Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.
00:00:00we are not going to, as the president said, we will not be left
00:00:03behind, and he said one more time that this will be
00:00:07a completely different war, it will be short. We have said many
00:00:10times that this scenario is very
00:00:13realistic, leading to a conflict, unfortunately, what we
00:00:17have been observing lately, hearing and seeing from Western countries, unfortunately
00:00:20only confirms this scenario, but on the other
00:00:23hand, well, yes, they bought weapons, they produced them, well, yes, they invested
00:00:27in the military, but dying is more expensive?
00:00:32Is there a chance at all to turn these Western elites
00:00:36away from stubbornly leading to war, from provoking
00:00:40Russia?
00:00:45Well, first of all, at present, despite the fact that there is a war in Ukraine,
00:00:48and in general, 2025 from
00:00:52the point of view of the United Nations became a record year for the number
00:00:56of armed conflicts and their geography, there is still room.
00:01:01to take a few steps back from the abyss called World War
00:01:04III, we once talked about this after the meeting
00:01:08between Putin and Trump in Anije, then unfortunately events followed
00:01:12that indicate that
00:01:15agreements, preliminary ones, concluded between Russia
00:01:18and the US were not fulfilled and are unlikely to be, moreover,
00:01:22everyone frankly started laughing at the phrase “the spirit
00:01:25of Ankardige,”
00:01:28a diplomatic path remains.
00:01:30However, at the same time, we must objectively analyze a number
00:01:33of very alarming signs indicating that preparations for
00:01:37an aggressive war are underway, and you are right that the war
00:01:41will cost millions of human lives. Is the West ready for
00:01:45war - this is a rhetorical question, or rather Western society, but in my
00:01:48opinion, the peoples of Central
00:01:52for war. Uh-huh. For example, data on
00:01:55arms export-import in
00:01:582025 indicate this. The global arms export market
00:02:02was estimated at 120 billion dollars, of which
00:02:0680 billion accounts for NATO countries. The leading
00:02:09manufacturer is the United States of America, third place is
00:02:12Germany, and so on. And who buys
00:02:15weapons? First place in the world is the Republic
00:02:19of Poland. Approximately 13% of all arms
00:02:22deals are arms imports. Second place
00:02:25is Romania. What does this indicate?
00:02:28Should we consider these objective factors when we conduct,
00:02:32for example, diplomatic negotiations with the Republic of Poland,
00:02:35Sikorski tells us about the diplomacy of snowdrops, well, you should never
00:02:39refuse to talk, but let's recall the situation on the eve of World
00:02:42War II: practically everyone concluded non-aggression pacts with
00:02:46Germany, and the first to do so was the Republic of Poland. And how did
00:02:50World War II begin? With Hitler's provocation that
00:02:53supposedly Poles attacked the Third Reich. It's interesting that you draw this
00:02:57parallel, because from the NATO camp,
00:03:00such, you know, suspicious things are heard, on the one hand, they are pumping up
00:03:04Lithuania, Poland, well, it's dangerous to pump
00:03:07up Lithuania, because the state is small, but in a military sense it simply may not
00:03:10withstand such tension, well, I'll put it this way, excuse me, I might be taking
00:03:14up my colleagues' time, as much as possible,
00:03:18Lithuania has already been pumped up, so look, at the same time, the NATO Secretary General makes
00:03:21a statement, you even need to try to comprehend what he is saying, because it's
00:03:25a stand-up comedian in fact, Article Five
00:03:28of the Charter, he says,
00:04:00a Russian crosses the border, NATO fighters will
00:04:03immediately scramble, F-35s will sweep everything away, but in fact
00:04:07we know that these promises are very
00:04:10often not kept, especially if the cost
00:04:14is damage or death of German and
00:04:17French citizens, then their lives, their value, compared
00:04:21to Poles, Lithuanians, is much higher valued in
00:04:25Western Europe, and here the question is
00:04:28different, why do the elites
00:04:30of these states go, well, they understand everything perfectly,
00:04:33this hierarchy, and that
00:04:36they are doomed, in case of a clash with Russia
00:04:40and Belarus, why do they do it? There are two,
00:04:43two points: first, they are either
00:04:46simply outright foreign agents,
00:04:49well, simply graduates or protégés of special services
00:04:52or special institutions, they manage not in the interests of their
00:04:56peoples, or they trade in the security of their countries.
00:05:00Today they will attract contracts, funding,
00:05:03troops, they will make good money, then they will leave and smoke
00:05:06something far away, and they
00:05:09no longer care what happens to these states, that is...
00:05:12In fact, the question is
00:05:15about with whom, what to
00:05:18talk about, knowing the real background and the real
00:05:22consciousness of these people, moreover, pay attention, the same Rieter is much more
00:05:25specific when talking about Ukraine, here he has no vague
00:05:28wording, I quote verbatim: NATO countries are ready to deploy
00:05:32troops on the territory of Ukraine in case of conflict resolution with
00:05:35Russia, but as if forgetting that one of the main
00:05:39reasons for the special military operation is this direct.
00:07:14here you have to understand, we shouldn't proceed from Patriot missiles, the thing is
00:07:17that this topic generally depends on
00:07:21profitability, and we all should have understood a long time ago that
00:07:24war is business, whether it's soft, hard, cold,
00:07:28hot, it's all business, and
00:07:31profitability is at the heart of this business, as long as the
00:07:34national debt and
00:07:38financing of these military preparations are at the same
00:07:42level. As soon as the national debt starts
00:07:45to exceed or military preparations, yes, then
00:07:48appropriate movements will begin. From all this, I see one
00:07:52big problem: we don't notice how investment
00:07:55funds, transnational corporations are quickly
00:07:59adapting to the topic of multipolarity.
00:08:02Today we perceive it as a change,
00:08:05yes, the hegemony of a unipolar world to a multipolar one, and
00:08:09these investment funds and corporations, they...
00:08:13are viewed as business fragmentation, you see,
00:08:16how they are just as actively integrating into
00:08:20the global South, this global majority,
00:08:23in this case, they already consider the state as
00:08:27a tool to achieve their goals, because in fact, investment funds have invested
00:08:31in the whole world, they are
00:08:33co-owners of shares
00:08:37around the world, that is, everything today
00:08:40belongs to them, and if...
00:08:42if you look closer, they have a big safety
00:08:46cushion, these are pension funds, 15
00:08:49trillion, right, or how much more,
00:08:53probably, is at their disposal, you see,
00:08:57that is, they have the means
00:09:00today to achieve this,
00:09:04this is such an element, whose task is to
00:09:07annoy, well, look, Moscow says, we perceive
00:09:10any objects from which a threat
00:09:14may emanate, as potential targets for strikes, in
00:09:18case this last red line is
00:09:21crossed, the Poles suddenly say: we will build
00:09:24Patriots, and moreover, we believe that this will be a safe
00:09:27territory somewhere in Poland, that is, well,
00:09:30this feeling, you know, like children, I'm in my house, I
00:09:34hear nothing, see nothing, this is my position, no, this is
00:09:37a tactic, a new tactic, you see, yesterday,
00:09:40I think, attacked...
00:10:12there are no safe distances, it can be considered a provocation in that
00:10:16case, of course, that is, it is a conscious
00:10:18provocation, it is a challenge, as we said,
00:10:22to that very Article Five, Alekseevich. How do you
00:10:25see this? You know, we have discussed many times that at the core
00:10:29of all conflicts lies economics, and
00:10:32we know perfectly well that since 2008,
00:10:35Europe, as
00:10:37in principle, the global corporate economy, cannot
00:10:40cope with the main crisis of overproduction, the crisis
00:10:43of overproduction, which has accompanied
00:10:46these large corporations many times, there are many goods, no one
00:10:50to sell them to, the best means of getting rid
00:10:54of all...
00:11:55in theory, it's economic theory, but in practice it doesn't work,
00:11:59especially when giants like
00:12:02China, Russia, India, started uniting,
00:12:05closing their markets in BRICS, SCO, and saying:
00:12:08"That's it, friends, forget about it, we don't need your European, American
00:12:12goods at all, the basis of any nation's wealth is
00:12:16formed by goods, they say: how can that be, we
00:12:19were these dominants, yes, we were
00:12:22the metropolis, you were colonies, everything was wonderful for us, now..." you
00:12:25say that our goods are not needed by you, we
00:12:28will then engage in another way of earning money
00:12:31through war, but war, as is known, Lenin once
00:12:35repeated this phrase, Lenin said, the best
00:12:38means of embezzlement is war, because in this way you
00:12:42gain access to budgets, who forms the budget,
00:12:45ordinary citizens with their taxes, naturally, having gained
00:12:48access, corporations, the corporate elite gains access through war to
00:12:52these budget funds.
00:13:55lies in the sub-crane, and at the right moment they will stop it. Poles are different, since
00:13:59we are talking about neighbors, and sensible people in Poland also, of course,
00:14:02exist, we cannot allow ourselves to be drawn into
00:14:05war, under this heading a local magazine publishes an interview with retired
00:14:09General Leon Komornicki, former deputy chief of staff of the Polish
00:14:13army. I see no goals from Russia's point of view
00:14:17that it could achieve by starting a war with Poland. Therefore, I
00:14:20believe that the entire rhetorical campaign unfolding on
00:14:24this issue is subordinate not to Russian, but to our internal
00:14:27political goals. Politicians and generals talk about war
00:14:30instead of peace, they talk about war to justify spending
00:14:34huge sums of money. We see that inside, Poland sees what
00:14:38we are talking about, exactly the same way now. The method
00:14:41of historical analogies is, of course, controversial, but at the same
00:14:44time, the main threat to Poland today is
00:14:48being drawn into the space of World War
00:14:51III, when Poland will become simply a puppet in the hands of the West.
00:15:04at the level of rhetoric, at the level of practical actions, they are preparing for war with Russia, which was the case in the
00:15:071930s, until February 1939,
00:15:11the Polish General Staff developed plans for attacking the
00:15:14USSR, while the real threat to Poland
00:15:17came from Germany, but the Polish
00:15:20military-political leadership, President Rydz-Śmigły, and before him the Minister
00:15:24of Foreign...
00:15:49for 2027-2034, this process is accompanied by numerous disputes within the
00:15:52European Union, the group of six states,
00:15:56Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland,
00:15:59Sweden and Denmark, refuse to approve this
00:16:03budget if it retains a high proportion of social spending.
00:16:07for aid, to the countries of southern and
00:16:11central Europe, farmers,
00:16:15enterprises, businesses suffering losses,
00:16:18but instead these funds
00:16:21are proposed to be redirected to so-called defense
00:16:24needs, this is another proof that it is this
00:16:28region, Central European, which
00:16:30in principle, according to the plan of these financial whales, which Alexey
00:16:34Alekseevich spoke about, should become the arena of the future against.
00:17:07confrontation of different approaches, to say that
00:17:11there are no sane forces left in Europe, I would not
00:17:14say, the same Alternative for Germany, the party is quite
00:17:17loose, controversial from the point of view
00:17:20of ideology, some, let's say, some
00:17:24bias, there is also an openly ultra-right wing, but at the same time
00:17:27from there come sensible voices about the need
00:17:30to still negotiate, although it is difficult to imagine anyone more radical in
00:17:34their policies than the same Merz now, judging by what he says.
00:18:37Iran said, I know a thousand ways to lure
00:18:41the Russian bear out of its den, but I don't know
00:18:44a single way to drive it
00:18:47back. Let's continue this topic, is there
00:18:50a chance at all for these alternatives, Alternative for
00:18:53Germany, Polish forces in France, so that
00:18:57they create that critical mass that will be able to reset these
00:19:01elites, and war, despite all the practical
00:19:04benefits, will not become, let's say, the main one.
00:20:07who will say: well, let's go back, for example, to building a common European
00:20:11home, and what will start again, internal
00:20:14changes and turmoil will begin with us, that is, we will have to enter into some
00:20:18convergence with these forces, well, in order to restore
00:20:22relations and talk about security, but we have also
00:20:25been through this, we remember the lessons of convergence, perestroika,
00:20:29building a common European home, that is, the question is
00:20:32what, this is a multi-level game,
00:20:35how much these forces will retain their
00:20:39political credo, how much we will be able
00:20:42to retain our credo in relations with them, because it is very easy to say,
00:20:46yes, that's enough of this East, we are tired, let's hug and love again.
00:21:20radically changed, that is, changing Europe, cooperation with them
00:21:24for refusing relations with China or
00:21:27the East would be extremely imprudent, so
00:21:31yes, let these forces come, prove that they are truly
00:21:34friendly, but we should not fall into euphoria, let alone
00:21:37abandon partners who have appeared recently,
00:21:41if we summarize the main
00:21:44question,
00:21:46in that case, to conclude the first part of our conversation,
00:21:50who ultimately benefits more from the war in Ukraine? Alexey
00:21:53Alekseevich, since you discussed the topic of benefit in your opening statement,
00:21:56Americans or Europeans?
00:22:00You know, the Americans clearly answered this question back in September
00:22:042022 in a publication in
00:22:07Rand, they answered that the war in
00:22:10Ukraine is necessary for
00:22:13Anglo-Saxon corporations, the very goal of this war
00:22:17is not Russia, not even China, it is
00:22:21Europe, thus there is a destruction
00:22:24of European competitive corporations, banks,
00:22:28the attraction of all engineering elites,
00:22:31corporate designers directly to
00:22:35America and the formation of powerful
00:22:38industrial and technological clusters based on
00:22:41European corporations, that is the goal,
00:22:44that's why they are waging this war, definitely the Americans,
00:22:48but they are waging it against Europe. more and more often recently,
00:22:52I'm sure our viewers also encounter thoughts, and a number of Russian
00:22:55experts, for example, Alexander Dugin, says that in principle
00:22:59World War III is already underway, but it's not a war, conditionally speaking, between Russia
00:23:02and the West, and certainly not Russia and Ukraine, it's a war
00:23:06of a unipolar world with a multipolar world, that is,
00:23:09that's it, but considering that there was talk about that, and Alexan Vladimich's idea was
00:23:13interesting, that these global corporations have restructured in such a way that they
00:23:17have learned to work with the global South, including,
00:23:45they know how to extract net profit in interaction with China, with
00:23:48SCO, with BRICS. Well, they will establish
00:23:51relations, they will train politicians who will say
00:23:55what is needed, they will train analysts who will
00:23:59produce what is needed, the main thing is to extract net profit, and
00:24:02we perfectly another stage of extracting
00:24:05net profit is market control, raw material
00:24:08markets and, most importantly, sales markets, because
00:24:12our planet Earth is already limited in terms of sales
00:24:15markets, and pay attention to what the leading
00:24:19owners strive for?
00:25:20Well, Zelensky is already a pathological hanger,
00:25:23for him, any topic
00:25:27that leads to peace causes not just irritation, but
00:25:30fear, and
00:25:33animal fear, he says,
00:25:36of course, Trump about Moscow, understanding that Zelensky
00:25:39will never agree, but nevertheless,
00:25:42at the APEC summit,
00:25:45these moments are already being discussed, that is,
00:25:49still. Trump promotes the ideas
00:25:52of diplomatic
00:25:55negotiations that could resolve, sign, and so
00:25:58on. Trump also needs to hurry, because his system.
00:28:32with the use of artificial intelligence, Palantir, all this
00:28:36is now widely known, regarding the destruction of Russian fuel
00:28:39infrastructure and popular
00:28:42marketplaces warehouses, it has in principle changed Russia's
00:28:46approach to waging war, so now they are talking
00:28:49about an energy truce about the possibility of some
00:28:52consultations, but I suspect that Moscow will
00:28:56not agree to this, Moscow has quite
00:28:59specific parameters.
00:30:03thinks thoroughly about life after the war, we
00:30:06try, I quote him, we try to do our work in such a way
00:30:09that after the war and after this presidential work you can continue to live in
00:30:13your country, walk the streets and no one will want to kill
00:30:16you and hate you, he is talking about himself, of course,
00:30:20well, he reveals his fear, he is most afraid
00:30:23of this, he understands that after
00:30:26the war even those fanatics who are now
00:30:30, relatively speaking, protecting his power, will come to him and
00:30:33ask: why did you bring it to this point, because
00:30:37well, the strategic outcome
00:30:40of this war for Ukraine is clear, it is a disaster,
00:30:44demographic, economic, territorial,
00:30:48then these frustrated people,
00:30:50only offended, who did not get either victory, nor
00:30:54any satisfaction from the fact that they fought, and to whom
00:30:57will they present these claims, they are field commanders,
00:31:01veterans?
00:31:45Bandera left, and none of them were
00:31:48saved from a very sad physical end, and here Alexey Valerievich
00:31:51is absolutely right,
00:31:55bills for these accounts will be presented by people
00:31:58who lost their property, loved ones, relatives, health
00:32:01in this war, and of course peace will not suit the revanchists, that
00:32:05is, in essence, the most important question that should
00:32:08also be started to be discussed and
00:32:12specific planning developed in this regard. What will happen
00:32:15after? Any war, as we know, ends with some
00:32:19solution, what will the territory of Ukraine turn into, what processes will
00:32:23take place there, including from the point of view of our country's national
00:32:26security, four nuclear
00:32:29power plants are currently under the control of the Kyiv regime,
00:32:32chaos, destabilization, collapse of Ukrainian
00:32:35statehood - this is a threat to national security, perhaps
00:32:39even more serious than what is happening today
00:32:42in this territory. Our security is also
00:32:46directly affected, regarding walking calmly on the
00:32:50streets when it all ends, here it seems Vladimir Zelensky rushed things,
00:32:53indeed, according to a sociological survey,
00:32:5650% of surveyed Ukrainians are most concerned not
00:33:00about war, but about corruption, and
00:33:0272% believe that Zelensky
00:33:06personally is to blame for it, so
00:33:08most likely he will have to leave anyway, Vladimir, well, I
00:33:11agree that he has nowhere to go.
00:33:15He will simply be caught
00:33:18at any stage and torn to pieces, why? Because
00:33:22yes, indeed, well,
00:33:25you have to understand, Zelensky is certainly to blame, but
00:33:28he is not the main driving force in this whole
00:33:31tragedy, the point is that this country was led
00:33:34to this finish line
00:33:38a long, long time ago, they will simply blame
00:33:41everything on him, yes, they say that he was able to steal
00:33:45more than anyone else, because such a budget as he was given was not given
00:33:48to anyone, so, the more
00:33:51handouts, the more you can steal from these
00:33:54elements, but Zelensky clings
00:33:58to this war, because he has no other options, he
00:34:02understands perfectly that the longer the war goes on, the longer
00:34:05he has something to bite us with, look, Sibiga
00:34:09is speaking, he starts talking about his old record again, Ukraine
00:34:12calls to strengthen pressure on the regime. Lukashenko for complicity in Russian
00:34:16aggression, they want to add new ingredients to the cauldron of war,
00:34:20you understand what the question is, not an attempt to build some, and even
00:34:23to realize what it would be like if Belarus was really
00:34:26an aggressor, so for us it would be monstrous, but for
00:34:30them, well, he is calling on NATO,
00:34:33you understand, he wants to draw not Belarus into the war,
00:34:37he wants to draw NATO into the war, so he is looking for pretexts and
00:34:40reasons through the Belarusian circuit, so in this
00:34:43regard, I say. The longer the war goes on, the longer
00:34:47his chances of living, well,
00:34:49you know, when they talk about corruption in Ukraine,
00:34:53we can already clearly see that this corruption
00:34:56is coming as an ideology from NATO structures, from
00:35:00European Union structures,
00:35:03yes, that there are some NABU fighting
00:35:06supposedly against corruption, so these are corrupt officials fighting
00:35:09corrupt officials, they are simply trying to control
00:35:12access to different funds and...
00:35:45as in America, as in Europe, they earn well,
00:35:48they will not give up Zelensky under any circumstances, because
00:35:52in colloquial slang, criminal slang - he is
00:35:55a runner, yes, because a runner must always
00:35:58work, run around, solve problems, take
00:36:02on the main risks, key people who
00:36:05stole, received the main funds, no one will
00:36:08see them, yes, at some stage they will shoot this Zelensky
00:36:12or they won't shoot him.
00:37:54Eurasia, the largest continent on the planet with almost
00:37:58a hundred states, there is currently a military conflict on the territory of Eurasia, largely
00:38:01provoked by a state located on another
00:38:05continent, but instead of us deciding what to do on our own continent,
00:38:08we are waiting for what some external forces will say about this,
00:38:12starting with representatives of the country that, in fact,
00:38:16provoked this military conflict. The nominal
00:38:19current security architecture, represented primarily by
00:38:23the UN and its Security Council, well, everyone understands
00:38:26perfectly well that it not only does not work,
00:38:29but has also collapsed with a deafening crash. The longer
00:38:32there is no adequate counterbalance in the world, with adequate
00:38:35unity, the more often new military conflicts and new economic
00:38:39confrontations will occur on the planet, despite all the
00:38:42risks, challenges, and threats in Belarus, what is most important, there was no,
00:38:46there is no, and no war is expected, and the Belarusian army is not involved in
00:38:50direct armed conflict, so that there would be no war in Belarus, it was impossible to crash
00:38:54the country's economy with excessive, and as it later turned out...
00:40:37War, war, war, but perhaps humanity can do otherwise, not just
00:40:41use the right of the strong, but live humanly. Belarus puts forward
00:40:44the initiative of the Eurasian Charter of Diversity and Multipolarity in
00:40:48the XX century, launched the negotiation process symbolically on the sidelines of
00:40:52the UN General Assembly. The idea of the charter arose in
00:40:552023, what will it be about? The Union of
00:41:40Myanmar, that is, for us it is important that friendly states share our
00:41:44view on the future multipolar world order, and here there is
00:41:48no, probably, any concentrated
00:41:50project, we propose to discuss how the multipolar
00:41:54world will look, and before that in our discussion the
00:41:57topic of the reasoning of Alexander Gelyevich Dugin was touched upon
00:42:01that the current confrontation is a confrontation between
00:42:04a unipolar and multipolar world, but there are
00:42:08certain vulnerabilities in this reasoning. The fact is that even
00:42:11supporters of a multipolar world are
00:42:15not united in their views, because
00:42:18we know that Dugin's illusions, for example,
00:42:21regarding the possibility of a pact with
00:42:24right-wing, conservative American circles, with
00:42:27Trumpists, they generally crumbled, and Trump's
00:42:30realpolitik, that is, we look at the multipolar world
00:42:33differently, so in this regard, multipolarity
00:42:37instead of unipolarity will not necessarily be a blessing.
00:44:10that we are proposing this new concept
00:44:13without destroying the old, that is, even
00:44:17with all the objective criticism of the United Nations, we say that
00:44:21we need to breathe new life into it, that is, not abolish
00:44:24the SCO, BRICS, some other institutions to rethink,
00:44:28and why is this important?
00:44:30well, it is really important to go the evolutionary
00:44:34way here and, figuratively speaking, to grow
00:44:37more or less working structures, well... predatory
00:45:41such a struggle for survival on the part of
00:46:02the outgoing hegemon, he just clings with all his
00:46:06claws, teeth to this status of his, he doesn't want...
00:48:52the main struggle, pay attention, who was sitting at
00:48:56a reception in Washington at the same table with Trump and Xi, these are
00:48:59technobillionaires, Musk, Cook, Huang,
00:49:02SpaceX, Apple and Nvidia. And we see that
00:49:05there are different approaches. Bill Gates, for example, says: it is absolutely
00:49:09necessary to introduce state regulation, to develop
00:49:12common norms in the world, China, USA, how will we
00:49:16regulate, and without regulation it is impossible. There is
00:49:19Trump, who publicly declares that... no, we will not
00:49:23regulate, because otherwise we will lose the race, and this
00:49:26is like death, he even wrote on his social networks, whoever wins in
00:49:29the field of AI, that
00:52:05we see perfectly well from Ukraine, when
00:52:09these CIA chief comes to
00:52:12President Vladimir Vladimirovich
00:52:16Putin and says: we have artificial intelligence,
00:52:19calculated that your economy will soon be bad, yes
00:52:23surrender, go for a truce,
00:52:26but what did they answer him, well, you sort of go with your artificial
00:52:30intelligence, go on, they also predicted
00:52:33some strikes on... and thought that strikes on
00:52:36oil would cause a political crisis before
00:52:40the elections, that is, they think so stereotypically that their artificial
00:52:44intelligence has really enslaved them and they are really
00:52:47these, what are they called, not caterpillars, but snails, so
00:52:51they are snails, Americans and Europeans are snails who trust
00:52:54artificial intelligence, we do not just not trust artificial intelligence, we use
00:53:25the artificial word super
00:53:28intelligence, why? because the taxi is symbolically
00:53:31symbolically shortened to AI, it turns out, yes.
00:55:08now a new panic wave is emerging, they
00:55:11again medical and
00:55:14retail workers put on masks,
00:55:17you see, that is, they caught some disease that
00:55:21is already difficult to treat and spreads
00:57:52Riga is preparing another round of prohibitions against Minsk and
00:57:55Moscow. We want the three Baltic countries to have a completely unified position
00:57:58on the issue of Russian and Belarusian grain. According to experts, this is capable of
00:58:02disrupting traditional logistics chains,
00:58:05reducing supply in the market and pushing up
00:58:09world grain prices. Lithuania has taken concrete
00:58:12steps to revise its nuclear-free
00:58:16status. The relevant committee of the Seimas supported
00:58:19the initiative to exclude from the Constitution
00:58:22the article prohibiting the deployment of
00:58:25nuclear weapons and foreign military bases
00:58:28on the country's territory. Alternative for
00:58:32Germany celebrates victory, while Chancellor Merz shows
00:58:35confusion. The era of the black-red cabinet
00:58:39is over, the activity of the federal government is not just helpless,
00:58:43it is immoral. Especially the unprecedented borrowing
00:58:46policy. Finances are in a deplorable
00:58:49state, Merz leaves behind scorched earth,
00:58:53you are pushing Germany towards state bankruptcy, which
00:58:56can happen at any moment. According to the French Court of Auditors, by
00:59:002026 the country's national debt
00:59:03will for the first time exceed the mark of 3.6
00:59:07trillion euros, which will amount
00:59:09to 118.5% of
00:59:12GDP. The country has faced a series of weak governments,
00:59:16incapable.
01:00:23Hello, this is the main broadcast, we summarize the results of the week, watching how Western
01:00:27officials and NATO military strategists have finally moved from hidden
01:00:31plans to cynical discussions of the timing of a direct military
01:00:34confrontation. Minsk is already habitually responding to these challenges with
01:00:38cold pragmatism, building the foundation for a peaceful
01:00:41tomorrow. This week, the president conducted a large-scale personnel audit, sending
01:00:45a clear signal to managers: " State security does not begin in
01:00:49offices, but on