Venezuela: teleSUR

20261011 03:00 UTC · 00:31:00 · 290 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 465 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:27explaining, what
00:00:50An unexpected result had qualified Lula to lose in the
00:00:54first round of the Brazilian election, the last one he will dispute in his
00:00:57life. Bolsonaro, with cunning, has managed to identify
00:01:01Lula's PT as if it were the party of the
00:01:04system, of the status quo, attributing
00:01:07to him the blame for the high prices of the basic
00:01:10food basket, the biggest complaint of the
00:01:12voters, urging an extraordinary
00:01:16recovery of the minimum
00:01:17wage.
00:01:20Lula decided to moderately raise only the value of the Bolsa
00:01:23Familia. In addition, Lula's proposal for
00:01:26reducing the work day
00:01:30went unnoticed in the massive web of fake news
00:01:34that large media outlets hostile to the
00:01:37PT. There are spaces for recovery and
00:01:40comeback.
00:01:44He still has in his hands government levers.
00:01:48He can adopt more
00:01:50forceful measures.
00:03:00you for the invitation to this
00:03:24undoubtedly be analyzed for a long
00:03:27time.
00:03:30Given the richness they entail in terms of experiences,
00:03:34successes, errors, ultimately,
00:03:36definitiva,
00:03:39I believe that not only yesterday's elections, but elections
00:03:43in all their aspects, including the second round
00:03:47and the context in which elections are held in
00:03:50Brazil and in the world,
00:03:53will be the subject of study by future
00:03:56historians and also future political scientists.
00:04:06next week with another
00:04:10If you ask me for a first assessment, I would say that these
00:04:13are elections that pose perhaps the greatest challenge for Brazilian
00:04:17democracy since its re-democratization,
00:04:20redemocratización
00:04:24since the recovery of democratic space in the
00:04:2880s, and perhaps to... set a more concrete date,
00:04:32since the proclamation of the 1988
00:04:34constitution, the constitution that was called
00:04:38the citizen constitution because it introduced a series of
00:04:42innovations, rights enshrined in
00:04:46it, that reflect the mood
00:04:49of that moment, as well as a
00:04:53correlation of forces also at that very
00:04:56special moment,
00:04:59and this... Despite the amendments and some controversial
00:05:02issues related precisely to the way said
00:05:06constitution was
00:05:07modified.
00:05:12for the democratic rights of
00:05:14Brazil, rights that in my
00:05:17opinion are currently facing a
00:06:31Diplomacy as a means of resolving disputes regarding human rights, the denunciation
00:06:34of flagrant violations of international law and human
00:06:38rights, was very forceful in its condemnation of the genocide.
00:08:18that remains in the collective memory, is considered the great
00:08:21promoter of a modern Brazil
00:08:25with important labor legislation, therefore, then
00:08:28he represents that to the other
00:08:31candidacy
00:08:36that surprisingly became the most
00:08:40voted.
00:08:52that for much of the counting remained at a level that
00:08:56allowed to foresee a result in the first
00:08:59round,
00:09:04but those differences were narrowing as
00:09:07results started to come in, especially
00:09:10from the northeast.
00:09:14which remains one of the great regions where President
00:09:17Lula and the Workers' Party
00:09:21maintain their influence and
00:09:23support,
00:09:29Flavio Bolsonaro's candidacy is the antithesis of what President
00:09:33Lula represents from many points of
00:09:36view,
00:09:42he is I don't know if I should call him.
00:09:51a proposal that goes against the state, against the state, less
00:09:55so in what concerns a state that cares about
00:09:59social
00:09:59justice.
00:10:04Evidently, all the policies and practices that President
00:10:08Lula has defended to reverse Brazil's historical social
00:10:12gap.
00:10:25large in terms of resources and
00:10:27numbers,
00:10:31an elite that relatively views with extreme concern
00:10:35and displeasure any minimal social policy, but this
00:10:38is also historical in Brazil, as our esteemed
00:10:42Darcy
00:10:43Ribeiro said,
00:10:49that the Brazilian elite is an elite that turns its back
00:10:52on any aspiration of the Brazilian people.
00:11:13He is a representative of that option for an extremely intolerant Brazil with
00:11:16any program of social progress in the most
00:11:20popular sectors.
00:11:27It is a candidacy that has repeatedly shown minimal
00:11:31respect for the rule of
00:11:33law
00:11:37with accusations that are often based on
00:11:40lies, but ultimately all the criticisms
00:11:43that the candidacy has made against democratic institutions.
00:11:46democratic institutions.
00:12:25and malicious to identify the
00:12:28PT as if it were the party of the system, the
00:12:31party of the status quo, when talking about rising
00:12:34prices, that people cannot fill their supermarket
00:12:37carts, about high taxes, that
00:12:41people really feel that prices are high, that fuels
00:12:45are expensive, and that President Lula's responses in this
00:12:49regard, such as wage increases and the increase
00:12:52in Bolsa Família in recent days,
00:12:55have been, however, very timid, there was also that
00:12:58danger,
00:13:02I believe that a large part of the
00:13:04abstention votes
00:13:08that were high and a large part of the support for Flavio
00:13:12Bolsonaro's candidacy
00:13:15does not come from an electorate that is 100% co-opted by
00:13:19an extreme right-wing proposal like the one the
00:13:23candidate represents, but rather it is a...
00:13:46because it must be explained that people have the right to feel
00:13:49dissatisfied,
00:13:52because life is indeed expensive.
00:13:56In fact, the salary is not enough to make ends meet for a large
00:13:59part of the Brazilian
00:14:00population,
00:14:07it is necessary to bring up issues that do not have such a simple
00:14:10explanation, because what happens on the
00:14:14right
00:14:18and unfortunately this has been the case for a long
00:14:21time, is not even that this candidacy. So,
00:14:35why is life still difficult for the working class,
00:14:39even though this
00:14:43government has perhaps done the most for it, at least
00:14:46since re-democratization, re-democratization,
00:14:49because this government is within a
00:14:52system where the rules of neoliberalism
00:15:07that is, investment in public education, in public health, in
00:15:11public transport, in decent housing, not as
00:15:14investment, but as expenditure, and it is
00:15:17fought and not approved, and
00:15:20furthermore, as President Lula expressed at the
00:15:23time. The government's budget was
00:15:27hijacked, that was the word, if I'm not mistaken, that
00:15:30he used
00:15:34secret secret.
00:15:52An attempt is made to exercise control, but deep down there
00:15:55isn't,
00:15:57Supreme Court member Dino Flavio Dino tried to
00:16:01provide some degree of transparency on the destination of
00:16:04those resources, but on the one hand.
00:16:08We have a state budget that is incompatible with the real
00:16:12needs of the Brazilian
00:16:13people,
00:16:18there is all this spending cap that is part of that
00:16:22neoliberal framework that was imposed and inherited by the
00:16:26Workers' Party governments.
00:16:29This comes from previous administrations and in
00:16:32particular since the coup against the
00:16:36president. they greatly
00:16:46limit the resources
00:16:49that the state has to invest in these
00:16:52public policies on the one hand, and on the other hand,
00:16:56part of that budget hijacked by a congress
00:16:59and by deputies.
00:17:13This generates this, this needs to be explained, but it
00:17:17is too complex a topic to address in a campaign
00:17:21debate,
00:17:23where that cannot be achieved, that is
00:17:26where I believe there is a topic that is not for now, for this
00:17:30campaign, right, but rather it is a topic for the
00:17:33future for all progressives, right?
00:17:54I remember that it was extremely important and that it was carried
00:17:58out with great, let's say, responsibility on the part
00:18:02of the political world, political
00:18:03education.
00:18:09political education, because in a campaign there is no way to
00:18:13explain that complexity to the voter who is hungry
00:18:16at home, a work of years and years, even with
00:18:20popular media,
00:18:24we are here talking with Beatriz Vicio, here at Latitud
00:18:27Brasil, professor at UFRJ, the Federal
00:18:31University of Rio de Janeiro, historical
00:18:33representative of the notebooks.
00:20:07Today we are talking here at Latitud Brasil with Beatrice Vicio,
00:20:11professor at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro,
00:20:13journalist and also historical representative of the
00:20:17Third World Notebooks about the elections in Brazil that
00:20:21gave an unexpected result with Flavio ahead of
00:20:24Lula.
00:20:30He is now talking about appointing
00:20:31Acienda.
00:21:29He has rightly said that he will try or will work with those who abstained in the elections, those who did not
00:21:32vote, who abstained, which is
00:21:35extremely important, because we see that he lost, today I
00:21:38have been analyzing in each state how the
00:21:41vote went,
00:21:45compared to the votes he obtained in
00:21:472022.
00:21:50He lost 4 million votes, many of
00:21:54which are interpreted as coming from
00:21:57voters who did not even go to the
00:21:59polls, not necessarily those who switched to the
00:22:03opposite side, but also obviously a part that
00:22:07voted for candidate Bolsonaro, but many of
00:22:10those who were, shall we say, disappointed with democracy, with the
00:22:13PT's management and administration, did not go to
00:22:16vote.
00:22:28So he lost four and compared to the current
00:22:32candidate, they are separated by 2 million, so
00:22:36that's where he can really work, on the other
00:22:39hand, within the scheme, so to
00:22:43speak, of the upper class.
00:22:47The situation is different, I think.
00:23:06perhaps with one or the other it is possible, but there are those who are more
00:23:09linked to a productive sector and who
00:23:12in fact,
00:23:52there I enter another field because it is a difficult
00:23:56area to work in,
00:24:01I think, although there are possibilities, but I think
00:24:04it is one of the ways of working in this brief experience that the
00:24:08president has ahead,
00:24:11with a three-week campaign and I think the base
00:24:14too.
00:24:55It is in the progressive sectors, more or less the
00:24:57left, they have acted together in
00:25:01the campaign,
00:25:03they have been very united and I think that has been a great
00:25:07achievement.
00:25:12There have not been those disputes, that discomfort within the
00:25:15progressive forces, as there were in the
00:25:18campaigns. I think that the experience of Bolsonaro's
00:25:22four years of government, with all that it has
00:25:25meant, loss of sovereignty, loss of
00:25:28rights, loss of human lives, more than 600,000
00:25:32Brazilians deceased in the pandemic and losses and
00:25:36losses and
00:25:37losses,
00:25:42has forged a unity among progressive
00:25:45forces.
00:26:13because that is truly what we want for our children and
00:26:16grandchildren,
00:26:17exactly,
00:26:20from an international point of view, Lula represents
00:26:23Brazil in the BRICS, Brazil in CELAC, Latin American
00:26:26integration as a living
00:26:28flag, the revitalization.
00:27:08All of progressive Latin America feels Brazil's
00:27:11campaign as
00:27:12its own,
00:27:15because in some way the destiny of Latin America, and especially
00:27:18that of South
00:27:20America, is linked to what happens in
00:27:24Brazil. Just think or
00:27:26remember that in 1964,
00:27:30the coup d'état here in Brazil
00:27:33was what triggered that domino effect of dictatorships in
00:27:36Uruguay, Argentina, Chile and
00:27:39so on.
00:27:43And decades lost with a human, political and institutional
00:27:47cost.
00:27:50The consequences of which we are still suffering, so it
00:27:54really is a
00:27:55loss.
00:28:14that represent an alternative to that declining hegemony, although still
00:28:17important for the United States, if Latin
00:28:21America, which in this case Brazil represents along
00:28:25with other
00:28:30countries, Brazil brought to the BRICS, loses that link.
00:28:33I think that is a problem, even during
00:28:37Bolsonaro's time, he did not withdraw from the BRICS,
00:28:40but he maintained a very low profile in his actions within
00:28:44the BRICS. I was just watching an international
00:28:47news program on French television and when reporting on
00:28:51the current electoral campaign
00:28:52in Brazil,
00:28:56they recalled that when Bolsonaro was president and there was a
00:28:59meeting, I am not sure if it really
00:29:03was a meeting not related to the BRICS, but it was a
00:29:06matter that involved an audience that President
00:29:10Bolsonaro was going to have with French President Macron
00:29:13and President Bolsonaro did not attend the audience because
00:29:16he decided to get a
00:29:18haircut,
00:29:21so I was remembering that, reflecting precisely
00:29:25on what a defeat for the president would mean in
00:29:28terms of Brazil's position in the world. president's defeat.
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.