United Kingdom: BBC News London — Question Time

20260917 20:00 UTC · 01:01:00 · 975 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Fiona Bruce presents an hour of topical debate.

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 916 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56
00:31:00
00:31:04
00:31:08
00:31:12
00:31:16
00:31:20
00:31:24
00:31:28
00:31:32
00:31:36
00:31:40
00:31:44
00:31:48
00:31:52
00:31:56
00:32:00
00:32:04
00:32:08
00:32:12
00:32:16
00:32:20
00:32:24
00:32:28
00:32:32
00:32:36
00:32:40
00:32:44
00:32:48
00:32:52
00:32:56
00:33:00
00:33:04
00:33:08
00:33:12
00:33:16
00:33:20
00:33:24
00:33:28
00:33:32
00:33:36
00:33:40
00:33:44
00:33:48
00:33:52
00:33:56
00:34:00
00:34:04
00:34:08
00:34:12
00:34:16
00:34:20
00:34:24
00:34:28
00:34:32
00:34:36
00:34:40
00:34:44
00:34:48
00:34:52
00:34:56
00:35:00
00:35:04
00:35:08
00:35:12
00:35:16
00:35:20
00:35:24
00:35:28
00:35:32
00:35:36
00:35:40
00:35:44
00:35:48
00:35:52
00:35:56
00:36:00
00:36:04
00:36:08
00:36:12
00:36:16
00:36:20
00:36:24
00:36:28
00:36:32
00:36:36
00:36:40
00:36:44
00:36:48
00:36:52
00:36:56
00:37:00
00:37:04
00:37:08
00:37:12
00:37:16
00:37:20
00:37:24
00:37:28
00:37:32
00:37:36
00:37:40
00:37:44
00:37:48
00:37:52
00:37:56
00:38:00
00:38:04
00:38:08
00:38:12
00:38:16
00:38:20
00:38:24
00:38:28
00:38:32
00:38:36
00:38:40
00:38:44
00:38:48
00:38:52
00:38:56
00:39:00
00:39:04
00:39:08
00:39:12
00:39:16
00:39:20
00:39:24
00:39:28
00:39:32
00:39:36
00:39:40
00:39:44
00:39:48
00:39:52
00:39:56
00:40:00
00:40:04
00:40:08
00:40:12
00:40:16
00:40:20
00:40:24
00:40:28
00:40:32
00:40:36
00:40:40
00:40:44
00:40:48
00:40:52
00:40:56
00:41:00
00:41:04
00:41:08
00:41:12
00:41:16
00:41:20
00:41:24
00:41:28
00:41:32
00:41:36
00:41:40
00:41:44
00:41:48
00:41:52
00:41:56
00:42:00
00:42:04
00:42:08
00:42:12
00:42:16
00:42:20
00:42:24
00:42:28
00:42:32
00:42:36
00:42:40
00:42:44
00:42:48
00:42:52
00:42:56
00:43:00
00:43:04
00:43:08
00:43:12
00:43:16
00:43:20
00:43:24
00:43:28
00:43:32
00:43:36
00:43:40
00:43:44
00:43:48
00:43:52
00:43:56
00:44:00
00:44:04
00:44:08
00:44:12
00:44:16
00:44:20
00:44:24
00:44:28
00:44:32
00:44:36
00:44:40
00:44:44
00:44:48
00:44:52
00:44:56
00:45:00
00:45:04
00:45:08
00:45:12
00:45:16
00:45:20
00:45:24
00:45:28
00:45:32
00:45:36
00:45:40
00:45:44
00:45:48
00:45:52
00:45:56
00:46:00
00:46:04
00:46:08
00:46:12
00:46:16
00:46:20
00:46:24
00:46:28
00:46:32
00:46:36
00:46:40
00:46:44
00:46:48
00:46:52
00:46:56
00:47:00
00:47:04
00:47:08
00:47:12
00:47:16
00:47:20
00:47:24
00:47:28
00:47:32
00:47:36
00:47:40
00:47:44
00:47:48
00:47:52
00:47:56
00:48:00
00:48:04
00:48:08
00:48:12
00:48:16
00:48:20
00:48:24
00:48:28
00:48:32
00:48:36
00:48:40
00:48:44
00:48:48
00:48:52
00:48:56
00:49:00
00:49:04
00:49:08
00:49:12
00:49:16
00:49:20
00:49:24
00:49:28
00:49:32
00:49:36
00:49:40
00:49:44
00:49:48
00:49:52
00:49:56
00:50:00
00:50:04
00:50:08
00:50:12
00:50:16
00:50:20
00:50:24
00:50:28
00:50:32
00:50:36
00:50:40
00:50:44
00:50:48
00:50:52
00:50:56
00:51:00
00:51:04
00:51:08
00:51:12
00:51:16
00:51:20
00:51:24
00:51:28
00:51:32
00:51:36
00:51:40
00:51:44
00:51:48
00:51:52
00:51:56
00:52:00
00:52:04
00:52:08
00:52:12
00:52:16
00:52:20
00:52:24
00:52:28
00:52:32
00:52:36
00:52:40
00:52:44
00:52:48
00:52:52
00:52:56
00:53:00
00:53:04
00:53:08
00:53:12
00:53:16
00:53:20
00:53:24
00:53:28
00:53:32
00:53:36
00:53:40
00:53:44
00:53:48
00:53:52
00:53:56
00:54:00
00:54:04
00:54:08
00:54:12
00:54:16
00:54:20
00:54:24
00:54:28
00:54:32
00:54:36
00:54:40
00:54:44
00:54:48
00:54:52
00:54:56
00:55:00
00:55:04
00:55:08
00:55:12
00:55:16
00:55:20
00:55:24
00:55:28
00:55:32
00:55:36
00:55:40
00:55:44
00:55:48
00:55:52
00:55:56
00:56:00
00:56:04
00:56:08
00:56:12
00:56:16
00:56:20
00:56:24
00:56:28
00:56:32
00:56:36
00:56:40
00:56:44
00:56:48
00:56:52
00:56:56
00:57:00
00:57:04
00:57:08
00:57:12
00:57:16
00:57:20
00:57:24
00:57:28
00:57:32
00:57:36
00:57:40
00:57:44
00:57:48
00:57:52
00:57:56
00:58:00
00:58:04
00:58:08
00:58:12
00:58:16
00:58:20
00:58:24
00:58:28
00:58:32
00:58:36
00:58:40
00:58:44
00:58:48
00:58:52
00:58:56
00:59:00
00:59:04
00:59:08
00:59:12
00:59:16
00:59:20
00:59:24
00:59:28
00:59:32
00:59:36
00:59:40
00:59:44
00:59:48
00:59:52
00:59:56
01:00:00
01:00:04
01:00:08
01:00:12
01:00:16
01:00:20
01:00:24
01:00:28
01:00:32
01:00:36
01:00:40
01:00:44
01:00:48
01:00:52
01:00:56
01:01:00

Transcript

Original Broadcaster Captioning (Enhanced). Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:08MUSIC
00:00:16Hello, I'm Christian Fraser.
00:00:17This is The Context on BBC News.
00:00:20News. The headlines King Charles Charles warns of the existential
00:00:24existential dangers of AI systems systems falling into the wrong hands
00:00:27hands as he gathers the giants of of artificial intelligence at a summit
00:00:31summit in Scotland. Those in our
00:00:34our world who value deeply our humanity
00:00:37humanity and its vital moral component
00:00:39component are anxiously seeking your
00:00:42your reassurance that we will not
00:00:43not lose control of our destiny or
00:00:47or our souls. The head of Nato tells
00:00:49tells the BBC. There has to be a
00:00:51a credible path towards the UK meeting
00:00:54meeting targets to increase defence defence spending and the United Nations
00:00:58Nations warns of a serious decline decline in the amount of fresh water
00:01:01water stored on the Earth's surface.
00:01:02surface. We'll consider the consequences.
00:01:14consequences. Hello. Good evening. evening. Welcome to the programme.
00:01:16programme. King Charles has warned warned of the existential dangers
00:01:20dangers posed by artificial intelligence. intelligence. He made the comments
00:01:23comments at a summit he convened convened in Ayrshire, Scotland, bringing
00:01:26bringing together representatives representatives from the AI giants
00:01:29giants Nvidia, OpenAI, Google, DeepMind DeepMind and Anthropic. It follows
00:01:32follows a series of warnings about
00:01:34about the risks posed by two humanity
00:01:37humanity by AI and the need for regulation.
00:01:39regulation. President Trump this this week dismissed fears about the
00:01:42the safety of AI as a hoax and criticised
00:01:45criticised calls for more guardrails guardrails in place for the technology.
00:01:48technology. Our correspondent Shiona
00:01:50Shiona McCallum has our top story.
00:01:54story. Not just another royal engagement engagement for the King. He was hosting
00:01:58hosting Jensen Huang, the boss of of one of the world's most valuable
00:02:02valuable companies in Nvidia and and Sir Demis Hassabis, the co-founder
00:02:06co-founder of Google DeepMind, along along with some of the world's most
00:02:08most influential voices on AI. And
00:02:11And as soon as pleasantries were were over, it was a stark warning.
00:02:14warning. There seems urgency in adequately
00:02:19adequately considering the existential existential dangers of such technologies
00:02:23technologies falling into the wrong wrong hands. The King addressed an
00:02:26an audience that included Tino Cuellar Cuellar from Anthropic, Sarah Friar
00:02:30Friar from OpenAI and Professor Chu
00:02:33Chu Lang from the Shanghai University University in China. A Chinese presence
00:02:36presence in the room is significant, significant, too, with President
00:02:39President Trump framing AI as a race.
00:02:41race. America must win. The summit summit has been in the royal diary
00:02:44diary for six months, but the timing timing of it has become part of the
00:02:48the story. Last week, a former Anthropic Anthropic researcher said some of
00:02:52of the people building AI believe believe that it could kill us all
00:02:55all by the end of the decade. The
00:02:57The King has asked you here to give
00:03:00give reassurances that this technology technology will not harm humanity.
00:03:02humanity. Can you give those reassurances?
00:03:06reassurances? It is the responsibility responsibility of the AI companies
00:03:10companies ourselves to develop the the technology safely and to properly
00:03:14properly test it. That as we move
00:03:15move from labs to product development,
00:03:18development, the companies have to
00:03:20to become much more rigorous in testing.
00:03:23testing. But other chief execs are
00:03:25are less optimistic. I think that
00:03:27that if we all create AI that are
00:03:30are able to act autonomously, that
00:03:32that can define their own objectives,
00:03:34objectives, that can earn money, money, that can own assets, that
00:03:37that could run businesses, we're
00:03:40we're essentially ceding a new silicon silicon species, which will no doubt
00:03:44doubt compete with us for resources, resources, no matter how much it
00:03:48it cares about humanity and loves loves us. Beyond the garden, the
00:03:51the public's feelings about AI are are equally as mixed. I do think
00:03:55think it is scary if you think about about it too much, so it's better
00:03:58better just to stay in the present. I think there's a lot of of fear mongering as well with it,
00:04:01it, but I do think it's going to to take a lot of jobs. And the debate
00:04:04debate is not only about safety and
00:04:06and jobs. The data centres powering
00:04:09powering AI require enormous amounts
00:04:11amounts of electricity and water, water, placing the tech's environmental
00:04:14environmental issues at the heart heart of a cause that King Charles
00:04:17Charles has championed for decades.
00:04:20decades. The King cannot regulate regulate artificial intelligence, intelligence, but what he can do
00:04:24do is use his convening power to to get these rivals round the table.
00:04:28table. The question is will anything anything concrete be produced from
00:04:32from these private discussions beyond
00:04:33beyond what happens in Dumfries House
00:04:36House Shiona McCallum BBC News. Gina
00:04:39Gina Neff is the deputy CEO of responsible responsible AI UK and she runs the
00:04:43the Minderoo Centre for Technology Technology and Democracy at the University
00:04:47University of Cambridge. Welcome Welcome to the programme. Let's set set the context here because we have
00:04:50have a president who has established established this as an existential
00:04:53existential risk to national security. security. We have a leading figure figure there in Jensen Huang who
00:04:57who says we need much more rigorous rigorous testing on frontier models.
00:05:01models. Who wins the argument? Well,
00:05:04Well, right now the industry is winning winning the argument. They're saying,
00:05:07saying, trust us, we're the ones
00:05:10ones who can do this testing in-house. in-house. All of the fears that have
00:05:14have bubbled up to the surface over
00:05:15over the last week and months have
00:05:18have been answered with an industry
00:05:21industry by calls for we can do this this as long as we have people sitting
00:05:24sitting alongside us to help evaluate
00:05:26evaluate these models. I think we
00:05:29we are at a stage where there need
00:05:32need to be stronger conversations conversations among all of us on
00:05:35on what we're going to do to regulate regulate these technologies and the
00:05:39the companies that make them. Can
00:05:41Can you, though, as a CEO answerable
00:05:45answerable to shareholders, slow slow down frontier AI development
00:05:48development if a competitor is racing
00:05:50racing ahead? Well, right now this
00:05:52this has been posited as a race and
00:05:54and a race that it's between the
00:05:57the US and China, evidently with
00:05:59with no room for anyone else in the the world and a race about a set
00:06:02set of values that we either speed speed up or completely slow down
00:06:06down with nothing in between. I think
00:06:08think a race to the bottom is not
00:06:11not the right way. We should be sending
00:06:14sending these messages around AI.
00:06:16AI. There are other alternatives
00:06:19alternatives we can have shared best best practices across the industry.
00:06:22industry. We can have products that that are safe for our children, for
00:06:25for our families, for our society.
00:06:28society. It would be like imagine imagine that we would have products
00:06:31products in any other category from
00:06:35from pharmaceuticals to automobiles, automobiles, where the industry simply
00:06:37simply said, trust us, we can regulate regulate ourselves. We need no safety
00:06:41safety controls from anyone else. else. So do you think we're going
00:06:44going beyond that? Because I mean, mean, there's a feeling within the the industry that they want to mark
00:06:48mark their own homework. And one. one. Thing. Mark, but one thing that
00:06:52that Dario Amodei has put forward
00:06:53forward is that they would have independent
00:06:57independent inspectors in the training training sessions for these frontier
00:06:59frontier models. They would have
00:07:02have open access to all the models.
00:07:05models. They wouldn't be restricted. restricted. Can you really see the
00:07:07the industry agreeing to that? Well,
00:07:10Well, he's actually saying it should should be in the company's own remit
00:07:14remit to invite those independent independent investigators in that
00:07:17that they would have no legal oversight, oversight, that they would have that
00:07:20that and that these would be voluntary voluntary measures. And he's called
00:07:23called on other companies to do these these voluntary measures. So, yes,
00:07:27yes, they're asking to mark their
00:07:28their own homework and they're asking
00:07:31asking to, you know, to trust that that they're building AI that is
00:07:35is in benefit for all of us. Listen Listen 85. We did a piece of survey
00:07:38survey research in the UK and my
00:07:41my research centre and 85% of British
00:07:44British public surveyed said they they want stronger government action
00:07:47action here, that they don't trust trust the companies alone. 70% say
00:07:51say they're really worried about about the direction of AI. And I
00:07:54I think we've got a moment and an an opportunity here where we can
00:07:58can start to guarantee some kind kind of flaws and safeguards, some
00:08:02some real red lines that we don't don't want this technology to do, do, but we're not going to get there
00:08:06there if we just listen to industry. industry. Gina, good to talk to you. you. Thank you for coming on the
00:08:09the programme. Thank you. Well away
00:08:11away from the King's meeting in Ayrshire, Ayrshire, there were more deeply
00:08:15deeply personal claims made about about him today, due to be published
00:08:18published tomorrow in the British British newspapers. Extracts from
00:08:19from a new book written by Earl Spencer,
00:08:22Spencer, the brother of Diana, Princess Princess of Wales. The earl says
00:08:25says that on the night Diana died, died, the then princess, the then
00:08:29then Prince Charles, I should say,
00:08:31say, sounded giddily elated, like like a lottery winner. Buckingham
00:08:34Buckingham Palace said yesterday. yesterday. The King was mindful that
00:08:37that the pain of fraternal grief
00:08:39grief can cloud reason. Daniela Relph
00:08:41Relph reports. The King and his former
00:08:44former brother in law, another royal royal drama playing out in public.
00:08:48public. It's the content of Earl Earl Spencer's new book about his
00:08:51his sister that has so angered Buckingham Buckingham Palace. In the book, Earl
00:08:55Earl Spencer recounts a row with with the King in the days after the
00:08:59the death of Princess Diana in 1997
00:09:021997 over the decision to have Princes Princes William and Harry walking
00:09:05walking behind their mother's coffin.
00:09:06coffin. Earl Spencer writes he Charles
00:09:10Charles unleashed down the phone phone what I've always taken to be
00:09:13be his pent up contempt for Diana
00:09:16Diana and his horror that the world world was so bowled over by her death.
00:09:20death. Rest assured, he hissed. We'll
00:09:22We'll forget her soon enough. It
00:09:26It is an incendiary allegation and and the palace has pushed back hard,
00:09:29hard, saying that a brother's grief grief can cloud reason, affect judgement
00:09:33judgement and colour memory. You've You've got this extraordinary, well
00:09:36well protected, very rich royal family family and you've got the likes bizarrely
00:09:39bizarrely of Charles Spencer feeling feeling like the underprivileged
00:09:43underprivileged one weaponising and and monetising his sister's legacy
00:09:46legacy and casting himself very much
00:09:48much against the House of Windsor.
00:09:50Windsor. The Earl Spencer. The relationship relationship between the Royal family
00:09:54family and the Spencers has never never really recovered since the
00:09:56the funeral of Princess Diana. In
00:09:58In his eulogy to his sister, Earl Earl Spencer was openly critical
00:10:02critical of the royals. It caused caused lasting damage. On behalf
00:10:06behalf of your mother and sisters, sisters, I pledge that we, your blood
00:10:09blood family, will do all we can can to continue the imaginative and
00:10:13and loving way in which you were were steering these two exceptional
00:10:16exceptional young men so that their their souls are not simply immersed
00:10:20immersed by duty and tradition, but
00:10:22but can sing openly as you planned.
00:10:26planned. Of all senior royals, it it is Prince Harry who has the closest
00:10:30closest relationship with his uncle uncle Earl Spencer. The warmth on
00:10:33on show two years ago at a service
00:10:35service at St Paul's Cathedral and
00:10:38and recent social media posts show show Harry, Meghan and their children
00:10:41children at the Spencer Family Estate Estate at Althorp in Northamptonshire,
00:10:44Northamptonshire, where they stayed stayed over the summer holiday tonight,
00:10:47tonight, the Daily Mail has published published further extracts from Earl
00:10:50Earl Spencer's book, including an an account of a phone call he had
00:10:53had with the King in the hours after after Diana's death. Earl Spencer
00:10:56Spencer writes unlike my other callers callers who were stunned, barely
00:10:59barely able to articulate their condolences condolences and offers of help, he
00:11:03he sounded giddily elated like a
00:11:05a lottery winner. I remember thinking
00:11:07thinking at the time, the book is
00:11:09is a direct personal criticism of
00:11:12of the King from Buckingham Palace. Palace. There has been no further
00:11:15further response. Well, Prince Harry Harry and his wife Meghan have kept
00:11:19kept a low profile since returning returning to the UK from California
00:11:23California three weeks ago. But the the Duke of Sussex today made his
00:11:25his first public appearances. Speaking
00:11:27Speaking at a charity event and attending attending an awards ceremony in London
00:11:31London this evening linked to his
00:11:34his Invictus Games, Meghan is understood understood to have stayed at home
00:11:36home with their two children. Our Our royal correspondent Noor Nanji
00:11:40Nanji was in Greenwich as Prince Prince Harry arrived to a barrage
00:11:43barrage of reporters questions about
00:11:44about his uncle's book. Even here,
00:11:47here, there's no escaping the Earl Earl Spencer revelations. As Prince
00:11:50Prince Harry arrived, a journalist journalist did ask him what he made
00:11:54made of his uncle's book. It may may not surprise you that he didn't
00:11:57didn't answer that he walked straight straight into the venue. But you
00:12:00you know, tonight for Prince Harry Harry is really something for him
00:12:03him to celebrate. We know how dear dear the Invictus Games are to him,
00:12:07him, how close it is to his heart. heart. This is an event which is
00:12:11is around an awards event which is
00:12:13is celebrating the people who have have the communities around Invictus
00:12:16Invictus and the people who've really really championed and celebrated
00:12:19celebrated that cause. And so it's it's for him something he describes
00:12:22describes as a family. We know how how much it means to him. He, of
00:12:25of course, founded the Invictus Games,
00:12:27Games, which are for injured servicemen servicemen and servicewomen. So he
00:12:31he speaks a lot of this. The group group here as his family. And we
00:12:34we know that he is, as you say, treated treated as something of a hero when
00:12:37when he arrives at events like this. this. Even when he was living in
00:12:40in the US, he still made a point point of attending all these sorts sorts of events. Of course, now he
00:12:44he has moved back here. This is his
00:12:47his first big public event since since moving back here. So that will
00:12:50will be the focus today. No escaping escaping the Earl Spencer revelations.
00:12:54revelations. But of course for him, him, a moment to celebrate Meghan,
00:12:57Meghan, as you were saying there, there, she did not join him. There
00:13:01There had been some speculation she she might join on at this event because
00:13:05because she does tend to attend a
00:13:06a lot of the Invictus Games events
00:13:09events with him. But sources close
00:13:11close to the Sussexes have said that
00:13:13that her priority is really settling settling the children, Archie and
00:13:16and Lilibet into their new routine. routine. Of course they've just moved
00:13:19moved a country as well so it's a a big step for them and that is her
00:13:22her priority for the time being. being. So we understand that she
00:13:25she stayed with the children tonight.
00:13:27tonight. Noor Nanji they're reporting reporting from Greenwich. Let's take
00:13:30take a
00:14:30changing capital of Warsaw and the the buzzing port town of Gdansk. Gdansk. Join me, Julie Lynn, for
00:14:34for discovering the world's table
00:14:35table Poland on BBC News. Welcome
00:14:43Welcome back. The Secretary General General of Nato has told the BBC
00:14:47BBC there has to be a credible path
00:14:50path towards the UK meeting targets targets to increase defence spending.
00:14:53spending. Mark Rutte, on a visit visit to Britain, has met the Prime
00:14:56Prime Minister and Defence Secretary Secretary for the first time. He
00:14:59He also described drone strikes in in western Ukraine today very close
00:15:02close to the Polish border, as evidence evidence of Russia's desperation.
00:15:06desperation. Mr Rutter has been talking
00:15:07talking to our political editor,
00:15:10editor, Chris Mason. In eastern Poland
00:15:14Poland this morning, sirens blaring
00:15:16blaring Russia's war in Ukraine sounds
00:15:19sounds near drone strikes over the
00:15:21the border far too close for comfort.
00:15:24comfort. Is this yet another example example of a dangerous escalation
00:15:27escalation in this war? It's clearly
00:15:29clearly an example of increasingly
00:15:32increasingly reckless behaviour by by Russia and its president, but
00:15:36but also evidence of him being increasingly
00:15:38increasingly desperate. Should Nato Nato intercept Russian drones that
00:15:42that are over Ukrainian territory territory if they are approaching
00:15:45approaching a Nato border? There There is a limit to what I can go
00:15:49go into in a public interview, but but I can assure you we do everything
00:15:53everything to make sure that Nato Nato stays safe. Nato territory stay
00:15:56stay safe, that we can defend every every inch of that that's happening
00:15:59happening again. I can never get get into those operational details.
00:16:02details. I was told afterwards drones
00:16:05drones were not, at least yet intercepted
00:16:08intercepted by Nato while still over over Ukraine. How worried are you?
00:16:11you? How worried should we all be
00:16:13be that Russia will attack or invade
00:16:16invade a Nato country in the coming
00:16:18coming years? If you're willing to to sacrifice 1.2 million of your
00:16:22your own people in this crazy, unprovoked
00:16:24unprovoked fight, let's not be naive naive about what Putin could do,
00:16:28do, but we are stronger. I mean, mean, in. Other words, it could happen. happen. It could happen in the coming
00:16:32coming years. I don't think so because because we are strong, so strong
00:16:35strong that he will not try. But But we have to make sure of is that
00:16:38that we are as strong in two, three, three, five years from now.
00:16:45Years from now. You've been here meeting the Prime Minister, Minister, the Defence Secretary, Secretary, the Foreign Secretary,
00:16:48Secretary, as you all know, the Chancellor, Chancellor, John Healey, the former former Defence Secretary, resigned resigned because he wasn't certain.
00:16:52certain. No, he didn't think the the previous government would get
00:16:54get to 3% of national income on defence
00:16:57defence by 2030 and said that was was essential. The new government
00:17:00government hasn't yet explicitly explicitly committed to that. In In the conversations you've just
00:17:04just come from, are you confident confident they're going to manage
00:17:07manage that? I'm totally confident confident about what this government
00:17:09government wants to do. That is to
00:17:12to reach the 3.5 and 2035. Also understanding understanding that cannot be that
00:17:15that you stick to 2.6, 2.7 now and
00:17:18and then in one go in 2034 you would
00:17:21would go to 3.5. So you've long been been a sceptic about. A credible
00:17:24credible path. Yeah. Sounds like like they've not managed to be specific
00:17:27specific and reassure you that that
00:17:29that 3% target by 2030 is actually actually going to be met. I'm absolutely
00:17:32absolutely confident that when it it comes to the 3.5, they are there.
00:17:36there. I'm absolutely confident that that when it comes to the yearly
00:17:39yearly increments, they totally take take it and accept it that they have
00:17:42have to be there. What exactly the the pathway will be, we will see see next year in the spending review.
00:17:46review. Secretary General, thank thank you. Thank you very much. Chris
00:17:49Chris Mason there with the Nato Secretary Secretary General. Let's bring in
00:17:52in Major General Tim Cross, former former British Army major General, General, good to have you with us.
00:17:56us. Reuters says there has to be be a credible path to meeting the
00:17:59the targets. It didn't sound to me
00:18:02me like he'd been given a path to
00:18:04to getting to 3% by the end of this this parliament. Do you think there
00:18:08there is a credible path? No, no, no, there's absolutely not a credible
00:18:11credible path. I mean, he clearly clearly he's a good man and he clearly clearly needs to be a diplomat and
00:18:15and be very careful what he says says in public. And I don't know know what they said behind closed
00:18:19closed doors. And it may well be be that, you know, the British ministers
00:18:22ministers gave him a sense of that. that. They understand the scale of
00:18:26of the problem. But there is the the bottom line is it's pretty obvious
00:18:29obvious there is no plan. And, you
00:18:31you know, picking up what he was was saying in that interview. Ultimately,
00:18:35Ultimately, this is all about deterrence deterrence and trying to avoid the
00:18:39the fact that Russia tries it on on Nato by invading a Nato country
00:18:43country or indeed, you know, does does other things against us in a
00:18:46a sort of hybrid sense. But the bottom bottom line is there is no evidence
00:18:49evidence of any clear plan at all. all. There's lots of rhetoric, lots
00:18:53lots of promises, lots of lots of,
00:18:55of, you know, strategic defence reviews,
00:18:57reviews, etc but virtually no, no no action. And we know from the Prime
00:19:01Prime Minister's statement that he he that he I don't think he takes takes this very seriously at all.
00:19:04all. Right. OK. So you don't believe
00:19:08believe the reassurances he's given given and you would be pointing,
00:19:11pointing, would you, to what he said said about welfare payments and that
00:19:15that taking precedence over defence defence spending. Yeah. No, you know,
00:19:19know, I spent 43 years man and boy boy in the British Army and you know,
00:19:22know, clearly I see these things things from a certain perspective perspective and I absolutely recognise,
00:19:26recognise, you know, the Prime Minister's Minister's got all sorts of issues.
00:19:28issues. But nonetheless, you know, know, defence and security are, as
00:19:31as we all know, a key, if not the
00:19:34the most the most important issue issue for any nation. And we've had
00:19:38had years of rhetoric and people
00:19:40people talking about the need to to improve our defence, to spend
00:19:43spend more on defence, to recognise recognise the threats that are around
00:19:46around in the world, etc many, many many senior people saying that we're
00:19:49we're living in very difficult times, times, probably more dangerous times.
00:19:53times. People comparing it to the
00:19:56the mid 1930s, people talking about about a major war with Russia within
00:19:59within three years. You know, all all these words are being said, but
00:20:02but there is absolutely no evidence evidence that the Prime Minister
00:20:05Minister and indeed the previous previous Prime Minister really took
00:20:08took this seriously. They were not not they're not they don't seem to
00:20:10to be prepared to put their to coin coin the phrase, to put their money
00:20:14money where their mouth is. I recognise recognise the Chancellor's got difficulties
00:20:17difficulties and I like John Healey. Healey. He was a very good Defence Defence Secretary, but the fact that
00:20:21that he has basically announced that that he's going to kick this can
00:20:24can further down the road into next next year before he makes any statement
00:20:27statement is just indicative of the
00:20:29the problem. Can I push you on the the question that Chris asked of
00:20:33of Mark Rutte about drones over western
00:20:36western Ukraine? Two airports were were closed today in Poland. We had had a drone that
00:20:44We had a drone that came over the border into Lithuania yesterday. yesterday. Do you think we're fast
00:20:47fast approaching a situation where where Nato might consider taking taking down drones when they approach approach the border? Yeah, I think
00:20:51think so. I mean, you know, it's it's difficult to know. We talk about
00:20:55about Putin as if he's driving every, every, you know, every aspect of of this war in Ukraine. But there's
00:20:59there's no doubt in my mind at all all that Putin is pushing hard and
00:21:02and harder. He's going to give Ukraine
00:21:04Ukraine a hard time this winter particularly
00:21:07particularly in targeting their critical critical national infrastructure infrastructure and their energy and
00:21:10and so on. And he will push that that as far as he can go. And a lot
00:21:14lot of that means striking deep into into Ukraine, deep into Western territory
00:21:18territory of Ukraine with the danger danger that some of these drones drones will go across borders. But
00:21:22But most of these drones, you know, know, they know where they're going.
00:21:25going. So I think we're going to to see more of these incursions into
00:21:29into Nato territory. And I think think he's pushing to see how does
00:21:32does Nato respond to this. And in in all in you know, in dealing with
00:21:35with these sorts of guys, history history tells us you have to be robust.
00:21:39robust. You have to you have to show show that you are prepared to, you
00:21:42you know, to take him on. So yeah, yeah, I think the pressure is building.
00:21:46building. I'm not saying it's happening happening at the moment. I don't don't think it is actually, but I
00:21:50I don't think there's any doubt that that Poland and others on that, you
00:21:53you know, right on the border with with what's going on here are going
00:21:57going to be pushing hard to say. say. We've got to start doing something something about these incursions
00:22:01incursions into our territory. So So yeah, I think it's coming. Major Major cross. Good to talk to you
00:22:04you this evening. Thank you for coming coming on. Not at all. The United
00:22:07United Nations is warning of a serious serious decline in the amount of
00:22:11of fresh water stored on the Earth's Earth's surface. The annual report
00:22:14report from the UN's World Meteorological Meteorological Organisation says
00:22:16says rivers and lakes are drying drying up while glaciers are retreating.
00:22:20retreating. It says the increasingly increasingly erratic weather caused
00:22:22caused by climate change is predicted predicted to cause both floods and
00:22:26and drought. The authors say there there will be particularly severe
00:22:29severe consequences for Asia and and Africa, where 80% of water related
00:22:32related disasters have occurred in in recent years. Here's the WMO Secretary
00:22:36Secretary General. Celeste Saulo
00:22:38Saulo for the fourth consecutive
00:22:41consecutive year in 2025, every major
00:22:43major glaciated region on earth lost
00:22:46lost ice mass. Several regions with
00:22:49with smaller glaciers, including
00:22:50including the Alps show signs of
00:22:54of having past peak water. This is
00:22:56is the point at which glaciers can can no longer contribute more meltwater
00:23:00meltwater in a hot year, because because it has run out of ice to
00:23:04to give. Let's get a view on that. that. We can speak to Naho Mirumachi.
00:23:07Mirumachi. She is professor of environmental environmental politics and co-director
00:23:11co-director of the King's Water Centre Centre at King's College London. London. Thank you for being with
00:23:14with us. Bluntly, what exactly is
00:23:18is disappearing and how fast? So
00:23:21So what we're seeing is that we're
00:23:23we're losing massive chunks of these
00:23:25these glaciers from places like the
00:23:27the Arctic, Iceland, parts of Canada
00:23:29Canada and also places like the South
00:23:31South Asia. And we're losing over
00:23:35over 1400 gigatons of water when
00:23:38when they melt. Now this is a problem
00:23:40problem because quite often these
00:23:42these glaciers are water storage storage bodies for us. They become
00:23:46become very useful during our dry dry seasons when we need water further
00:23:50further downstream. So when there there are no glaciers, when they're
00:23:54they're melting very rapidly, there's there's not a lot of water left to
00:23:57to use in other times of the year. year. During the dry season. And
00:24:00And when they melt, they also cause cause flash floods. And we know that
00:24:04that this can be very devastating
00:24:06devastating for livelihoods. Right. Right. So if you extrapolate that
00:24:09that if lakes are drying up and riverbeds riverbeds are drying up and they're
00:24:13they're not being replenished by by glaciers, are we becoming more
00:24:17more dependent on salt water? Well, Well, there are lots of technologies
00:24:21technologies that are trying to look look at how we can convert salt water
00:24:24water into fresh water, but we need
00:24:27need lots of fresh water to support
00:24:30support not just our drinking water water to flush or lose, to have showers,
00:24:33showers, but also to produce food
00:24:36food and agriculture. So this is is the thing that puzzles me though,
00:24:39though, is that we were told because because of the climate change, there there was going to be more moisture
00:24:42moisture in the air, more rainfall. rainfall. Yes. That's right. But
00:24:45But the thing is, it doesn't happen
00:24:48happen evenly across the world. So So there are some places that gets
00:24:51gets lots of rain and then places places that don't get a lot of rain.
00:24:54rain. And we're also seeing different different timings. And this also
00:24:58also impacts farming because you you need the right amount of rain
00:25:01rain at the right amount of time time on the land. You need it. So
00:25:05So this is why it's not working out
00:25:08out just because we have lots more more water and. And is it just this
00:25:12this year? It's a bad year because because of the El Nino cycle we know
00:25:14know we're in. Or is this a permanent
00:25:16permanent shift. So we're seeing
00:25:18seeing a trend where there are drying drying rivers where there is going
00:25:22going to be lots more melting of
00:25:25of glaciers. Our groundwater is also
00:25:28also being slowly recharged, but but not at the rate that we need
00:25:31need it to be. So if we go from one
00:25:34one extreme to another, from another another drought to another drought,
00:25:37drought, we don't have enough time time for these water bodies to replenish.
00:25:40replenish. And that's where the real
00:25:42real challenge lies. Professor really
00:25:45really interesting. Thank you for for coming on the programme. Really
00:25:48Really interesting. And of course, course, a great concern to many countries
00:25:52countries around the world. We are are going to take a short break very very shortly. But coming up the other
00:25:56other side of that break, we're going going to take you to our latest edition
00:25:59edition of AI Decoded. We're going going to talk to our panel here in
00:26:03in the studio. And of course, our our focus will be
00:27:35temperatures peaking into the mid mid 40s. Take care.
00:29:39fast changing capital of Warsaw and and the buzzing port town of Gdansk.
00:29:42Gdansk. Join me, Julie Lynn, for
00:29:44for discovering the world table Poland
00:29:47Poland on BBC News. Here at BBC Verify
00:29:53Verify we use forensic investigative investigative techniques and tools
00:29:55tools to fact check stories, verify
00:29:58verify information and counter disinformation disinformation using data analysis analysis and the latest technology,
00:30:02technology, our journalists examine examine the evidence and get to the the facts. Watch our BBC Verify reports
00:30:05reports on the BBC News channel or
00:30:07or go online to find out more. MUSIC
00:30:18MUSIC These These are the latest headlines from
00:30:20from BBC News. King Charles warns warns of the existential dangers
00:30:24dangers of AI systems falling into into the wrong hands as he addresses
00:30:27addresses tech leaders at a summit
00:30:29summit in Scotland. The Duke of Sussex Sussex has been seen for the first
00:30:32first time in public since returning returning to the UK, when he arrived
00:30:35arrived at an awards ceremony for
00:30:37for the Invictus Games. More allegations
00:30:40allegations from Earl Spencer in in the latest extract from his book
00:30:43book on Princess Diana, he claims
00:30:45claims the then Prince Charles sounded sounded giddily elated on the night
00:30:49night Princess Diana died. South South African police say they have
00:30:53have found the body of a ninth woman woman near Johannesburg in a spate
00:30:56spate of murders, causing fear and
00:30:59and outrage across the country. The The head of Nato tells the BBC there
00:31:03there has to be a credible path towards
00:31:05towards the UK meeting targets to
00:31:08to increase defence spending and and the United Nations warns of a
00:31:12a serious decline in the amount of
00:31:13of fresh water stored on the Earth's
00:31:17Earth's surface.
00:31:29Welcome to AI Decoded. King Charles has warned of the existential
00:31:33existential dangers of AI falling falling into the wrong hands. Addressing
00:31:36Addressing tech leaders at Dumfries Dumfries House in Scotland today.
00:31:40today. Among those at the table,
00:31:42table, Nvidia. Google, DeepMind,
00:31:45DeepMind, OpenAI and Anthropic and and a delegation from China. Now
00:31:48Now the King has no power to regulate regulate any of this. What he does
00:31:52does have is convening power, the the ability to get rivals into the
00:31:55the same room. Can they set aside
00:31:57aside the white hot competition to
00:32:00to agree shared principles that keep
00:32:02keep AI in the service of humanity? humanity? The substantive discussions
00:32:06discussions were taking place behind behind closed doors. We will discuss
00:32:09discuss tonight what progress might might look like. But first let's
00:32:12let's hear a little bit of what the the King had to say at the opening
00:32:16opening of this summit. AI is already
00:32:19already showing its immense capacity
00:32:21capacity to improve and save life.
00:32:24life. For example, in the field of
00:32:26of life sciences and medicine, yet
00:32:31yet those who have created these
00:32:33these technologies are now increasingly increasingly warning that AI risks
00:32:37risks developing darker capacities.
00:32:39capacities. Perhaps even to take
00:32:42take life. And in this regard, if
00:32:44if I may say so, there seems urgency
00:32:47urgency in adequately considering
00:32:50considering the existential dangers dangers of such technologies falling
00:32:53falling into the wrong hands. It It is rather an incongruous sight.
00:32:57sight. The monarchy, one of the world's world's oldest institutions sitting
00:33:01sitting down with the new lords of of artificial intelligence, first
00:33:05first among them Jensen Huang president president and chief executive of
00:33:08of Nvidia. He was asked directly directly whether he could offer any
00:33:11any reassurance in the face of some some pretty existential warnings
00:33:15warnings from within the industry
00:33:16industry this past week. It is the
00:33:20the responsibility of the AI companies companies ourselves to develop the
00:33:24the technology safely and to properly
00:33:26properly test it. There were incidents
00:33:29incidents and those incidents thankfully
00:33:32thankfully did no harm. But those those incidents are a reminder that
00:33:35that as we move from labs to product
00:33:39product development, the companies companies have to become much more
00:33:43more rigorous in testing and securing securing and making sure that the
00:33:47the products are ready for use before
00:33:49before it's released. And in doing
00:33:52doing so, if it's not ready, just just hold it back. You should go
00:33:56go as fast as you can, but no faster
00:33:58faster than that. Pacing. We'll talk talk about that in the course of
00:34:02of the programme. We're joined in in the studio by Daryl Flack partner
00:34:05partner at AI Security company Avella
00:34:08Avella Security, and also here AI AI Decoded Stephanie Hare, author
00:34:11author of the book Technology is
00:34:14is Not Neutral. Quite an extensive extensive family photo in Ayrshire
00:34:17Ayrshire today. Lots of different different figures from the world
00:34:19world of AI. And Stephanie's been been telling me while we were off
00:34:23off air that she's been plotting plotting on a piece of paper the
00:34:26the narrative, which might be quite quite a big bubble map because there
00:34:29there are different narratives from from different directions. Yeah.
00:34:32Yeah. So if we take it from the top, top, I see four groups and we may
00:34:35may evolve this over time. I think think the first one are the people
00:34:38people who are worrying that AI could could kill humanity. So call those
00:34:42those your AI doomers and they are are walking the walk with their claim
00:34:45claim by resigning. So like the Anthropic Anthropic researcher last week who
00:34:49who resigned and then made his statement statement to the public over Twitter,
00:34:52Twitter, but also Yoshua Bengio, Bengio, who is the world's most cited
00:34:55cited computer scientist. These are are people who are spending their their lives and really putting their
00:34:59their money on the line to try and and make sure that AI does not kill
00:35:02kill humanity. Then there's a group group of people who think that AI
00:35:05AI could or even will kill humanity, humanity, but they would like to
00:35:09to make generational wealth before before that happens. So that's where
00:35:12where we would put, I think, Elon
00:35:15Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Dario Amodei
00:35:18Amodei and I reckon even Demis Hassabis
00:35:21Hassabis of Google DeepMind because because they're building while warning
00:35:25warning they're not stopping. They They haven't slowed down in any way, way, shape or form, but they'd like
00:35:28like to tell us all how worried they they are in very long manifestos
00:35:31manifestos that they publish online.
00:35:34online. Then there's the people who who say, I don't think AI is going
00:35:38going to kill us at all. And in fact, fact, this is all a con. This is
00:35:41is distracting us. This hypothetical hypothetical scenario from the real
00:35:45real risks of AI, the ones that are are already happening today, which
00:35:49which is algorithmic discrimination. discrimination. It's not a sustainable sustainable technology. It requires
00:35:52requires lots of energy and water. water. How are we going to build build all of this? They're powered
00:35:56powered by fossil fuels, these data data centres. So what are we going going to do with climate change?
00:35:59change? Right. So they want us to to focus on that. They think this
00:36:02this is all a distraction. And then
00:36:04then we conclude with the AI boomers
00:36:07boomers or Accelerationists are the the ones who are like full steam
00:36:09steam ahead. This is led by Jensen
00:36:12Jensen Huang of Nvidia who says go go for it. And of course President President Trump, who thinks we have
00:36:16have all the guardrails we need because
00:36:18because all we need is a smart, high
00:36:20high IQ president. And we have that that in the United States. There
00:36:24There is an ocean between these different different viewpoints. Daryl, how
00:36:28how do you get them all around the
00:36:29the table to agree a safe way forward?
00:36:32forward? I think that's part of what what King Charles has tried to do
00:36:35do today. I think making it non-political non-political today is probably the
00:36:38the starting point where there aren't aren't anyone to lobby from a political
00:36:42political point of view and have have partisan views, and to create create that neutral environment where
00:36:45where people can hopefully speak speak their mind and agree a way
00:36:49way of achieving a safe path forward. forward. Unfortunately, with all
00:36:53all of the diversity of views and and opinions, that's not going to
00:36:56to be easy. And sometimes what people people say in front of the cameras cameras isn't quite what they're
00:36:59they're saying behind closed doors, doors, right? One of the solutions
00:37:03solutions that has been put forward
00:37:05forward by Dario Amodei in his 3500
00:37:093500 word open letter over the weekend, weekend, was that they should invite
00:37:12invite in to the company to see first-hand
00:37:15first-hand the training of frontier
00:37:18frontier models, independent assessors. assessors. Can you ever envisage
00:37:21envisage a scenario where all the the companies would agree to that?
00:37:24that? It's almost like we're talking
00:37:26talking about AI as a potential weapon, weapon, which would make sense because
00:37:29because it's a dual use or multi multi use technology. And that reminds
00:37:33reminds me a little bit about inspections inspections regimes that we have
00:37:35have for things like biological, biological, chemical and nuclear
00:37:38nuclear warfare. If they think that that what they are building is that
00:37:41that dangerous and they're the ones ones saying it, not us. Why not have
00:37:44have an inspection regime for AI?
00:37:47AI? We'll talk more because this this week on the YouTube edition
00:37:50edition of AI Decoded, we've been been discussing this very issue the the threats, the solutions and whether
00:37:54whether it's possible to pace the the development of the most advanced advanced frontier models. We had
00:37:58had two leading experts on AI security security with us, Max Corbridge and
00:38:01and Andrew Weber, and I asked Max Max if these latest AI models were
00:38:05were to outrun our capability to to understand them, whether we'd
00:38:09we'd even know what was coming. We We wouldn't know. And that's the
00:38:12the really tricky thing. The continued continued development of this technology
00:38:16technology is largely happening in in some closed doors in one state
00:38:20state within the US, and the models
00:38:22models that we consume from the public public perspective, we wouldn't be
00:38:25be the first to know. Maybe. Maybe Maybe we'd see continued evolution
00:38:28evolution of these models closer closer or shorter gaps between models
00:38:32models being released, bigger leaps leaps in the models capabilities,
00:38:36capabilities, but only the models models that we see publicly. And And those are not going to be all
00:38:39all the models. We know that both both the major AI labs are doing doing a lot of work behind the scenes
00:38:43scenes that maybe doesn't make it it out into the public, and that's that's where a lot of this risk is
00:38:46is really living within those walls walls that we don't get the view
00:38:49view into when. It comes to regulation. regulation. Andy, let's talk about
00:38:53about the three step plan that Ahmed
00:38:54Ahmed has put on the table embedded
00:38:57embedded third party evaluators within
00:39:00within companies with employee like like access. So common standards
00:39:04standards across democracies, to to the extent that's possible pacing
00:39:07pacing with China and the authoritarian authoritarian states, if that's possible,
00:39:11possible, does any of that do you you think survive contact with the
00:39:15the real world? I think so, I think
00:39:18think I'm already after the Hugging
00:39:20Hugging Face incident, at least two
00:39:22two of the frontier laboratories
00:39:24laboratories invited an independent independent evaluation group called
00:39:28called metre Meta into their. This
00:39:30This is the non-profit in Berkeley, Berkeley, California. Yes, exactly.
00:39:34exactly. With expertise. And they
00:39:36they were given not complete access. access. In the future I'd like to
00:39:40to see them get more access. But But if each of the Frontier Labs
00:39:44Labs would agree to allow such independent
00:39:48independent audits, if you will,
00:39:49will, I think that will go a long
00:39:53long way to understanding the threat
00:39:56threat and preventing it before it it gets out of control. And even
00:39:59even though Meta was given sort of of limited access, didn't they come
00:40:02come up with some, you know, quite, quite, quite chilling results? You
00:40:05You know, they weren't shown all all of the work. They weren't shown shown all of the logs. And yet with
00:40:09with the small amount that they were were shown and the small amount of
00:40:12of time that they had access to stuff, stuff, the results that they came came back with were quite were really
00:40:16really quite worrying, weren't
00:40:19they? Yes. I think that's why we're we're seeing so much urgency at the
00:40:22the moment. The mythos moment earlier
00:40:26earlier this year and then the Hugging
00:40:30Hugging Face incident these agents agents teaming up and breaking out
00:40:33out of the sandbox and not finding finding out about it until there
00:40:37there was a significant lag time.
00:40:39time. This has really set off alarm
00:40:42alarm bells inside the Frontier Laboratories Laboratories and for the first time
00:40:45time they're talking about co-operating co-operating together to get a handle
00:40:49handle on these risks. The interesting interesting thing actually about
00:40:52about Meta Daryl was that they kind kind of went into the company after
00:40:55after this Hugging Face incident incident with one hand tied behind
00:40:59behind their back and still found found significant red flags. And
00:41:01And I think that's some of the concerns
00:41:04concerns in that in order for there there to be independent assurance,
00:41:07assurance, it needs to be open, independent independent assurance, it needs to
00:41:09to be with all of the guardrails guardrails down, complete visibility
00:41:13visibility of all of the logs, all all of the chain of thought that that is going on behind the scenes.
00:41:17scenes. But the downside then is is that equally, some of these models models can hide what they're thinking
00:41:20thinking and use deception to avoid avoid writing things to logs. So
00:41:23So unless you've got full open access access and I would suggest that needs
00:41:26needs to be done outside of the frontier frontier AI environments. It should
00:41:30should be done in independent environments environments like the AI Security Security Institute in the UK. I think
00:41:34think unless you're doing it in those those environments where you can
00:41:36can fully test across a whole range range of different examples where
00:41:40where you can see how it's behaving, behaving, how it's writing to logs,
00:41:44logs, having real time views. I think think you're going to have a real
00:41:47real problem to understand what the the true challenges are going to
00:41:49to be. Because I mean, what we have
00:41:52have had in the last week is an acceptance acceptance for an acknowledgement acknowledgement from the companies
00:41:55companies that they don't fully understand understand what is going on in the
00:41:59the brain of the models, the frontier frontier models they're training. And if you don't understand
00:42:02understand what's going on behind behind the scenes, how can you protect
00:42:06protect from it ultimately the outcomes outcomes that you're trying to achieve
00:42:08achieve if those goals aren't aligned aligned with the goals that you want
00:42:11want them to be aligned with, then then they're going to start behaving
00:42:14behaving in ways that you don't expect. expect. And so trying to create an
00:42:17an environment, a sandbox that secure, secure, that can prevent that kind
00:42:20kind of escape from task driven and
00:42:22and objective driven outcomes is is going to be pretty difficult.
00:42:26difficult. If that is the case. And And I speak to you as an American
00:42:30American and Donald Trump doesn't doesn't want to legislate on that
00:42:32that and wants to stand in the way way of legislation. And there is
00:42:36is a threat, a cyber threat to all
00:42:38all of us, don't we? As individual
00:42:41individual countries have to take take proper precautions and pass
00:42:43pass our own laws, irrespective of
00:42:45of whether there is a threat of tariffs tariffs for doing that? Yes. And
00:42:48And that's I think, a really important important point to raise. We know
00:42:52know that Washington, DC is going going to be the site of a meeting
00:42:54meeting between President Trump and and China's President, Xi Jinping,
00:42:58Jinping, on the 24th of September. September. Lots of talk about whether whether or not these two leaders
00:43:01leaders are going to agree some sort sort of AI safety standards. I regret
00:43:04regret to say I do not think we should should be holding our breath on that.
00:43:08that. They see the problem really really differently. China is not
00:43:11not worried about this. China would would actually belong in the third third category that I was mentioning
00:43:15mentioning of. We're not worried worried about this existential risk
00:43:17risk to humanity. That's a very Bay Bay area. Because there was reporting
00:43:20reporting this week that their spy spy chief had raised the flag, that
00:43:24that it could be a problem for the the Communist Party. So they're worried
00:43:26worried about their control. Control
00:43:28Control of the population. So misinformation, misinformation, disinformation, people
00:43:32people becoming psychologically crazy crazy because they have relationships relationships with chat bots that
00:43:35that persuade them to kill themselves. themselves. All the things that we're we're seeing already, and of course,
00:43:38course, the existing cyber security security risks, these are things
00:43:41things that are happening today. We're worried about the United United States being the leader. Well,
00:43:44Well, there's also the fact that that from China's perspective, it's it's the United States that looks
00:43:47looks like the crazy country with with the President that doesn't want
00:43:50want to regulate and the companies companies that are going gangbusters
00:43:53gangbusters and building fast and and releasing products onto the market
00:43:56market that are not safe. That's That's where Jensen Huang was very very interesting. The CEO of Nvidia,
00:44:00Nvidia, when he said, you don't put put a car onto the road if it is
00:44:04is not safe and roadworthy, you would would not release drugs into the
00:44:06the market. If they are not safe, safe, things have to pass safety safety tests before you sell them.
00:44:10them. Why are these AI companies
00:44:11companies doing that? Why are they
00:44:15they asking for regulation? Presumably
00:44:17Presumably there is state law which
00:44:20which exists already under which which they have liability. So why
00:44:23why do they want federal law and and is it I mean, am I being cynical
00:44:27cynical to suggest that maybe it's it's because they know there are
00:44:29are lawsuits coming down the road? Well, I think as organisations organisations their first duty is
00:44:33is to sort of grow their business business and to grow the value of of their business. So unless there
00:44:37there are regulations in place that that force them to do things, ultimately
00:44:41ultimately they're going to be driven driven from a commercial angle. And
00:44:44And so for having to have frontier frontier AI companies coming out out asking for regulation, I think
00:44:48think is them saying we're aware aware that we've got a problem here
00:44:51here and doing it on our own against against the competitive environment
00:44:54environment isn't going to sort of of cut the mustard for our internal internal shareholders or from our
00:44:58our internal value point of view. view. We need everyone to agree that
00:45:01that we need to slow down order for for in us to put the right security
00:45:04security guards in place. We could could talk plenty more about it,
00:45:07it, couldn't we? But we are out of of time. Stephanie. Daryl, thank thank you very much indeed. Just
00:45:11Just to remind you that AI Decoded Decoded YouTube version is out tomorrow.
00:45:14tomorrow. It's a really good listen listen at 24 minutes where we knock
00:45:17knock all this around, do take a a look at it. It'll be up first thing
00:45:20thing tomorrow morning. Daryl. Stephanie,
00:45:23Stephanie, thank you very much indeed. indeed. We're going to take a short
00:45:26short break around the world and and across
00:46:28for world questions. Nigeria truth,
00:46:31truth, trust and fake news on BBC
00:46:34BBC News. Welcome back. The National
00:46:42National Portrait Gallery in London London has unveiled one of the earliest
00:46:46earliest known portraits of a black black individual in Western art.
00:46:50art. The 400-year-old painting shows
00:46:52shows two teenage boys standing side-by-side.
00:46:54side-by-side. One of African heritage heritage and one of European descent.
00:46:58descent. An inscription says. Both
00:47:01Both were 13 and identifies the boy boy on the left as Prince Rupert,
00:47:04Rupert, a nephew of Charles the First. First. The identity of the other
00:47:08other boy is unknown. The gallery gallery hopes the portrait will challenge
00:47:12challenge historical preconceptions preconceptions about the presence presence of people of African heritage
00:47:16heritage in Europe. I'm joined to to discuss it by Charlotte Bolland,
00:47:20Bolland, a senior curator, researcher
00:47:22researcher and 16th century collections collections at the National Portrait
00:47:25Portrait Gallery. Thank you very very much for being with us. So what what are we looking at here? Take
00:47:29Take us through it. Well, it's a
00:47:32a really unusual double portrait portrait from the period. As you you see, you've got these two kind
00:47:35kind of teenage boys standing side-by-side.
00:47:38side-by-side. And it's also quite quite intriguing in its scale that
00:47:41that it's actually a small double double portrait as you can see. But
00:47:44But they're dressed kind of ready ready to go hunting. So they've got got this landscape in the background
00:47:48background and in this rather unusual unusual setting with a sort of swagged swagged curtain and column behind
00:47:51behind them. But the main thing is, is, is this really interesting kind
00:47:54kind of parallel pose that they have have standing side-by-side. Who painted
00:47:58painted it? We do not know. There There are so many mysteries with
00:48:02with this painting, and that's one one of the things that we're researching
00:48:05researching and really hoping by by having it on display with other
00:48:08other works by artists from the period, period, we can really investigate investigate that question as to who
00:48:11who might have made it. So if you you don't know who painted it, how
00:48:14how can you date it to more than
00:48:17than 400 years old. That it's got got really useful information. It's
00:48:20It's got an inscription on it dating dating the painting to 1626. And
00:48:24And this correlates both to all the the materials and techniques that
00:48:27that are in use and also the costume costume that the boys are wearing.
00:48:29wearing. So we're really kind of of confident with that date. And
00:48:33And that is just really early for for a portrait of this type. From
00:48:36From the scholars who've looked at at it, have they been able to ascertain
00:48:40ascertain if that's Prince Rupert, Rupert, who he was? I mean, was he
00:48:43he a servant, a companion, a boy
00:48:45boy of status? What do the clothes
00:48:48clothes and the composition of this this painting tell you? Well, that
00:48:51that thing that the mystery kind kind of deepens because the Prince Prince Rupert is actually a kind
00:48:54kind of false trail that it's we've we've realised through technical
00:48:57technical analysis that it's actually actually a later addition to the
00:49:00the portrait. So while the date and and the age of the boy is original,
00:49:03original, the Prince Rupert is a a later addition. So we can kind
00:49:06kind of discard that identity. So So we've really got to kind of start
00:49:10start from scratch from looking at at the dates. But they look to be
00:49:13be very kind of wealthy. The large large amount of kind of gold embroidery
00:49:17embroidery and just the ambition ambition of commissioning a portrait portrait of that type, but perhaps
00:49:20perhaps not the kind of most elite elite of the top of the aristocracy,
00:49:23aristocracy, the kind of very wealthy
00:49:25wealthy gentry, merchant class, perhaps.
00:49:28perhaps. So where has it been up
00:49:30up to this point? And you said it's
00:49:33it's 1626, so obviously it is bang bang on 400 years. What story are
00:49:37are you hoping to tell the public? public? So this portrait belongs
00:49:41belongs to the Sidney family and and has been at Penshurst Place in
00:49:45in Kent at least since the mid 18th
00:49:4718th century, but quite possibly possibly since the painting was made.
00:49:51made. So that's the kind of first first area we're looking through through is working with the Sidney
00:49:54Sidney family and collaboration to to kind of track through inventories
00:49:57inventories and also thinking about about kind of family networks because
00:50:01because they're connected to all all sorts of interesting families families that were really involved
00:50:04involved in the early 17th century
00:50:06century with the beginnings of England's
00:50:09England's activities in America and and the kind of trading companies
00:50:12companies like the Virginia Company Company through the Earl of Warwick,
00:50:15Warwick, the Smythe family. So all all these networks is where we're we're kind of really looking in to
00:50:18to try and identify these boys. Right. Right. You had any reaction from
00:50:22from those who've seen it? Yes. I
00:50:24I mean, people it's only just gone
00:50:26gone on display this morning following following conservation treatment.
00:50:30treatment. But prior to it, the people people who've the researchers have have been able to come into the conservation
00:50:34conservation studio have just been been so struck, I think, by how immediately
00:50:37immediately engaging kind of the the portrait is that I've had kind kind of colleagues sort of say, you
00:50:41you know, I went to school with them
00:50:43them and there's something brilliantly
00:50:46brilliantly kind of human and understandable understandable about them that makes makes you want to learn more about
00:50:50about their lives. Charlotte it's it's a lovely story. I look forward forward to seeing it. I'm going to
00:50:54to go and have a look. Charlotte Charlotte Bolland, curator and senior
00:50:57senior researcher at the National National Portrait Gallery. Thank
00:50:59Thank you very much indeed. That's That's it from me. We will be back
00:51:03back same time tomorrow. Do join
00:51:05join us for that. Thanks for watching.
00:51:12watching. MUSIC
00:51:22I know this might sound weird,
00:51:25but I've been obsessed with the oldest
00:51:27oldest person in the world for years.
00:51:32years. Meet adventurous Brooklyn Brooklyn based, Oscar nominated filmmaker
00:51:36filmmaker Sam Green. Since 2015, 2015, he's been travelling the world,
00:51:40world, chronicling the forever changing changing holders of the title of
00:51:42of oldest person in the world. Its
00:51:46Its survey has included Kane Tanaka Tanaka in Japan, who held the title
00:51:49title for four years. And then there's
00:51:51there's the oldest person ever, Jeanne
00:51:54Jeanne Louise Calment, who when she
00:51:56she died in 1997, was 122 years old.
00:51:58old. In her later years she recorded
00:52:00recorded a rap album. The thing I I liked about the film Sam Green's
00:52:04Green's investigation of these very very senior citizens has become a
00:52:07a lifelong project. A documentary documentary based on his survey so
00:52:10so far has just been released. He
00:52:12He has long been fascinated by why
00:52:14why the news media and the public
00:52:17public are so interested in the title title holder of the oldest person
00:52:20person in the world. To this day, day, I still don't fully understand
00:52:23understand it. Is this a fear of
00:52:26of death? Is this a fear of fate
00:52:29fate or a you know, one of those
00:52:31those things like with the car crash
00:52:33crash where you can't look away but
00:52:35but you don't want to look at it? it? In making his documentary, Sam
00:52:39Sam Green found there was nearly nearly always a desire on the part
00:52:41part of others to find out if there's there's a secret to longevity. The
00:52:45The elderly people, he observed, observed, had all kinds of answers
00:52:48answers for why they'd led a long long life. One woman stated she'd
00:52:52she'd live for a long time because because she'd stayed away from men.
00:52:55men. She also said her secret was was eating three raw eggs a day.
00:52:59day. Two, you know, so it's like like the media descends on these
00:53:02these people. Everybody asks them them what their secret is and they
00:53:06they say something and everybody everybody runs with that. This documentary
00:53:09documentary often shows that other other people, the outside world is
00:53:12is often much more intrigued by the the oldest person in the world than
00:53:16than the subjects who hold that title.
00:53:18title. But this film isn't just about about the very old. It's also about
00:53:22about life and death and events in in the filmmaker's own life the birth
00:53:26birth of a son and his own confrontation confrontation with a life threatening
00:53:29threatening illness. These things things started to creep into the
00:53:32the movie, so over time it becomes
00:53:34becomes a larger meditation, I hope,
00:53:37hope, about time and the mysteries mysteries of being alive and fate
00:53:40fate and all these big questions
00:53:43questions that we ask ourselves.
00:53:46ourselves. The last person I interviewed, interviewed, a Spanish woman named
00:53:49named Maria Branyas, she was very very funny. She even was making fun
00:53:53fun of me, which I love. But in.
00:53:55in. At a moment in the interview
00:53:57interview she said, you are young. young. What else? I was jobless.
00:54:01jobless. Now is the time to do good good works. What you were saying
00:54:05saying is you're young and you have
00:54:07have time, so use it. And I think
00:54:10think that's a beautiful thing to
00:54:15to appreciate. Over the last ten ten years, Sam Green has met many
00:54:18many of those who've held the title title of oldest person in the world.
00:54:21world. But there's been one holdout
00:54:23holdout the current title holder, holder, 117-year-old Ethel Caterham,
00:54:27Caterham, who lives in Surrey, just just outside London. She was born
00:54:31born in Edwardian times. She is the
00:54:33the first person in ten years who
00:54:37who has rebuffed my overtures. But But she did let King Charles visit
00:54:40visit her, didn't she? When I saw
00:54:43saw a video of her in King Charles
00:54:46Charles and I thought, Charles, not
00:54:47not me. You know she's British. She's
00:54:51She's the last Edwardian. So I guess guess she feels some allegiance to
00:54:54to the King. But you know, come on. on. I've been doing this for ten
00:54:57ten years. Even though this documentary documentary focuses on the very old
00:55:01old and very fragile. It makes the the point that there is much to learn
00:55:04learn from observing them and from from the filmmaker himself about
00:55:08about what it means to live a thoughtful
00:55:10thoughtful life. It is an unexpectedly
00:55:13unexpectedly life affirming film.
00:59:02I was here at the very first
00:59:04protest. The party had organised
00:59:07organised about a month ago, and and this is so much bigger. We've
00:59:10We've been driving towards the site site of this wildfire, but we've we've just stopped at the side of
00:59:14of the road here because of what what we saw out the window. Spain
00:59:18Spain is still burning. This man man has been pulled out successfully.
00:59:21successfully. It's taken a mammoth mammoth mammoth rescue effort. These
00:59:25These young rebels are heading back
00:59:26back to the front line to pull. There's
00:59:29There's a hunter base there which which these men have been trying
00:59:33trying to take for two years now. now. From the entrance of the pub
00:59:36pub this morning, you get very little little sense of the terrible scenes
00:59:39scenes that were witnessed here last last night. There. When the story
00:59:43story breaks. BBC News.
01:00:08MUSIC
01:00:17I'm Caitriona Perry in Washington and this is BBC World
01:00:20World News America. King Charles
01:00:23Charles urges leading tech bosses bosses developing AI to ensure our
01:00:26our humanity remains sacred, as he
01:00:29he warns of existential dangers.
01:00:33dangers. Those who have created these
01:00:35these technologies are now increasingly increasingly warning that AI risks
01:00:39risks developing darker capacities.
01:00:42capacities. Perhaps even to take
01:00:45take life. Possible war crimes by
01:00:48by the US that's the verdict of a
01:00:50a UN panel investigating two deadly deadly strikes in Iran this February.
01:00:54February. The US rejects that report
01:00:57report and Canada's Prime Minister Minister hails its
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.