47Pakistan's relationship with Saudi Arabia, as I
00:28:50mentioned, is not 80
00:28:53years old, but centuries old, based
00:28:56on brotherhood, religion, and fraternity.
00:29:00And now Pakistan
00:29:03is now connected, and in this we have
00:29:07bilateral agreements,
00:29:10trilateral agreements regarding defense, so I
00:29:13believe that in this regard, what the Houthi are
00:29:17doing is extremely regrettable.
00:29:21No matter how much it is condemned, it is not enough. Pakistan has
00:29:24repeatedly said, even today, that
00:29:28this aggression against Saudi Arabia by the Houthis
00:29:32has no justification. A few weeks
00:29:35ago, there was a drone over Makkah, which they
00:29:39successfully negotiated.
00:29:42So who? I mean, from Kuala Lumpur
00:29:45to the West,
00:29:48you can go. So
00:29:51the entire Muslim Ummah is
00:29:54Makkah, Baitullah, Baitullah, which is the house
00:29:58of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) in Madinah Munawwarah. Which Muslim is
00:30:33ready and especially the sanctity of Madinah Munawwarah and Makkah
00:30:37and its protection is the responsibility of
00:30:41billions of Muslims around the world. So I
00:30:45believe that in this regard, this is a red
00:30:48line. We all pray to Allah Almighty that
00:30:52this matter will be resolved peacefully, otherwise
00:30:55Pakistan will always stand with its
00:30:58Saudi brothers and sisters.
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.