Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.
00:00:24At this moment, this hot spot
00:00:29OPPO, etc.
00:01:48Speak with facts.
00:01:50,
00:01:53Correct mistakes and discuss.
00:01:54。
00:01:57Hello, audience friends, welcome to watch.
00:02:02Since the official launch of the central safety production assessment and inspection team's 2nd and 3rd quarter unannounced visits
00:02:06, the intensity has been greater and the requirements stricter than ever before . For the first time, a special inspection of supervision and law enforcement
00:02:09problems was carried out .
00:02:13Road transportation of dangerous goods is a very high-risk industry
00:02:16. Therefore, the state has formulated strict regulations and standards. This is to prevent
00:02:20major and serious safety production accidents from the source.
00:02:24However, the assessment and inspection team found in some places that there were
00:02:28overloaded dangerous goods vehicles. Fake inspection reports, loopholes in the electronic waybill management system
00:02:32, and other problems need to be taken seriously
00:02:35.
00:02:39Jingbian County Xingda Comprehensive Development Co., Ltd. is located in Linshi City, Shanxi Province
00:02:42. It is a company that mainly transports crude oil
00:02:46and has more than 60 tank trucks . In mid-June,
00:02:50when the reporter followed the central safety production assessment and inspection team here
00:02:54, they initially found no problems . However, after logging into the backend electronic
00:02:58waybill system,
00:05:00after many efforts, the reporter found a surveillance video
00:05:04accidentally taken on June 18th , the day of the inspection. It was found
00:05:08that the two tank trucks had the same license plate number , both 3943.
00:05:12One was running on the road and the other was being inspected
00:05:16. However, the shapes of these two tanks , the length of the reflective strips
00:05:20, and the position of the markings were all different. Obviously, these
00:05:24were not the same tank at all . Whether this constitutes illegal replacement
00:05:27of the tank needs further investigation by relevant departments
00:05:31. How many tons do you ship each month
00:05:34?
00:05:41Where are you from?
00:06:42A deeper investigation found that the main reason was
00:06:46that four links failed layer by layer . We will still take
00:06:49this tank truck with license plate number 3943 as an example to see how it
00:06:53passed these four hurdles . First, the source filling
00:06:57link, the provincial review failed . When this truck went to the oil collection station
00:07:01to load oil, the oil collection station should have checked its rated load
00:07:04, which is 14 tons . But in fact,
00:07:08it was loaded with 22 tons . This obviously violates the provisions
00:07:12of Article 29 of the Administrative Measures for Road Transportation Safety of Dangerous Goods
00:07:15. The loaded goods shall not exceed the rated load
00:07:19of the transport vehicle. Obviously, the oil collection station did not fulfill its relevant
00:07:23duties. The second hurdle, the transport enterprise did not fill in the
00:07:27waybill truthfully. In our country , dangerous goods must have a paper
00:07:31or electronic waybill before they can be transported on the road. Strictly
00:07:34implement the system of one vehicle, one trip, one waybill. The waybill
00:07:38for this vehicle with license plate number 3943 is issued by the carrier, which is
00:08:12the electronic waybill system . It can mainly
00:08:15reflect the information of our consignor, carrier, and
00:08:19vehicle owner
00:08:20.
00:08:23Including the information of the transport route, including the risk display of the entire vehicle
00:08:27during operation . The state promotes
00:08:31the construction of electronic waybill systems in various places , the purpose of which is to conduct full-chain
00:08:35dynamic supervision of dangerous goods road transportation. However, the Shanxi
00:08:39electronic waybill system did not connect with the source of the oil collection station.
00:09:12In order to plug this loophole, it has been mandated by local regulations
00:09:16that electronic ground scales of dangerous goods loading and unloading enterprises be connected to the supervision platform
00:09:20, and automatically compared with the weight reported in the electronic waybill, forming
00:09:24a closed loop. However, Shanxi is precisely missing this crucial link
00:09:27. Finally, let's look at the fourth aspect, roadside
00:09:31inspection. Can the traffic management department responsible for
00:09:35roadside inspection discover its overloading ? The answer is very difficult
00:09:38. First, there are many dangerous goods vehicles . As of 2025,
00:10:56In addition to the overloading of dangerous goods transportation , this central safety production assessment
00:11:00and inspection team also found shocking problems of fraudulent dangerous goods
00:11:04vehicle inspection reports . According to regulations,
00:11:07the body of dangerous goods vehicles must undergo an annual inspection, and the tank must undergo
00:11:11a regular inspection every two years. The inspection is completed by a professional organization
00:11:14and an inspection report is issued. This is an important measure to ensure the safe operation of vehicles
00:11:18. Dangerous goods vehicle inspection is much stricter
00:11:22than ordinary trucks. The inspection items amount to
00:11:55The person in charge of the enterprise said he didn't know clearly
00:11:59. Later, we measured the ghost level through the courtyard
00:12:02. From January to April this year , the enterprise had not
00:12:06been to the nearby area. This kind of enterprise's person in charge,
00:12:10the main person in charge, said that what he mentioned was
00:12:14a bought report, which means no inspection . On the day of the inspection
00:12:17, the Guizhou Provincial Department of Transportation filed a case for investigation against Fengmao Logistics
00:12:21based on the clues provided by the assessment and inspection team . The investigation found that
00:12:25the 84 inspection reports submitted by Fengmao Logistics
00:12:28had not undergone any actual inspection, but the reports issued
00:12:32were indistinguishable from genuine ones . The QR code
00:12:36and its seal content were all authentic
00:12:40, but there was no actual inspection . Therefore, from the report,
00:12:43its falsity could not be detected . The Office of the State Council Safety Committee
00:12:47transferred this issue to the Fujian Provincial People's Government for further investigation
00:12:51. On May 6th, the Fujian Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Department
00:12:55conducted an investigation against Fujian Shengyuan Testing Technology Service Co., Ltd.
00:12:59, which provides tank inspection and testing services
00:13:02.
00:13:05A total of 91 problematic inspection reports were found. We found three points in our investigation. Its
00:13:09testing personnel did not actually arrive at the scene for actual inspection
00:13:13. Second, the inspection equipment required for the inspection items
00:13:17was not used . The third is that its
00:13:21original inspection records were fabricated and forged afterwards
00:13:24. So how did these 91 false reports
00:13:28end up in the hands of Guizhou Fengmao Logistics ? The investigation found
00:13:31that on January 9, 2025 , Fujian Lushengyuan Testing Technology
00:13:35Service Co., Ltd. signed an authorized power of attorney with an unqualified
00:13:39external person, Zhang Mou . Zhang Mou helped Shengyuan
00:13:43solicit tank truck business, and Shengyuan issued inspection reports for Zhang Mou
00:13:47and paid a certain fee. The regular inspection
00:13:51business for the tanks of Guizhou Fengmao Logistics was completed by Zhang Mou
00:13:55in cooperation with Lushengyuan . From January
00:13:5925th to April 26th, during the period
00:14:02, the city did not send personnel to the scene and did not conduct on-site
00:14:06inspections, directly receiving the data provided
00:14:10by Zhang Mou for the 74 dangerous goods transport vehicles
00:14:14of Guizhou Fengmao Logistics , providing 91
00:14:18regular inspection reports . Experts stated that
00:14:21tank trucks carrying dangerous goods that have long relied on false reports
00:15:16In addition to Guizhou and Fujian, the assessment and inspection team also found
00:15:20false inspection reports issued in Shandong, Shanxi , Ningxia, Heilongjiang and other
00:15:24places
00:16:07whether it's a testing agency issuing false inspection reports, both are touching
00:16:11the red line of public safety . Any
00:16:15failure in any link of dangerous goods transportation can lead to serious accidents
00:16:18. In response to the various safety hazards identified, relevant departments have already
00:16:22demanded that all regions strictly investigate and punish , urge the rectification of regulatory shortcomings
00:16:25, consolidate the safety responsibilities of all parties , and firmly adhere to the bottom line of safe production
00:16:29for dangerous goods transportation . Thank you for watching today's Focus Interview
00:16:33. Goodbye .