CSPAN2 — FCC Chair Brendan Carr Holds Press Conference Following August Meeting

20260808 10:12 UTC · 00:43:59 · 704 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr spoke to reporters following the agency's August open meeting, where commissioners voted 2-to-1 along party lines to remove the 39% national viewer cap on TV station ownership by a single company. Carr, who was appointed by President Trump, defended the vote, calling it the "right policy call" while comparing parallels between local TV stations to the business decline of local newspapers. "I don't want to be an FCC Chair that sat back and observed the trend, and did nothing," he said. Democratic Commissioner Anna Gomez, the sole dissent in the vote, told reporters in her own press conference that the FCC was "putting its thumb on the scale" in favor of content that the Trump administration favored, while punishing the content that it disliked. Gomez encouraged Congress to exercise its oversight and called on the FCC to testify on this decision and others.<br /><br />Sponsor: Federal Communications Commission

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 660 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56
00:31:00
00:31:04
00:31:08
00:31:12
00:31:16
00:31:20
00:31:24
00:31:28
00:31:32
00:31:36
00:31:40
00:31:44
00:31:48
00:31:52
00:31:56
00:32:00
00:32:04
00:32:08
00:32:12
00:32:16
00:32:20
00:32:24
00:32:28
00:32:32
00:32:36
00:32:40
00:32:44
00:32:48
00:32:52
00:32:56
00:33:00
00:33:04
00:33:08
00:33:12
00:33:16
00:33:20
00:33:24
00:33:28
00:33:32
00:33:36
00:33:40
00:33:44
00:33:48
00:33:52
00:33:56
00:34:00
00:34:04
00:34:08
00:34:12
00:34:16
00:34:20
00:34:24
00:34:28
00:34:32
00:34:36
00:34:40
00:34:44
00:34:48
00:34:52
00:34:56
00:35:00
00:35:04
00:35:08
00:35:12
00:35:16
00:35:20
00:35:24
00:35:28
00:35:32
00:35:36
00:35:40
00:35:44
00:35:48
00:35:52
00:35:56
00:36:00
00:36:04
00:36:08
00:36:12
00:36:16
00:36:20
00:36:24
00:36:28
00:36:32
00:36:36
00:36:40
00:36:44
00:36:48
00:36:52
00:36:56
00:37:00
00:37:04
00:37:08
00:37:12
00:37:16
00:37:20
00:37:24
00:37:28
00:37:32
00:37:36
00:37:40
00:37:44
00:37:48
00:37:52
00:37:56
00:38:00
00:38:04
00:38:08
00:38:12
00:38:16
00:38:20
00:38:24
00:38:28
00:38:32
00:38:36
00:38:40
00:38:44
00:38:48
00:38:52
00:38:56
00:39:00
00:39:04
00:39:08
00:39:12
00:39:16
00:39:20
00:39:24
00:39:28
00:39:32
00:39:36
00:39:40
00:39:44
00:39:48
00:39:52
00:39:56
00:40:00
00:40:04
00:40:08
00:40:12
00:40:16
00:40:20
00:40:24
00:40:28
00:40:32
00:40:36
00:40:40
00:40:44
00:40:48
00:40:52
00:40:56
00:41:00
00:41:04
00:41:08
00:41:12
00:41:16
00:41:20
00:41:24
00:41:28
00:41:32
00:41:36
00:41:40
00:41:44
00:41:48
00:41:52
00:41:56
00:42:00
00:42:04
00:42:08
00:42:12
00:42:16
00:42:20
00:42:24
00:42:28
00:42:32
00:42:36
00:42:40
00:42:44
00:42:48
00:42:52
00:42:56
00:43:00
00:43:04
00:43:08
00:43:12
00:43:16
00:43:20
00:43:24
00:43:28
00:43:32
00:43:36
00:43:40
00:43:44
00:43:48
00:43:52
00:43:56

Transcript

Original Broadcaster Captioning (Enhanced). Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:01:24MINUTES.
00:01:39>> IF YOU COULD PLEASE TAKE YOUR CONVERSATIONS OUTSIDE.
00:01:41THANK YOU.
00:01:57>> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, EVERYBODY.
00:02:00WELCOME TO THE CHAIRMAN'S PRESS CONFERENCE. AS A REMINDER, GIVE YOUR NAME
00:02:04AND IDENTIFY YOUR OUTLETS UPON ASKING YOUR QUESTION. WE GREATLY APPRECIATE THAT.
00:02:08AND WITH THAT, I WILL TURN IT
00:02:10OVER TO CHAIRMAN CARR.
00:02:15>> THANKS SO MUCH. GREAT TO SEE MOST OF YOU AGAIN.
00:02:18WE HAVE A BIG BREAK HERE BETWEEN OUR AUGUST MEETING AND OUR SEPTEMBER MEETING.
00:02:22SO THESE WERE TWO PACKED MEETINGS BACK TO BACK.
00:02:25ANOTHER GOOD MEETING, OBVIOUSLY. WE'VE BEEN VERY MUCH FOCUSED
00:02:28HERE ON THE FCC BUILD AMERICA AGENDA.
00:02:31YOU SAW ONE BIG FEATURE OF THAT,
00:02:32THIS WEEK, WHICH WAS THE DIRECT
00:02:36TO DEVICE ITEM ON UNLICENSED SPECTRUM BUT PAIRS WITH A LOT OF
00:02:40WORK WE ARE DOING ON DIRECT DEVICES AND ONE AREA WE CAME IN,
00:02:43WE KNEW WE WANTED AMERICA TO LEAD THE WORLD IN IT. AND WE ARE TAKING THE CONCRETE
00:02:47STEPS TO DO EXACTLY THAT. AND WE THINK THAT'S GOING TO BE
00:02:49REALLY DISRUPTIVE AND A GOOD OUTCOME FOR CONSUMERS.
00:02:52YOU ALSO SAW ON THE PAST WEEK OR SO SINCE OUR LAST MEETING
00:02:55ANOTHER EFFORT ON NATIONAL SECURITY. AGAIN, WE CAME IN AND ONE OF THE
00:02:58FIRST THINGS WE DID WAS A NEW
00:03:01COUNCIL ON NATIONAL SECURITY INSIDE THE AGENCY.
00:03:05WE WERE TAKING A SERIES OF ACTIONS. WE DID RECENTLY HAS BEEN TO ADD
00:03:09TO THE AGENCY'S COVERED LIST,
00:03:11THE ADVANCED ROBOTICS WHICH
00:03:14INCLUDE HUMANOID ROBOTS AND
00:03:19ROBOT DOGS BY SOME PEOPLE. AND WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE ACROSS
00:03:22THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS TAKING A REALLY SMART APPROACH TO THESE NATIONAL SECURITY
00:03:26ISSUES. BY PUTTING SOMETHING ON THE COVERED LIST YOU'RE SENDING A
00:03:29VERY CLEAR SIGNAL TO THE MARKET ABOUT A NATIONAL SECURITY RISK
00:03:33WHILE ALSO MAKING SURE THAT THERE IS A TIME LINE TO TRANSITION.
00:03:37SO WE DON'T WANT TO BE IN A SITUATION FIVE YEARS FROM NOW
00:03:39WHERE YOU GOT MANY, MANY THOUSANDS OR MILLIONS OF THESE
00:03:43TYPES OF DEVICES THAT ARE A NATIONAL SECURITY RISK WHERE WE
00:03:46HAVE BECOME OVERLY DEPENDENT ON
00:03:48SUPPLY CHAINS OVERSEAS OR TELLING PEOPLE THAT NOW IS THE
00:03:52TIME TO ONSHORE A LOT OF THE
00:03:55INVESTMENT AND DEVELOP IT INTO WHAT COULD BE CRITICAL ELEMENTS
00:03:59OF OUR NATIONAL SECURITY AS WELL AS ECONOMIC SECURITY.
00:04:02SO ADVANCED ROBOTICS PLUS POWER
00:04:05INVERTERS WERE RECENTLY ADDED.
00:04:07THERE IS AN EXCEPTION AND A WAIVER PROCESS AND ALLOWS US TO TAKE ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY
00:04:11RISK, ALLOW THE MARKET TO
00:04:12ADJUST, AND GO THROUGH INDIVIDUAL EITHER ACCEPT OR WE
00:04:16ALSO HAVE THE PROCESSES TO REMOVE SOME OF THE
00:04:20GRANDFATHERING PROVISIONS AS WELL. SO WE'RE PLEASED WITH THE
00:04:23ROLLOUT OF THOSE INITIATIVES. AND AGAIN, AT THE TOP OF THE
00:04:26LAST MONTH, LAST MEETING, WE'RE SEEING GOOD RESULTS ON DRONES,
00:04:29FOR INSTANCE, THE AGENCY ADDED DRONES TO THE COVERED LIST,
00:04:33FOREIGN-PRODUCED DRONES AT THE END OF LAST YEAR AND WE'VE SEEN
00:04:35THE DATA SHOW THAT WE'RE IN
00:04:37EXCESS OF $5 BILLION OF NEWLY FLOWED INTO DRONE AND
00:04:41DRONE-RELATED BUSINESSES AND WE'RE SEEING DRONE MOTORS, FOR
00:04:44INSTANCE, BEING PRODUCED NOW IN
00:04:46THIS COUNTRY, TOWARD A SCALE
00:04:48THAT WE HAVEN'T SEEN BEFORE. GOOD OUTCOMES AND ULTIMATELY
00:04:51PART OF OUR BUILD AMERICA AGENDA. AND WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO TURN
00:04:55IT OVER TO WHAT I'M SURE WILL BE LOTS OF QUESTIONS ABOUT THE
00:04:57BUILD AMERICA AGENDA.
00:05:02REPORTER: I'M MAGGY RHODES, A REPORTER FOR THE CAPITAL FORUM.
00:05:07IS A LAWSUIT EXPECTED TO BE BROUGHT BY PUBLIC INTEREST
00:05:09GROUPS WILL BE FILED SINCE THE FCC AS EXPECTED REMOVED THE
00:05:13AUDIENCE CAP? A SOURCE WORKING ON THE CASE SAID MEMBERS OF CONGRESS ARE
00:05:16EXPECTED TO FILE BRIEFS SAYING THEY CAN ONLY REVISE THE LAW.
00:05:18HOW WILL YOU RESPOND TO THESE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS IF THEY FILE THE BRIEFS?
00:05:22>> WELL, LOOK, EVERYONE IS FREE TO APPEAL FCC DECISIONS.
00:05:26THAT'S HOW THE PROCESS WORKS.
00:05:27FOR US, IT COMES DOWN TO AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT'S THE RIGHT
00:05:31POLICY CALL. WHERE DO WE THINK THE LAW IS AND
00:05:33EVERYONE IS FREE TO LITIGATE.
00:05:35FOLKS HAVE LITIGATED FCC MEDIA
00:05:38REGULATION DECISIONS HISTORICALLY. I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED IF THERE
00:05:41IS APPEALS HERE. AND WE'LL ALLOW THE COURTS TO WORK THROUGH IT.
00:05:45BUT WE'VE DONE OUR PART. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE TREND LINE AGAIN, I THINK THE PARALLELS AS
00:05:49I WENT ON AT LENGTH PROBABLY DURING MY STATEMENT TO THE LOCAL
00:05:52NEWSPAPER INDUSTRY ARE VERY CLEAR. AND I DON'T WANT TO BE AN FCC
00:05:55CHAIR THAT SAT BACK AND OBSERVED THE TREND AND DID NOTHING.
00:05:58I THINK IT'S THE RIGHT POLICY CALL. I ALSO HAPPEN TO THINK GIVEN THE
00:06:02DC CIRCUIT'S DECISION PREVIOUSLY
00:06:05ON A DIFFERENT SPECIFIC STATUTORY CAP WHERE THEY SAID IT
00:06:08CAN BE MODIFIED THAT WE CAN DO IT. IF IT GOES TO THE COURTS IT GOES
00:06:11TO THE COURTS WE'LL LITIGATE IT
00:06:13AND WE'LL SEE WHERE IT GOES.
00:06:17REPORTER: KELSEY GRIFFITH WITH BLOOMBERG NEWS. ONE OF OUR MAIN JUSTIFICATIONS
00:06:21FOR GETTING RID OF THE 39% CAP
00:06:23WAS TO INCREASE LOCAL REPORTING AND THE RESOURCES THAT LOCAL STATIONS HAVE.
00:06:27YOU'VE ALREADY ALLOWED TWO MAIN STATION GROUP OWNERS TO MERGE
00:06:31UNDER THAT VIEW. COULD THE LARGE STATION GROPE
00:06:34OWNERS FIND THEMSELVES SUBJECT TO REGULATORY SCRUTINY IN THE
00:06:37FUTURE IF THEY IMPOSE TOO MUCH OF A NATIONAL VIEWPOINT OR BEGIN
00:06:40ACTING LIKE NATIONAL NETWORKS THEMSELVES?
00:06:43>> WELL A COUPLE OF POINTS THERE.
00:06:45ONE, WHEN IT COMES TO SPECIFIC TRANSACTIONS WE WILL ALWAYS LOOK AT THE FACTS THERE.
00:06:48WE PUT CONDITIONS IN PLACE ON TRANSACTIONS AND WE CAN PUT
00:06:52CONDITIONS IN PLACE ON
00:06:53TRANSACTIONS THAT FOCUS ON LOCALISM.
00:06:57AND I THINK WE SHOULD CONTINUE TO DO THAT. DIRECTIONALLY, AGAIN, I THINK
00:07:00IT'S -- THERE'S AN INTERESTING CONVERSATION TO HAVE ABOUT WHAT
00:07:04DID CONGRESS INTEND WITH THE BROADCAST INDUSTRY?
00:07:08AND IT'S DIFFERENT THAN NATIONAL
00:07:11REACH DISTRIBUTION PLATFORMS.
00:07:12THE WAY SOAKS MEDIA TODAY -- THE
00:07:15WAY SOCIAL MEDIA TODAY OR CABLE IS. ASK A BALANCE BETWEEN THE
00:07:18NATIONAL PROGRAMMERS AND THE AFFILIATE AGREEMENTS AND THE PROGRAMMING THEY PROVIDE AND
00:07:22ALSO PRODUCTION OF LOCAL NEWS, LOCAL INFORMATION, AND WE'RE
00:07:26ATTEMPTING THROUGH A DOZEN OR MORE DIFFERENT PROCEEDINGS TO
00:07:28TRY TO STRENGTHEN AND ENHANCE LOCALISM.
00:07:32AGAIN, I SAID IN A STATEMENT, IF WE MOVE INTO A WORLD AND SOME
00:07:35BROADCASTERS ARE WHERE THEY'RE BECOMING NOTHING MORE THAN
00:07:38UNDIFFERENTIATED PASS-THROUGHS FOR NATIONAL PROGRAMMING
00:07:42PRODUCED IN HOLLYWOOD AND NEW YORK THAT'S ONLY ACCELERATING THE DECLINE AND SORT OF
00:07:46INCREASING SOME OF THE SECULAR HEAD WINDS THAT THEY'RE FACING.
00:07:48THE FUTURE OF LOCAL BROADCAST TV HAS TO BE LOCALISM.
00:07:52AND IF THEY ARE JUST, YOU KNOW, A PASS-THROUGH, A MOUTHPIECE FOR
00:07:56THE NATIONAL FEED, PEOPLE CAN GET THAT THROUGH YOUTUBE TV OR OTHER CHANNELS.
00:08:00SO I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO EXIST, THEY HAVE EVERY MARKET INCENTIVE TO
00:08:04CONTINUE TO FOCUS ON LOCALISM. AND THE FCC HAS BEEN.
00:08:07WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO PREEMPT. WE ARE SUPPOSED TO IF YOU THINK
00:08:10THERE'S A BETTER FIT, PREEMPTIVE NATIONAL PROGRAMMING, WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT TREND CONTINUE.
00:08:14SO WE WILL BE FOCUSED TO MAKE SURE THAT BROADCASTERS CONTINUE
00:08:17TO FOCUS ON LOCALISM AND NOT JUST BEING DUMB PIPES FOR THE
00:08:21NATIONAL FEED.
00:08:26>> MR. CHAIRMAN, WITH POLITICO. I WANTED TO FOLLOW UP A LITTLE ON WHAT YOU HAD TO SAY ABOUT THE
00:08:29COVERED LIST AT THE OUTSET. YOU KNOW, WE'VE SEEN I THINK A
00:08:32BIGGER GEOPOLITICAL FOCUS AT THE FCC FOR YEARS CURIOUS WHAT YOU
00:08:36SEE AS DRIVING THAT AND WHERE YOU THINK THAT MIGHT BE GOING.
00:08:39IS THAT AN ENDURING MORE PERMANENT CHANGE LIKE -- THINKING HIGH LEVEL ABOUT THE
00:08:42IDENTITY OF THE FCC, WANTED TO
00:08:45ASK A BIT ABOUT THAT AND SOME OF THE TOOLS AVAILABLE TO IT?
00:08:49>> IT IS SOMETHING WE'VE THOUGHT A LOT ABOUT. I THINK ONE WAY TO DESCRIBE IT
00:08:53IS A CONTINUATION OF A TREND THAT CUTS THROUGH THE BIDEN
00:08:56ADMINISTRATION AND THE FIRST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. IF YOU GO BACK, THOSE WERE SOME
00:08:59OF THE FIRST -- FIRST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WHEN WE STARTED
00:09:03TO INSERT NATIONAL SECURITY
00:09:04CHECKS INTO FCC REVIEWS.
00:09:07THAT WAS WHEN WE DID THE RIP AND REPLACE PROCEEDING WITH HUAWEI
00:09:10AND GTE AND DENIED BEFORE THAT,
00:09:13USF SUBSIDIES FOR POTENTIALLY INSECURE GEAR.
00:09:17CHAIRMAN ROSEN EXTENDED AND CONTINUED A LOT OF THOSE ACTIONS.
00:09:20SO IN SOME WAYS THIS IS MOMENTUM
00:09:22CONTINUING TO BUILD TOWARD A REALIZATION THAT WHEN IT COMES
00:09:26TO TECH AND TELECOM AND OUR NETWORKS, THERE ARE BAD ACTORS
00:09:29AND FOREIGN ADVERSARIES THAT ARE
00:09:31CONSTANTLY PROBING AND PRODDING
00:09:34AND LOOKING FOR WAYS IN AND RAMPING UP OUR WORK.
00:09:36AND AGAIN, FROM DAY ONE, THE COUNCIL ON NATIONAL SECURITY WAS
00:09:40A CLEAR SIGNAL THAT THIS
00:09:41PARTICULAR AGENCY WAS GOING TO CONTINUE AND ACCELERATE THAT
00:09:45TREND LINE. AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE
00:09:48DOING.
00:09:51>> WITH MS NOW. I'M SURE AS YOU'RE AWARE, ABC
00:09:54ACCUSED THE FCC OF ATTEMPTING CENSORSHIP. DO YOU HAVE A COMMENT IN
00:09:58RESPONSE TO THAT ESPECIALLY WHEN IT'S REFERENCING OR ABC IS REFERENCING SOME OF THE
00:10:02POLITICAL CONTENT OF THEIR SHOWS?
00:10:05>> WELL, AGAIN, I THINK THE SUPREME COURT HAS ALREADY
00:10:08ADDRESSED THIS QUESTION OF WHETHER THE FCC ENFORCEMENT OF
00:10:11THE PUBLIC INTEREST STANDARD AND RELATED STATUTORY OBLIGATIONS
00:10:15THAT BROADCASTERS HAVE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
00:10:19THE SUPREME COURT HAS SAID THAT
00:10:21ENFORCING THESE PUBLIC INTEREST
00:10:23STANDARDS IS NOT CENSORSHIP.
00:10:26WITH RESPECT TO DISNEY AND ABC, THERE ARE SEVERAL PROCEEDINGS GOING ON.
00:10:30THEY'RE MAKING THE ARGUMENT TO THE AGENCY THAT THE VIEW IS A
00:10:33BONA FIDE NEWS PROGRAM AND PEOPLE HAVE STRONG FEELINGS ON THAT.
00:10:36I THINK ON LOTS OF DIFFERENT SIDES AND WE'RE LOOKING AT THE RECORD. WE HAVEN'T MADE A FINAL
00:10:40DECISION. BUT OUR JOB IS TO ENFORCE THE
00:10:44ACT AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST STANDARD AND PEOPLE DON'T LIKE IT. I GET IT.
00:10:47BUT PEOPLE DON'T LIKE IT IN ALL SORTS OF CONTEXTS, RIGHT?
00:10:50WHETHER PUBLIC SAFETY ITEMS OR WIRELINE ITEMS.
00:10:53YOU FIND THAT PEOPLE PUSH BACK AND THEY MAKE A LOT OF ARGUMENTS
00:10:57THAT IN TO YOUR VIEW AREN'T TRUE. BUT WE CONTINUE TO WORK THROUGH IT.
00:11:00SO WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD. WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO
00:11:03ENFORCE THE PUBLIC INTEREST STANDARD.
00:11:06AND MESSAGING CAMPAIGNS, THE WHOLE STANDING. REPORTER: A FOLLOW-UP.
00:11:10NEXT STEPS. DO YOU PLAN TO HAVE A HEARING?
00:11:13IS IT GOING TO BE FOR THE FCC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE?
00:11:17WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS? >> WE HAVEN'T MADE A FINAL DECISION ON TIMING OR NEXT
00:11:21STEPS. WITH RESPECT TO DISNEY, ABC'S
00:11:24BROADCAST LICENSES IN PARTICULAR.
00:11:26WE ISSUED AN EARLY RENEWAL DECISION. THEY FILED AND MAKING THEIR
00:11:30POSITION, THEIR ARGUMENT THAT THEY HAVE OPERATED IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
00:11:34THERE HAD BEEN PETITIONS TO DENY. THERE HAVE BEEN OPPOSITIONS TO THAT.
00:11:37RECENTLY FILED BY DISNEY.
00:11:38I THINK FOR NOW EITHER OR THIS
00:11:42WEEK THE PLEADING CYCLE IS STILL GOING AND WHEN THAT CLOSES WE
00:11:46WILL TAKE A LOOK AT THE RECORD AND DECIDE BASED ON THE EVIDENCE BEFORE US WHAT THE NEXT STEP
00:11:49WILL BE.
00:11:53REPORTER: MR. CHAIRMAN, DIEGO MUNOZ, YOU'RE GETTING A LOT
00:11:57OF -- FROM CHINA HAWKS FOR THE
00:11:59COVERED LIST ACTIONS. CAN YOU UNPACK YOUR VIEW ABOUT
00:12:03HOW THEY WON'T IMPACT THE DOMESTIC INDUSTRY OR THEY MIGHT
00:12:07EVEN BENEFIT THE DOMESTIC INDUSTRY GIVEN A LOT OF THOSE
00:12:10SUPPLY CHAINS ARE STILL VERY MUCH RELIANT ON CHINA.
00:12:12LIKE THE ROBOTICS INDUSTRY.
00:12:16AND COULD YOU SAY WHERE YOU'RE GOING NEXT?
00:12:18IT'S BEEN REPORTED THAT YOU'RE CONSIDERING DATA CENTER
00:12:22COMPONENTS FOR THE COVERED LIST,
00:12:24ARE YOU? >> WELL, THE ACTIONS WE'RE
00:12:28TAKING WITH RESPECT TO THE COVERED LIST INCLUDING RECENTLY ARE NOT COUNTRY SPECIFIC.
00:12:31SO FOR INSTANCE, WE BAN ALL
00:12:35FOREIGN-PRODUCED DRONES AT THE END OF LAST YEAR AS WE JUST TALKED ABOUT.
00:12:38WE'VE ADDED TO THE COVERED LIST ALL FOREIGN-PRODUCED ADVANCED
00:12:42ROBOTICS. FOREIGN-PRODUCED ROUTERS.
00:12:44BUT WE DO IT IN A WAY THAT IS,
00:12:46YOU KNOW, SUFFICIENT AND
00:12:49DIRECTED AT NATIONAL SECURITY.
00:12:51BUT ALSO IN A WAY THAT AVOIDS A
00:12:54FLASH CUT JARRING CHANGE TO THE MARKET. AGAIN, IF THERE IS A DRONE OR IF
00:12:58THERE'S AN ADVANCED ROBOTIC, THAT'S ON THE SHELVES TODAY, THE
00:13:02COMPANY THAT MAKES IT CAN CONTINUE TO MAKE NEW -- NOT NEW
00:13:06VERSIONS BUT NEW ONES OF THAT
00:13:08MODEL, YOU AS A CONSUMER CAN
00:13:11CONTINUE TO BUY IT AND BUY IT A WEEK FROM NOW.
00:13:14AND THERE'S BEEN NO ACTION TO REMOVE ANY PRODUCT FROM A CONSUMER'S HANDS.
00:13:18IN FACT, THE FCC HASN'T GIVEN ITSELF RULES THAT WOULD
00:13:22CONTEMPLATE THAT. SO IT'S A SMART TRANSITION.
00:13:24IT'S A LONG-TERM SIGNAL TO THE MARKET OF WHERE WE'RE GOING.
00:13:28THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS SO FOR DRONES, FOR INSTANCE, EXCEPTIONS
00:13:32THAT WERE GRANTED FOR TOY DRONES. AND WERE EXCEPTIONS FOR DRONES
00:13:36THAT ARE ON THE -- PART OF THE
00:13:39BUY AMERICA PROGRAM. AND SO WE'RE ABLE TO SORT OF DO
00:13:42IT WITH A BROAD SIGNAL.
00:13:45BUT ALSO CAREFULLY CALIBRATED TO
00:13:48AVOID MASSIVE MARKET DISRUPTIONS. BUT THE MARKET IS CORRECTING. WE TALKED ABOUT DRONES.
00:13:52$5 BILLION SINCE THAT DECISION THAT'S FLOWED INTO DRONE AND
00:13:55DRONE-RELATED THINGS. MOTORS. BEING PRODUCED HERE NOW.
00:13:59SO I THINK IT'S A VERY, VERY SMART APPROACH.
00:14:03SENDS A LONG-TERM SIGNAL AND PROVIDES CERTAINTY IN THE LONG RUN BUT ALLOWS FOR A NUANCED
00:14:07APPROACH IN THE SHORT RUN. WE GET A COUPLE HUNDRED OR A
00:14:10COUPLE DOZEN OF A BAD PRODUCT, NOT A GREAT THING.
00:14:12BUT IT'S VERY DIFFERENT THAN ADVANCING FIVE YEARS FROM NOW
00:14:15AND HAVING MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF THAT BAD THING. SO WE'RE TAKING STEPS NOW TO NOT
00:14:19BE IN THAT CIRCUMSTANCE. >> THE DATA CENTER COMPONENTS?
00:14:23>> WHAT WAS THAT? REPORTER: DATA CENTER COMPONENTS, ARE YOU CONSIDERING THAT?
00:14:27>> THE DECISION ABOUT WHAT TO ADD, WHAT IS -- ONE THAT'S
00:14:30DRIVEN BY THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCIES, THEY
00:14:34MAKE THE DECISION. WE THEN IMPLEMENT THE DECISION THEY MAKE.
00:14:37SO I REFER YOU TO THEM FOR ANY COMPETENT ON WHAT, IF ANYTHING, THEY MAY HAVE NEXT.
00:14:41>> A QUICK FOLLOW-UP. YOU SAID THIS IS NOT COUNTRY SPECIFIC. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT.
00:14:45BUT IT'S WIDELY SEEN TARGETED AT CHINA.
00:14:49WHY THE HESITANCY IN SAYING THESE ARE CHINA TARGETED ACTIONS?
00:14:52>> THE DECISION THAT WE GET COMES FROM THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH NATIONAL SECURITY BODIES.
00:14:56AND IT IS FOR ALL FOREIGN PRODUCED.
00:14:59SO I SAY IT JUST BECAUSE IT'S AN
00:15:02ACCURATE DEPICTION.
00:15:04DETERMINATION.
00:15:07I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU ARE HERE. HOW LONG HAS IT BEEN? [LAUGHTER]
00:15:11>> A COUPLE OF MONTHS. >> I DON'T THINK I'VE SEEN YOU IN PERSON SINCE COVID.
00:15:13BUT IT'S GREAT TO SEE -- THE
00:15:16EDITOR OF COMMUNICATIONS DAILY COMING DOWN AND VISITING WITH
00:15:20US. I APPRECIATE IT.
00:15:22REPORTER: LIKE TWO MONTHS AGO.
00:15:24AT A CTI EVENT.
00:15:28THANK YOU FOR NOTICING. >> THANK YOU.
00:15:32[LAUGHTER] REPORTER: SO WITH THAT, I WANTED TO ASK, I GUESS I WANTED TO GO
00:15:36OFF IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION.
00:15:37YOU KNOW, I HEAR A LOT ON MY
00:15:40BEAT ABOUT CBRS AND CONCERNS
00:15:41ABOUT WHAT THE FCC MIGHT DO ON
00:15:45CBR'S BAND. AND SO CAN YOU GIVE US ANY
00:15:48UPDATE ON WHAT YOUR THINKING IS
00:15:53ON THAT AND PROVIDE ANY COLOR ON
00:15:54THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE FCC CAN
00:15:58START GETTING READY FOR THE 2.7
00:16:01GIGAHERTZ AUCTION BEFORE THE UPPER C BAND AUCTION WHICH WILL
00:16:05TAKE A LOT OF TIME. IN OTHER WORDS, CAN STAFF WORK
00:16:09ON BOTH ON MORE OR LESS PARALLEE
00:16:39YEARS OF COVERING.
00:16:39>> YES.
00:17:07WE'RE SEEING SINCE TRUMP WAS
00:17:10INAUGURATED, WE SEE MORE.
00:17:22>> YOU DIDN'T MENTION -- GETTING
00:17:26FOCUS FROM YOU?
00:17:29>> FOCUSED ON ALL THE SPECTRUM BANDS.
00:17:30I'VE BEEN WORKING ON CLOSELY,
00:17:33GETTING C-BAND DONE AND FOCUSED
00:17:35ON SORT OF THREE BIG NEW
00:17:38AUCTIONS FOR 2028 AND A LOT OF TALENTED PEOPLE HERE THAT HAVE
00:17:41EYEBALLS ON EVERY SINGLE SPECTRUM BAND FROM CBRS TO MANY
00:17:45OTHERS AS WELL. YEAH.
00:17:48>> CHAIRMAN, TED JOHNSON FROM JET LINE.
00:17:51I WANTED TO SEE IF YOU HAVE ANY
00:17:53REACTION, SENATOR KENNEDY AT THE
00:17:57CONFIRMATION HEARING, SAID --
00:18:02SAID TO HIM, OF THE FCC, YOU'RE
00:18:04GETTING INTO THE FOOTHILLS OF VIOLATING THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
00:18:07DO YOU HAVE ANY REACTION TO THAT?
00:18:11>> LOOK, THE REGULATORY
00:18:14FRAMEWORK FOR BROADCAST IS FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT THAN EVERY OTHER DISTRIBUTION PLATFORM.
00:18:18I THINK WHAT WE GOT TO BE CLEAR
00:18:19ABOUT IS BROADCASTERS CUT A DEAL
00:18:22WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. WHICH IS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
00:18:26HAVE EFFECTIVELY BEEN FORCED TO
00:18:28GIVE BROADCASTERS FREE
00:18:31SUBSIDIZED DISTRIBUTION BY USING THE AIRWAVES.
00:18:35THE AIRWAVES IS A PUBLIC
00:18:37RESOURCE.
00:18:39OWNED BY THE AMERICAN TAXPAYERS AND MOBILE WIRELESS PROVIDERS
00:18:43PAY BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF
00:18:44DOLLARS FOR ACCESS TO THAT.
00:18:49A DEAL WAS CUT. YOU GET TO USE THIS PUBLIC
00:18:51RESOURCE FOR FREE BUT IN
00:18:54EXCHANGE A PART OF THE BARGAIN
00:18:59YOU HAVE TO OPERATE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST. THE CONCEPT OF THE DEAL STRUCK,
00:19:02FREE ACCESS BUT COMPLY WITH
00:19:03PUBLIC INTEREST.
00:19:07PART AND PARCEL WHY BROADCAST IS
00:19:10SO DIFFERENT AND WHY THESE ISSUES WERE RAISED AT THE SUPREME COURT VERY CLEAR THAT
00:19:14ENFORCING THE PUBLIC INTEREST OBLIGATIONS IS NOT ANYTHING THAT
00:19:17APPROACHES CENSORSHIP OR A FIRST AMENDMENT ISSUE.
00:19:21SOME BROADCASTERS HAVE EFFECTIVELY SUGGESTED THAT THEY
00:19:24DON'T WANT TO BE HELD TO THAT BARGAIN ANYMORE AND HAVE THIS
00:19:27FREE ACCESS TO THE SUBSIDIZED SPECTRUM AND NOT LIVE UP TO THE
00:19:31PUBLIC INTEREST OBLIGATION. THAT BREAKS THE DEAL WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
00:19:35IF THEY WANT TO DO THAT WE SHOULD LOOK AT WAYS THEY CAN DO
00:19:38THAT AND PAY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR THEIR ACCESS TO SPECTRUM AND
00:19:42MAYBE EVEN PAY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BACK IF THEY HAVEN'T BEEN LIVING UP TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST
00:19:46STANDARDS FOR A WHILE. BACKWARD LOOKING FOR THEIR USE OF IT. BUT THAT'S THE DEAL.
00:19:50AND IT'S BEEN VERY CLEAR.
00:19:52I THINK CONGRESS ALSO HAD A LOT
00:19:54OF CONCERNS FOR INSTANCE, WITH NPR AND PBS AND MEMBERS OF
00:19:58CONGRESS, WASN'T AN FCC CALL, AND THEY ARTICULATED THE VIEW
00:20:01THAT NPR AND PBS HAD GOTTEN TOO
00:20:04MUCH OUTSIDE OF THE MAINSTREAM
00:20:07TO FORCE EVERY TAXPAYER TO
00:20:11SUBSIDIZE THEIR BROAD CAST OPERATIONS. AND I THINK YOU SEE A LOT OF
00:20:14PEOPLE MAKING SOME OF THE SAME POINTS WITH BROADCAST TV.
00:20:17WE'RE FORCING PEOPLE TO EFFECTIVELY SUBSIDIZE BROADCAST
00:20:21TV BY DEPRIVING THE TREASURY AND THE PEOPLE OF THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT OTHERS WOULD PAY
00:20:24FOR IT, WE SHOULD BE VIGILANT ABOUT HOLDING THEM TO THEIR
00:20:28PUBLIC INTEREST OBLIGATIONS. >> IF I COULD, JUST FOLLOW UP.
00:20:32THIS SEEMED TO BE ABOUT THE
00:20:35ABC -- THAT SENATOR KENNEDY'S REMARKS AND WE DON'T KNOW FOR SURE AND DIDN'T SAY IT.
00:20:39BUT ON THE ABC PROCEEDING ABOUT THE STATION RENEWALS, YOU'VE
00:20:42BEEN CRITICAL OF PREVIOUS FCC
00:20:46CHAIRS FOR HOLDING THESE
00:20:49RENEWALS OPEN FOR A LONG TIME.
00:20:52THAT KIND OF UNCERTAINTY.
00:20:54CAN YOU SAY THAT FOR EXAMPLE
00:20:57WITH THE ABC EARLY RENEWAL IT
00:21:02WON'T BE A MATTER -- CAN YOU GIVE A TIME LINE?
00:21:05IT'S NOT GOING TO BE TWO YEARS FROM NOW WHEN YOU MAKE SOME KIND
00:21:08OF DECISION.
00:21:14ON THIS PROCEEDING THAT'S ONGOING.
00:21:16>> NO NEWS -- WE WANT TO LOOK AT
00:21:19THE RECORD AND REVIEW IT ONCE THAT PROCESS IS COMPLETE BETTER INSIGHT.
00:21:24BUT AT THIS POINT, WE HAVE NOT
00:21:25MADE A DECISION.
00:21:29WHAT YOU ARE REFERENCING THE BIDEN YEARS AND ARGUMENTS RAISED
00:21:33ABOUT FOX NEWS CABLE CHANNEL.
00:21:35CONTENT ON A CABLE CHANNEL WHICH THERE'S NO LICENSE AND NO PUBLIC
00:21:38INTEREST OBLIGATION AND NO STATUTORY OBLIGATIONS OF THAT TYPE OF SORT.
00:21:42THE FCC HELD UP A RENEWAL BASED ON CONCERNS ABOUT A CABLE
00:21:46CHANNEL. AND WE HAVEN'T DONE THAT,
00:21:49OBVIOUSLY.
00:21:52REPORTER: CHAIRMAN CARR, AN
00:21:54UPDATE ON AMAZON GLOBAL STAR AND
00:21:57GOT THE APPROVAL IN JULY AND WHERE IN A STANDS IN TERMS OF
00:22:00THE DOCKET THERE AND WHEN YOU
00:22:03GUYS MIGHT BE -- ACTION ON THAT.
00:22:07>> THEY FILED THEIR APPLICATION AT LEAST ON -- A COUPLE OF THINGS GOING ON WITH AMAZON.
00:22:11THERE'S DIRECT TO DEVICE APPLICATIONS AND ALSO THE TRANSACTION.
00:22:14WE ARE WORKING THROUGH ALL THOSE ISSUES BUT NO SPECIFIC NEWS TO
00:22:17BREAK ON TIMING THERE. GOOD. APPRECIATE IT.
00:22:21HOPE YOU GUYS HAVE A GOOD AUGUST. AND WE WILL SEE SOME OR ALL OF
00:22:24YOU IN SEPTEMBER.
00:22:26THANKS.
00:22:29>> I WANT TO START WITH WHAT HAPPENED. THIS ECONOMICS VOTE DAD TO
00:22:32ELIMINATE THE NATIONAL OWNERSHIP
00:22:35CAP, CONGRESS WROTE INTO LAW, HANDING MORE CONTROL OF THE
00:22:38PUBLIC AIRWAVES TO A SMALL NUMBER OF COMPANIES WHOSE
00:22:42COVERAGE PLEASES THIS ADMINISTRATION.
00:22:45THE COMMISSION'S RATIONALE FOR
00:22:46ITS ACTION TODAY IS THAT IT BALANCES OR IT WANTS TO BALANCE
00:22:50THE POWER BETWEEN LOCAL BROADCASTERS AND NETWORKS.
00:22:54IN DOING SO, IT IS PUTTING ITS THUMB ON THE SCALE IN FAVOR OF
00:22:57CONTENT THAT THIS ADMINISTRATION LIKES AND AGAINST CONTENT THAT
00:23:01IT DISLIKES.
00:23:02WE HAVE WATCHED THESE MASSIVE
00:23:05MEDIA CORPORATIONS PULL NETWORK PROGRAMMING TO PLEASE THIS
00:23:09ADMINISTRATION JUST AS THOSE SAME COMPANY OVERRIDE THE
00:23:13NETWORK'S OWN EDITORIAL JUDGMENT WHEN CURRYING FAVOR CUTS THE OTHER WAY.
00:23:17BOTH MOVES COME FROM THE SAME PLAYBOOK.
00:23:20EXECUTIVES CALCULATING WHAT WOULD WIN THEM FAVOR WITH THIS
00:23:24ADMINISTRATION RATHER THAN ASKING WHAT THEIR VIEWERS
00:23:26ACTUALLY NEEDED FROM THEM. YOUR LOCAL NEWSROOM USED TO
00:23:29DECIDE WHAT YOU GOT TO WATCH.
00:23:32NOW THAT DECISION INCREASINGLY RUNS THROUGH WHETHER IT PLEASES
00:23:35THE WHITE HOUSE AND WITHOUT A CONSUMER PROTECTION MEASURE LIKE
00:23:38THE NATIONAL OWNERSHIP CAP IN PLACE IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE.
00:23:41THAT IS THE REAL STORY BEHIND THIS COMMISSION'S CAMPAIGN OF
00:23:45CENSORSHIP AND CONTROL AGAINST ABC AND DISNEY.
00:23:48THIS WAS NEVER ABOUT BALANCE.
00:23:50BECAUSE THE FCC HAS NO BUSINESS
00:23:53BALANCING THE IDEOLOGICAL CONTENT OF THE NEWS IN THE FIRST PLACE.
00:23:57WHAT THIS COMMISSION WANTS IS POWER.
00:23:59THE POWER TO REWARD BROADCASTERS WHO PLAY BALL AND TO PUNISH THE
00:24:02ONES THAT DON'T. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE NOT BUYING IT.
00:24:06WHEN THE FCC OPENED TO PUBLIC COMMENT BOTH THE UNPRECEDENTED
00:24:10EARLY RENEWAL OF ABC STATION
00:24:13LICENSES AND THE SEPARATE BUT
00:24:14EQUALLY POLITICAL MOTIVATED CASE
00:24:18AGAINST THE VIEW, THE RESPONSE WAS MASSIVE.
00:24:21AND THE MESSAGE CUT ACROSS PARTY LINES.
00:24:23PEOPLE TRUST THEIR LOCAL STATIONS. THEY DO NOT WANT THE FCC
00:24:27ANYWHERE NEAR THESE EDITORIAL DECISIONS AND THEY SAID SO IN
00:24:30OVERWHELMING NUMBERS. THAT CONSENSUS EXTENDS WELL
00:24:34BEYOND THE USUAL VOICES. CONSERVATIVE AND FREE MARKET
00:24:37GROUPS HAVE JOINED THIS FIGHT, TOO. WARNING THAT TURNING THE LICENSE
00:24:41RENEWAL PROCESS INTO A POLITICAL
00:24:43WEAPON WILL NOT STAY POINTED IN ONE DIRECTION.
00:24:47AND THAT THE NEXT TARGET COULD JUST AS EASILY BE A CONSERVATIVE
00:24:50OR A RELIGIOUS BROADCASTER. THEY ARE RIGHT TO WORRY.
00:24:54AND I APPRECIATE THEIR WILLINGNESS TO SAY SO.
00:24:57JUST YESTERDAY, THAT WARNING
00:25:00CAME YET AGAIN FROM THE UNITED STATES SENATE. SENATOR JOHN KENNEDY WARNED THAT
00:25:03THE FCC IS GETTING INTO THE
00:25:06FOOTHILLS OF VIOLATING THE FIRST
00:25:09AMENDMENT. AND ANOTHER REPUBLICAN SENATOR IS ISSUING THAT KIND OF WARNING
00:25:12TO THIS AGENCY, IT SHOULD GIVE
00:25:14EVERY MEMBER OF THIS COMMISSION PAUSE.
00:25:17THIS FCC CAN KEEP PRETENDING THIS WAS ALL ABOUT THE PUBLIC
00:25:21INTEREST. BUT THE PUBLIC ALREADY GAVE ITS ANSWER.
00:25:24LOUDLY AND FROM EVERY DIRECTION.
00:25:26THEY WANT THIS GOVERNMENT OUT OF THE NEWSROOM. THANK YOU.
00:25:30AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER YOUR
00:25:33QUESTIONS.
00:25:39SURE. REPORTER: I CAN GO FIRST. MY NAME IS MAGGY RHODES.
00:25:42I'M A REPORTER AT THE CAPITAL FORUM. YOU MAY HAVE ALREADY TOUCHED ON
00:25:45THIS BUT CAN YOU SAY HOW THE
00:25:47AUDIENCE CAP RESERVES LOCALISM ESPECIALLY IF STREAMING
00:25:50PLATFORMS HAVE THE POSSIBILITY OF REACHING 100% OF AMERICANS?
00:25:52THANK YOU.
00:25:55>> OUR LOCAL BROADCAST STATIONS ACTUALLY SERVE THEIR LOCAL
00:25:59COMMUNITIES. AND THAT IS WHERE A LOT OF LOCAL JOURNALISM STEMS FROM.
00:26:03EVEN WHEN YOU SEE ON TIKTOK,
00:26:06USUALLY THAT STARTS WITH A LOCAL REPORTER.
00:26:08THAT'S REPORTING ON SOMETHING LOCAL.
00:26:11SO THE NATIONAL CAP HELPS WITH THAT. BECAUSE WHAT IT AVOIDS IS WHAT
00:26:15WE SEE EVERY TIME WE HAVE THESE
00:26:17BIG CONSOLIDATIONS.
00:26:19AND THAT IS THE ELIMINATION OF
00:26:22LOCAL REPORTING.
00:26:24THE NATIONALIZATION OF THE NEWS,
00:26:26IT STARTS TO GET PRODUCED AND IT STOPS ACTUALLY REPORTING ON
00:26:30LOCAL NEWS. EVEN -- EVEN IN THE WAY THE
00:26:34COMMISSION TALKS ABOUT, BALANCING THE POWER BETWEEN THE
00:26:37NETWORKS AND BIG TECH, WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT IS MAKING
00:26:41THEM SO BIG THAT WHAT YOU REALLY
00:26:43LOSE IS THAT LOCAL FLAVOR.
00:26:48REPORTER: COMMISSIONER GOMEZ, KELSEY GRIFFITH WITH BLOOMBERG.
00:26:50I WANTED TO ASK, DO YOU HAVE ANY
00:26:54CONCERNS THAT THESE STATION
00:26:56GROUP OWNERS ARE GETTING SO BIG THAT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY BE
00:27:00ABLE TO BEHAVE LIKE THEIR OWN NATIONAL NETWORK AND IMPOSE SOME
00:27:03SORT OF VIEWPOINT THERE? IF IT IS ABOUT LOCALISM, AND
00:27:07WE'RE SEEING THESE COMPANIES GET LARGER, EVEN IF THEY DON'T HAVE
00:27:10THE SORT OF SEEMINGLY NATIONAL
00:27:13NETWORK BROADCAST REACH, DO YOU SEE ANY RISKS THERE?
00:27:17>> YES. AGAIN, THIS COMES BACK TO MY CONCERN ABOUT LOCALISM
00:27:21COMPETITION AND VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY. YOU LOSE VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY
00:27:24WITHOUT A DOUBT. BECAUSE WHAT YOU'RE SEEING IS
00:27:28NEWS THAT GETS REALLY CONTROLLED AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL.
00:27:31SO I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.
00:27:33AND FRANKLY, WE HAVE SEEN THIS IN THE PAST.
00:27:36WE KNOW SOME OF THESE STATION
00:27:39GROUPS FARM OUT CONTENT THAT IS
00:27:40NOT REALLY CHANGED. IT'S THE EXACT SAME THING THAT
00:27:44GETS READ IN EVERY LOCAL NEWS
00:27:49PROGRAMMING THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY. FOR THAT ONE BROADCAST STATION.
00:27:52SO WE'VE SEEN THIS HAPPEN BEFORE. AND I AM CONCERNED THAT IT WILL
00:27:55HAPPEN AGAIN.
00:27:59>> COMMISSIONER GOMEZ, WITH POLITICO. WANTED TO SHIFT GEARS A LITTLE
00:28:02BIT AND ASK ABOUT THE AFFORDABLE CONNECTIVITY PROGRAM.
00:28:06AND GIVEN IT'S BEEN A COUPLE OF YEARS SINCE WE'VE SEEN THAT
00:28:09FUNDING LAPSE AND YOU WERE
00:28:13OUTSPOKEN A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO. HOW ARE YOU THINKING ABOUT THE
00:28:15EFFECTS OF THAT LAPSE NOW TWO YEARS LATER?
00:28:18IS THAT SOMETHING WHERE YOU HAVE HEARD AND SEEN MANY EFFECTS FROM
00:28:22THAT? AND HOW ARE YOU THINKING ABOUT
00:28:25WHERE THE APPETITE MIGHT BE FOR
00:28:28BRINGING BACK ANYTHING SIMILAR? WHERE THE NEED IS FOR THAT?
00:28:30AND BEEN CURIOUS ABOUT THAT. AND A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS AROUND
00:28:33THE USF STIMULATELY INCLUDING TODAY AT THE MEETING.
00:28:37>> YEAH. I APPRECIATE YOU RAISING THAT.
00:28:39AFFORDABILITY CONTINUES TO BE --
00:28:42AFFORDABILITY FOR BROADBAND CONTINUES TO BE A SIGNIFICANT
00:28:46ISSUE OF CONCERN AS FAMILIES ARE
00:28:50FACING AFFORDABILITY CONCERNS ALL AROUND. AND WHAT YOU SEE IS PEOPLE MAKING TOUGH CHOICES.
00:28:54CAN I AFFORD TO PAY FOR FOOD?
00:28:56CAN I AFFORD TO PAY FOR MY SITTER?
00:28:59OR CAN I AFFORD TO PAY FOR BROADBAND? TO PARTICIPATE IN TODAY'S
00:29:02DIGITAL ECONOMY, YOU REALLY NEED
00:29:04A BROADBAND CONNECTION.
00:29:07SO I AM CONCERNED THAT WE'VE --
00:29:09WE ARE NOT ADDRESSING THAT SPECIFIC ISSUE IN THE ACTIONS
00:29:12THAT WE'RE TAKING. AND WE NEED TO LOOK AT THAT AND
00:29:15CONTINUE TO FIND WAYS.
00:29:18NOW, THE -- WE HAVE THE BIPARTISAN BICAMERAL WORKING
00:29:21GROUP IN CONGRESS THAT IS LOOKING AT REFORMING THE
00:29:25UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND PROGRAM.
00:29:29AND IN THE LAST CONGRESS, THERE
00:29:31WAS A PROPOSAL TO WRAP THE ACP
00:29:35INTO THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND WHICH I THINK IS AN EXCELLENT
00:29:38WAY TO HANDLE THIS ISSUE. BECAUSE WHILE WE DO HAVE THE
00:29:42LIFELINE PROGRAM, IT'S REALLY
00:29:46NOT SUFFICIENT TO -- TO ADDRESS
00:29:50ALL OF THE AFFORDABILITY NEEDS.
00:29:53IT'S ONLY $9.25 A MONTH.
00:29:55IT'S CLEARLY NOT ENOUGH TO HELP
00:29:57FAMILIES ACTUALLY CONNECT.
00:30:00AND ALSO LIMITATIONS TO THE LIFELINE PROGRAM THAT WE DID NOT
00:30:04HAVE UNDER THE ACP.
00:30:07WHICH MEANT A LOT OF PROVIDERS COULDN'T PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM ITSELF.
00:30:10SO WE WANT EVERYONE TO BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE SO THAT WE CAN
00:30:13GET MORE AND MORE FAMILIES CONNECTED.
00:30:16SO I'M HOPEFUL THAT THIS WILL SURVIVE THIS CURRENT ITERATION
00:30:19OF THE WORKING GROUP. AND THAT IT WILL BE MADE PART OF
00:30:22THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND BECAUSE THEN IT WILL BE
00:30:26SUSTAINABLE. REPORTER: THANK YOU. REPORTER: COMMISSIONER, ARIEL
00:30:29WITH MS NOW. YOU MENTIONED LOTS OF RESPONSE
00:30:33TO THE FCC'S REVIEW OF THE
00:30:34ABC -- I SAW OVER 150,000
00:30:38COMMENTS REPORTED. MAYBE THERE IS EVEN MORE AT THIS
00:30:41POINT. IS THAT -- IS THAT A LARGE -- IS
00:30:44THAT LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE FCC TO RECONSIDER ITS ACTIONS MOVING
00:30:48FORWARD? >> YEAH. I THINK IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT WE KEEP TALKING ABOUT
00:30:51OR THE FCC KEEPS TALKING ABOUT HOW IT'S TAKING THESE AXES TO
00:30:55ENSURE THE PUBLIC -- THESE ACTIONS TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC
00:30:58INTEREST. THE PUBLIC HAS SPOKEN.
00:31:00WE HAVE 20,000 COMMENTS --
00:31:04230,000 COMMENTS BETWEEN "THE VIEW" AND THE EARLY RENEWAL PROCESS.
00:31:08THESE COMMENTS ALL SAY THE SAME THING. WE VALUE OUR LOCAL NEWS.
00:31:12WE VALUE THE CONTENT THAT WE'RE WATCHING. AND WE DON'T THINK IT IS THE
00:31:16FCC'S BUSINESS TO DECIDE WHAT IS A PROPER EDITORIAL DECISION OR
00:31:20WHAT IS ACTUALLY JOURNALISM.
00:31:24SO I DO BELIEVE THAT THE FCC
00:31:28SHOULD BASICALLY STOP THIS
00:31:31ACTION THAT IT IS TAKING WHICH
00:31:33IS CLEARLY DESIGNED TO ADDRESS THE CONTENT THAT THIS
00:31:37ADMINISTRATION DOESN'T LIKE.
00:31:39IN THE DISNEY NETWORK. AND THAT I DON'T THINK IS
00:31:43APPROPRIATE UNDER THE FIRST
00:31:45AMENDMENT.
00:31:54REPORTER: CARING DIEGO FROM PUNCH BOWL.
00:31:57-- CARMEN DIEGO FROM PUNCH BOWL.
00:32:03NOT THE FIRST TIME HE CRITICIZES THE MAJORITY.
00:32:06AND ENDS UP SIDING WITH YOU. BUT WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE CHAIRMAN
00:32:10CRUZ TO DO? DO YOU THINK -- IS THERE
00:32:12ANYTHING THAT THE SENATE COMMERCE COMMITTEE AND CONGRESS
00:32:15CAN DO TO CHANGE WHAT'S GOING ON
00:32:18HERE AT THE FCC? >> I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS
00:32:21THAT ALL OF CONGRESS CAN DO IS
00:32:23EXERCISE ITS OVERSIGHT OVER THE FCC.
00:32:27WE ANSWER TO THE CONGRESS.
00:32:30AND IT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL IF
00:32:32THEY WOULD, YOU KNOW, EXERCISE
00:32:36THEIR OVERSIGHT, CALL US UP
00:32:38THERE SO WE CAN SPEAK TO THE ACTIONS THAT THIS ADMINISTRATION
00:32:42IS TAKEN AND THE FCC HAS BEEN
00:32:45TAKING.
00:32:48REPORTER: COMMUNICATIONS DAILY. >> HI, HOWARD. I HEARD YOU'RE HERE AGAIN.
00:32:51REPORTER: THANK YOU. PLEASE CALL ATTENTION TO ME.
00:32:55WE LIKE THAT.
00:32:56AND I'M NOT REALLY SURE.
00:33:00BUT HERE'S -- I WANTED TO ASK
00:33:02FIRST OF ALL ABOUT -- SO WE'VE SEEN ALL THESE ACTIONS TAKEN
00:33:07ABOUT ROUTERS AND DRONES AND I
00:33:12GUESS -- WHAT WERE YOU SAYING, ROBOTS. ROBOTICS.
00:33:15AND WHAT IS IT, POWER INVERTERS AND MAYBE ANNOUNCE SOMETHING
00:33:19HAVING TO DO WITH -- WITH -- SO
00:33:25THE CHAIRMAN IS TALKING ABOUT
00:33:26HOW THAT'S LED TO A $5 BILLION
00:33:29INCREASE IN THE US DRONE INDUSTRY.
00:33:32OR -- AND I'M TRYING TO GET THAE
00:33:36DATA ON THAT.
00:33:38BUT I'M HEARING A LOT OF CONCERNS FROM PEOPLE ABOUT HOW,
00:33:42YOU KNOW, HOW DIFFICULT IT IS AND HOW THESE ARE DECISIONS ARE
00:33:46MADE WITHOUT PROVIDING A WHOLE LOT OF DOCUMENTATION AND NOBODY
00:33:49REALLY KNOWS, YOU KNOW, WHAT THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO DO OR NOT
00:33:52SUPPOSED TO DO.
00:33:53AND I'M JUST WONDERING, WHAT --
00:33:56WHAT'S YOUR SORT OF READ ON THAT AND HOW MUCH ARE YOU HEARING
00:33:58ABOUT THAT ISSUE?
00:34:01>> SO STARTING WITH I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT FOR US TO PUSH
00:34:04BACK ON FOREIGN ADVERSARIES AND TO ENSURE OUR NATIONAL SECURITY.
00:34:08BUT WHAT I'M HEARING FROM A LOT OF AMERICAN COMPANIES AND
00:34:12INDUSTRY LEADERS IS THAT THEY'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THE HAPHAZARD
00:34:16WAY, THE CHAOTIC WAY IN WHICH WE'VE SEEN THE ROLLOUT OF
00:34:20BASICALLY PROFOUND CHANGES TO THE COVERED LIST.
00:34:23IF WE WANT TO AVOID THE APPEARANCE OF FAVORING CERTAIN
00:34:27ACTORS FROM OTHERS, WE NEED TRANSPARENCY.
00:34:31PEOPLE KNOW AND PEOPLE NEED TO
00:34:32KNOW, PEOPLE NEED CLEAR GUIDANCE
00:34:36AS TO WHICH COMPANIES WE'RE
00:34:38TARGETING AND SOMEHOW THEY CAN COME INTO COMPLIANCE.
00:34:41OTHERWISE, WITH THIS ACTUALLY
00:34:43LOOKS LIKE IS JUST INDUSTRIAL POLICY.
00:34:46REPORTER: AND ALSO WANTED TO ASK
00:34:49YOU, YOUR FORCES -- FORCED TO
00:34:53DEAL WITH THESE MEDIA ISSUES A LOT AND TALKING A LOT ABOUT
00:34:56THAT. BUT ONE OF THE OTHER AREAS I THINK THAT YOU'VE BEEN CONCERNED
00:35:00ABOUT IS MERGER APPROVALS IN --
00:35:03THE MERGER POLICY. AND THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF --
00:35:06THERE'S BEEN SOME REPORTING, YOU
00:35:08KNOW, NATIONAL PUBLICATIONS LATELY, THAT IT'S JUST SEEMS --
00:35:11LIKE A LOT OF COMPANIES ARE SORT OF LINING UP TO GET IN DURING
00:35:14THIS ADMINISTRATION BECAUSE THEY FEEL LIKE IT'S EASIER TO GET DEALS THROUGH.
00:35:18ARE YOU SEEING THAT AT THE FCC?
00:35:21AND SO SORT OF WHAT'S YOUR -- HOW DO YOU THINK THAT'S GOING RIGHT NOW?
00:35:25WHAT'S YOUR TAKE ON THAT? YOU'RE NOT BEING ASKED TO VOTE
00:35:28ON A LOT OF THESE DEALS. >> FOR ME, THE BIGGER ISSUE HAS
00:35:31BEEN HOW LITTLE I'VE BEEN ABLE TO VOTE ON THESE TRANSACTIONS.
00:35:35I THINK THAT THIS COMMISSION HAS
00:35:38STRETCHED THE LEGALITY OF DELEGATED AUTHORITY TO ITS
00:35:42LIMIT. AND THERE HAVE BEEN A LOT OF TRANSACTIONS THAT I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE VOTED ON.
00:35:46AS A COMMISSIONER.
00:35:48YOU KNOW, BASED ON TODAY'S
00:35:51LIFTING OF THE 39% CAP, IT'S AN INVITATION TO BRING IN A LOT OF
00:35:55TRANSACTIONS WHICH APPARENTLY ARE GOING TO BE CONSIDERED ON A
00:35:58CASE BY CASE BASIS AND I'M VERY CURIOUS TO SEE EXACTLY WHAT IT
00:36:01IS ARE GOING TO BE THE -- THE --
00:36:07IS GOING TO BE THE TEST FOR SERVING THE PUBLIC INTEREST OF A
00:36:11PARTICULAR MERGER. I HAVE A SUSPICION THAT IT MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING IS TO DO WITH THE
00:36:14PARTICULAR PARTIES THAT ARE MERGING. BASED ON ALL OF THE ACTIONS THAT
00:36:19THIS ADMINISTRATION HAS TAKEN IN THE MEDIA CONTEXT.
00:36:23REPORTER: THANK YOU. REPORTER: COMMISSIONER, TED
00:36:26JOHNSON, FROM DEADLINE.
00:36:30THE LIFTING -- THE REPEAL OF THE
00:36:3339% CAP LIKELY WILL BE
00:36:35CHALLENGED IN COURT.
00:36:38THE AGENCY'S POSITION SEEMS TO
00:36:40BE THAT THEY ARE ON SOLID
00:36:44FOOTING.
00:36:44THEY CLAIM THAT THE CONGRESS'
00:36:492004 ACTION WAS MERELY TO MODIFY
00:36:52ITS RULES. WAS A DIRECTIVE TO MODIFY ITS
00:36:56RULES. THEY ALSO CITE A IT WOULD TWO
00:36:59APPELLATE COURT -- A 2002
00:37:04APPELLATE COURT DECISION. I WAS WONDERING WHAT IS YOUR
00:37:06IMPRESSION OF THAT?
00:37:08ARE -- DO YOU THINK THAT IS A
00:37:10SOLID LEGAL ARGUMENT FOR THEM TO
00:37:13MAKE JUST GIVEN THOSE TWO POINTS? >> I CLEARLY DISAGREE WITH THE
00:37:17MAJORITY'S DECISION ON THIS.
00:37:20CONGRESS MADE IT ABUNDANTLY
00:37:21CLEAR IN THE 2004 LAW THAT IT
00:37:26WAS NOT ONLY SETTING THE CAP, BUT THAT WE WERE NOT PERMITTED TO CHANGE THAT CAP.
00:37:30AND IT DID SO IN A NUMBER OF WAYS.
00:37:33FIRST OF ALL, IT REMOVED THE CAP FROM OUR -- THEN BY ANY REVIEW
00:37:37WHICH BECAME THE QUADRENNIAL REVIEW. AND SAID YOU'RE NOT GOING TO
00:37:41MAKE A DECISION ON WHETHER THAT
00:37:44PARTICULAR CAP SHOULD BE --
00:37:46SHOULD BE CHANGED OR LIFTED BECAUSE OF CHANGED
00:37:50CIRCUMSTANCES. WHICH IS HOW WE LOOK AT THE
00:37:51OTHER THINGS.
00:37:54IT ALSO FORBADE US FROM
00:37:56FORBEARING FROM ENFORCING THE CAP. I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW CONGRESS
00:37:59CAN TELL US YOU CAN'T ENFORCE
00:38:01THE CAP BUT WE CAN ALSO SAY WE CAN WAIVE THE CAP?
00:38:05A WAIVER IS ESSENTIALLY FOR --
00:38:09FOREBEARING FROM ENFORCING A CAP BUT ELIMINATING IT ALTOGETHER.
00:38:13SO THERE'S THAT.
00:38:16IT -- I'M TRYING TO THINK WHAT
00:38:18ELSE -- THERE'S NUMEROUS THINGS THAT IT SAID.
00:38:22OH, IT REQUIRES COMPANIES THAT
00:38:24GO OVER THE CAP TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE CAP WITHIN
00:38:28TWO YEARS. AND THAT'S STILL IN THE LAW.
00:38:32SO TO ME, THE LAW IS PRETTY
00:38:34CLEAR THAT CONGRESS DID NOT --
00:38:37DID NOT FORESEE US ACTING AS WE
00:38:41DID PRE-2004 AND AS THE DC
00:38:44CIRCUIT ON WHICH THIS COMMISSION
00:38:46RELIES, FOUND THAT IN FACT WE
00:38:49COULD HAVE WAIVED THE CAP PREVIOUSLY OR LIFTED THE CAP OR
00:38:52SET A HIGHER CAP PREVIOUSLY.
00:38:56IT CHANGED IN 2004.
00:39:00REPORTER: INTERESTED TO FOLLOW UP. I'VE HEARD THE ARGUMENT AS WELL
00:39:03THAT THEY GET RID OF THE CAP.
00:39:06YOU STILL HAVE ANTITRUST LAW
00:39:08THAT CAN BE KIND OF A BACKSTOP.
00:39:11AND I GUESS, YOU KNOW, YOU COULD SAY WE'RE SEEING THAT WITH NEXSTAR.
00:39:15THE FCC APPROVED THAT DEAL.
00:39:18THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ALSO DID. BUT YOU HAVE STATE ATTORNEY
00:39:22GENERAL THAT STEPPED IN. AND A JUDGE SEEMS TO BE SIDING WITH THE STATE.
00:39:26WHAT ABOUT THAT ARGUMENT THAT
00:39:28ANTITRUST LAW CAN KIND OF FILL
00:39:31IN WITH THE ABSENCE OF THE CAP?
00:39:33>> YOU KNOW, ANTITRUST LAW IS VERY IMPORTANT.
00:39:36AND I DO THINK THAT -- IT
00:39:38APPLIES IN THE CONTEXT OF
00:39:41NEXSTAR-TEGNA.
00:39:44BUT THIS POLICY CHOICE OF PROTECTING LOCALISM AND
00:39:46VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY IS NOT ADDRESSED. COMPETITION IS.
00:39:50BUT LOCALISM AND VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY IS NOT ADDRESSED BY ANTITRUST LAW.
00:39:54AND THAT IS STILL FUNDAMENTAL TO THE SERVICES THAT COMMUNITIES
00:39:58RELY ON WHEN IT COMES TO THEIR BROADCASTERS.
00:40:02>> THANK YOU. >> GOT NOTHING? YEAH.
00:40:05THANK YOU.
00:40:13[CAPTIONS COPYRIGHT NATIONAL CABLE SATELLITE CORP. 2026]
00:40:17[CAPTIONING PERFORMED BY THE
00:40:18NA
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.