CSPAN — The Hearing Room Stakeholders Testify on Social Security Solvency

20260808 21:41 UTC · 01:52:00 · 1886 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Stakeholders representing AARP and the National Academy of Social Insurance are among the witnesses who testified on Social Security solvency before the Senate Finance Committee. The committee and panel of witnesses discussed the best process for Congress to address Social Security funding before it is unable to pay out full benefits.<br /><br />Sponsor: Senate Finance Committee

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 1681 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56
00:31:00
00:31:04
00:31:08
00:31:12
00:31:16
00:31:20
00:31:24
00:31:28
00:31:32
00:31:36
00:31:40
00:31:44
00:31:48
00:31:52
00:31:56
00:32:00
00:32:04
00:32:08
00:32:12
00:32:16
00:32:20
00:32:24
00:32:28
00:32:32
00:32:36
00:32:40
00:32:44
00:32:48
00:32:52
00:32:56
00:33:00
00:33:04
00:33:08
00:33:12
00:33:16
00:33:20
00:33:24
00:33:28
00:33:32
00:33:36
00:33:40
00:33:44
00:33:48
00:33:52
00:33:56
00:34:00
00:34:04
00:34:08
00:34:12
00:34:16
00:34:20
00:34:24
00:34:28
00:34:32
00:34:36
00:34:40
00:34:44
00:34:48
00:34:52
00:34:56
00:35:00
00:35:04
00:35:08
00:35:12
00:35:16
00:35:20
00:35:24
00:35:28
00:35:32
00:35:36
00:35:40
00:35:44
00:35:48
00:35:52
00:35:56
00:36:00
00:36:04
00:36:08
00:36:12
00:36:16
00:36:20
00:36:24
00:36:28
00:36:32
00:36:36
00:36:40
00:36:44
00:36:48
00:36:52
00:36:56
00:37:00
00:37:04
00:37:08
00:37:12
00:37:16
00:37:20
00:37:24
00:37:28
00:37:32
00:37:36
00:37:40
00:37:44
00:37:48
00:37:52
00:37:56
00:38:00
00:38:04
00:38:08
00:38:12
00:38:16
00:38:20
00:38:24
00:38:28
00:38:32
00:38:36
00:38:40
00:38:44
00:38:48
00:38:52
00:38:56
00:39:00
00:39:04
00:39:08
00:39:12
00:39:16
00:39:20
00:39:24
00:39:28
00:39:32
00:39:36
00:39:40
00:39:44
00:39:48
00:39:52
00:39:56
00:40:00
00:40:04
00:40:08
00:40:12
00:40:16
00:40:20
00:40:24
00:40:28
00:40:32
00:40:36
00:40:40
00:40:44
00:40:48
00:40:52
00:40:56
00:41:00
00:41:04
00:41:08
00:41:12
00:41:16
00:41:20
00:41:24
00:41:28
00:41:32
00:41:36
00:41:40
00:41:44
00:41:48
00:41:52
00:41:56
00:42:00
00:42:04
00:42:08
00:42:12
00:42:16
00:42:20
00:42:24
00:42:28
00:42:32
00:42:36
00:42:40
00:42:44
00:42:48
00:42:52
00:42:56
00:43:00
00:43:04
00:43:08
00:43:12
00:43:16
00:43:20
00:43:24
00:43:28
00:43:32
00:43:36
00:43:40
00:43:44
00:43:48
00:43:52
00:43:56
00:44:00
00:44:04
00:44:08
00:44:12
00:44:16
00:44:20
00:44:24
00:44:28
00:44:32
00:44:36
00:44:40
00:44:44
00:44:48
00:44:52
00:44:56
00:45:00
00:45:04
00:45:08
00:45:12
00:45:16
00:45:20
00:45:24
00:45:28
00:45:32
00:45:36
00:45:40
00:45:44
00:45:48
00:45:52
00:45:56
00:46:00
00:46:04
00:46:08
00:46:12
00:46:16
00:46:20
00:46:24
00:46:28
00:46:32
00:46:36
00:46:40
00:46:44
00:46:48
00:46:52
00:46:56
00:47:00
00:47:04
00:47:08
00:47:12
00:47:16
00:47:20
00:47:24
00:47:28
00:47:32
00:47:36
00:47:40
00:47:44
00:47:48
00:47:52
00:47:56
00:48:00
00:48:04
00:48:08
00:48:12
00:48:16
00:48:20
00:48:24
00:48:28
00:48:32
00:48:36
00:48:40
00:48:44
00:48:48
00:48:52
00:48:56
00:49:00
00:49:04
00:49:08
00:49:12
00:49:16
00:49:20
00:49:24
00:49:28
00:49:32
00:49:36
00:49:40
00:49:44
00:49:48
00:49:52
00:49:56
00:50:00
00:50:04
00:50:08
00:50:12
00:50:16
00:50:20
00:50:24
00:50:28
00:50:32
00:50:36
00:50:40
00:50:44
00:50:48
00:50:52
00:50:56
00:51:00
00:51:04
00:51:08
00:51:12
00:51:16
00:51:20
00:51:24
00:51:28
00:51:32
00:51:36
00:51:40
00:51:44
00:51:48
00:51:52
00:51:56
00:52:00
00:52:04
00:52:08
00:52:12
00:52:16
00:52:20
00:52:24
00:52:28
00:52:32
00:52:36
00:52:40
00:52:44
00:52:48
00:52:52
00:52:56
00:53:00
00:53:04
00:53:08
00:53:12
00:53:16
00:53:20
00:53:24
00:53:28
00:53:32
00:53:36
00:53:40
00:53:44
00:53:48
00:53:52
00:53:56
00:54:00
00:54:04
00:54:08
00:54:12
00:54:16
00:54:20
00:54:24
00:54:28
00:54:32
00:54:36
00:54:40
00:54:44
00:54:48
00:54:52
00:54:56
00:55:00
00:55:04
00:55:08
00:55:12
00:55:16
00:55:20
00:55:24
00:55:28
00:55:32
00:55:36
00:55:40
00:55:44
00:55:48
00:55:52
00:55:56
00:56:00
00:56:04
00:56:08
00:56:12
00:56:16
00:56:20
00:56:24
00:56:28
00:56:32
00:56:36
00:56:40
00:56:44
00:56:48
00:56:52
00:56:56
00:57:00
00:57:04
00:57:08
00:57:12
00:57:16
00:57:20
00:57:24
00:57:28
00:57:32
00:57:36
00:57:40
00:57:44
00:57:48
00:57:52
00:57:56
00:58:00
00:58:04
00:58:08
00:58:12
00:58:16
00:58:20
00:58:24
00:58:28
00:58:32
00:58:36
00:58:40
00:58:44
00:58:48
00:58:52
00:58:56
00:59:00
00:59:04
00:59:08
00:59:12
00:59:16
00:59:20
00:59:24
00:59:28
00:59:32
00:59:36
00:59:40
00:59:44
00:59:48
00:59:52
00:59:56
01:00:00
01:00:04
01:00:08
01:00:12
01:00:16
01:00:20
01:00:24
01:00:28
01:00:32
01:00:36
01:00:40
01:00:44
01:00:48
01:00:52
01:00:56
01:01:00
01:01:04
01:01:08
01:01:12
01:01:16
01:01:20
01:01:24
01:01:28
01:01:32
01:01:36
01:01:40
01:01:44
01:01:48
01:01:52
01:01:56
01:02:00
01:02:04
01:02:08
01:02:12
01:02:16
01:02:20
01:02:24
01:02:28
01:02:32
01:02:36
01:02:40
01:02:44
01:02:48
01:02:52
01:02:56
01:03:00
01:03:04
01:03:08
01:03:12
01:03:16
01:03:20
01:03:24
01:03:28
01:03:32
01:03:36
01:03:40
01:03:44
01:03:48
01:03:52
01:03:56
01:04:00
01:04:04
01:04:08
01:04:12
01:04:16
01:04:20
01:04:24
01:04:28
01:04:32
01:04:36
01:04:40
01:04:44
01:04:48
01:04:52
01:04:56
01:05:00
01:05:04
01:05:08
01:05:12
01:05:16
01:05:20
01:05:24
01:05:28
01:05:32
01:05:36
01:05:40
01:05:44
01:05:48
01:05:52
01:05:56
01:06:00
01:06:04
01:06:08
01:06:12
01:06:16
01:06:20
01:06:24
01:06:28
01:06:32
01:06:36
01:06:40
01:06:44
01:06:48
01:06:52
01:06:56
01:07:00
01:07:04
01:07:08
01:07:12
01:07:16
01:07:20
01:07:24
01:07:28
01:07:32
01:07:36
01:07:40
01:07:44
01:07:48
01:07:52
01:07:56
01:08:00
01:08:04
01:08:08
01:08:12
01:08:16
01:08:20
01:08:24
01:08:28
01:08:32
01:08:36
01:08:40
01:08:44
01:08:48
01:08:52
01:08:56
01:09:00
01:09:04
01:09:08
01:09:12
01:09:16
01:09:20
01:09:24
01:09:28
01:09:32
01:09:36
01:09:40
01:09:44
01:09:48
01:09:52
01:09:56
01:10:00
01:10:04
01:10:08
01:10:12
01:10:16
01:10:20
01:10:24
01:10:28
01:10:32
01:10:36
01:10:40
01:10:44
01:10:48
01:10:52
01:10:56
01:11:00
01:11:04
01:11:08
01:11:12
01:11:16
01:11:20
01:11:24
01:11:28
01:11:32
01:11:36
01:11:40
01:11:44
01:11:48
01:11:52
01:11:56
01:12:00
01:12:04
01:12:08
01:12:12
01:12:16
01:12:20
01:12:24
01:12:28
01:12:32
01:12:36
01:12:40
01:12:44
01:12:48
01:12:52
01:12:56
01:13:00
01:13:04
01:13:08
01:13:12
01:13:16
01:13:20
01:13:24
01:13:28
01:13:32
01:13:36
01:13:40
01:13:44
01:13:48
01:13:52
01:13:56
01:14:00
01:14:04
01:14:08
01:14:12
01:14:16
01:14:20
01:14:24
01:14:28
01:14:32
01:14:36
01:14:40
01:14:44
01:14:48
01:14:52
01:14:56
01:15:00
01:15:04
01:15:08
01:15:12
01:15:16
01:15:20
01:15:24
01:15:28
01:15:32
01:15:36
01:15:40
01:15:44
01:15:48
01:15:52
01:15:56
01:16:00
01:16:04
01:16:08
01:16:12
01:16:16
01:16:20
01:16:24
01:16:28
01:16:32
01:16:36
01:16:40
01:16:44
01:16:48
01:16:52
01:16:56
01:17:00
01:17:04
01:17:08
01:17:12
01:17:16
01:17:20
01:17:24
01:17:28
01:17:32
01:17:36
01:17:40
01:17:44
01:17:48
01:17:52
01:17:56
01:18:00
01:18:04
01:18:08
01:18:12
01:18:16
01:18:20
01:18:24
01:18:28
01:18:32
01:18:36
01:18:40
01:18:44
01:18:48
01:18:52
01:18:56
01:19:00
01:19:04
01:19:08
01:19:12
01:19:16
01:19:20
01:19:24
01:19:28
01:19:32
01:19:36
01:19:40
01:19:44
01:19:48
01:19:52
01:19:56
01:20:00
01:20:04
01:20:08
01:20:12
01:20:16
01:20:20
01:20:24
01:20:28
01:20:32
01:20:36
01:20:40
01:20:44
01:20:48
01:20:52
01:20:56
01:21:00
01:21:04
01:21:08
01:21:12
01:21:16
01:21:20
01:21:24
01:21:28
01:21:32
01:21:36
01:21:40
01:21:44
01:21:48
01:21:52
01:21:56
01:22:00
01:22:04
01:22:08
01:22:12
01:22:16
01:22:20
01:22:24
01:22:28
01:22:32
01:22:36
01:22:40
01:22:44
01:22:48
01:22:52
01:22:56
01:23:00
01:23:04
01:23:08
01:23:12
01:23:16
01:23:20
01:23:24
01:23:28
01:23:32
01:23:36
01:23:40
01:23:44
01:23:48
01:23:52
01:23:56
01:24:00
01:24:04
01:24:08
01:24:12
01:24:16
01:24:20
01:24:24
01:24:28
01:24:32
01:24:36
01:24:40
01:24:44
01:24:48
01:24:52
01:24:56
01:25:00
01:25:04
01:25:08
01:25:12
01:25:16
01:25:20
01:25:24
01:25:28
01:25:32
01:25:36
01:25:40
01:25:44
01:25:48
01:25:52
01:25:56
01:26:00
01:26:04
01:26:08
01:26:12
01:26:16
01:26:20
01:26:24
01:26:28
01:26:32
01:26:36
01:26:40
01:26:44
01:26:48
01:26:52
01:26:56
01:27:00
01:27:04
01:27:08
01:27:12
01:27:16
01:27:20
01:27:24
01:27:28
01:27:32
01:27:36
01:27:40
01:27:44
01:27:48
01:27:52
01:27:56
01:28:00
01:28:04
01:28:08
01:28:12
01:28:16
01:28:20
01:28:24
01:28:28
01:28:32
01:28:36
01:28:40
01:28:44
01:28:48
01:28:52
01:28:56
01:29:00
01:29:04
01:29:08
01:29:12
01:29:16
01:29:20
01:29:24
01:29:28
01:29:32
01:29:36
01:29:40
01:29:44
01:29:48
01:29:52
01:29:56
01:30:00
01:30:04
01:30:08
01:30:12
01:30:16
01:30:20
01:30:24
01:30:28
01:30:32
01:30:36
01:30:40
01:30:44
01:30:48
01:30:52
01:30:56
01:31:00
01:31:04
01:31:08
01:31:12
01:31:16
01:31:20
01:31:24
01:31:28
01:31:32
01:31:36
01:31:40
01:31:44
01:31:48
01:31:52
01:31:56
01:32:00
01:32:04
01:32:08
01:32:12
01:32:16
01:32:20
01:32:24
01:32:28
01:32:32
01:32:36
01:32:40
01:32:44
01:32:48
01:32:52
01:32:56
01:33:00
01:33:04
01:33:08
01:33:12
01:33:16
01:33:20
01:33:24
01:33:28
01:33:32
01:33:36
01:33:40
01:33:44
01:33:48
01:33:52
01:33:56
01:34:00
01:34:04
01:34:08
01:34:12
01:34:16
01:34:20
01:34:24
01:34:28
01:34:32
01:34:36
01:34:40
01:34:44
01:34:48
01:34:52
01:34:56
01:35:00
01:35:04
01:35:08
01:35:12
01:35:16
01:35:20
01:35:24
01:35:28
01:35:32
01:35:36
01:35:40
01:35:44
01:35:48
01:35:52
01:35:56
01:36:00
01:36:04
01:36:08
01:36:12
01:36:16
01:36:20
01:36:24
01:36:28
01:36:32
01:36:36
01:36:40
01:36:44
01:36:48
01:36:52
01:36:56
01:37:00
01:37:04
01:37:08
01:37:12
01:37:16
01:37:20
01:37:24
01:37:28
01:37:32
01:37:36
01:37:40
01:37:44
01:37:48
01:37:52
01:37:56
01:38:00
01:38:04
01:38:08
01:38:12
01:38:16
01:38:20
01:38:24
01:38:28
01:38:32
01:38:36
01:38:40
01:38:44
01:38:48
01:38:52
01:38:56
01:39:00
01:39:04
01:39:08
01:39:12
01:39:16
01:39:20
01:39:24
01:39:28
01:39:32
01:39:36
01:39:40
01:39:44
01:39:48
01:39:52
01:39:56
01:40:00
01:40:04
01:40:08
01:40:12
01:40:16
01:40:20
01:40:24
01:40:28
01:40:32
01:40:36
01:40:40
01:40:44
01:40:48
01:40:52
01:40:56
01:41:00
01:41:04
01:41:08
01:41:12
01:41:16
01:41:20
01:41:24
01:41:28
01:41:32
01:41:36
01:41:40
01:41:44
01:41:48
01:41:52
01:41:56
01:42:00
01:42:04
01:42:08
01:42:12
01:42:16
01:42:20
01:42:24
01:42:28
01:42:32
01:42:36
01:42:40
01:42:44
01:42:48
01:42:52
01:42:56
01:43:00
01:43:04
01:43:08
01:43:12
01:43:16
01:43:20
01:43:24
01:43:28
01:43:32
01:43:36
01:43:40
01:43:44
01:43:48
01:43:52
01:43:56
01:44:00
01:44:04
01:44:08
01:44:12
01:44:16
01:44:20
01:44:24
01:44:28
01:44:32
01:44:36
01:44:40
01:44:44
01:44:48
01:44:52
01:44:56
01:45:00
01:45:04
01:45:08
01:45:12
01:45:16
01:45:20
01:45:24
01:45:28
01:45:32
01:45:36
01:45:40
01:45:44
01:45:48
01:45:52
01:45:56
01:46:00
01:46:04
01:46:08
01:46:12
01:46:16
01:46:20
01:46:24
01:46:28
01:46:32
01:46:36
01:46:40
01:46:44
01:46:48
01:46:52
01:46:56
01:47:00
01:47:04
01:47:08
01:47:12
01:47:16
01:47:20
01:47:24
01:47:28
01:47:32
01:47:36
01:47:40
01:47:44
01:47:48
01:47:52
01:47:56
01:48:00
01:48:04
01:48:08
01:48:12
01:48:16
01:48:20
01:48:24
01:48:28
01:48:32
01:48:36
01:48:40
01:48:44
01:48:48
01:48:52
01:48:56
01:49:00
01:49:04
01:49:08
01:49:12
01:49:16
01:49:20
01:49:24
01:49:28
01:49:32
01:49:36
01:49:40
01:49:44
01:49:48
01:49:52
01:49:56
01:50:00
01:50:04
01:50:08
01:50:12
01:50:16
01:50:20
01:50:24
01:50:28
01:50:32
01:50:36
01:50:40
01:50:44
01:50:48
01:50:52
01:50:56
01:51:00
01:51:04
01:51:08
01:51:12
01:51:16
01:51:20
01:51:24
01:51:28
01:51:32
01:51:36
01:51:40
01:51:44
01:51:48
01:51:52
01:51:56
01:52:00

Transcript

Original Broadcaster Captioning (Enhanced). Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:00WATCH THE HOUSE LIVE ON C-SPAN,
00:00:02THE SENATE ON C-SPAN2 AND ALL OF
00:00:05OUR PROGRAMMING CAN BE FOUND
00:00:07ONLINE AT C-SPAN.ORG OR WITH THE
00:00:09FREE C-SPAN NOW VIDEO APP.
00:00:15>> GET C-SPAN WHEREVER YOU ARE
00:00:17WITH C-SPAN NOW, OUR FREE MOBILE VIDEO APP THAT PUTS YOU AT THE
00:00:21CENTER OF DEMOCRACY. LIVE AND ON DEMAND.
00:00:25KEEP UP WITH THE DAY'S BIGGEST EVENTS WITH LIVE STREAMS OF
00:00:29COURT PROCEEDINGS AND HEARINGS FROM THE U.S. CONGRESS, WHITE
00:00:31HOUSE EVENTS, THE COURTS, CAMPAIGNS AND MORE FROM THE
00:00:35WORLD OF POLITICS, ALL AT YOUR FINGERTIPS.
00:00:38CATCH THE LATEST EPISODES OF "WASHINGTON JOURNAL," FIND SCHEDULING INFORMATION FOR
00:00:42C-SPAN'S TV AND RADIO NETWORKS,
00:00:44PLUS A VARIETY OF COMPELLING BROADCASTS.
00:00:47THE C-SPAN NOW APP IS AVAILABLE AT THE APPLE STORE AND GOOGLE PLAY.
00:00:50DOWNLOAD IT FOR FREE TODAY.
00:00:53C-SPAN, DEMOCRACY UNFILTERED.
00:00:58>> NOW, REPRESENTATIVES FROM
00:01:03AARP, THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SOCIAL INSURANCE AND OTHERS
00:01:07TESTIFY ON SOCIAL SECURITY
00:01:10SOLVENCY BEFORE THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE TO TALK ABOUT
00:01:14HOW CONGRESS SHOULD ADDRESS SOCIAL SECURITY FUNDING BEFORE IT'S INSOLVENT.
00:01:17THIS IS AN HOUR AND 50 MINUTES
00:01:48>> FOR MANY AMERICANS, SOCIAL SECURITY IS THE CORNERSTONE OF
00:01:51RETIREMENT SECURITY AND PROVIDES VITAL SUPPORT TO WORKERS WHO CAN
00:01:55NO LONGER PROVIDE A LIVING DUE
00:01:58TO INJURY OR ILLNESS.
00:02:00THE SOCIAL SECURITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES HAS RECOMMENDED THAT
00:02:04CONGRESS ACT QUICKLY TO ADDRESS THE PROGRAM'S LONG-TERM FINANCIAL CHALLENGES.
00:02:07ACCORDING TO THE TRUSTEES'
00:02:10LATEST PROJECTIONS, THE OLD AGE
00:02:13AND SURVIVORS INSURANCE TRUST FUNDS WILL BE EXHAUSTED IN LATE
00:02:172032. IF CONGRESS FAILS TO ACT BEFORE
00:02:21THEN, INCOMING PROGRAM RUIZ WILL
00:02:22BE SUFFICIENT TO PAY ONLY 78% OF
00:02:26THE PROMISED BENEFITS. CONGRESS HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT AND STRENGTHEN SOCIAL
00:02:30SECURITY FOR CURRENT
00:02:32BENEFICIARIES AND FUTURE GENERATIONS.
00:02:35THE LONGER WE WAIT, THE MORE DIFFICULT THIS CHALLENGE WILL BECOME.
00:02:39THE LAST COMPREHENSIVE EFFORT TO
00:02:42IMPROVE SOCIAL SECURITY SOLVENCY TOOK PLACE OVER 40 YEARS AGO AND
00:02:45CULMINATED IN THE SOCIAL
00:02:47SECURITY AMENDMENTS OF 1983.
00:02:50THOSE REFORMS WERE PRECEDED BY
00:02:55HIGH-LEVEL BIPARTISAN NEGOTIATIONS, INFORMED AND FACILITATED BY THE WORK OF THE
00:02:59NATIONAL COMMISSION ON SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM, WHAT WAS KNOWN
00:03:03AS THE GREENSPAN COMMISSION.
00:03:06THAT PROCESS DEMONSTRATED THE
00:03:08VALUE OF CREATING A FORUM WHERE POLICYMAKERS COULD WORK THROUGH
00:03:12DIFFICULT ISSUES AND BUILD
00:03:13CONSENSUS ON A BIPARTISAN BASIS.
00:03:17MORE THAN TWO DECADES LATER, I PARTICIPATED IN ANOTHER
00:03:20BIPARTISAN EFFORT TO DEVELOP
00:03:23RECOMMENDATIONS, TO ADDRESS OUR NATION'S LONG-TERM FISCAL
00:03:27CHALLENGES. ALONG WITH SENATOR DICK DURBIN,
00:03:30THE DEMOCRATIC CO-AUTHOR OF ONE OF THE PROCESS BILLS THAT WILL
00:03:34BE DISCUSSED TODAY. AS A PART OF ITS WORK, THE
00:03:37NATIONAL COMMISSION ON FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND REFORM, OFTEN
00:03:41REFORMED TO AS THE SIMPSON
00:03:45COMMISSION, DEVELOPED A BIPARTISAN SOCIAL SECURITY SOLVENCY PLAN.
00:03:48WHILE THE COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS ULTIMATELY DID
00:03:52NOT RECEIVE SUPPORT NECESSARY TO
00:03:54MOVE FORWARD, ITS WORK HAS
00:03:58INFORMED SUBSEQUENT SOCIAL SECURITY SOLVENCY DISCUSSIONS.
00:04:02AS SOCIAL SECURITY APPROACHES A
00:04:05PIVOTAL MOMENT, MEMBERS OF CONGRESS HAVE PROPOSED A VARIETY
00:04:07OF PROCESS REFORMS DESIGNED TO FACILITATE BIPARTISAN
00:04:10DISCUSSIONS AND HELP DEVELOP LASTING SOLUTIONS AND THAT'S
00:04:14PART OF THE REASON WE ARE HERE TODAY. TODAY'S HEARING WILL EXAMINE
00:04:18THOSE APPROACHES AND CONSIDER
00:04:20WHAT LESSONS CAN BE DRAWN FROM PAST EFFORTS.
00:04:23BEFORE I TURN TO RANKING MEMBER
00:04:25WIDEN, I'M GOING TO BRIEFLY LAY OUT HOW THE REST OF THE HEARING
00:04:29WILL PROCEED. AFTER RANKING MEMBER WIDEN GIVES
00:04:32HIS OPENING REMARKS, GENERALLY WE GO IMMEDIATELY TO THE
00:04:35WITNESSES BUT TODAY WE'LL LET OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE,
00:04:38IF THEY CHOOSE, TO HAVE A FIVE-MINUTE OPENING STATEMENT.
00:04:42SOME OF THESE MEMBERS WILL I'M SURE USE THIS FIVE MINUTES TO
00:04:46TALK ABOUT THEIR IDEAS.
00:04:50ONCE MEMBERS CONCLUDE THESE
00:04:52OPENING STATEMENTS, WE WILL TURN TO OUR WITNESSES FOR THEIR
00:04:55OPENING REMARKS AND PROCEED TO MEMBER QUESTIONS.
00:04:58I WANT TO THANK OUR WITNESSES FOR BEING HERE TODAY AND I LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR TESTIMONY.
00:05:02NOW I TURN TO RANKING MEMBER WIDEN FOR HIS OPENING REMARKS.
00:05:06>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, PLANTAR FASCITIS -- MR. CHAIRMAN.
00:05:10I SHARE YOUR VIEW THAT WE HAVE
00:05:14AN EXCELLENT PANEL OF WITNESSES AND A GOOD START TO THIS ISSUE.
00:05:17WE'RE GOING TO BE DISCUSSING THE
00:05:20FUTURE OF SOCIAL SECURITY, AS
00:05:25SACRED AN ISSUE AS THERE IS IN AMERICA.
00:05:27THE TRUST FUND IS GOING TO BE DEPLETED BEFORE THE END OF THE
00:05:31NEXT PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION. SEVERAL REPUBLICAN MEMBERS OF
00:05:35THE PANEL WILL SAY THAT THEY
00:05:38HAVE A SOLUTION, SOME SORT OF
00:05:42UNACCOUNTABLE COMMISSION THAT
00:05:44RUBBER STAMPS BENEFIT CUTS LIKE INCREASING THE RETIREMENT AGE.
00:05:48IT SEEMS THAT EVERY TIME SOME REPUBLICANS GET THEIR HANDS ON
00:05:51THESE SORT OF IDEAS FOR SOCIAL
00:05:54SECURITY, LIFE GETS WORSE FOR
00:05:56OLDER PEOPLE THAT COUNT ON THE
00:05:58PROGRAM TO GET BY.
00:06:01NOW, THANKS TO DONALD TRUMP AND THE BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL, THE
00:06:05CRISIS IS SPEEDING UP. SENATORS ELECTED THIS FALL WILL
00:06:09BE IN OFFICE WHEN SOCIAL
00:06:10SECURITY BECOMES INSOLVENT AND
00:06:13REPUBLICANS STARTED THIS FIRE AND NOW THEY'RE CLAIMING THEY'RE
00:06:16THE ONES THAT CAN PUT IT OUT.
00:06:20THE CONSEQUENCES OF INSOLVENCY ARE SEVERE.
00:06:24AMERICANS WHO PAID INTO SOCIAL SECURITY OUT OF EVERY PAYCHECK
00:06:27DURING THEIR WORKING YEARS WOULD
00:06:28NO LONGER RECEIVE FULL BENEFIT.
00:06:31ONE IN FOUR SENIORS RELY ON THEIR EARNED SOCIAL SECURITY
00:06:35BENEFITS FOR VIRTUALLY ALL OF THEIR INCOME.
00:06:39THAT NUMBER IS EVEN HIGHER FOR PEOPLE RECEIVING DISABILITY
00:06:43BENEFITS OR KIDS WHO LOST A
00:06:46PARENT.
00:06:49TRUMP AND THE MAGA CROWD GIVE
00:06:50HUGE TAX BREAKS TO BILLIONAIRES
00:06:53AND MASSIVE CORPORATIONS AND
00:06:56THAT BILL PLUNDERED SOCIAL
00:06:59SECURITY BY $168 BILLION.
00:07:02YOU DON'T HAVE TO TAKE MY WORD FOR IT.
00:07:05THE NUMBER COMES FROM THE SOCIAL
00:07:08SECURITY ACTUARY OFFICE ITSELF.
00:07:10SO HERE'S MY BOTTOM LINE.
00:07:13I WANT TO WORK ON A BIPARTISAN
00:07:15BASIS TO FIX THE PROBLEM AND
00:07:17PROTECT TYPICAL RETIREES FROM
00:07:20MISSING OUT ON THEIR EARNED BENEFITS IN A LITTLE MORE THAN SIX YEARS.
00:07:24THAT CAN BE DONE BY UPDATING SOCIAL SECURITY TO REFLECT THE
00:07:28ECONOMY OF TODAY AND ASK BILLIONAIRES TO PAY THEIR FAIR
00:07:32SHARE THROUGH THE PAYROLL AND
00:07:36INCOME TAXES.
00:07:38THAT SAID, SO I WISH THAT THE FINANCE COMMITTEE WAS HERE TO
00:07:42MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE A
00:07:46SUBSTANTIVE DEBATE. INSTEAD, THE CONCEPT BEING
00:07:49DISCUSSED TODAY WOULD ACT AS A SHORTCUT FOR REPUBLICANS TO
00:07:52CARRY OUT THEIR GOAL OF SLASHING
00:07:54SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS FOR
00:07:57RETIREES AND RAISING TAXES ON
00:08:00MIDDLE CLASS FOLKS. IN MY FEW, SUPPORTING THIS
00:08:03FLAWED IDEA WOULD BE A DERELICTION OF DUTY, SOMETHING
00:08:05THAT I WOULD NEVER BE PART OF.
00:08:08THIS IS THE WORK WE WERE SENT TO
00:08:11CONGRESS TO UNDERTAKE. QUAINT IDEA.
00:08:14WE DO THE WORK THAT WE'RE SENT TO CONGRESS TO DO.
00:08:17HANDING OFF THAT RESPONSIBILITY
00:08:19TO SOMEBODY ELSE, TO ME, IS JUST
00:08:23BUCK PASSING. SO IN THE WORDS OF BASKETBALL
00:08:26GREAT, ALLEN IVERSON, AND I QUOTE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PRACTICE, NOT A GAME.
00:08:31WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PRACTICE.
00:08:33INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT TALKING, THIS BODY SHOULD GET TO
00:08:36WORK ON FINDING A SOLUTION TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY SOLVENCY
00:08:40CHALLENGE AND HAVING THAT DEBATE IN PUBLIC VIEW. DEMOCRATS ON THIS COMMITTEE HAVE
00:08:44PUT FORWARD THEIR IDEAS. THROUGH OUR PLAN, SOCIAL
00:08:48SECURITY CAN BE SECURED INDEFINITELY, INTO THE FUTURE,
00:08:52WITHOUT A SINGLE DIME OF CUTS TO A CURRENT OR FUTURE RETIREE.
00:08:56THAT MEANS NO RAISING THE RETIREMENT AGE, NO COST OF
00:09:00LIVING HAIRCUTS AND NO MEANS TESTING BENEFITS BUT IT DOES
00:09:04REQUIRE THAT BILLIONAIRES WHO HAVE SEEN THEIR WEALTH SKYROCKET
00:09:07TO OVER $9 TRILLION THIS YEAR
00:09:09WHILE WORKING PEOPLE SUFFER, THOSE BILLIONAIRES WOULD PAY
00:09:13THEIR FAIR SHARE. INSTEAD OF HAVING A PUBLIC DEBATE, THE COMMISSION THAT'S
00:09:17BEING DISCUSSED WOULD SMUGGLE IN
00:09:21BENEFIT CUT PLANS WITH MINIMAL PUBLIC SCRUTINY OR DEBATE.
00:09:24I REJECT THAT APPROACH. I'M GOING TO OPPOSE EFFORTS TO
00:09:28SET UP A PLAN LIKE THAT. I'VE GOT FAITH THAT EVERY MEMBER
00:09:30OF THIS COMMITTEE HAS THE WHEREWITHAL TO ENGAGE IN AN
00:09:34IMPORTANT DEBATE HERE AND NOW,
00:09:37NOT A COMMISSION, BUT A DEBATE HERE AND NOW.
00:09:40BUT IT REQUIRES THE COURAGE TO STAND BEHIND YOUR IDEAS IN PULL
00:09:43PUBLIC VIEW AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DESERVE NO LESS.
00:09:46I THANK OUR WITNESSES FOR JOINING THE COMMITTEE AND I LOOK
00:09:50FORWARD TO THE DISCUSSION.
00:09:52MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD ASK
00:09:55UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO ENTER INTO THE RECORD A STATEMENT FROM
00:09:58SENATOR GILLIBRAND AND ALSO
00:10:00CONSENT TO ENTER IN A STATEMENT
00:10:03FROM THE ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS. THAT'S A REQUEST FOR BOTH
00:10:07DOCUMENTS. >> WITHOUT OBJECTION. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. >> BEFORE I GO TO MEMBERS, I
00:10:11HAVE TO CORRECT SOMETHING SENATOR WYDEN.
00:10:15THIS HEARING IS NOT TO PUSH A
00:10:18SPECIFIC PROPOSAL. THIS HEARING IS TO TALK ABOUT ALL THE OPTIONS ON THE TABLE.
00:10:23THAT'S WHY WE HAVE A BROAD ARRAY OF WITNESSES AND WHY I'VE OFFERED EVERY MEMBER OF THIS
00:10:26COMMITTEE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THEIR IDEAS IF THEY WANT TO.
00:10:30THEN WE CAN MOVE FORWARD AND
00:10:32HOPEFULLY ON A BIPARTISAN BASIS BUILD A SOLUTION.
00:10:35>> MR. CHAIRMAN, I WON'T
00:10:37CONTINUE THIS AT LENGTH.
00:10:40WHAT I'VE INDICATED IS THAT I'M
00:10:42VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN EXACTLY
00:10:45THE KIND OF BIPARTISAN EFFORTS PEOPLE WHO'VE WORKED ON THIS
00:10:48COMMITTEE KNOW THAT I PURSUE THIS.
00:10:50I DON'T THINK BUCK-PASSING,
00:10:52THOUGH, IS SERIOUS BIPARTISAN EFFORT. I THINK IT'S DUCKING AND THAT'S
00:10:56WHAT THE DEBATE TODAY ALSO
00:10:59INCLUDES.
00:11:09>> I WAS GOING TO GO TO SENATOR
00:11:11GRASSLEY BUT I BELIEVE HE
00:11:14STEPPED OUT.
00:11:17SO THEN NEXT ON MY LIST WOULD BE
00:11:24SENATOR CASSIDY UNLESS SENATOR
00:11:26CORNYN -- I BELIEVE YOU DID NOT WANT TO.
00:11:30SENATOR CASSIDY. >> LET US BE CLEAR, WE'RE
00:11:33TALKING TODAY ABOUT SETTING UP A PROCESS. WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT A
00:11:36SPECIFIC SOLUTION -- A PROCESS
00:11:39THAT WOULD BE BIPARTISAN, IDEALLY INVOLVING THE HOUSE, TO
00:11:42LOOK AT SOLUTIONS.
00:11:44TO HAVE IT MISCHARACTERIZED AND
00:11:47MISREPRESENTED AS REPUBLICANS CUTTING THINGS IS FALSE.
00:11:50IT IS LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
00:11:53THIS COMMITTEE HEARING IS ABOUT
00:11:55SETTING UP A PROCESS TO LISTEN
00:11:58TO PROPOSALS ABOUT HITTING BILLIONAIRES AND MILLIONAIRES
00:12:01WITH LOTS OF MONEY OR OTHER PROPOSALS, HOWEVER IT IS, TO
00:12:04HAVE SOMETHING TO PRESENT TO US
00:12:06IN THIS COMMITTEE IN NORMAL
00:12:10ORDER TO EITHER REJECT OR ACCEPT. IT ISN'T ONE PROPOSAL.
00:12:14IT COULD BE TWO, IT COULD BE THREE.
00:12:16AND ANY MEMBER HERE COULD PUT UP
00:12:21A BILL, AN AMENDMENT IN THE
00:12:24NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE AND REPLACE IT ALL. THAT'S HAD A WE'RE TALKING ABOUT
00:12:28HERE. IF THE OTHER SIDE OF THE AISLE THINKS THEY'VE GOT A GREAT IDEA,
00:12:32THEY SHOULD WANT THIS PROCESS.
00:12:35THEY SHOULD WANT THIS PROCESS BECAUSE THAT WOULD GIVE THEM THE
00:12:38OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND TO THIS
00:12:41COMMITTEE AND TO THE SENATE,
00:12:43THEIR PARTICULAR PERSPECTIVE.
00:12:46TO SAY THAT YOU DON'T WANT A
00:12:49PROCESS, HOWEVER YOU PUT ALL KINDS OF FANCY WORDS ABOUT IT
00:12:52AND RHETORIC ABOUT THAT SIDE AND
00:12:54THIS SIDE, IF YOU SAY YOU DON'T WANT A PROCESS, IT MEANS YOU
00:12:58DON'T WANT TO TAKE IT ON, THAT YOU DECIDED IT'S MORE IMPORTANT
00:13:01TO BE A POLITICIAN AND TO HAVE
00:13:03AN ISSUE TO DIVIDE OUR COUNTRY
00:13:05THAN TO BE A SENATOR WHO'S LOOKING FOR SOLUTIONS.
00:13:10BY THE WAY, I HAVE AN IDEA.
00:13:12I'LL BE HONEST ABOUT THAT.
00:13:15BIPARTISAN WITH MULTIPLE
00:13:18DEMOCRATS SUPPORTING THE IDEA. BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN MY IDEA
00:13:20WILL BE THE ONE THAT'S ACCEPTED.
00:13:22WE TODAY ARE ONLY TALKING ABOUT
00:13:25SETTING UP A PROCESS WHERE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE THE
00:13:29OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE INPUT IN
00:13:31ORDER AT THE END OF THAT PROCESS WOULD BRING TO THIS COMMITTEE A
00:13:35PRODUCT TO BE CONSIDERED OR REJECTED AND REPLACED WITH
00:13:39ANOTHER PRODUCT.
00:13:41THAT IS REGULAR ORDER AND TO
00:13:44START SAYING IT'S PARTISAN AND WE'RE CUTTING BENEFITS, THAT IS
00:13:48NOT TRUE. WHY AM I SO PASSIONATE?
00:13:52GUESS WHAT, YOU KNOW WHAT'S REALLY GOING TO CUT SENIORS?
00:13:55IF WE DON'T FIX IT AND THE THERE'S GOING TO BE BY LAW A 22%
00:13:59TO 28% CUT IN BENEFITS FOR EVERY
00:14:04SENIOR CURRENTLY RECEIVING
00:14:06SOCIAL SECURITY.
00:14:09OR WOULD INCREASE TAXES BY 40% OR WOULD THAT GUT THE ABILITY TO
00:14:13SAVE MONEY FOR RETIREMENT FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, OR WE'LL
00:14:16JUST BORROW LOTS OF MONEY AND
00:14:19DESTROY OUR COUNTRY'S CREDIT RATING AND EVERY YEAR WE WAIT IT
00:14:23GETS WORSE.
00:14:25NOW I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY BERNIE
00:14:27SANDERS AND BY LINDSEY GRAHAM,
00:14:29BILL, I'M QUOTING LINDSEY NOW --
00:14:32YOU'RE A LOUSY POLITICIAN BUT YOU'RE A GOOD SENATOR.
00:14:36I TOOK THAT AS A COMPLIMENT. I CHALLENGE ALL OF US TO BE
00:14:40LOUSY POLITICIANS BUT TO BE GOOD
00:14:44SENATORS BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THE LONGER WE WAIT, THE HARDER IT IS
00:14:47FOR OUR COUNTRY AND THE MORE THAT A SENIOR IS GOING TO SEE
00:14:50THEIR BENEFITS GO AWAY AND THE MORE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MORE
00:14:54LIKELY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL SEE THEIR TAXES GO UP OR OUR
00:14:58COUNTRY WILL HAVE TO BORROW SO
00:15:01MUCH MONEY THAT WE WILL GO INTO
00:15:04OBLIVION. LET'S BE PATRIOTIC, LET'S BE GOOD SENATORS.
00:15:08LET'S BE HERE TO MAKE THE HARD DECISIONS.
00:15:10NOT ON A PARTICULAR SOLUTION
00:15:13BECAUSE WHAT WE'RE CONSIDERING TODAY IS ONLY A PROCESS BILL.
00:15:16IT SETS UP NOT AN INDEPENDENT COMMISSION WHICH IS ISOLATED FROM THE INFLUENCE OF THE
00:15:20VOTERS. IT SETS UP SOMETHING WHICH
00:15:22ULTIMATELY COMES TO THIS COMMITTEE. THIS COMMITTEE WITH EVERYBODY ON
00:15:26THIS COMMITTEE ANSWERABLE TO THE VOTERS AND EVERYBODY ON THIS
00:15:30COMMITTEE THEN HAVING TO TAKE A VOTE ON EITHER THAT WHICH IS
00:15:34PRODUCED OR AN AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE, THAT
00:15:37WOULD GO TO THE FLOOR OF THE
00:15:39SENATE WHERE EVERY SENATOR WHO'S
00:15:42ANSWERABLE TO THE PEOPLE OF HIS OR HER STATE WOULD AGAIN HAVE A
00:15:46CHANCE TO WEIGH IN. THIS IS THE WAY THE PROCESS IS
00:15:49SUPPOSED TO WORK AND WHAT WE'RE CONSIDERING TODAY IS BASICALLY A TIME AGREEMENT.
00:15:53AND TIME AGREEMENTS ARE HOW THINGS ARE DONE AROUND HERE.
00:15:56I AM SO FRUSTRATED BY THIS KIND
00:16:01OF, LET'S BE POLITICAL, LET'S
00:16:04JUST ONE MORE TIME USE THIS AS A
00:16:06WEDGE ISSUE. NO, LET'S BE GOOD SENATORS.
00:16:10LET'S BE GOOD SENATORS. LET'S VOTE FOR A BILL THAT SETS
00:16:13UP A PROCESS IN WHICH ANYBODY'S PROPOSAL CAN BE CONSIDERED,
00:16:16HEARD AND VOTED ON AND CHOSEN.
00:16:20THIS IS NOT ABOUT A SOLUTION.
00:16:22THIS IS ABOUT A SOLUTION TO ARRIVE AT A SOLUTION.
00:16:26IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE UNITED STATES AND CARE ABOUT SENIORS,
00:16:30WE SHOULD BE VOTING FOR THIS BILL TODAY. >> THANK YOU, SENATOR CASSIDY.
00:16:34SENATOR WARNER?
00:16:35>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, AND THANK YOU FOR HOLDING THIS
00:16:39HEARING. GOOD TO SEE FOLKS LIKE MARK ON THE PANEL.
00:16:42YOU KNOW THIS IS SOMETHING, I APPRECIATE EVERYBODY'S PASSION
00:16:45ON THIS ISSUE -- THAT YOU AND I
00:16:47WORKED ON, MR. CHAIRMAN.
00:16:50WE STARTED -- WE DIDN'T,
00:16:54OBVIOUSLY, GET IT DONE OR WE
00:16:56WOULDN'T BE HERE TODAY DEBATING THIS ISSUE.
00:17:00I DO BELIEVE THE ONLY WAY WE'LL
00:17:02GET THIS SOLVED IS THROUGH A BIPARTISAN EFFORT.
00:17:06WE KNOW SOCIAL SECURITY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT COMMITMENT OUR
00:17:10COUNTRY MAKES TO SENIORS AND TO SURVIVING SPOUSES AND CHILDREN,
00:17:14PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES.
00:17:18IT SUPPORTS 70 MILLION
00:17:19AMERICANS, ENSURES ANOTHER 239
00:17:24MILLION WORKERS AGAINST THE RISK
00:17:25OF AGING, DISABILITY OR DEATH OF
00:17:28A SPOUSE OR PARENT. WE ALSO KNOW IT'S MATH.
00:17:32WE'RE GOING TO HIT THIS CLIFF IN
00:17:34THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 2032 WHEN
00:17:37TIME AND TRUST FUND IS DEPLETED
00:17:39AND EVERY BENEFICIARY TAKES AN
00:17:42AUTOMATIC CUT OF 22%. THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DO
00:17:45NOTHING. FOR VIRGINIANS IT MEANS NEARLY
00:17:491.5 MILLION VIRGINIANS WHO RECEIVE SOME FORM OF SOCIAL
00:17:53SECURITY BENEFITS WILL HAVE A
00:17:55DRAMATIC CUT IN THOSE BENEFITS.
00:17:58AND WHEN THE TRUST FUND RUNS
00:18:01DRY, THE AVERAGE VIRGINIA
00:18:03RETIREE STANDS TO LOSE MORE
00:18:06$500 A MONTH, CLOSE TO $9
00:18:09BILLION IN THE STATE TAKEN OUT OF THE POCKETS OF VIRGINIA SENIORS.
00:18:12A TYPICAL COUPLE RETIRING IN
00:18:142033 WOULD LOSE NEARLY $17,000 A
00:18:18YEAR. THIS IS GOING TO BE A DISASTER
00:18:21AND THE THING THAT IS ALSO COMING ON TOP OF THIS IS, I KNOW
00:18:25THE CHAIRMAN AND RANKING MEMBER
00:18:28KNOWS, THE MEDICARE HOSPITAL
00:18:31INSURANCE FUND IS ABOUT TO GO INSOLVENT A FEW MONTH AFTER
00:18:35THAT, ANOTHER HIT OF 11%.
00:18:37FOR THOSE OF US WHO HAVE BEEN
00:18:40TALKING ABOUT THIS, WE GO WAY,
00:18:42WAY BACK IN TIME, IN 2010, WHEN
00:18:45WE WERE STARTING SOME OF THESE EFFORTS.
00:18:49SOCIAL SECURITY 75-YEAR
00:18:51SHORTFALL WAS $5.4 TRILLION IN
00:18:542010 DOLLARS.
00:18:55NOW IT'S $30 TRILLION AND EVERY
00:18:59YEAR THE MATH GETS UGLIER. WE CAN TALK ABOUT PROCESSES.
00:19:03THE ONE THING WE LOOKED AT AND I
00:19:05LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUING -- I'VE LAID OUT IDEAS, TAKEN HITS
00:19:09FROM BOTH SIDES ON SOME OF THE IDEAS I HAD.
00:19:11ONE THING I HOPE AS WE ARE
00:19:14FORCED TO GRAPPLE WITH THIS,
00:19:17THAT WHATEVER SITUATION AROUND
00:19:20CAPS AND AGE AND BENEFITS, THAT
00:19:22WE ALSO SET IN PROCESS
00:19:27-- WHERE WE DON'T WAIT ANOTHER
00:19:3130 OR 40 YEARS TO TAKE IT UP AGAIN. ONE OF THE THINGS WE
00:19:52I'M OPEN TO ALL IDEAS. AS SOMEBODY WHO HAS TAKEN HITS
00:19:56ON LAYING OUT SOME CONTROVERSIAL IDEAS, WE WILL HAVE TO COME BACK
00:19:59AND ADDRESS THEM AGAIN.
00:20:03BUT I BELIEVE HAVING THESE KIND OF HEARINGS TO STOP AT THIS
00:20:06STAGE.
00:20:08WE KNOW IT IS COMING, WE CANNOT
00:20:12PRETEND LIKE WE DID NOT SEE IT COMING DIRECTLY.
00:20:17AND OBVIOUSLY, THOSE OF US WHO
00:20:19HAVE WRESTLED WITH VERSUS
00:20:23MEDICARE, WHICH IS A REAL CHALLENGE. THIS STARTS WITH PLAIN OLD MATT,
00:20:28AND WORKING ON THIS COULD GET IT
00:20:32RIGHT. MIGHT NOT EVEN NEED TO GO TO AN AI BASED SOLUTION.
00:20:38MIGHT BE SENATORS PUT OUR HEADS TOGETHER AND SORT THIS OUT. THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY.
00:20:45>> A, SENATOR WARNER. I FINALLY REMEMBER OUR WORK
00:20:49TOGETHER, AND I HOPE WE CAN DO
00:20:50ANOTHER SIMILAR ENDEAVOR THAT
00:20:53PUTS IT OVER THE GOAL LINE THIS TIME.
00:20:58SENATOR JOHNSON.
00:20:58>> MY 30 YEARS IN MANUFACTURING,
00:21:04SOLVES A LOT OF PROBLEMS. YOU REALIZE THERE IS A PROCESS TO SOLVING A PROBLEM.
00:21:07FIRST IS TO ADMIT YOU HAVE ONE, WHICH I THINK WE ALL ADMIT WE
00:21:11HAVE A PROBLEM. THE SECOND STEP IS EVEN MORE CRUCIAL.
00:21:16YOU HAVE TO PROPERLY FIND IT.
00:21:20THE LAST STEP IS THE SOLUTIONS.
00:21:26AROUND HERE WAS SEEMS TO HAVE IT, EVERYONE HAS THEIR PIECE OF
00:21:30LEGISLATION, THE SOLUTION, BUT THEY HAVE NOT DEFINED THE PROBLEM.
00:21:36SO LET ME THROW OUT THE PROBLEM
00:21:39WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH IS THE FACTOR WE ARE $40 TRILLION IN
00:21:43DEBT, HEADING TO $60 TRILLION.
00:21:47WE NEED TO AGREE ON COMMON FACTS.
00:21:51ONE OF THE FACTS THAT WE HAVE TO
00:21:55GRAPPLE WITH IS BENEFITS ALREADY EXCEED REVENUE.
00:21:59AGAIN, WE ARE HONORING THOSE BENEFITS.
00:22:03WHEN THE TRUST FUND RUNS OUT, IT
00:22:06SHOULDN'T BE A CALAMITY. WE'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE TO PLUS
00:22:10UP THOSE BENEFITS, AND WE WILL PROBABLY DO THAT.
00:22:14ONE FACTOR WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE
00:22:16IS THE U.S. GOVERNMENT BONDS HAS NO VALUE.
00:22:20THE TRUST FUNDS A FICTION.
00:22:26ANOTHER THING WE HAVE TO GRAPPLE WITH IS SOCIAL SECURITY IS A
00:22:30LEGAL PONZI SCHEME. I GET CRITICIZE, BUT THAT IS WHAT THAT IS.
00:22:35WE EXTRACTED MONEY FROM
00:22:38TAXPAYERS, INVESTORS.
00:22:40WE SPENT THE MONEY, IT IS GONE,
00:22:44IT GOT PAID OUT TO EARLIER INVESTORS. NOTHING OF VALUE.
00:22:52I OFTEN HEAR FROM CONSTITUENTS WHO GO THAT IS MY MONEY. IT IS, TO A CERTAIN EXTENT.
00:22:57BUT I WANT TO ENTER INTO THE
00:22:59RECORD TABLE ONE, RATIOS FOR
00:23:04HYPOTHETICAL WORKERS WITH VARIOUS EARNINGS LEVELS.
00:23:07IT SAYS THE SOCIAL SECURITY RECIPIENT RECEIVES WHAT THEY RECEIVED FOR EACH DOLLAR THEY
00:23:11PUT IN THE FUNDS.
00:23:12IT RANGES FROM GETTING BACK $.59
00:23:15ON THE DOLLAR, TO A HIGH OF
00:23:18GETTING A HIGH OF GETTING $4.78 ON THE DOLLAR.
00:23:23IT IS A FICTION.
00:23:27IT WASN'T SET UP AS AN INVESTMENT FUND. YOU WILL NOT SOLVE THIS PROBLEM
00:23:31IF YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO
00:23:33RECOGNIZE HOW GROSSLY MISMANAGED SOCIAL SECURITY WAS FOR DECADES.
00:23:40BY POLITICIANS. BY OUR PREDECESSORS.
00:23:44THEY SQUANDERED THE MONEY. THERE IS NOTHING OF VALUE THERE.
00:23:47EVEN WORSE THAN THAT, THEY HAVE
00:23:50RUN UP ENORMOUS DEFICITS, $40
00:23:52TRILLION IN DEBT, SO WE MAY NOT
00:23:57HAVE THE FINANCIAL WHEREWITHAL TO CONTINUE TO TRUST UP BENEFITS.
00:24:00PERSONALLY, I AM AMAZED THE DEADLINE HAS NOT ALREADY GONE OFF.
00:24:04BECAUSE I GUESS WE ARE THE LEAST
00:24:09WORSE IN TERMS OF GOVERNMENTS AROUND THE WORLD.
00:24:13WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST IS LET'S AGREE ON COMMON FACTS.
00:24:20I HAD A BUDGET HEARING YESTERDAY, THE TITLE WAS MEDICAID'S REALITY.
00:24:26I KNOW MY DEMOCRATIC COLLEAGUES MUST HAVE GOT UNDER THEIR SKIN,
00:24:29BECAUSE IN THE END THEY SAID YOU WERE TURNING THIS INTO DEBATE SOCIETY.
00:24:33EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE.
00:24:37THEY DID NOT LIKE THE FACT WHEN THEY WOULD LIE AND SAY WE HAVE TO CUT, I HEARD THE EXACT SAME
00:24:43WORDS FROM THE RANKING MEMBER. WE ARE NOT, THAT IS A LIE.
00:24:48WE ARE NOT CUTTING AND SLASHING MEDICAID.
00:24:51WHICH I KEPT HAVING TO REPEAT,
00:24:552014, THE START OF MEDICAID EXPANSION, $300 BILLION.
00:25:002019 BEFORE THE PANDEMIC, 400 BILLION DOLLARS.
00:25:03LAST YEAR, $668 BILLION.
00:25:06I HAVE NOT SEEN A PROJECTION WHEN THE NUMBER DECREASES.
00:25:11IT IS A LIE. QUIT LYING.
00:25:15START TELLING THE TRUTH. ACKNOWLEDGE REALITY.
00:25:20I'M ALL FOR A PROCESS, BUT
00:25:22PLEASE LET'S HAVE THE PROCESS GO
00:25:25IN THE RIGHT ORDER. LET'S START TO FIND THE PROBLEM
00:25:29WITH FACTS. LET'S AGREE ON THE FACTS.
00:25:34STOP LYING ABOUT PEOPLE.
00:25:37STOP SAYING THAT WE WANT -- NO,
00:25:39WE WANT TO PRESERVE SOCIAL SECURITY. THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT IS
00:25:43REDUCE THE DEFICITS SO WE DON'T RUN THE MASSIVE DEBT BOMB THAT
00:25:47WILL BLOW UP IN OUR FACE AND WE WILL NOT HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL TO
00:25:49CROSS UP THE BENEFITS WHEN A
00:25:52FICTION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND RUNS OUT.
00:25:56>> THANK. SENATOR WHITEHOUSE.
00:25:58>> THIS HEARING IS NOT ABOUT MEDICAID, BUT LET ME POINT OUT
00:26:02THERE IS IN FACT AROUND $1 TRILLION IN CUTS COMING TO
00:26:06MEDICAID. AND WE KNOW THAT IS A FACT
00:26:09BECAUSE FACT-BASED PEOPLE OUT IN
00:26:10THE REAL WORLD LIKE HOSPITALS
00:26:13AND NURSING HOMES AND DOCTORS PRACTICES ARE ALREADY PLANNING
00:26:16THEIR FINANCES FOR THE CRASH IN
00:26:21REVENUE THAT IS GOING TO COME FROM THE REPUBLICAN BUILT RED
00:26:23TAPE BOMB IN MEDICAID TO
00:26:29BASICALLY DRIVE PEOPLE OFF BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
00:26:32KEEP UP WITH THE RED TAPE REQUIREMENT. I CANNOT LET THAT GO.
00:26:37WITH RESPECT TO SOCIAL SECURITY,
00:26:40TRUST FUND IS GOING TO BE EXHAUSTED BUT YOU'RE EARLIER
00:26:44THAN PREDICTED. A LOT OF THAT IS THANKS TO THE BILLIONAIRES BILL THAT THE
00:26:48REPUBLICANS JAMMED THROUGH. IN 2032, JUST SIX YEARS FROM NOW.
00:26:54DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN PRETTY OUT THERE. WE HAVE BILLS.
00:26:58YOU CAN LOOK AT IT. KICK THE TIRES, TAKE YOUR POT SHOTS.
00:27:02WE HAVE LEGISLATION THAT WILL MAKE SOCIAL SECURITY SOLVENT AS
00:27:06FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE WITHOUT CUTTING BENEFITS.
00:27:10WHERE IS REPUBLICAN PROPOSAL? WHERE IS IT? IT DOESN'T EXIST.
00:27:15YOU WANT TO GO IN THE BACK ROOM AND GET WHEEL OR DEALS DONE THAT
00:27:18ALLOW FOR BENEFIT CUTS AND THINGS LIKE THAT THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO OWN SO THEY DON'T PUT IT OUT THERE.
00:27:23THAT IS WHERE WE ARE. THE FIRST THING WE SHOULD SEE IS
00:27:26IF REPUBLICANS WANT TO SOLVE SOCIAL SECURITY, PUT YOUR PLAN ON THE TABLE. WHY HIDE IT?
00:27:31PUT IT OUT THERE. WE HAVE DONE THAT.
00:27:35WHILE WE ARE AT IT ON SOCIAL SECURITY, NOT ONLY IS IT RUNNING
00:27:39OUT OF TRUST FUND, BUT WE'VE
00:27:45ALSO GOT SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION INTERNAL COLLAPSE
00:27:48THANKS TO ELON MUSK AND HIS WRETCHED LITTLE DOGGY BOYS GOING
00:27:52IN AND GETTING A LOT OF PEOPLE FIRED FROM THEIR JOBS.
00:27:55WE'VE GOT REPORTING THAT THEY
00:27:58TOOK DATA, PLANNING TO TAKE
00:28:01SOCIAL SECURITY PRIVATE DATA, AND OFFER IT TO PRIVATE
00:28:05EMPLOYERS.
00:28:08THERE ARE A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH SOCIAL SECURITY. BUT THE BIG ONE IS HOW DO WE
00:28:11MAKE SURE BENEFITS DON'T GET CUT IN 2032? WE HAVE A PLAN.
00:28:15WE ARE NOT ASHAMED OF OUR PLAN. WE PUT IT OUT THERE.
00:28:19IT IS NOT COMPLICATED. YOU MAKE PEOPLE WHO ARE MAKING
00:28:23HUGE AMOUNT OF INCOME PAY SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES AS EVERYONE ELSE
00:28:26ALL THE WAY UP THE REST OF THEIR INCOME.
00:28:28AND IF THEY ARE DODGING THEIR INCOME BECAUSE THEY ARE REALLY FANCY AND THEY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO
00:28:32PARK IT THROUGH VARIOUS TYPES OF
00:28:36CORPORATE OBSCURING, GO HUNT
00:28:41THAT DOWN AND MAKE SURE THAT THEY'VE GOT A SOCIAL SECURITY ON THAT AS WELL.
00:28:46YOU SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO HIDE YOUR INCOME THROUGH A CORPORATE DEVICE AND DODGE SOCIAL SECURITY
00:28:50THAT WAY. YOU ARE STILL SPENDING IT, THAT
00:28:54IS THE WAY YOUR WORLD WORKS. WE CAN DO THAT.
00:28:58REMEMBER THE DAY WHEN BIDEN AT
00:29:01THE STATE OF THE UNION SAID NO
00:29:04BENEFIT CUTS TO SOCIAL SECURITY?
00:29:05AND THE WHOLE ROOM STOOD UP.
00:29:09UNANIMOUS, BIPARTISAN APPLAUSE.
00:29:13IF WE ARE STILL THERE, THE MATH IS REALLY SIMPLE.
00:29:16IF YOU DON'T CUT BENEFITS, YOU'VE GOT TO ADD REVENUE.
00:29:20WHERE WOULD YOU WANT TO GO FOR REVENUE?
00:29:24WHY NOT TO THE HIGHEST INCOME PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT PAYING INTO
00:29:28IT NOW BEYOND WHAT AN ORDINARY NURSE OR PLUMBER WOULD?
00:29:32THAT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE. WHY WOULD YOU REWARD PEOPLE FOR
00:29:35DODGING THEIR INCOME THROUGH CORPORATE SCREAMS SO THAT THEY
00:29:37DON'T HAVE TO COUNT IT AS
00:29:41PAYROLL, THEY BRING IT IN OTHER WAYS.
00:29:45THIS SHOULD NOT BE HARD.
00:29:47AND THE FIRST STEP IS GOING TO
00:29:53BE OUR REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES, PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
00:29:57GIVE US A PLAN.
00:29:59IF YOU DON'T HAVE ONE, LET'S HAVE A VOTE ON OURS AND YOU CAN
00:30:03VOTE IT DOWN AND ON THAT.
00:30:04BUT WE HAVE BEEN VERY CLEAR,
00:30:07MULTIPLE DEMOCRAT SENATORS HAVE PUT OUT PLAN AFTER PLAN THAT WILL MAKE SOCIAL SECURITY
00:30:11SOLVENT, MIGHT MAKE SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE SOLVENT
00:30:15FOR 75 YEARS AS FAR AS THE EYE
00:30:18CAN SEE, ACCORDING TO BOTH SOCIAL SECURITY AND THE CMS ACTUARIES.
00:30:22WE CAN DO THIS. THEY ARE RIGHT IN FRONT OF US.
00:30:26IT IS A QUESTION OF POLITICAL WILL. OF SOME PEOPLE NOT WANTING TO
00:30:30OWE WHAT THEY WANT TO DO TO SOCIAL SECURITY. THAT IS OUR PROBLEM. THANK YOU.
00:30:35>> THANK YOU, SENATOR.
00:30:37BEFORE I GO TO THE WITNESSES, I HAVE TO MAKE ONE CLARIFICATION.
00:30:43THIS NOTION THAT REPUBLICANS HAVEN'T GOT ANY IDEA OR HAVE NOT PUT UP ANY PLANS IS FALSE.
00:30:48THE REALITY IS BEFORE YOU GOT
00:30:50HERE, SENATOR WHITEHOUSE, SENATOR WARNER AND I WERE
00:30:53TALKING ABOUT A PLAN THAT I HAVE
00:30:55PUT UP WITH HIM AND OTHERS BEFORE, AND WE HAVE DONE THIS
00:30:58OVER THE YEARS, AND THERE ARE THOSE SITTING HERE WHO HAVE PUT
00:31:02OUT PLANS. LET'S NOT MAKE THIS PARTISAN.
00:31:06LET'S GET TOGETHER AND WORK ON SOLUTIONS. THEN WE CAN HOPEFULLY GET TO
00:31:10SOMETHING WE CAN PUT OVER THE FINISH LINE AND PASS.
00:31:15>> MR. CHAIRMAN, I'M ALL FOR SOLUTIONS, BUT I THINK THEY HAVE
00:31:18TO BE SOLUTIONS, AND NOT
00:31:21COMMISSIONS, AND WORK PROJECTS THAT DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE A SOLUTION IN THEM.
00:31:26I THINK A LOT OF THAT STUFF IS ANOTHER WAY TO HIDE WHAT PEOPLE WANT TO DO IN TERMS OF CUTTING BENEFITS.
00:31:32>> MR. CHAIRMAN, THE GOOD NEWS IS SINCE WE ARE VOTING ONLY ON A
00:31:34BILL TODAY TO GIVE A PROCESS FOR
00:31:38SENATOR WHITEHOUSE'S BILL TO BE THE SOLUTION, I THINK HE WILL ENDORSE THIS.
00:31:42WE ARE NOT VOTING ON SOLUTIONS TODAY, WE ARE VOTING ON A
00:31:46PROCESS BY WHICH THE BILL --
00:31:50SINCE THE SENATOR OFFERED, OR A BILL LIKE I AND DICK DURBIN HAVE OFFERED, THAT IS A GOOD THING.
00:31:55I LOOK FORWARD TO SUPPORT FOR THIS BILL.
00:32:00>> THANK YOU, SENATOR CASSIDY.
00:32:03TO OUR WITNESSES, IT IS TIME FOR YOU.
00:32:07THERE IS A LOT OF EMOTION AND INTENSITY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE.
00:32:12I THINK THAT IS A GOOD THING
00:32:13BECAUSE IT SHOWS THERE'S A LOT
00:32:17OF DESIRE TO GET THIS ISSUE ADDRESSED.
00:32:19WE MAY STILL HAVE OUR FIGHTS, BUT WE WANT TO GET THIS FIXED.
00:32:23THAT IS WHY I'M HOLDING THIS
00:32:26HEARING, AND WHY WHAT WILL COME OUT OF THE HEARING IS SUPPORT
00:32:29FROM YOU WITH IDEAS AND ANALYTICS AND ASSISTANCE TO HELP
00:32:33US FIGURE OUT WHAT THE PLAN SHOULD BE.
00:32:40BEFORE I ASK YOU TO BEGIN, GIVE A BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF EACH OF
00:32:44OUR WITNESSES.
00:32:46>> OUR FIRST WITNESS WILL BE MR.
00:32:49GOLDMINE, THE VICE PRESIDENT AND SENIOR POLICY DIRECTOR AT THE COMMITTEE FOR A RESPONSIBLE BUDGET.
00:32:53PRIOR TO JOINING THE COMMITTEE FOR A RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL
00:32:57BUDGET, HE SERVED AS ASSOCIATE
00:32:59DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON FISCAL
00:33:01RESPONSIBILITY AND REFORM KNOWN
00:33:04AS THE BALL SIMPSON COMMISSION, WHICH I REFERENCED AND SERVED
00:33:08ON. AND SENIOR BUDGET ANALYSTS ON THE JOINT SELECT COMMITTEE ON
00:33:11DEFICIT REDUCTION, ALSO KNOWN AS THE SUPERCOMMITTEE.
00:33:16DR. BLAIR HOUSE IS THE J FISH
00:33:20AND LILY SMITH CHAIR AND SENIOR
00:33:22RESEARCH STRATEGIST AT THE MAKEDA CENTER.
00:33:27HE SPECIALIZES IN DOMESTIC ECONOMIC POLICY AND RETIREMENT
00:33:31SECURITY WITH AN EMPHASIS ON SOCIAL SECURITY.
00:33:33AS WELL AS FEDERAL FISCAL POLICY, ENTITLEMENTS, AND HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS.
00:33:39HE'S THE AUTHOR OF SOCIAL SECURITY, THE UNFINISHED WORK.
00:33:43HE ALSO SERVES AS PUBLIC TRUSTEE
00:33:46FOR SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE FROM 2010 TO 2015.
00:33:54MS. LAMONT'S EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF ADVOCACY AND ENGAGEMENT OFFICER AT AARP.
00:34:00WHERE SHE HAS DIRECTED SEVERAL
00:34:03NOTABLE ADVOCACY CAMPAIGNS FOR AARP AMONG OTHER ACHIEVEMENTS.
00:34:07SHE ALSO OVERSEES AARP'S PUBLIC OUTREACH AND EDUCATION
00:34:11INITIATIVES AS WELL AS STATE AND LOCAL ADVOCACY AND COMMUNITY
00:34:13ENGAGEMENT ACROSS ALL 50 STATES.
00:34:18THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, PUERTO RICO, AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS.
00:34:22MISS VALLAS SERVES AS CHIEF
00:34:24EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE ACADEMY OF SOCIAL INSURANCE.
00:34:29PREVIOUSLY A SENIOR FELLOW AT
00:34:31THE CENTURY FOUNDATION, WHERE SHE FOUNDED THE ORGANIZATION'S
00:34:35DISABILITY ECONOMIC JUSTICE WORK
00:34:37AND LAUNCHED A NATIONAL CAMPAIGN
00:34:40TO MODERNIZE SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME.
00:34:43WE WILL BEGIN WITH MR. GOLDLINE'S OPENING STATEMENT
00:34:47FOLLOWED BY DR. BLAIR HOUSE,
00:34:49MISS LAMONT, AND MISS VALLAS.
00:34:53>> THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN, RANKING MEMBER, MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE.
00:34:56THANK YOU FOR INVITING ME TO
00:34:58TESTIFY ON THIS IMPORTANT ISSUE. SOCIAL SECURITY IS THE BEDROCK
00:35:02OF AMERICA'S COURT SYSTEM PROVIDING VITAL BENEFITS TO 70 MILLION AMERICANS.
00:35:07SOCIAL SECURITY'S RETIREMENT TRUST FUND IS IN CRISIS.
00:35:11IN JUST SIX YEARS, THE RETIREMENT PROGRAM IS PROJECTED
00:35:14TO BE INSOLVENT. THAT IS NOT FAR OFF.
00:35:16IT IS WHEN TODAY'S YOUNGEST RETIREES TURN 68 AND THE NEXT
00:35:20CLASS OF SENATORS FINISH UP THEIR FIRST TERM. AT THAT POINT THE LAW CALLS FOR
00:35:25A 22 PERCENT BENEFIT CUT. THE EQUIVALENT OF $500 PER PERSON EACH MONTH.
00:35:30CONGRESS COULD CHANGE THE LAW USING GENERAL FUNDS TO COVER
00:35:33SOCIAL SECURITY'S FINANCING GAP, BUT IT WOULD ENTAIL BORROWING AN
00:35:37ADDITIONAL $190 TRILLION OVER THE NEXT 75 YEARS.
00:35:41THE EQUIVALENT OF 165% OF GDP ON
00:35:44TOP OF WHAT WE ALREADY OWE. THAT ADDITIONAL BORROWING WOULD
00:35:48STIFLE ECONOMIC AND INCOME GROWTH, BALLOON INTEREST RATES, AND LIKELY SEND THE COUNTRY INTO
00:35:52A DANGEROUS DEBT SPIRAL.
00:35:53PAYING OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND WOULD END SOCIAL SECURITY AS WE
00:35:57KNOW IT AS A SELF FINANCED CONTRIBUTORY SOCIAL INSURANCE PROGRAM.
00:36:04FORTUNATELY, A NUMBER OF WELL-KNOWN SOLUTIONS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY WITHOUT SPARKING A
00:36:08FINANCIAL CRISIS. PROPOSALS TO ENACT PROGRESSIVE BENEFIT REFORMS, INCREASE
00:36:11PAYROLL TAX, OR ADJUST THE RETIREMENT AGE HAVE BEEN WELL
00:36:14VETTED AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF ANY SOLVENCY PACKAGE.
00:36:18MY ORGANIZATION HAS BEEN DEVELOPING NOVEL SOLUTIONS,
00:36:22INCLUDING IMPOSING A 100,000 ARE CAP ON THE AMOUNT OF BENEFITS A
00:36:25COUPLE CAN COLLECT, INCLUDING BROADENING THE EMPLOYER PAYROLL TAX BASE TO COVER ALL
00:36:29COMPENSATION, CAPPING FOR
00:36:33RECEIVERS, PERFORMING THE TAXATION OF BENEFITS, AND I COULD GO ON.
00:36:36THE CHALLENGE BEFORE WASHINGTON IS LESS ABOUT WHAT TO DO TO SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY, AND MORE ABOUT HOW.
00:36:42BASED ON MY RESEARCH AND PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, I SUGGEST
00:36:45YOU TASK A COMMISSION, COUNCIL,
00:36:48OR ADVISORY BOARD TO FACILITATE AN AGREEMENT ON A SOLVENCY PACKAGE BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.
00:36:53THE APPROACH WOULD NOT BE NEW FOR SOCIAL SECURITY.
00:36:56ALL MAJOR LEGISLATION, ALL OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT SOCIAL SECURITY LAWS EVER PASSED WERE
00:37:00DEVELOPED WITH THE HELP OF AN OUTSIDE COMMISSION OR A COUNCIL. THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT CAME
00:37:05FROM THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC
00:37:08SECURITY, MAJOR LEGISLATION IN
00:37:111939, 1950, 1956, 1972, 1977,
00:37:14CAME OUT OF THE WORK OF SOCIAL ADVISORY COUNCILS.
00:37:19AND THE LANDMARK 1983 REFORM,
00:37:22WHICH BROUGHT 50 YEARS OF SOLVENCY, WAS DEVELOPED AND
00:37:24NEGOTIATED IN PART THROUGH THE GREENSPAN COMMISSION.
00:37:28WHEN IT COMES TO SOCIAL SECURITY, THESE PROPHECIES ARE THE REGULAR ORDER.
00:37:33OF COURSE THEY DON'T REMOVE ELECTED OFFICIALS FROM THE IMPORTANT ROLES AND
00:37:37RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.
00:37:41THEY HELP FACILITATE BIPARTISAN AGREEMENTS BY SETTING FORTH A SPECIFIC MISSION AND
00:37:44ESTABLISHING A SAFE SPACE TO
00:37:46DEVELOPING OPTIONS, TRADE-OFFS, AND COMPROMISES.
00:37:50OVER THE YEARS, CONGRESS ESTABLISHED HUNDREDS OF COMMISSIONS, ADVISORY COUNCILS,
00:37:54AND OTHER GROUPS FOCUSED ON ALL SORTS OF TOPICS.
00:37:58MANY FAIL, BUT MANY SUCCEED, AND THEY TAKE DIFFERENT FORMS.
00:38:02IN THE CASE OF THE BRAT COMMISSION TO CONSOLIDATE
00:38:05MILITARY BASES, CONGRESS ENACTED THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL.
00:38:08FOR THE GREENSPAN COMMISSION, THAT IS A VENUE FOR NEGOTIATIONS
00:38:11BETWEEN PRESIDENT REAGAN AND THE SPEAKER.
00:38:15THE 9/11 COMMISSION DEVELOPED
00:38:18RECOMMENDATIONS CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT IMPLEMENT IT A PIECEMEAL BASE ON THEIR OWN POLICY JUDGMENT.
00:38:23I WAS LUCKY ENOUGH TO SERVE ON TWO OF THESE COMMITTEES, INCLUDING WORKING WITH THE
00:38:27CHAIRMAN AND SENATOR DURBIN ON
00:38:30THE FISCAL COMMISSION IN 2010. IF OUR COMMISSION DEVELOPED A
00:38:33PLAN TO STEM THE GROWTH OF DEBT AND WE SERVE PERMANENT SOLVENCY
00:38:37TO SOCIAL SECURITY. 11 OUT OF 18 OF OUR MEMBERS
00:38:41SUPPORTED THESE RECOMMENDATIONS.
00:38:43IT EVEN IN THIS BODY WOULD BE A FILIBUSTER PROOF SUPERMAJORITY.
00:38:47OUR RECOMMENDATIONS WERE NOT ENACTED IN FULL INTO LAW BUT
00:38:50SPARKED A NATIONAL CONVERSATION FOR FISCAL POLICY AND NEARLY
00:38:54CULMINATED IN -- THREE DIFFERENT TIMES.
00:38:59THE COMMISSION WAS ABLE TO REACH AGREEMENTS BECAUSE MEMBERS TOOK
00:39:02THE TIME TO BRING A COMMON SET OF FACTS AND BUILT A SHARE TRUST
00:39:06AND UNDERSTANDING. THE CHAIRMAN POINTED OUT BEFORE THE RELATIONSHIPS BUILT ON THAT
00:39:09COMMISSION WERE A VERY BIG PART OF ITS SUCCESS.
00:39:12OF COURSE, ALL SIDES HAD TO COMPROMISE, THEY DID SO IN THE
00:39:16SPIRIT OF SECURING FINANCES AND SAVING SOCIAL SECURITY FOR GENERATIONS TO COME.
00:39:20I WANT TO CLOSE BY QUOTING THE LATE 70'S TOM COLE TOM COBURN,
00:39:24WHO VOTED -- SAID THIS BEFORE HE VOTED, WHICH HE DECLARED HE
00:39:28HATED HALF OF IT.
00:39:30ALL REPUBLICS FAIL, THEY FAIL OVER FISCAL ISSUES.
00:39:36THE WAY WE REACH HISTORY IS -- SO WE CREATE A FUTURE THAT IS
00:39:40HONORING THE TREMENDOUS SACRIFICE THAT CAME BEFORE US. THANK YOU TO THE MEMBERS OF THIS
00:39:44COMMITTEE FOR YOUR IMPORTANT WORK.
00:39:47>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN, RANKING
00:39:50MEMBER WYDEN, ALL THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS.
00:39:54I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE FOUR POINTS BASED ON MY WRITTEN STATEMENT.
00:39:58SOCIAL SECURITY SOLVENCY MATTERS.
00:40:00THIS IS NOT JUST AN ABSTRACT ACCOUNTING EXERCISE.
00:40:04THERE'S A REASON SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS ARE SO RELIABLE AND
00:40:07AMERICANS DON'T REGARD THEM BECAUSE WELFARE.
00:40:09WHEN YOU GET A JOB THAT YOU PAY
00:40:12SOCIAL SECURITY PAYROLL TAXES, THESE DEDICATED TAXES ARE CREDITED TO SPECIAL TRUST FUNDS
00:40:16WHOSE SOLE PURPOSE IS TO FIND A SECURITY OBLIGATIONS.
00:40:20THE FUNDS CANNOT SPEND BEYOND THE REVENUES THEY COLLECT.
00:40:24YOUR BENEFIT IS A METH MEDICAL
00:40:26FUNCTION OF YOUR EARNINGS THAT WERE TAXED.
00:40:29ALL OF THIS ENABLES WORKERS TO SAY TO ELECTED OFFICIALS WE HAVE
00:40:31EARNED THESE BENEFITS, WE PAY FOR THESE BENEFITS, YOU CANNOT
00:40:35ARBITRARILY TAKE THEM AWAY. THERE IS A PRICE FOR THAT UNIQUE
00:40:39SECURITY AND POLITICAL STRENGTH. IT ONLY WORKS AS LONG AS
00:40:43LAWMAKERS ALIGN BENEFIT SCHEDULES WITH WHAT WORKER CONTRIBUTIONS CAN FINANCE.
00:40:47THIS IS SOMETIMES MEANT INCREASING TAX COLLECTIONS,
00:40:50MODERATING BENEFIT GROWTH, AND ADJUSTING ELIGIBILITY AGENTS. IF WE ARE NO LONGER WILLING TO
00:40:54DO SUCH THINGS, WE CAN'T HAVE THIS TYPE OF SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM ANYMORE.
00:40:58WE CAN HAVE A SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM, BUT A VERY DIFFERENT ONE
00:41:02WITH BENEFIT LEVELS DISCONNECTED
00:41:05FROM INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS. WORKERS CAN NO LONGER ASSERT
00:41:07THEY PAID FOR THEIR BENEFITS.
00:41:10SOCIAL SECURITY'S BIPARTISAN ADVISORY COUNCILS REPEATEDLY WARNED DO NOT LET THAT HAPPEN.
00:41:16KEEP THE SYSTEM SELF FINANCING AND SOLVENT FOR SOCIAL SECURITY
00:41:19TO KEEP FUNDING EACH YEAR WITHIN THE GENERAL BUDGET, UNIQUE RELIABILITY OF ITS BENEFITS
00:41:23WOULD BE LOST.
00:41:27SPEED IS ESSENTIAL. JUST LIKE A PATIENT FACING A
00:41:30POTENTIALLY LETHAL CONDITION, THE LONGER TREATMENT IS DELAYED,
00:41:33THE WEAKER THE PROSPECTS FOR SUCCESS. THE CURRENT SITUATION DIFFERS
00:41:36DRAMATICALLY FROM THE ONE SUCCESSFULLY CONFRONTED IN 1983.
00:41:40THIS TIME THERE IS NOT THE LUXURY OF WAITING UNTIL THE TRUST FUNDS ARE NEARLY DEPLETED.
00:41:47THE 2016 TRUSTEES REPORT FOUND THE SHORTFALL EQUALED 19% OF FUTURE BENEFIT CLAIMS.
00:41:5310 YEARS LATER, THIS YEAR'S REPORT FOUND IT EQUALS 30% OF FUTURE BENEFIT CLAIMS.
00:41:57BY THE TIME THE TRUST FUND FACES
00:42:00DEPLETION, IT IS CLEARLY TOO LATE. AT THAT POINT, EVEN IF NEW
00:42:04CLAIMS WERE COMPLETELY CUT OFF, THE TRUST FUND COULD STILL RUN OUT.
00:42:08WE ARE RAPIDLY PASSING THE POINT OF NO RETURN.
00:42:11PAST WHICH IT BECOMES IMPLAUSIBLE SOCIAL SECURITY'S HISTORIC DESIGN CAN BE RETAINED.
00:42:16THIRD, WHETHER A SOLUTION HOLDS DEPENDS ON THE ANALYSIS DONE WHILE DEVELOPING IT.
00:42:21THE 1983 REFORMS WERE A MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT BUT BEGAN UNRAVELING ALMOST IMMEDIATELY.
00:42:25THE 1985 REPORT SHOWED A
00:42:29SIGNIFICANT SHORTFALL, WHICH MORE THAN QUINTUPLED AND BECAME BIGGER THAN THE ONES JUST
00:42:32ADDRESSED ALL WITHIN A DECADE.
00:42:35THIS HAPPENED BECAUSE THE GREENSPAN COMMISSION RELIED ON ESTIMATES OF HOW MUCH EACH
00:42:38PROVISION WOULD APPROVE THINGS ON AVERAGE OVER 75 YEARS, RATHER
00:42:42THAN HOW EACH PROVISION WOULD AFFECT ANNUAL OPERATIONS IN DIFFERENT YEARS.
00:43:08, THE LAST THING YOU WANT IS TO HAVE A REPORT SEE THE PROBLEM IS BACK.
00:43:12TO PREVENT THAT, YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE YOUR PLAN PASSES BOTH TESTS.
00:43:16WHILE MY TESTIMONY OUTLINES WHY
00:43:18THEY TAKE A 75 YEAR VIEW, A 50
00:43:21YEAR VIEW CAN WORK PROVIDED BOTH OF THESE TESTS ARE PASSED.
00:43:25FOURTH, THE PROCESS AND PRODUCT NEED TO BE BIPARTISAN.
00:43:28SINCE THE SHORTFALL REEMERGED, THERE HAVE BEEN 15 DIFFERENT YEARS WHEN ONE PARTY OR THE
00:43:32OTHER HAS CONTROLLED THE LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE BRANCHES.
00:43:36IF EITHER PARTY COULD DO THIS WITHOUT THE OTHER, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN DONE BY NOW.
00:43:41THE 1983 EXPERIENCE INSTRUCTED
00:43:43HOW KEY LAWMAKERS CAN BE BROUGHT INTO A BIPARTISAN NEGOTIATION.
00:43:46THE MOST INFLUENTIAL SENATORS
00:43:47WERE ON THE 83 COMMISSION, HOUSE
00:43:51LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVELY REPRESENTED, AND THE WHITE HOUSE PARTICIPATED IN NEGOTIATIONS.
00:43:55THE COMMISSION CONTAINED ENOUGH OUTSIDE EXPERTS TO PROVIDE NEW COVER.
00:44:00REASONS WE NEED BIPARTISAN COMPROMISE ARE NOT JUST POLITICAL. THEY ARE MATHEMATICAL.
00:44:04THERE WAS ONCE A TIME WHEN THE
00:44:06SHORTFALL WAS THE SIZE HE COULD REALISTICALLY BE FIXED WITH
00:44:09SOCIAL REVENUES, SLOWING BENEFIT GROWTH, OR THE ELIGIBILITY AGENTS.
00:44:14THAT TIME HAS LONG PASSED. MAYBE THERE ARE INDIVIDUAL
00:44:18NUMBERS OF CONGRESS WILLING TO INCREASE AMERICAN PAYROLL TAX BURDENS BY THE NECESSARY ONE
00:44:22THIRD, OR TO CUT FUTURE BENEFIT
00:44:23CLAIMS BY 50% ACROSS THE BOARD.
00:44:27UNTIL CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CAN DELIVER THE VOTES TO ENACT
00:44:29ONE EXTREME OR ANOTHER, WE SHOULD ASSUME A COMBINATION OF
00:44:33LESS EXTREME MEASURES WILL BE NECESSARY. I WILL CLOSE BY COMMENDING THE
00:44:36COMMITTEE FOR HOLDING THE HEARING AND EXPLORING WAYS FORWARD.
00:44:38THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WILL BE WELL
00:44:41SERVED IF THE LEADERSHIP RESULTS IN A SIGNIFICANT EXTENSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY SOLVENCY. THANK YOU.
00:44:46>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
00:44:50>> CHAIRMAN, RANKING MEMBER WYDEN, AND MEMBERS OF THE
00:44:53COMMITTEE, THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO TESTIFY TODAY. IT IS A PLEASURE TO BE WITH YOU.
00:44:58I WANT TO BEGIN BY APPLAUDING THIS COMMITTEE FOR COMING
00:45:03TOGETHER ACROSS PARTY LINES TO TALK ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY'S FUTURE.
00:45:07AARP PROBABLY REPRESENTS REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS, AND
00:45:12INDEPENDENCE, ALL OF WHOM SEE
00:45:13STORY AFTER STORY ABOUT PARSON
00:45:17DIVISION. WE KNOW THIS WORK IS HARD, AND
00:45:19ALREADY IN CONGRESS, AARP HAS ENDORSED MORE THAN 130
00:45:23BIPARTISAN BILLS TO SUPPORT
00:45:24FAMILY CAREGIVERS, TO LOWER
00:45:27PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES, TO CRACK DOWN ON FRAUD, STRENGTHEN
00:45:31SOCIAL SECURITY AND CUSTOMER SERVICE.
00:45:33FOR NEARLY 91 YEARS, SOCIAL
00:45:36SECURITY HAS BEEN ONE OF THE MOST ENDURING PROMISES IN
00:45:40AMERICAN HISTORY. WORK HARD, CONTRIBUTE THROUGHOUT
00:45:43YOUR CAREER, AND RETIRE WITH THE FOUNDATION OF FINANCIAL
00:45:47SECURITY.
00:45:50TODAY, THAT PROMISE SUPPORTS 71 MILLION AMERICANS WITH NEARLY
00:45:53185 MILLION WORKERS PAYING WITH EVERY PAYCHECK.
00:46:00OUR MESSAGE TODAY IS SIMPLE. TO PROTECT AND STRENGTHEN SOCIAL
00:46:04SECURITY WITHOUT CUTTING THE BENEFITS AMERICANS HAVE EARNED
00:46:07THROUGH A LIFETIME OF WORK, AND DO THIS IN CONGRESS THROUGH
00:46:11REGULAR ORDER IN FULL VIEW OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
00:46:16IT IS FAR IMPORTANT TO BE
00:46:20RUSHED, OUTSOURCED, OR DECIDED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.
00:46:22AT AARP, WE HEAR EVERY DAY WHAT
00:46:26SOCIAL SECURITY MEANS TO OUR MEMBERS.
00:46:29MEMBERS LIKE LEE FROM OREGON,
00:46:30WHO WORKED HIS ENTIRE LIFE, THEN
00:46:34CAME HIS WIFE'S MEDICAL CRISIS. HE TOLD US WERE IT NOT FOR
00:46:38SOCIAL SECURITY, HE WOULD BE
00:46:42HOMELESS. LEE IS NOT ALONE, YOU CAN HEAR
00:46:46FROM WAYS BACK HOME ALL THE TIME.
00:46:4843% OF OLDER HOUSEHOLDS RELY ON SOCIAL SECURITY FOR MORE THAN
00:46:52HALF OF THEIR INCOME AT A TIME
00:46:55WHEN 37% OF OLDER ADULTS SAY THEY FEEL FINANCIALLY INSECURE.
00:47:00WOMEN IN PARTICULAR RELY MORE ON
00:47:04SOCIAL SECURITY BECAUSE THEY OFTEN SPENT FEWER YEARS IN THE
00:47:07WORKFORCE, EARNED LOWER LIFETIME WAGES, AND LIVE LONGER.
00:47:11PUT SIMPLY, WHEN SOCIAL SECURITY IS SECURE, MILLIONS OF FAMILIES
00:47:14ARE MORE SECURE, AND SO IS OUR
00:47:18ECONOMY. SOCIAL SECURITY SUPPORTS $2.6
00:47:21TRILLION IN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY EVERY YEAR.
00:47:25MANY FORGET THE BENEFIT REDUCTIONS ENACTED IN 1983 ARE
00:47:29STILL BEING PHASED IN TODAY.
00:47:31TO PUT THOSE REDUCTIONS IN CONTEXT, FOR SOMEONE RETIRING
00:47:35TODAY, THOSE CHANGES HAVE ALREADY REDUCED THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY BY AN AVERAGE OF NEARLY 19%.
00:47:42ALL THE WHILE, FUTURE
00:47:44GENERATIONS ARE LIKELY TO RELY ON SOCIAL SECURITY EVEN MORE.
00:47:50PRIVATE PENSIONS HAVE MOSTLY VANISHED.
00:47:52AROUND HALF OF OUR WORKFORCE HAS
00:47:54NO EMPLOYER SPONSORED RETIREMENT PLAN.
00:47:5742% OF AMERICANS AGE 50 PLUS WHO
00:48:01ARE YET RETIRED HAVE LESS THAN
00:48:04$50,000 IN RETIREMENT SAVINGS. ALL OF THIS MEANS SOCIAL
00:48:08SECURITY WILL REMAIN ESSENTIAL FOR MANY YEARS TO COME.
00:48:12THAT IS WHY 81% OF OLDER
00:48:13AMERICANS ACROSS PARTY LINES
00:48:17REJECT CUTTING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS TO SAVE IT.
00:48:21OUR MESSAGE IS STRAIGHTFORWARD, DO NOT CUT SOCIAL SECURITY THE PEOPLE HAVE EARNED.
00:48:26AND TO BE CLEAR, THERE IS WORK TO DO.
00:48:29THE QUESTION FOR US IS NOT WHETHER TO ACT, IT IS HOW
00:48:33CONGRESS ACTS. THE HISTORY OF SPECIAL COMMISSIONS IS LITTERED WITH
00:48:38VERY GOOD INTENTIONS AND FAILED RESULTS THAT TYPICALLY LACKED
00:48:42THE CLOUT, POWER, AND JURISDICTION TO DO THIS HARD WORK.
00:48:47SOCIAL SECURITY'S FUTURE BELONGS
00:48:49AT THIS TABLE BEFORE THIS COMMITTEE.
00:48:53THIS COMMITTEE HAS JURISDICTION, THE CLOUD, AND A 90 YEAR HISTORY
00:48:56OF SOLVING HARD SOCIAL SECURITY PROBLEMS.
00:48:59HEARINGS LIKE THIS ONE ARE EXACTLY WHAT WILL LEAD US FROM DISCUSSION TO ACTION.
00:49:05WE ARE CONFIDENT CONGRESS CAN GET THE JOB DONE THROUGH REGULAR ORDER BECAUSE YOU HAVE DONE IT BEFORE.
00:49:11AARP DOES NOT OPPOSE ACTION. WE WANT CONGRESS TO ACT SOONER
00:49:14RATHER THAN LATER, AND WE BRING
00:49:18WITH US THE VOICE OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WHO WANT
00:49:21THIS PROMISE KEPT WITHOUT CUTS.
00:49:23WE WANT TO PARTNER WITH YOU IN LIFTING THESE VOICES UP.
00:49:26MANY OF YOU HAVE JOINED US FOR TOWN HALLS OR EVENTS.
00:49:30I HOPE WE CAN CONTINUE TO DO MORE WITH YOU AND BRING THIS
00:49:33IMPORTANT DIALOGUE TO MORE
00:49:36AMERICANS IN YOUR STATES. WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH
00:49:39THE COMMITTEE THROUGH REGULAR ORDER TO GET THIS DONE.
00:49:42THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU. I APPRECIATED WORKING WITH YOU
00:49:46IN THE PAST AND WILL CONTINUE TO APPRECIATE WORKING WITH YOU ON THIS.
00:49:52>> CHAIRMAN CRAPO, RANKING MEMBER WYDEN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO TESTIFY.
00:49:58I HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF SERVING
00:50:02AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SOCIAL INSURANCE.
00:50:05THIS YEAR AS OUR NATION CELEBRATES 200 50 YEARS OF
00:50:08AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, WE ARE CELEBRATING THE SIMPLE BUT
00:50:11PROFOUND IDEA THAT LIES AT ITS HEART.
00:50:16THE GOVERNMENT EXISTS TO SERVE THE PEOPLE, AND THOSE ENTRUSTED
00:50:20WITH PUBLIC OFFICE ARE STEWARDS OF INSTITUTIONS THAT BELONG NOT
00:50:24TO ANY ONE POLITICAL PARTY, BUT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS A WHOLE.
00:50:29FEW INSTITUTIONS BETTER IN BODY THAT IDEA THAN SOCIAL SECURITY.
00:50:3391 YEARS AGO THIS MONTH, WHEN
00:50:37PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT SIGNED THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT INTO LAW, HE
00:50:41CALLED IT A CORNERSTONE IN A STRUCTURE WHICH BY NO MEANS IS COMPLETE.
00:50:45I'VE ALWAYS LOVED THOSE WORDS OF FDR BECAUSE THEY REMIND US
00:50:48SOCIAL SECURITY HAS NEVER BEEN A FINISHED PROJECT.
00:50:51IT IS A LIVING EXPRESSION OF OUR DEMOCRACY AND HOW WE SHOW UP FOR ONE ANOTHER WHEN IT MATTERS
00:50:55MOST.
00:50:57I BELIEVE THAT IS EXACTLY THE RESPONSIBILITY THIS COMMITTEE
00:51:00TODAY HAS AND IN THE CHAPTER AHEAD NEEDS TO WORK ON TOGETHER.
00:51:06I WILL OFFER THREE BRIEF POINTS.
00:51:09FIRST, SOCIAL SECURITY IS THE CORNERSTONE OF ECONOMIC SECURITY IN AMERICA.
00:51:14AS YOU HEARD FROM EVERYONE WHO HAS SPOKEN.
00:51:18WHILE SOCIAL SECURITY IS APPROPRIATELY CELEBRATED FOR
00:51:20REDUCING POVERTY, THE ACADEMY RESEARCH FINDS IT IS
00:51:23FOUNDATIONAL TO RETIREMENT AND
00:51:24DISABILITY SECURITY ALL THE WAY
00:51:28ACROSS THE INCOME SPECTRUM.
00:51:30VIRTUALLY EVERY AMERICAN SAYS SOCIAL SECURITY WILL BE
00:51:33IMPORTANT OR VERY IMPORTANT TO
00:51:34THEIR RETIREMENT INCOME, A 4% OF
00:51:38AMERICANS SAY IT WILL BE NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT TO THEM IN
00:51:42RETIREMENT. LIKEWISE, 2% SAY IT WOULD NOT BE
00:51:44AT ALL IMPORTANT IF THEY EXPERIENCED WORK LIMITING DISABILITY.
00:51:48AT A TIME OF GREAT DIVISION ON
00:51:51SO MANY ISSUES, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE REMARKABLY UNITED
00:51:55AROUND WHAT THEY WANT FOR SOCIAL SECURITY'S FUTURE.
00:52:00THE ACADEMY NATIONAL SURVEY RESEARCH WE CONDUCTED WITH AARP
00:52:03AND OTHERS, FINDS MORE THAN
00:52:05THREE IN FOUR REPUBLICANS, MORE
00:52:08THAN NINE IN 10 DEMOCRATS, MORE THAN EIGHT IN 10 INDEPENDENTS
00:52:12WANT LAWMAKERS TO STRENGTHEN SOCIAL SECURITY REVENUE BASE TO
00:52:16PROTECT ITS CRITICAL BENEFITS.
00:52:18AMERICANS ACROSS PARTY LINES,
00:52:22INCOME, EDUCATION, AND GENERATIONS SUPPORTS STARTING BY
00:52:25REFORMING THE PAYROLL TAX CAP FOR HIGHER EARNERS AND ARE
00:52:29INTERESTED IN LOOKING TO OTHER SOURCES OF WEALTH AND INCOME
00:52:32THAT HAVE INCREASINGLY ESCAPED SOCIAL SECURITY'S FINANCING
00:52:36STRUCTURE AS THE ECONOMY HAS SHIFTED.
00:52:40AMERICANS DON'T SEE SOLVENCY AND
00:52:42BENEFIT ADEQUACY AS COMPETING GOALS.
00:52:4582% PREFER A PACKAGE THAT BOTH
00:52:48CLOSES THE LONG TERM FINANCING
00:52:50GAP AND AS MY TESTIMONY NOTES,
00:52:53MAKES TARGETED IMPROVEMENTS THAT BETTER REFLECT THE REALITIES OF MODERN LIFE.
00:52:57MY THIRD AND FINAL POINT IS THIS.
00:53:00SOCIAL SECURITY BELONGS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
00:53:05THAT MEANS THE PROCESS THIS COMMITTEE ADOPTS TO ADDRESS
00:53:08SOCIAL SECURITY'S FINANCES IS
00:53:10JUST AS IMPORTANT AS THE POLICY
00:53:13CHOICES THEMSELVES. COMMISSIONS AND EXPEDITED LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURES ARE NOT
00:53:17INHERENTLY GOOD OR BAD, BUT AIR ANY PROCESS TO SHAPE THE FUTURE
00:53:20OF A PROGRAM AS IMPORTANT AS
00:53:23SOCIAL SECURITY SHOULD STRENGTHEN, NOT WEAKEN THE
00:53:26CONNECTION BETWEEN CONGRESS AND THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE IT SERVES.
00:53:30A PROCESS THAT LIMITS PUBLIC
00:53:32DEBATE OR MAKES IT EASIER FOR
00:53:36ELECTED OFFICIALS TO DISTANCE THEMSELVES FROM THE OUTCOME RISKS DOING THE OPPOSITE.
00:53:40ON MANY ISSUES, DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE
00:53:43THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEMSELVES ARE DEEPLY DIVIDED.
00:53:47BUT SOCIAL SECURITY IS DIFFERENT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE REMARKABLY UNITED ABOUT WHAT
00:53:50THEY WANT FOR THE PROGRAM'S FUTURE.
00:53:54STRENGTHEN ITS REVENUE BASE TO PROTECT BENEFITS, AND EXPAND
00:53:57PROTECTIONS FOR GROUPS BEING LEFT BEHIND.
00:54:00IN OTHER WORDS, ON THIS ISSUE, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY
00:54:03ANSWERED MANY OF THE BIGGEST QUESTIONS.
00:54:07CONGRESS PASSED TASK IS NOT TO FIND WAYS AROUND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, IT IS TO LISTEN TO THEM.
00:54:12SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT JUST A GOVERNMENT PROGRAM, AND NOT
00:54:16SIMPLY A MATH PROBLEM TO SOLVE. IT IS PART OF THE FABRIC OF
00:54:19AMERICAN LIFE, RELIED UPON TODAY
00:54:22AND COUNTED ON TOMORROW BY
00:54:24AMERICANS ACROSS INCOME LEVELS,
00:54:26PARTY AFFILIATIONS, AND
00:54:29GENERATIONS. AS WE CELEBRATE 250 YEARS OF
00:54:32AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, THERE ARE FEW RESPONSIBILITIES OF GREATER CONSEQUENCE THAN STEWARDING A
00:54:37PROGRAM THAT BELONGS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
00:54:41AND THE ACADEMY STANDS READY TO SUPPORT THE COMMITTEE AS IT
00:54:45UNDERTAKES THIS IMPORTANT BIPARTISAN WORK. THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME AS PART
00:54:49OF THIS CRITICAL CONVERSATION. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TESTIMONY
00:54:52AND TO OUR COMMITTEE.
00:54:54I WILL START OUT WITH MR. GOLD WINE.
00:54:58I MAY NOT GET PAST THEM. BUT I WANT YOU TO LISTEN TO THIS
00:55:01QUESTION IF WE DON'T GET TO YOU DURING MY BRIEF FIVE MINUTES.
00:55:04I WOULD LIKE YOU TO RESPOND TO IT IF I DON'T GET TO YOU.
00:55:08IT GETS TO THE CORE ISSUES DISCUSSED BETWEEN MY COLLEAGUES,
00:55:14AND IT WAS DISCUSSED BY EACH OF YOU.
00:55:17IT HAS BEEN MENTIONED BY ME THAT
00:55:19I WAS PART OF THE BOLD SIMPSON COMMISSION.
00:55:26SENATOR WARNER ALSO REFERENCED THAT I WAS PART OF THE GANG OF SIX.
00:55:31THE BOLD SIMPSON COMMISSION WAS
00:55:32A COMMISSION APPOINTED BY
00:55:38PRESIDENT OBAMA. THE GANG OF SIX WAS A GROUP OF SIX SENATORS WHO GOT TOGETHER
00:55:40AND SAID WE ARE GOING TO TRY AND HELP THE COMMISSION GET OVER THE
00:55:44LINE.
00:55:48BUT THERE HAS BEEN SOME VERY
00:55:50DIFFICULT ISSUES RAISED HERE TODAY.
00:55:54THAT IS WHAT IS THE VALUE OF THE COMMISSION? IS IT THE DIRECTION TO GO?
00:55:59THERE ARE THOSE ON OUR PANEL WHO
00:56:01SAID NO, THIS IS CONGRESS'S RESPONSIBILITY.
00:56:05I FIND MYSELF THE CHAIRMAN OF THAT COMMITTEE.
00:56:10I'M A FORMER MEMBER OF THE
00:56:13COMMISSION, BUT NOW THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE THAT DEALS WITH
00:56:17IT AND HAS THE JURISDICTION TO DEAL WITH IT.
00:56:21I WOULD SAY WHEN WE WERE TRYING
00:56:23TO GET THE COMMISSION PASSED, A
00:56:26LOT OF MY COLLEAGUES ON THE FLOOR AFTER WE HAD OUR VOTE AND
00:56:30PUT WHAT I THOUGHT WAS A FABULOUS PRODUCT, A LOT OF MY COLLEAGUES SAID THAT IS GREAT
00:56:34BUT I WASN'T PART OF IT.
00:56:37IT WAS NOT DONE THROUGH THE PROCESS WE DO TO MAKE LAW IN THE U.S.
00:56:41ONE OF THE BIG ISSUES WE RAN
00:56:45INTO WAS GETTING BY INNS BECAUSE OF THOSE WHO THOUGHT THEY DID
00:56:48NOT HAVE A PART IN THE PROCESS
00:56:51AND WHO THOUGHT THAT THEY WERE ELECTED TO BE A PART OF THAT PROCESS.
00:56:56SO THERE WERE SOME COMPETING PRESSURES HERE.
00:56:59I SEE IT FROM BOTH SIDES.
00:57:04THE QUESTION I HAVE IS I UNDERSTAND THE NOTION THAT THIS
00:57:06COMMITTEE AND THE APPROPRIATE
00:57:09COMMITTEE IN THE HOUSE AND CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT ARE
00:57:13THE ONES WHO SHOULD MAKE THESE DECISIONS.
00:57:18THIS COMMITTEE IS THE PLACE WHERE THESE DECISIONS SHOULD BE CRAFTED.
00:57:21ON THE OTHER HAND, IF PAST
00:57:27POLICY -- PARTISAN POLITICS HAVE STOPPED THIS, THE IDEA IS TO GET
00:57:29A COMMISSION TO DO THE JOB.
00:57:32IT SEEMS TO BE THERE IS SOME MERIT TO THAT NOTION THAT WE
00:57:35WON'T DO OUR WORK, THEN LET'S
00:57:39GET SOME ADVISORS OUT THERE TO PUT PUBLIC PRESSURE ON US WITH IDEAS.
00:57:45SO I GUESS MY QUESTION TO YOU IS
00:57:48HOW DO WE ADDRESS THIS
00:57:50COMPETITION OF CONCERNS?
00:57:53IS A COMMISSION SIMPLY A BAD IDEA, OR IS THE WAY A COMMISSION
00:57:58OPERATES -- DOES IT NEED TO BE
00:58:00HANDLED IN A WAY THAT FULLY RECOGNIZES AND INVOLVES THE
00:58:04CONGRESS IN THE OUTCOME OF ITS PROCEEDINGS.
00:58:08>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTION.
00:58:14>> TO AVOID PEOPLE SAYING IT IS THE BS COMMISSION.
00:58:18VERY IMPORTANT TO AL SIMPSON. >> I WILL TRY TO SAY THAT.
00:58:22>> OF COURSE THIS IS CONGRESS'S JOB.
00:58:25THE COMMITTEE'S JOB.
00:58:27WITH ADVISORY BOARD IS THEY HELP CONGRESS.
00:58:31IT IS WHAT THEY HAVE ALWAYS DONE THROUGH MAJOR PIECES OF SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION.
00:58:35THE COMMISSIONS CREATE A SINGLE
00:58:41MISSION. THE COMMITTEE IS DEALING WITH ALL SORTS OF THINGS.
00:58:44THEY SAY THIS IS OUR MISSION, TO STOP SOCIAL SECURITY SOLVENCY,
00:58:48TO GET THE DEFICIT TO A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF GDP, THEY CREATED
00:58:52A MISSION, A SPACE TO ACCOMPLISH THAT MISSION, AN OPPORTUNITY FOR
00:58:55TRUST BUILDING. I THINK THEY ENGAGE THE PUBLIC.
00:59:00THEY DID MORE TO ENGAGE THE PUBLIC ON FISCAL POLICY THAN ALL
00:59:03OF THE COMMITTEE HEARINGS DONE BY THE FINANCE COMMITTEE OVER
00:59:06THE PREVIOUS 10 YEARS COMBINED. I THINK THESE COMMISSIONS ARE
00:59:10REALLY IMPORTANT NOT AS A REPLACEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE WORK, BUT TO HELP TO SUPPORT IT.
00:59:15>> THANK YOU, I'VE ONLY GOT 35 SECONDS LEFT, I'M NOT GOING TO
00:59:20ASK THE REST OF YOU TO RESPOND
00:59:22IN THIS MEETING, BUT I WOULD ASK
00:59:24YOU TO RESPOND TO ME ON THIS. YOU WILL GET SOME QUESTIONS FOR
00:59:28THE RECORD FROM OTHER SENATORS.
00:59:31TAKE THIS AS MIND FOR YOU, HOW WE ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.
00:59:35IN THE END, THE REASON SIMPSON BOWLES DID NOT GET OVER THE
00:59:39FINISH LINE WAS THIS ISSUE.
00:59:41WHETHER IT WAS DONE IN A WAY
00:59:45THAT GOT THE BUY-IN FROM THE
00:59:47REST OF THE ELECTED OFFICIALS IN CONGRESS.
00:59:52>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
00:59:55I HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE PANEL ACROSS THE BOARD.
01:00:00IT SEEMS TO ME WHAT YOU ARE
01:00:03SAYING SAFEGUARDING SOCIAL SECURITY FOR THE NEXT GENERATION
01:00:06IS NOT JUST DOLLARS AND CENTS,
01:00:07IT IS ABOUT ENSURING WITH
01:00:11DIGNITY.
01:00:16>> ABSOLUTELY. I MENTIONED LEE FROM OREGON.
01:00:19ALL OF YOU WHEN YOU MEET WITH CONSTITUENTS BACK HOME, SIMILAR
01:00:23STORIES. LEE WAS SOMEBODY WHO HAD GOOD
01:00:28SAVINGS, HIS WIFE ENDED UP WITH
01:00:31A VERY SERIOUS ILLNESS AND WAS IN A SITUATION WHERE THEY WERE
01:00:35LIVING ON THE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT.
01:00:38THE AVERAGE BENEFIT IS ABOUT $2000 A MONTH, MAY BE A MAXIMUM
01:00:43OF $4000. WE HEAR THIS ALL THE TIME.
01:00:46WE HEAR IT INCREASINGLY AS WE
01:00:48ENJOY THE MIRACLE OF LONGEVITY.
01:00:51AT THE SAME TIME, AS PEOPLE LIVE LONGER, THEY LIVE WITH CHRONIC
01:00:55DISEASES. WE ARE FINDING CAREGIVING IS TAKING MORE AND MORE TIME AND
01:00:59ATTENTION. THAT WAS THE EXPERIENCE LEE HAD.
01:01:03WE KNOW AS WE TALK TO OUR MEMBERS THAT THEY ARE STRUGGLING
01:01:06RIGHT NOW.
01:01:10AND REALLY LOOKING TO ALL OF US
01:01:13TO COME TO A SOLUTION, TO FIND A
01:01:15WAY TO PRESERVE SOCIAL SECURITY
01:01:18SO THEY CAN COUNT ON IT. IT IS THE BEDROCK RETIREMENT
01:01:22SECURITY IN THE U.S. >> LET ME TURN TO YOU.
01:01:27IF I MIGHT TALK ABOUT THE WAY
01:01:31THE UNDERLYING ECONOMICS OF SOCIAL SECURITY WORKS AND HOW IT FIGURES INTO WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TODAY.
01:01:37TODAY, WORKING AMERICANS PAY INTO SOCIAL SECURITY STRAIGHT OUT OF EACH PAYCHECK.
01:01:41BUT IF YOU ARE WEALTHY AND HAVE ACCOUNTANTS AND LAWYERS AND THE
01:01:45LIKE, YOU CAN USE A BUNCH OF LOOPHOLES TO GET OUT OF PAYING
01:01:48ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT.
01:01:52THE ALREADY LOW CAP ON SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT ENOUGH OF THE
01:01:54GIVEAWAY TO THE VERY WEALTHY TO STRUCTURE THEIR INCOME THROUGH
01:01:58COMPLEX PARTNERSHIPS TO AVOID PAYING EVEN THE BARE MINIMUM
01:02:02INTO SOCIAL SECURITY.
01:02:05SO IT SEEMS TO ME AS WE GET INTO
01:02:07THIS ISSUE, FAIRNESS IS ESSENTIAL IN ORDER TO MOVE
01:02:12FORWARD IN A CONSTRUCTIVE AND BIPARTISAN WAY.
01:02:16MY QUESTION TO YOU IS DO YOU
01:02:18THINK RAISING NEW REVENUE AND
01:02:22ENSURING SOPHISTICATED TAXPAYERS
01:02:26CAN'T DODGE THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES, IT SHOULD BE AN
01:02:30IMPORTANT COMPONENT OF ACHIEVING SOLVENCY?
01:02:33>> THANK YOU FOR ASKING THAT. MANY HIGH INCOME BUSINESS OWNERS
01:02:36TO RECLASSIFY THEIR LABOR INCOME
01:02:39AS BUSINESS INCOME TO BASICALLY AVOID THE PAYROLL TAX. THAT IS BIG FOR MEDICARE RIGHT NOW.
01:02:45IF YOU PAY TAXES IT WOULD BE BIG FOR SOCIAL SECURITY. IT IS SOMETHING TO ADDRESS.
01:02:51>> APROPOS OF MY QUESTION, DO
01:02:53YOU THINK RAISING NEW REVENUE
01:02:56AND ENSURING SOPHISTICATED TAXPAYERS CAN DODGE SOCIAL
01:03:00SECURITY OUT OF THE KEY
01:03:03COMPONENT OF ACHIEVING SOLVENCY? >> YES. IT SHOULD BE PART OF SOLVENCY.
01:03:08>> NOW WE HAVE SOMETHING SIGNIFICANT ON THE TABLE.
01:03:12I THINK MEMBERS OF THIS COMMITTEE KNOW THAT I HAVE
01:03:16INTRODUCED LEGISLATION, NOT A
01:03:21COMMISSION, BUT A LEGISLATION TO TRY TO MOVE IN THE DIRECTION OF
01:03:25WORKING WITH DEMOCRATS AND
01:03:25REPUBLICANS AROUND SOMETHING MR.
01:03:29GOLDLINE SAID HE THINKS MAKES SENSE.
01:03:31THAT IS BY BILLIONAIRE INCOME
01:03:35TAX, A PIECE OF LEGISLATION,
01:03:37BLACK LETTER TEXT WITH 22
01:03:39MEMBERS OF THE U.S. SENATE ON
01:03:44THIS COMPROMISE. MY SENSE IS WHAT WE ARE GOING TO
01:03:46HAVE TO DO IS WORK TOGETHER ON
01:03:52LEGISLATION, NOT COMMISSIONS, IN ORDER TO DEAL WITH THIS ISSUE
01:03:55AND ENSURE THAT SENIORS -- HAS
01:04:00BEEN ELOQUENT ON THIS SUBJECT AS WELL. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO FIND A
01:04:04WAY TO DEAL WITH THE REVENUE IN QUESTION.
01:04:07AND I'VE INTRODUCED LEGISLATION THAT STARTS US IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
01:04:13MR. GOLDLINE HAS SAID, AND I THINK HE COMES FROM A DIFFERENT
01:04:17PERSPECTIVE THAT IT WILL BE IMPORTANT.
01:04:18I THINK WE OUGHT TO GET GOING IN
01:04:21TERMS OF TALKING ABOUT
01:04:25LEGISLATION WHERE WE DO WHAT THE FINANCE COMMITTEE HAS HISTORICALLY BEEN ALL ABOUT.
01:04:29THE SOONER WE DO IT, THE BETTER. I YIELD BACK.
01:04:34>> THANK YOU, SENATOR. NEXT WILL BE SENATOR CASSIDY.
01:04:39>> THANK YOU ALL.
01:04:45-- DO YOUR 38 MILLION MEMBERS,
01:04:48WOULD THEY LIKE TO HAVE A SOCIAL
01:04:50SECURITY SYSTEM THAT IS FULLY
01:04:53FUNDED AND WITHOUT THE THREAT OF
01:04:55A 22% TO 28% BENEFIT CUT?
01:04:59>> NO, THEY DON'T WANT TO BENEFIT CUP.
01:05:02>> WHAT I'M SAYING IS WOULD THEY
01:05:03LIKE TO AVOID THAT, AND HAVING
01:05:06SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM FULLY FUNDED? >> YES.
01:05:11>> IS AARP DEVELOPING A PLAN TO DO SO?
01:05:13>> AARP HAS NOT ENDORSED ANY OF THE --
01:05:16>> ARE YOU DEVELOPING A PLAN?
01:05:18>> WE ARE REVIEWING --
01:05:21>> IS AARP DEVELOPING A PLAN TO ADDRESS IT? >> WE ARE NOT DEVELOPING OUR OWN PLAN.
01:05:26>> THAT SAID, LET ME ASK YOU --
01:05:30THE OBJECTION YOU SEEM TO HAVE
01:05:31TO THIS, WHAT WE ARE CONSIDERING
01:05:36TODAY, WHICH IS MERELY SETTING UP A PROCESS SO SENATOR WYDEN'S
01:05:40PLAN, SENATOR WHITEHOUSE'S PLAN,
01:05:42SENATOR CASSIDY'S PLAN WITH SENATOR DURBIN WOULD BE
01:05:47CONSIDERED. IT DOESN'T SAY ONE OF THOSE WILL
01:05:48BE THE FINAL SOLUTION, IT JUST
01:05:51SAYS WE ARE GOING TO CONSIDER THEM. WE ARE SETTING UP A PROCESS.
01:05:56YOU OBJECT TO THIS.
01:05:59SEEM TO OBJECT BECAUSE WE ARE BRINGING IN THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACTUARY BOARDS.
01:06:04IF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACTUARY
01:06:06BOARD WAS NOT INVOLVED, BUT IT
01:06:09WAS JUST A WORKING GROUP OF
01:06:11REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS
01:06:14BIPARTISAN HAVING OPEN MEETINGS
01:06:15IN WHICH THE PRODUCT OR PRODUCTS
01:06:19WOULD BE BROUGHT BACK TO THIS COMMITTEE AND WAYS AND MEANS TO
01:06:23BE REJECTED, ACCEPTED, OR TO BE
01:06:26COMPLETELY REPLACED WITH SENATOR
01:06:30WYDEN'S PLAN OR SENATOR
01:06:32WHITEHOUSE'S PLAN, WOULD YOU OBJECT?
01:06:35>> WE WOULD SUPPORT ANY EFFORT OF GROUPS OF SENATORS,
01:06:39BIPARTISAN SENATORS COMING TOGETHER TO COME UP WITH A PLAN.
01:06:42WE HAVE EXAMPLES OF THAT.
01:06:45>> IF WHAT WE DO IS TAKE OUT THE
01:06:47SOCIAL SECURITY ACTUARY BOARD
01:06:49AND SET UP -- JUST TO REPEAT
01:06:51THIS, BECAUSE THIS IS DOABLE.
01:06:54A BIPARTISAN, BICAMERAL GROUP OF SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES
01:06:58STARTING NOW TO CONSIDER ALL OF THE PLANS TO BRING SENATOR
01:07:01WHITEHOUSE PLAN UP, AND CASSIDY AND DURBIN FOR THIS COMMITTEE TO
01:07:05CONSIDER AARP WOULD SUPPORT THAT?
01:07:09>> WE WOULD CERTAINLY WANT TO TALK WITH YOU --
01:07:12>> NO, BECAUSE THE ROPE A DOPE
01:07:14IS WE WANT TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT IT. I'M TRYING TO MEET YOU WHERE YOU ARE.
01:07:19IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACTUARY BOARD, AND WE
01:07:22WANT TO TELL LEE THAT SHE IS NOT
01:07:25GOING TO HAVE A 22% TO 28%
01:07:27BENEFIT CUT, RIGHT NOW SHE IS
01:07:30GOING TO GET A 20 TO 20% BENEFIT CUT.
01:07:35IF YOUR OBJECTION IS THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE SOCIAL
01:07:37SECURITY ACTUARY BOARD, BUT INSTEAD WE HAVE A WORKING GROUP OF PUBLIC MEETINGS BRINGING
01:07:41SOMETHING TO THIS TABLE, WHICH
01:07:43MAY BE SENATOR WHITEHOUSE'S
01:07:46PLAN, WOULD YOU ACCEPT THAT PROCESS BILL?
01:07:50>> WE ARE SEEKING REGULAR ORDER. WHAT YOU HAVE DESCRIBED SOUNDS
01:07:53TO ME LIKE REGULAR ORDER. >> THAT WOULD BE REGULAR ORDER.
01:07:57BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE WOULD BE A REGULAR ORDER, THEN
01:08:00IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COMMITTEE. THEN ON THE SENATE FLOOR.
01:08:05THAT IS WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT, SO YOU CAN ACCEPT THAT?
01:08:08>> IF IT IS REGULAR ORDER, WHICH IS WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE, YES.
01:08:13WE OBJECT TO A COMMISSION AND WOULD VERY MUCH LIKE SENATE
01:08:17FINANCE COMMITTEE, WAYS AND MEANS CAN BECOME A BIPARTISAN
01:08:19BICAMERAL TO COME TOGETHER AND
01:08:25REVIEW THE MANY PROPOSALS THAT
01:08:26EXIST, MANY OF WHICH ARE
01:08:29BIPARTISAN, SOME OF WHICH ARE NOT. AS THE CHAIRMAN SAID, LOOK AT
01:08:33THE VARIOUS IDEAS THAT ARE OUT THERE. >> I THINK WE MAY HAVE COMMON
01:08:37GROUND AFTER ALL. THE POINT IS HOW DID WE REVIEW
01:08:41THOSE PROPOSALS IN A TIMELY FASHION? THEY ARE ALL OUT THERE AND THEY
01:08:45HAVE BEEN SCORED. IN A TIMELY FASHION TO BRING THEM UP.
01:08:49AND I WANT HIM TO HAVE A HEARING. WHAT WE ARE DISCUSSING IS A PROCESS.
01:08:54AT SOME POINT I WILL PERHAPS MOVE THAT WE MODIFY THAT WHICH
01:08:58IS BEFORE US, AND I'M WILLING TO TAKE UP THE SOCIAL SECURITY
01:09:02ACTUARY BOARD BECAUSE PEOPLE KEEP OBJECTING TO COMMISSIONS.
01:09:07AND COME TOGETHER AS BIPARTISAN, BICAMERAL TO REVIEW THESE SOLUTIONS.
01:09:13IF THE PROPOSAL THEY COME UP
01:09:15WITH IS A STINKY PROPOSAL, I'M A
01:09:19GASTROENTEROLOGIST, WE CAN DO WHITE HOUSES.
01:09:22IT CAN BE AN AMENDMENT AND THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE.
01:09:25THEN WE WILL GET THEIR DAY.
01:09:27THERE DOESN'T HAVE TO BE BENEFIT CUTS, NO ONE IS SAYING BENEFIT
01:09:31CUTS, WE ARE TALKING A PROCESS BY WHICH TO COME UP WITH A SOLUTION.
01:09:34THERE MAY BE COMMON GROUND HERE.
01:09:37THANK YOU, AARP. I YIELD BACK.
01:09:42>> NEXT IS SENATOR WHITEHOUSE. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CHAIRMAN.
01:09:52DOES MY MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY FAIR SHARE ACT DO THE JOB?
01:09:57MAKING SOCIAL SECURITY ACTUALLY
01:10:00SOLVING FOR AS LONG AS ACTUARIES CAN SEE?
01:10:03>> THE SOCIAL SECURITY MEDICARE
01:10:05-- IT IS A NEW BASELINE, IT MIGHT FALL IF PERCENT SHORT.
01:10:10>> THE EXISTING BASELINE -- AGAINST THE LAST BASELINE IT DOES IT. YOU ARE VERY CLOSE.
01:10:15>> GOOD TO KNOW IT WILL WORK.
01:10:19DOES AARP BELIEVE THAT BENEFITS
01:10:23NEED TO BE CUT IN ORDER TO PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY
01:10:27SOLVENCY? >> NO. >> ESSAY AGAIN.
01:10:29>> AARP DOES NOT BELIEVE BENEFITS SHOULD BE CUT.
01:10:33>> AND MS. FALES, I BELIEVE YOU
01:10:36HAVE TAKEN A LOOK AT MY BILL.
01:10:39HOW WOULD YOU COMMENT ON THE
01:10:43FAIRNESS OF THE TAX PROPOSALS
01:10:47THAT RAISE THE REVENUE THAT ALLOWS SOCIAL SECURITY THE
01:10:52SOLVENCY MENTIONED WITHOUT THE
01:10:56BENEFIT CUTS THAT WERE OPPOSED? >> IT IS IMPORTANT IN ADDITION
01:11:00TO UNDERSTANDING WHERE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE IN THESE ISSUES TO UNDERSTAND THE ECONOMY
01:11:03WE HAVE TODAY IS NOT THE ECONOMY
01:11:05WE HAD IN 1983, CERTAINLY NOT
01:11:08THE ACADEMY -- ECONOMY WE HAD IN 1930 FIVE.
01:11:11MORE OF HIGHER EARNERS INCOME AND WEALTH NOW COMES FROM
01:11:15SOURCES OUTSIDE OF SOCIAL SECURITY PLUS TRADITIONAL FINANCING STRUCTURE.
01:11:20INVESTMENT INCOME, ALL OF THESE
01:11:22ARE THINGS THAT ARE ESCAPING
01:11:26SOCIAL SECURITY, IF YOU WILL. ALONG WITH REFORMS TO THE
01:11:30PAYROLL TAX CAP, WHICH HAVE BEEN MENTIONED, THERE'S A STRONG
01:11:34ECONOMIC CASE IN ADDITION TO IT BEING WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
01:11:39ARE INTERESTED IN THIS BODY EXPLORING. WE ARE STARTING TO LOOK AT OTHER
01:11:42TYPES OF REVENUE OPTIONS AND BROADENING THAT REVENUE BASE.
01:11:46I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THIS COMMITTEE TO HAVE THIS CONVERSATION.
01:11:51>> YOU WOULD APPROVE AS A REVENUE PROPOSAL.
01:11:53>> THE ACADEMY DOES NOT TAKE
01:11:55POSITIONS ON LEGISLATION, BUT I SUGGEST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE INTERESTED IN STARTING TO
01:11:59EXPLORE THAT IDEA. >> THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH.
01:12:03>> MR. CHAIRMAN, BACK TO YOU.
01:12:11>> SENATOR JOHNSON. >> MR. CHAIRMAN.
01:12:14HAVE YOUR RACINE TABLE ONE? >> I HAVE.
01:12:18I LOOK AT THOSE MONEY WORTH
01:12:21MEMORANDUM ALL THE TIME. THE ONE I USE IS TABLE THREE.
01:12:24>> WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TABLE ONE.
01:12:27>> MY ISSUE WITH TABLE ONE IS IT ASSUMES WE PAY FULL SCHEDULE
01:12:31BENEFITS WITHOUT COLLECTING PAYROLL TAXES TO DO IT.
01:12:34SO IT EXAGGERATES THE ACTUAL
01:12:37RATES OF RETURN FROM SOCIAL SECURITY.
01:12:41THE ONE FIGURED ON THE BASIS OF WHAT SOCIAL SECURITY WOULD PAY IS TABLE THREE.
01:12:44THE BASIC QUALITATIVE STORY IS THE SAME.
01:12:48>> WHAT I POINTED OUT, 220
01:12:51DIFFERENT INCOME LEVELS.
01:12:55THE PEOPLE GET HOSED THE MOST, THEY GET $.59 ON THE DOLLAR.
01:12:59PEOPLE WHO BENEFIT MOST GET $4.78 ON THE HOUR.
01:13:05YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE GRAND
01:13:06DESIGN OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
01:13:11FORCING YOU TO SAVE IT FOR YOUR RETIREMENT. THEN INVEST THAT MONEY AND GET
01:13:15RETURNS ON IT, THEN WE WILL RETURN TO YOU YOUR SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT.
01:13:21IT WASN'T A WELFARE PROGRAM, IT WAS FORCED SAVINGS RETURNED TO
01:13:25YOU.
01:13:27-- OUR CARE CUSTODY CONTROL, CORRECT?
01:13:30>> CORRECT, YOU CAN CONTINUE, BUT I THINK THERE IS A REALLY
01:13:34IMPORTANT STORY TO TELL BASED ON
01:13:37THAT TABLE IN YOUR PREVIOUS REMARKS, WHICH IS THAT.
01:13:42THE EARLIEST RECIPIENTS OF SOCIAL SECURITY DO NOT PAY FOR BENEFITS. THEY WERE BASICALLY GIVEN
01:13:45BENEFITS THEY DID NOT PAY FOR.
01:13:49>> I'M TRYING TO DEFINE THE PROBLEM HERE.
01:13:52WE JUST MISSED A FIND IT ALL THE TIME. THE PROBLEM IS $40 TRILLION IN DEBT.
01:13:58I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU GET YOUR
01:14:01$190 TRILLION, BUT IF YOU DON'T
01:14:03TAKE OUT A GENERAL FUND, YOU
01:14:06WILL HAVE TO INCREASE PEOPLE'S TAXES $190 TRILLION.
01:14:10IN THE SCORING OF THESE ACTUARIES, DO THEY CONSIDER THE DYNAMIC IMPACT TO THAT?
01:14:17THE DYNAMIC ECONOMIC IMPACT?
01:14:21>> 190 TRILLION DOLLARS IS WHAT WE HAVE TO BORROW IN TODAY'S
01:14:24DOLLARS IF WE WANT TO CLOSE THE ENTIRE GAP.
01:14:28>> OR WE CAN ADJUST BENEFITS.
01:14:30>> DO THEY CONSIDER THE DYNAMIC
01:14:34IMPACT AND THE FAIRNESS? IF YOU HAVE HIGH INCOME EARNERS
01:14:38GETTING $.59 ON THE DOLLAR, YOU
01:14:41LIFT THE CAP ON EARNINGS TO
01:14:44RAISE $190 TRILLION, FIRST OF ALL THAT IS THE GOLDEN GOOSE.
01:14:47THOSE PEOPLE DID NOT INVEST --
01:14:51PUTTING IN A MATTRESS, THEY INVEST IN BUSINESSES, WHICH I
01:14:55WOULD ARGUE IS THE NUMBER ONE COMPONENT SOLUTION FOR THESE PROBLEMS.
01:14:59WE HAVE TO GROW OUR ECONOMY. LET'S NOT DO ANYTHING THAT HARMS
01:15:03ECONOMIC GROWTH. MASSIVE TAX INCREASES.
01:15:06TAKING UP THE CAP VIOLATES THE PREMISE OF SOCIAL SECURITY.
01:15:11THOSE INDIVIDUALS PAY TO SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS, THEY WILL GET
01:15:15EVEN A PENNY.
01:15:18BY DOING THAT, YOU ARE TURNING IT INTO A WELFARE SYSTEM, BY AND LARGE.
01:15:24>> I WOULD URGE EXTREME CAUTION. SEVERING THAT CONNECTION.
01:15:29>> THEY ARE NOT USING EXTREME CAUTION.
01:15:32THE SOLUTION IS LIFT THE CAPS,
01:15:34COMPLETELY VIOLATE THE PREMISE
01:15:37OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM, THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE TALKING
01:15:41ABOUT, DOING GREAT ECONOMIC HARM.
01:15:43>> I WAS A CHANGE THE POLITICAL DYNAMICS AROUND THE PROGRAM.
01:15:47ONCE YOU HAVE A SYSTEM WHERE SOME PEOPLE PAY INTO THE SYSTEM
01:15:50WITHOUT GETTING BENEFITS, OTHERS GETTING BENEFITS THEY DID NOT
01:15:54PAY FOR. >> I WANT TO HONOR THOSE PROBLEMS.
01:15:58HERE'S A SIMPLE SOLUTION. LET'S GET RID OF THAT LAW THAT
01:16:02FORCES US TO CUT BENEFITS AND RECOGNIZE THE REALITY OF WHAT
01:16:05THE TRUE PROBLEM IS, RUNNING TO
01:16:08TRILLION DOLLAR PLUS DEFICITS. WE ARE $40 TRILLION IN DEBT.
01:16:13START ADDRESSING THAT PROBLEM BECAUSE THAT IS THE PROBLEM THAT
01:16:15HAS TO BE -- WE CAN FIND SOCIAL
01:16:19SECURITY, WILL COME UP WITH ALL OF THESE HALF-BAKED IDEAS.
01:16:22IT DOES NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM.
01:16:25UNTIL YOU ADDRESS THE FACT WE
01:16:27ARE 40 TRILLION DOLLARS IN DEBT AND THAT WILL GO OFF IN OUR
01:16:31FACES, AND HISTORY WILL
01:16:33SKYROCKET, AND YOU ALSO HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THE GROSS MISMANAGEMENT.
01:16:39HAVE YOU REDONE A CALCULATION IF WE TAKE THOSE SURPLUSES AND
01:16:42INVEST THAT IN SOMETHING THAT HAS THAT GOVERNMENT LIKE STOCKS?
01:16:46HAVE YOU EVER DONE A CALCULATION WITH HOW MUCH MONEY WE HAVE IN A TRUST FUND THAT HAS VALUE IN
01:16:50GOVERNMENT? >> CERTAINLY THERE HAVE BEEN
01:16:54CALCULATIONS DONE. >> I WANTED TO REDO THAT
01:16:58CALCULATION LAST TIME, $1 TRILLION.
01:17:01DO YOU AGREE WITH ME GOVERNMENT BONDS IN THE HAND OF A
01:17:04GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION -- THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?
01:17:07>> --
01:17:10IT HAS NO VALUE BECAUSE IT IS WORTHLESS. WHEN THE TRUSTEES RETURNED IT TO
01:17:14PAY OFF THOSE BENEFITS, THE TREASURY HAVE -- NEW BOND.
01:17:18I KNOW WE HAVE RUN OUT OF TIME, BUT IF WE GO THROUGH THIS
01:17:23PROCESS, LET'S RECOGNIZE THE REALITY OF THE SITUATION. LET'S RECOGNIZE HOW GROSSLY
01:17:28MISMANAGED, HOW THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE SOLD A BILL OF GOODS.
01:17:34AND NOW WE ARE GOING TO FIX IT.
01:17:36FIXING IT IS NOT GOING TO BE
01:17:39TAXING HIGH EARNERS WHO CREATE ALL OF THE JOBS AND PROSPERITY IN THIS COUNTRY. THANK YOU.
01:17:45>> THANK YOU. SENATOR HASSAN. >> THANK YOU CHAIR AND RANKING
01:17:49MEMBER WYDEN FOR HAVING TODAY'S HEARING. TO ALL OUR WITNESSES, THANK YOU
01:17:53FOR BEING HERE.
01:17:55I WANT TO START WITH A QUESTION
01:18:01ABOUT ONE IN FOUR GRANITE STATERS, MORE THAN 300 50,000 PEOPLE COUNT ON THEIR SOCIAL
01:18:04SECURITY BENEFITS TO MAKE ENDS MEET. WE HAVE TO PROTECT AND
01:18:08STRENGTHEN SOCIAL SECURITY
01:18:11BENEFICIARIES, AND FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS.
01:18:13I WANT TO BE CLEAR I DON'T SUPPORT CUTS TO SOCIAL SECURITY.
01:18:18ONE WAY TO STRENGTHEN SOCIAL
01:18:20SECURITY, AND I HAVE A DIFFERENT VIEW ON THIS THAN SENATOR
01:18:25JOHNSON, IS TO MAKE SURE THE WEALTHIEST AMERICANS CONTRIBUTE
01:18:29THE SAME SHARE OF THEIR INCOME
01:18:33TO SOCIAL SECURITY AS WORKING AMERICANS. UNDER CURRENT LAW, THE PAYROLL
01:18:36TAX ONLY APPLIES TO EARNINGS UP TO AROUND $185,000.
01:18:42HOW WOULD RAISING OR ELIMINATING THE TAX CAP STRENGTHEN THE
01:18:45SOLVENCY OF SOCIAL SECURITY?
01:18:49MR. GOLDWEIN: THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTION, SENATOR HASSAN. OBVIOUSLY THE ANSWER DEPENDS ON HOW MUCH YOU RAISE IT AND
01:18:52WHETHER YOU PAY BENEFITS.
01:18:57BUT IF YOU WERE TO ELIMINATE THE
01:18:58CAP, YOU COULD CLOSE IN THE
01:19:03NEIGHBORHOOD UP HALF OF THE 75-YEAR SHORTFALL AND 40% OF THE LONG-TERM SHORTFALL. SEN. HASSAN: AT A TIME WHEN OUR DEFICIT HAS BEEN DRAWN UP --
01:19:06DRIVEN UP BY EXTRAORDINARY TAX
01:19:12CUTS TO THE WEALTHIEST PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY, THIS IS ONE WAY TO
01:19:16ADDRESS THE SOLVENCY ISSUE WITHOUT HARMING THE BENEFITS FOR RECIPIENTS?
01:19:19MR. GOLDWEIN: IT IS ONE WAY TO
01:19:24HELP GET TO SOLVENCY, YES.
01:19:25SEN. HASSAN: THANK YOU.
01:19:30MS. LE MONDE, SCAMMERS ARE BECOMING MORE SOPHISTICATED IN
01:19:32USING TECHNOLOGY TO STEAL
01:19:39PEOPLE'S HARD-EARNED RETIREMENT
01:19:40SAVINGS. ACCORDING TO THE FBI, IN 2025
01:19:43SCAMMERS STOLE ABOUT 7.7 BILLION DOLLARS FROM SENIORS, A 30%
01:19:47INCREASE FROM 2024, JUST IN ONE YEAR. I HAVE APPRECIATED AARP'S
01:19:49SUPPORT FOR IMPROVING SOCIAL
01:19:54SECURITY'S SERVICE TO VICTIMS OF IDENTITY THEFT ACT, WHICH IS A
01:19:56MOUTHFUL. WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO IS MAKE
01:19:59SURE WHEN A SOCIAL SECURITY RECIPIENT'S IDENTITY HAS BEEN STOLEN THEY HAVE A SINGLE OFFICE
01:20:02TO GO TO AND THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION HAS DEDICATED
01:20:05SOMEBODY TO THIS WORK.
01:20:08SO THIS IS A BIPARTISAN BILL THAT I CO-LEAD WITH SENATOR
01:20:11GRASSLEY TO GET VICTIMS HELP IN
01:20:17REALLY DIFFICULT SITUATIONS. IN ADDITION TO GETTING THE BILL
01:20:19ACROSS THE FINISH LINE, WHAT STEPS SHOULD CONGRESS TAKE TO
01:20:22SUPPORT BENEFICIARIES WHO BECOME
01:20:24VICTIMS OF IDENTITY THEFT?
01:20:30MS. LEAMOND: FIRST OF ALL, THANKS TO YOU AND SENATOR
01:20:32GRASSLEY FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP ON
01:20:36THIS VERY IMPORTANT ISSUE. UNFORTUNATELY, MY PORTFOLIO ON FRAUD AND SCAMS IS THE
01:20:38FASTEST-GROWING I HAVE.
01:20:42THEY ARE SIMPLY UNENDING, AND WE WANT TO BE SURE THAT SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IS ABLE
01:20:45TO PROVIDE THE KIND OF SUPPORT YOU HAVE DESCRIBED. AS YOU PROBABLY KNOW, WE HAVE A
01:20:49FRAUD WATCH NETWORK LINE WHERE PEOPLE CALL IN.
01:20:52WE HAVE HUNDREDS OF CALLS EVERY WEEK FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN
01:20:54VICTIMS OF SCAMS.
01:20:57AND WE WANT TO PROVIDE THE KIND
01:20:59OF SUPPORT WE ARE GIVING, BUT
01:21:09ALSO HAVE FEDERAL AGENCIES -- THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION PROVIDES SIMILAR KINDS OF SUPPORT. I MENTIONED IN THE BEGINNING WE
01:21:12HAVE SUPPORTED A NUMBER OF BIPARTISAN BILLS IN THE CONGRESS
01:21:14THIS YEAR TO DEAL WITH THIS TREMENDOUS PROBLEM OF SCAMS AND
01:21:18FRAUD, AND WE APPRECIATE THE LEADERSHIP.
01:21:25SEN. HASSAN: I LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUING TO WORK WITH AARP ON SOME OF THOSE EFFORTS AND SEEING WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO SUPPORT
01:21:29THEM. LAST QUESTION IS TO YOU, MS.
01:21:31VALLAS. WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT RETIREMENT SECURITY IN A VACUUM.
01:21:35SENIORS ARE HAVING A HARDER TIME TODAY AFFORDING EVERYDAY
01:21:38EXPENSES.
01:21:42BETWEEN SOARING INFORMATION --
01:21:45INFLATION AND THE PRESIDENT'S FAILED ECONOMIC AGENDA, SOCIAL
01:21:50SECURITY BENEFITS ARE NOT GOING AS FAR AS THEY USED TO. HOW ARE INCREASED COSTS IMPACTING RETIREMENT SECURITY?
01:21:53MS. VALLAS: IT IS SUCH AN IMPORTANT QUESTION, AND THANK
01:21:55YOU FOR CONNECTING THOSE DOTS.
01:21:59WE ARE HAVING A NATIONAL CONVERSATION ABOUT
01:22:03AFFORDABILITY, AND SOCIAL SECURITY ABSOLUTELY IS AND NEEDS
01:22:06TO BE PART OF THAT. FOR MOST AMERICANS RETIREMENT SECURITY IS NOT SOME ABSTRACT
01:22:09CONCEPT.
01:22:15CONCEPT.
01:22:20IT IS ABOUT WHETHER THEY CAN AFFORD THE BASICS -- THEIR HOUSING, THEIR GROCERIES, THEIR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, THEIR HEALTH
01:22:23CARE, THEIR LONG-TERM CARE. THESE ARE THE THINGS WE HEAR WHEN PEOPLE SAY WHAT SOCIAL SECURITY MAKES IT POSSIBLE TO BE
01:22:27ABLE TO AFFORD, BUT ALSO HOW SOCIAL SECURITY DOES NOT GO AS FAR AS IT MIGHT NEED TO.
01:22:31THAT IS NOT JUST WHY SOCIAL SECURITY IS SO IMPORTANT, BUT PART OF WHY IT WAS UNSURPRISING IN THE ACADEMY'S SURVEY RESEARCH
01:22:34WE FOUND HUGE POPULARITY FOR
01:22:38ACTUALLY HAVING A MORE ACCURATE
01:22:43COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT AND HUGE UNPOPULARITY FOR A SLOWER COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT THAT WOULD MAKE THAT AFFORDABILITY
01:22:47CRISIS HARDER FOR SENIORS. SEN. HASSAN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR EXPERTISE AND
01:22:50TESTIMONY. THANKS, MR. CHAIR.
01:22:55CHAIR CRAPO: SENATOR WARREN. YOU ARE UP. [LAUGHTER]
01:22:58SEN. WARREN: ALL RIGHT.
01:23:00SO, THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
01:23:03SOCIAL SECURITY IS A PROMISE.
01:23:05YOU PAY IN, YEAR AFTER YEAR, AND
01:23:13THEN WHEN YOU NEED IT AT THE END, IT WILL ALWAYS, ALWAYS BE THERE FOR YOU.
01:23:15BUT WE HAVE GOT SIX YEARS NOW
01:23:19AHEAD OF US BEFORE THE SOCIAL
01:23:22SECURITY TRUST FUND FACES
01:23:25INSOLVENCY, MEANING THAT RETIREES COULD SEE THEIR BENEFITS SLASHED BY 22%. CONGRESS NEEDS TO ACT TO MAKE
01:23:29SURE THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN. THIS IS WHY DEMOCRATS ARE
01:23:33FIGHTING TO PROTECT AND EXPAND
01:23:39SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS FUNDED BY THE WEALTHIEST AMERICANS
01:23:41PAYING THEIR FAIR SHARE. BUT SO FAR, CONGRESSIONAL
01:23:44REPUBLICANS LIKE TO PRETEND THAT THE ONLY SOLUTION IS BENEFIT CUTS.
01:23:48AND WHEN THEY SEE HOW UNPOPULAR
01:23:49THAT IS, THEY THEN TRY TO PIVOT
01:23:53AND SAY LET'S SET UP A COMMISSION TO MAKE THE CUTS, BECAUSE THEN MAYBE THE VOTERS
01:23:57WON'T BLAME THE REPUBLICANS FOR IT. NOW, MS. LEAMOND, YOUR
01:24:01ORGANIZATION, AARP, REPRESENTS
01:24:02MILLIONS OF SENIORS.
01:24:05RIGHT NOW THEY ARE SEEING
01:24:07SKYROCKETING PRICES FOR
01:24:11EVERYTHING FROM HEALTH CARE TO
01:24:14GAS TO GROCERIES. MS. LEAMOND, IF SOCIAL SECURITY
01:24:16CHECKS ALREADY AREN'T KEEPING UP WITH INFLATION, WHAT HAPPENS IF
01:24:20THEY ARE CUT BY 22%? MS. LEAMOND: WELL, SENATOR,
01:24:24THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION, AND OF COURSE IT WOULD BE
01:24:27DEVASTATING TO OUR CONSTITUENCY.
01:24:30THAT 22% CUT, IF YOU GET THE
01:24:33MINIMUM BENEFIT, IT IS ALREADY $400. THINK ABOUT THAT IN TERMS OF
01:24:37PEOPLE AND THEIR DAILY EXPENSES.
01:24:41WE ARE HEARING MORE AND MORE
01:24:46FROM OUR MEMBERS NOT ONLY ABOUT
01:24:47THE KIND OF COST-OF-LIVING
01:24:50KITCHEN-TABLE ECONOMICS RIGHT
01:24:54NOW, BUT ALSO LONG TERM AS THEY THINK ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY. SEN. WARREN: LOOK, HERE IS A BETTER IDEA.
01:24:57HOW ABOUT WE MAKE THE WEALTHY PAY INTO SOCIAL SECURITY AT THE
01:24:59SAME RATE THAT WORKING FAMILIES PAY INTO SOCIAL SECURITY?
01:25:03RIGHT NOW THE SOCIAL SECURITY PAYROLL TAX IS CAPPED AT
01:25:06$184,500.
01:25:12THAT MEANS IF YOU ARE A NURSE OR CONSTRUCTION WORKER, YOU ARE
01:25:16PAYING SOCIAL SECURITY ON 100%
01:25:18OF YOUR INCOME.
01:25:22BUT IF YOU ARE A CORPORATE LAWYER RAKING IN MILLIONS, YOU
01:25:23ARE ONLY PAYING SOCIAL SECURITY
01:25:30ON A TINY LITTLE FRACTION OF YOUR INCOME. THAT IS NOT RIGHT. THAT IS WHY SENATOR MORENO AND I
01:25:33HAVE CALLED FOR CONGRESS TO
01:25:36SCRAP THE CAP ON PAYROLL TAXES. THAT ONE REFORM ALONE WOULD
01:25:38IMPACT ABOUT 6% OF ALL
01:25:43HOUSEHOLDS, THE HIGHEST-EARNING AMERICANS, AND WOULD PROTECT
01:25:46SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS FOR AT
01:25:47LEAST TWO DECADES.
01:25:54SO, MS. LEAMOND, DO YOU AGREE THAT SECURING BENEFITS BY
01:25:57SCRAPPING THE CAP ON PAYROLL TAXES WOULD HELP SENIORS?
01:26:00MS. LEAMOND: WELL, YOU HAVE
01:26:04DESCRIBED WHAT WE HEAR A GREAT
01:26:05DEAL FROM OUR SENIORS, AND IN
01:26:09OUR POSITION, WHICH IS PLEASE DON'T CUT BENEFITS, WE KNOW WE HAVE TO LOOK FOR SOURCES OF
01:26:12REVENUE, AND WE HEAR ALL THE TIME FROM PEOPLE ABOUT, IS IT
01:26:14FAIR THAT I AM PAYING ON ALL OF MY WAGES AND SOMEBODY DOWN THE
01:26:18STREET ISN'T?
01:26:22SOMETIMES THEY USE EXAMPLES OF
01:26:27PEOPLE THAT WORK IN NONPROFITS
01:26:28EVEN.
01:26:32SEN. WARREN: UH-HUH, THERE YOU GO. THAT IS NOT ALL WE COULD DO.
01:26:34WHILE WORKING-CLASS FAMILIES PAY
01:26:39INTO SOCIAL SECURITY ON EVERY PAYCHECK, WEALTHY INVESTORS TAKE ADVANTAGE OF LOOPHOLES TO AVOID PAYING INTO THE TRUST FUND.
01:26:42FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU ARE AN
01:26:46INVESTOR IN A HEDGE FUND, YOU CAN PAY YOURSELF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN PROFITS EACH YEAR
01:26:50WITHOUT PAYING ANYTHING INTO
01:26:51SOCIAL SECURITY.
01:26:56NOW, MS. VALLAS, YOU ARE AN EXPERT IN SOCIAL SECURITY AND DISABILITY POLICY.
01:27:00DO YOU AGREE THAT SECURING BENEFITS BY CLOSING THESE
01:27:03LOOPHOLES THAT ARE AVAILABLE
01:27:08PRETTY MUCH ONLY FOR WEALTHY INVESTORS WOULD HELP SENIORS AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES WHO
01:27:11RELY ON SOCIAL SECURITY?
01:27:15MS. VALLAS: IF THOSE FORMS OF
01:27:22REVENUE DO END UP BEING LOOKED AT AS SOLVENCY OPTIONS, WE WILL SEE HUGE PROTECTION FOR PEOPLE WHOSE BENEFITS WOULD NOT BE CUT,
01:27:25INCLUDING SENIORS AND PEOPLE
01:27:28WITH DISABILITIES.
01:27:31AND, JUST TO NOTE, DEPENDING ON
01:27:35HOW YOU STRUCTURE IT, YOU COULD ALSO END UP SEEING SUFFICIENT REVENUES TO STRENGTHEN BENEFITS
01:27:38FROM SOME OF THOSE FOLKS WHO ARE
01:27:42NOT WELL-SERVED, SOMETHING YOU AND OTHERS HAVE PROPOSED AS WELL. SEN. WARREN: I REALLY APPRECIATE -- LOOK, CONGRESS HAS A CHOICE
01:27:46TO MAKE. EITHER WE CAN DECIDE TO PROTECT THE TOP 6% OF ALL EARNERS IN
01:27:49AMERICA AND LET THE SOCIAL
01:27:52SECURITY TRUST FUND GET INTO
01:27:55TROUBLE, CUT BENEFITS FOR
01:27:56SENIORS, THROW MORE SENIORS INTO
01:28:03POVERTY, OR WE CAN DECIDE THAT EVERYBODY PAYS THE SAME SHARE AND PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY FOREVER INTO THE FUTURE.
01:28:08THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING HERE.
01:28:09THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
01:28:13SEN. WYDEN: THANK YOU, SENATOR
01:28:13WARREN.
01:28:18ARE GOING TO GET ALL THESE MEMBERS IN BEFORE THE BREAK. NEXT IN TERMS OF APPEARANCE ON
01:28:22THE CHAIRMAN'S CARD IS SENATOR
01:28:26GRASSLEY. WE WILL GET EVERYBODY IN.
01:28:27WE WANT TO GET SENATOR SANDERS
01:28:31AND SENATOR CORTEZ MASTO AND SENATOR LANKFORD, AND WE CAN DO IT ALL BEFORE THE BREAK. SENATOR GRASSLEY.
01:28:34SEN. GRASSLEY: I APOLOGIZE.
01:28:35I WAS ACROSS THE HALL WITH THE
01:28:39JUDICIARY COMMITTEE NOMINEES.
01:28:44SO I'M GOING TO START WITH MR.
01:28:45GOLDWEIN.
01:28:48FOR ANY SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM PROPOSAL TO SUCCEED, IT WILL
01:28:52REQUIRE THE SUPPORT OF AT LEAST 60 SENATORS.
01:28:56SO THAT MEANS BOTH PARTIES WORKING TOGETHER TO FIND A
01:28:57SOLUTION.
01:29:02OUTSIDE OF THE 1983 COMMISSION, ARE THERE EXAMPLES OF A
01:29:06COMMISSION OR OTHER SPECIAL
01:29:07PROCESS THAT SUCCESSFULLY
01:29:11SPARKED BIPARTISAN COOPERATION AND ACTION? MR. GOLDWEIN: THANK YOU FOR THAT
01:29:15QUESTION. COMMITTEES OFTEN SPARKED
01:29:16BIPARTISAN ACTION.
01:29:22AS I MENTIONED MY TESTIMONY, EVERY PIECE OF SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION, THE LARGEST PIECES,
01:29:25HAVE BEEN BASED ON ONE OF THESE
01:29:30COMMITTEES, MOST OF THEM BIPARTISAN. THE 9/11 COMMISSION, BIPARTISAN RESULTS.
01:29:34I WILL ALSO SAY SIMPSON-BOWLES, ALTHOUGH WE DID NOT GET TO THE FINISH LINE, SPARKED A
01:29:36BIPARTISAN CONVERSATION.
01:29:38IN FACT, 45 SENATORS IN THIS BODY CALLED FOR LEGISLATION
01:29:42BASED ON SIMPSON-BOWLES, INCLUDING SENATOR WYDEN, SENATOR JOHNSON, AND MANY OTHERS WHO
01:29:45HAVE SINCE LEFT. SO ABSOLUTELY, YES.
01:29:50SEN. GRASSLEY: AND MS. LEAMOND
01:29:51AND MS. VALLAS, BASED IN YOUR
01:29:55TESTIMONY, I UNDERSTAND YOU BOTH
01:29:57OPPOSE ANY SORT OF
01:30:02COMMISSION-BASED PROCESS.
01:30:06INSTEAD, YOU CONTEND CONGRESS SHOULD ADDRESS SOCIAL SECURITY THROUGH REGULAR COMMITTEE AND FLOOR PROCESSES. I RESPECT THAT VIEW.
01:30:09I AM OPEN TO ANY PROCESS THAT
01:30:10WILL FACILITATE THE BIPARTISAN
01:30:17COOPERATION THAT IS NECESSARY, WITH AN EMPHASIS UPON THE WORD
01:30:19"BIPARTISAN."
01:30:22WHAT ARE SOME ACTIONS YOUR GROUPS ARE TAKING OR PLAN TO TAKE TO FOSTER BIPARTISAN COOPERATION AND DISCUSSION OF
01:30:25SOCIAL SECURITY?
01:30:29MS. LEAMOND: THANK YOU, SENATOR GRASSLEY, AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP.
01:30:31WE KNOW YOU DID A HEARING IN JUNE.
01:30:35HEARING TODAY. WE ARE HOPEFUL WE WILL SEE MORE
01:30:39AND MORE DISCUSSION IN THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE. AS YOU KNOW FROM OUR TESTIMONY, WE BELIEVE THE SENATE FINANCE
01:30:42COMMITTEE IS WHERE THIS SHOULD
01:30:45BE DEBATED, SHOULD BE CONCERNED,
01:30:48-- SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, AND WHERE ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN.
01:30:54ON OUR PART, WE, AS YOU KNOW, HAVE BEEN VERY ACTIVE ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
01:30:57WE DO TELE- TOWN HALLS WITH
01:31:03OUR MEMBERS. WE WANT TO OFFER THAT TO MEMBERS
01:31:07OF THE COMMITTEE. AS YOU DELIBERATE VARIOUS PROPOSALS, WE THINK THAT IS GOING TO BE HUGELY IMPORTANT IN
01:31:10TERMS OF BRINGING PEOPLE TO THE
01:31:14TABLE.
01:31:17AND NOT JUST OUR CONSTITUENCY. BUT WHY DON'T WE REACH OUT TO
01:31:21YOUNGER PEOPLE? YOU KNOW THEY HAVE A TREMENDOUS STAKE IN THE FUTURE OF SOCIAL SECURITY.
01:31:24WE WANT TO WORK WITH YOU TO BRING PEOPLE TOGETHER, TALK ABOUT VARIOUS APPROACHES, AND MOVE AHEAD.
01:31:27WE DO NOT SUPPORT A COMMISSION. WE DO SUPPORT ACTION BY BIPARTISAN LEADERS IN THE
01:31:31CONGRESS, THE SENATE FINANCE
01:31:32COMMITTEE, HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS
01:31:37COMMITTEE. AND YOU CAN COUNT ON US BEING AN HONEST PARTNER ALL THE WAY, BOTH
01:31:41IN OUR OUTREACH TO OUR CONSTITUENCY, AND ALSO IN OUR DELIBERATIONS ABOUT VARIOUS
01:31:45POLICY APPROACHES.
01:31:48MS. VALLAS: I WILL ECHO MS.
01:31:50LEAMOND IN THANKING YOU,
01:31:54SENATOR, FOR THE QUESTION, AND YOUR LEADERSHIP. TO ANSWER ON BEHALF OF THE ACADEMY, THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF
01:31:58SOCIAL INSURANCE DOES NOT TAKE OFFICIAL POSITIONS ON
01:32:01LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURES OR INDIVIDUAL PIECES OF
01:32:03LEGISLATION.
01:32:06WE ARE NOT HERE OPPOSING OR SUPPORTING THE IDEA OF A
01:32:08COMMISSION.
01:32:15BUT WHAT WE ARE DOING TO TRY TO RESOURCE THIS COMMITTEE IN THIS IMPORTANT BIPARTISAN WORK IS
01:32:19ASKING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHAT THEY WANT THIS COMMITTEE TO DO. AS I MENTIONED AND AS I LAY OUT
01:32:22IN MY WRITTEN TESTIMONY AS WELL, DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE CAN BE
01:32:25DIFFICULT ON CERTAIN ISSUES
01:32:27WHERE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DON'T
01:32:35AGREE, BUT ON THIS ISSUE, ON SOCIAL SECURITY, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE VERY UNITED AND CLEAR
01:32:38ABOUT WHAT THEY WANT.
01:32:41SO OUR MESSAGE TO THIS COMMITTEE WOULD BE START BY LISTENING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THEY HAVE DONE A LOT OF THE HARD WORK FOR YOU. SEN. GRASSLEY: I SEE A LOT OF
01:32:46AARP ADS ON TELEVISION. I'VE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF ADVICE
01:32:49FOR YOU.
01:32:53BUT YOU ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN A
01:32:57CANDIDATE TRUMP AND A PRESIDENT
01:32:58BIDEN.
01:33:04THEY ALL RAN ON A PLATFORM, WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY.
01:33:07AND YOUR TV ADVERTISEMENTS ARE
01:33:11SAYING WE AREN'T GOING TO CUT SOCIAL SECURITY. I DON'T BLAME YOU FOR DEFENDING THE PROGRAM THAT WAY, BUT WE'VE
01:33:15GOT TO WAKE THIS ENTIRE NATION
01:33:17UP TO FACT THAT THERE IS GOING
01:33:21TO BE A 20% -- 22% CUTS IF WE DO
01:33:26N'T DO SOMETHING RIGHT NOW. AND YOU OUGHT TO SPEND SOME OF YOUR MONEY WAKING UP PEOPLE TO
01:33:29THE FACT THAT THERE IS A CRISIS
01:33:33DOWN THE LINE. AND YOU SAY DON'T CUT SOCIAL
01:33:35SECURITY, BUT IT IS GOING TO BE
01:33:40CUT AUTOMATICALLY IF YOU DON'T WAKE THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY
01:33:42UP, AND THAT IS WHAT I WOULD
01:33:46ADVISE YOU TO DO BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT A BIG VOICE. SEN. WYDEN: THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
01:33:51I DON'T WANT TO BE DIFFICULT HERE, BUT SENATOR LANKFORD WOULD BE NEXT, AND THEN SENATOR
01:33:55SANDERS, AND WE ARE GOING TO BE
01:33:56DONE.
01:34:01SEN. LANKFORD: WHY WOULD THAT BE DIFFICULT? SEN. WYDEN: EVERYBODY IS
01:34:03JUGGLING.
01:34:08SEN. LANKFORD: Y'ALL, THANKS FOR BEING HERE.
01:34:11I APPRECIATE THE CHAIRMAN
01:34:15AND RANKING MEMBER OF OUR HAVING A DIALOGUE ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY. THIS IS A MOMENT THAT WE SHOULD
01:34:19TALK ABOUT STABILIZING THE PROGRAM, AND THE CONCERN IS THAT WE ALL KNOW IN SIX YEARS WE HAVE
01:34:22AN INSOLVENCY ISSUE.
01:34:25THAT RED LIGHT ON THE DASH HAS BEEN FLASHING FOR A LONG TIME.
01:34:29BUT THE PROBLEM IS WHEN WE HAVE
01:34:34A CONVERSATION, IT BECOMES AN ISSUE OF FEAR MONGERING THAT THIS IS ABOUT TAKING BENEFITS AWAY.
01:34:38WE ARE TRYING TO GET TO A POINT THAT NO ONE LOSES BENEFITS. IN FACT, WE STABILIZE THE PROGRAM LONG-TERM IS THE GOAL OF
01:34:42THIS. BUT IT IS A REAL CHALLENGE TO
01:34:45HAVE A GROWN-UP CONVERSATION TO
01:34:54FIGURE OUT HOW DO WE RESOLVE IT. I AM SUPPORTIVE OF THIS COMMITTEE TO BEING ABLE TO PULL
01:34:56TOGETHER A NONPARTISAN COMMISSION MADE UP OF MEMBERS TO
01:34:59BE ABLE TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS. THERE ARE SOME MEMBERS THAT
01:35:02SPEND A LOT OF TIME DIGGING IN ON THE ISSUES OF SOCIAL
01:35:04SECURITY, AND SOME THAT DO NOT.
01:35:09AND TO BE ABLE TO PULL THE PEOPLE TOGETHER THAT HAVE AN
01:35:11INVESTMENT IN THE TIME AND DETAILS OF WHAT IT IS GOING TO TAKE TO DO THAT ON BOTH SIDES OF
01:35:14THE AISLE I THINK IS BENEFICIAL TO DO THAT AND ALLOW THEIR GROUP
01:35:18TO DO THE WORK, BRING IT BACK TO
01:35:21THE REST OF THE BODY, AND HAVE A VOTE. THAT IS THE WAY OFTEN THESE
01:35:23DIFFICULT CHALLENGES HAPPEN.
01:35:26I WAS PART OF A SMALL GROUP THAT
01:35:28MET WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA YEARS
01:35:32AGO WHEN THE HOUSE CHANGED OVER, AND IT WAS A REPUBLICAN HOUSE, DEMOCRATIC SENATE, AND
01:35:36DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT.
01:35:41NOW, IT WELL KNOWN AROUND THIS TOWN THAT HARD ISSUES ARE DONE WHEN THERE IS BIPARTISAN
01:35:45DIFFERENCES IN HOUSE, SENATE,
01:35:49AND THE WHITE HOUSE, AND SOME GAP THERE.
01:35:52I WAS PART OF THAT GROUP THAT SAT DOWN WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA
01:35:56THAT WE HAVE A REPUBLICAN HOUSE, DEMOCRATIC SENATE, DEMOCRATIC
01:35:59WHITE HOUSE, THIS WOULD BE AN IDEAL TIME TO TALK ABOUT SOME OF
01:36:03THESE HARD ISSUES LIKE THIS. HIS RESPONSE TO ME IN THAT PRIVATE CONVERSATION, WHICH I
01:36:05HAVE TALKED ABOUT SINCE THEN,
01:36:11WAS "I DIDN'T CAMPAIGN ON THIS. THIS IS NOT WHAT I CAMPAIGNED ON, WE ARE NOT GOING TO WORK ON THIS."
01:36:14IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO ON THIS.
01:36:18WE HAVE GOT TO HAVE A WHITE HOUSE AND A CONGRESS THAT ARE WILLING TO DO THIS.
01:36:22BUT WE ALSO NEED OUTSIDE GROUPS TO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS. MS. LEAMOND, THANK YOU FOR THE
01:36:25WORK YOU HAVE DONE.
01:36:26THERE ARE A LOT OF SENIORS IN MY
01:36:30STATE. IF I COULD RAISE SOMETHING TO
01:36:33YOU, WE NEED TO HAVE GOOD, HONEST I LIKE THAT DOESN'T START
01:36:37WITH PEOPLE BEING AFRAID THAT I'M GOING TO GO ATTACK SENIORS.
01:36:38IF I GO ON THE AARP'S WEBSITE
01:36:51TODAY, IT SAYS "TELL CONGRESS, DON'T CUT OUR SOCIAL SECURITY. SOCIAL SECURITY DIDN'T CAUSE THE NATION'S DEBT, WE PAID FOR SOCIAL SECURITY THROUGH OUR
01:36:55PAYCHECKS.
01:36:58HOWEVER, SOME ARE CALLING FOR A COMMISSION THAT COULD CUT SOCIAL SECURITY IN ORDER TO REDUCE OUR COUNTRY'S DEBT.
01:37:01THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS. WE WON'T LET LAWMAKERS TAKE THE
01:37:04MONEY WE HAVE EARNED OVER OUR LIFETIME. CONTACT YOUR MEMBER OF
01:37:08CONGRESS." NOW, WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO IS
01:37:12HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT HOW WE STABILIZE THIS PROGRAM. BUT WHAT YOUR ENTITY IS DOING IS
01:37:15TELLING PEOPLE TO CALL MY OFFICE
01:37:20AND SAY "STOP TALKING ABOUT THIS." WE SHOULD TALK ABOUT THIS. I SHOULD LISTEN TO SENATOR SANDERS AND HIS IDEAS ON THIS.
01:37:24I SHOULD LISTEN TO SENATOR WYDEN AND HIS IDEAS ON THIS. THEY SHOULD LISTEN TO MINE.
01:37:26WE'VE GOT TO FIGURE THIS OUT.
01:37:33BUT THIS IS A MESSAGE THAT SAYS "DON'T LET THEM TALK ABOUT THIS." SIX YEARS FROM NOW WE GO
01:37:36INSOLVENT.
01:37:40I HAVE A GREAT RELATIONSHIP WITH
01:37:45THE AARP LEADERSHIP IN MY STATE.
01:37:46KEEPS ME INFORMED.
01:37:52TERRIFIC ADVOCATE FOR SENIORS IN MY STATE. THAT'S GREAT.
01:37:56BUT WE NEED OUTSIDE ENTITIES THAT SAY PLEASE TELL CONGRESS TO SIT DOWN AND HAVE HARD CONVERSATIONS TO SOLVE THIS, NOT DON'T TALK.
01:37:59THAT IS MY CONCERN ON THIS. I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A NATIONAL
01:38:03ALLY ON THIS AS WELL, TO SAY LET'S FIGURE THIS OUT. THIS COMMITTEE IS ANOTHER WAY TO
01:38:05DO IT.
01:38:09AT THE END, CONGRESS STILL HAS TO VOTE. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE GOING TO
01:38:12BE ABLE TO HEAR THIS OUT. BUT LONG-TERM WE HAVE GOT TO FIGURE IT OUT.
01:38:16IS THAT AN UNFAIR REQUEST? MS. LEAMOND: WE WILL MEET YOU WITH THAT REQUEST.
01:38:18I BELIEVE THAT COMMUNICATION WAS
01:38:21REALLY GEARED TOWARD A COMMISSION, WHICH WE DO NOT SUPPORT.
01:38:24WE SUPPORT THE KIND OF BIPARTISAN DISCUSSIONS TO HAVE
01:38:27IN THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND ELSEWHERE, AND TO WORK
01:38:30INDIVIDUALLY.
01:38:37SEN. LANKFORD: BUT A COMMISSION WOULD HAVE BIPARTISAN MEMBERS, INCLUDING NUMBERS OF THIS COMMITTEE. IT IS THE WAY HARD THINGS HAVE
01:38:40BEEN DONE IN THE PAST.
01:38:44MS. LEAMOND: YEAH, WELL, WE HAVEN'T SUPPORTED COMMISSIONS
01:38:46OVER A PERIOD OF TIME, AND ALSO
01:38:50THE FAST-TRACK AUTHORITY INVOLVED IN THAT, BELIEVING THAT
01:38:55THIS IS SUCH AN IMPORTANT ISSUE IT SHOULD BE DEALT WITH THROUGH REGULAR ORDER. SEN. LANKFORD: WHAT IS FUNNY TO
01:38:59ME IS MOST PIECES OF LEGISLATION IN THE TIME I HAVE BEEN IN
01:39:02CONGRESS, WHEN THE COMMISSION IS AT WORK, I HAVE TO CALL SOMEBODY IN ONE OF THE OUTSIDE
01:39:06ORGANIZATIONS BECAUSE THEY SEE
01:39:11THE TEXT BEFORE I DO.
01:39:13THERE IS A LOT OF IN AND OUT CONVERSATIONS.
01:39:17SO ANY WORK LIKE THAT WOULD NOT HAPPEN IN A DARK BACKROOM THAT
01:39:20IS SMOKE-FILLED. I DON'T LIKE SMOKE ANYWAY. IT'S GOING TO BE IN CONVERSATION
01:39:24WITH OUTSIDE GROUPS WITH PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO BE ENGAGED.
01:39:28MY ENCOURAGEMENT WOULD BE TO
01:39:32FIND A WAY TO WORK TOGETHER TO SOLVE THIS, NOT JUST DISCOURAGE ANYONE FROM TALKING ABOUT IT. SEN. WYDEN: SENATOR SANDERS. SEN. SANDERS: THANK YOU, MR.
01:39:36CHAIRMAN, AND THANK YOU, PANELISTS, FOR BEING HERE.
01:39:40SENATOR LANKFORD IS RIGHT, WE
01:39:40SHOULD WORK TOGETHER AND TALK TO
01:39:45EACH OTHER.
01:39:47BUT I THINK IN THAT DISCUSSION, WE HAVE TO TAKE A BROAD LOOK AT WHAT IS HAPPENING IN OUR COUNTRY
01:39:51TODAY.
01:39:54IT GOES BEYOND SOCIAL SECURITY. WHAT IS THE REALITY OF AMERICAN SOCIETY TODAY?
01:39:59I DON'T HAVE TO TELL ANYBODY ON THE PANEL THAT WE HAVE MILLIONS OF SENIORS WHO ARE STRUGGLING.
01:40:03I THINK WE HAVE ABOUT HALF OF SENIORS TRYING TO MAKE IT ON
01:40:08$30,000 A YEAR OR LESS. ONE OUT OF THREE ARE STRUGGLING ECONOMICALLY.
01:40:11UNBELIEVABLY, SENATOR LANKFORD,
01:40:15IT'S REALLY QUITE UNBELIEVABLE, SOMETHING LIKE 20% OF SENIORS IN AMERICA ARE TRYING TO MAKE IT ON
01:40:18$15,000 A YEAR. I MEAN, THAT IS UNBELIEVABLE.
01:40:22I DON'T KNOW HOW ANYBODY SURVIVES ON THAT.
01:40:25BUT WITHIN THAT REALITY OF SO
01:40:29MANY OF OUR SENIORS STRUGGLING, THERE IS ANOTHER REALITY THAT
01:40:31HAS TO BE PLACED ON THE TABLE.
01:40:33AND THAT IS TODAY WE HAVE MORE WEALTH INEQUALITY THAN WE HAVE
01:40:37EVER HAD IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. REMEMBER THE GILDED AGE?
01:40:42ROCKEFELLER AND JP CARNEGIE? MUCH WORSE RIGHT NOW. IF YOU ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT
01:40:46SAVING SOCIAL SECURITY, YOU'VE GOT TO THROW THAT INTO THE HOPPER.
01:40:50AS SENATOR WARREN WAS SAYING,
01:40:52LEGISLATION I HAVE WHICH IS CALLED THE SOCIAL SECURITY
01:40:56EXPANSION ACT IS NOT COMPLICATED.
01:40:58YOU WANT BIPARTISANSHIP? REPUBLICANS SUPPORT IT OUTSIDE
01:41:02OF HERE, IN THE REAL WORLD. DEMOCRATS SUPPORT IT COME
01:41:06INDEPENDENTS SUPPORT IT. NOT VERY COMPLICATED.
01:41:10SHOULD ELON MUSK PAY THE SAME PERCENTAGE OF HIS INCOME -- HE DOESN'T PAY ANY -- INTO THE
01:41:12SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND AS A FIREMAN OR NURSE?
01:41:15ANYBODY THINK THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE?
01:41:16NOBODY DOES.
01:41:22AND THE BOTTOM LINE HERE IS THE PEOPLE ON TOP HAVE NEVER HAD IT
01:41:24SO GOOD AND SENIORS ARE STRUGGLING.
01:41:28WE'VE GOT TO DO WHAT SENIOR ADVOCATES FOR YEARS HAVE SAID.
01:41:30LIFT THAT CAP.
01:41:34AND MR. CHAIRMAN, IF WE DO THAT,
01:41:38IN 2023, THE CHIEF ACTUARY OF
01:41:41THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FOUND WE COULD EXTEND THE LIFE OF SOCIAL SECURITY FOR 75 YEARS.
01:41:44THAT IS PRETTY GOOD, SENATOR LANKFORD.
01:41:48YOU COULD INCREASE BENEFITS BY
01:41:50$2400 A YEAR.
01:41:52SO WE ARE DOING TWO THINGS. HELPING SENIORS TRYING TO GET
01:41:56BY, AND EXPANDING THE SOLVENCY
01:42:00IN SOCIAL SECURITY. AND WE DO THAT WITHOUT RAISING TAXES BY ONE PENNY ON THE 90% OF
01:42:04AMERICANS WHO EARN LESS THAN
01:42:07$250,000 A YEAR. I WOULD SAY TO MY FRIEND SENATOR
01:42:12LANKFORD, THAT HAS GOT TO BE THROWN INTO THE HOPPER. YOU CAN'T JUST TALK ABOUT SOCIAL
01:42:15SECURITY IN ISOLATION. LET ME TAKE A MOMENT TO ASK A
01:42:18FEW QUESTIONS TO SOME OF OUR
01:42:19PANELISTS HERE.
01:42:23PLEASE, BRIEF ANSWER. I DON'T HAVE A LOT OF TIME. DO YOU BELIEVE WE SHOULD INCREASE THE RETIREMENT AGE?
01:42:26MS. VALLAS? MS. VALLAS: OUR RESEARCH FINDS
01:42:31AMERICANS STRONGLY OPPOSE RAISING THE RETIREMENT AGE. MS. LEAMOND: NO.
01:42:34MR. BLAHOUS: YES.
01:42:37MR. GOLDWEIN: YES, AMERICANS ARE
01:42:42LIVING LONGER, AND RAISING THE AGE IS PART OF IT CONFERENCE A PACKAGE TO HELP PEOPLE BUILD
01:42:46MORE WEALTH, GET MORE BENEFITS. SEN. SANDERS: I WOULD JUST SAY
01:42:50IN RESPONSE TO THAT, HALF OF ALL OLDER WORKERS TODAY HAVE NOTHING
01:42:54IN SAVINGS AS THEY FACE RETIREMENT.
01:42:58SECOND QUESTION IS DO YOU BELIEVE WE SHOULD CONSIDER CAPPING OR REDUCING SOCIAL SECURITY?
01:43:02MS. VALLAS: OUR RESEARCH FINDS THAT AMERICANS STRONGLY OPPOSE DOING THAT.
01:43:06MS. LEAMOND: WE WOULD OPPOSE AS WELL. MR. BLAHOUS: I AM OPEN TO IT.
01:43:10MR. GOLDWEIN: IF THE CURRENT
01:43:14INFLATION OVERSTATES INFLATION
01:43:17-- IF WE CAP FOR THE HIGHEST
01:43:26EARNERS, IT IS A SMART IDEA THAT CAN EXTEND SOLVENCY. SEN. SANDERS: MS. VALLAS, DO YOU
01:43:28BELIEVE IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT ELON MUSK, THE WEALTHIEST MAN
01:43:32ALIVE, PAYS THE SAME AMOUNT OF
01:43:33TAXES IN SOCIAL SECURITY AS
01:43:38SOMEONE WHO MAKES $184,000 A YEAR? MS. VALLAS: AMERICANS ACROSS PARTY LINES THINGS THAT DOESN'T
01:43:41MAKE A LOT OF SENSE, AND I HAVE IN-LAWS IN MY FAMILY WHO SUPPORTED THIS CURRENT
01:43:45PRESIDENT, AND THE FIRST THING THEY ASKED ME WHEN THEY FOUND OUT WHEN I DO IS, WHY HASN'T CONGRESS DEALT WITH THE PAYROLL
01:43:48TAX CAP YET?
01:43:51MS. LEAMOND: WE SUPPORT LOOKING
01:43:56AT RAISING THE PAYROLL TAX.
01:43:59THAT IS PART OF WHAT HAS TO BE LOOKED AT IF WE TALK ABOUT NOT CUTTING BENEFITS. MR. BLAHOUS: I THINK A
01:44:02COMPREHENSIVE BIPARTISAN SOLUTION WOULD REQUIRE RAISING THE CAP.
01:44:05MR. GOLDWEIN: I THINK WE SHOULD
01:44:09LOOK AT RAISING THE CAP AND ALSO CAPPING BENEFITS.
01:44:13THAT CAN EXCEED $100,000 FOR THE WEALTHIEST SENIOR COUPLES. SEN. SANDERS: THANK YOU ALL VERY
01:44:17MUCH. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. CHAIR CRAPO: THANK YOU, SENATOR. SENATOR CORTEZ MASTO.
01:44:21SEN. CORTEZ MASTO: THANK YOU ALL FOR BEING HERE.
01:44:26THE DISCUSSION AROUND SOCIAL
01:44:28SECURITY SOLVENCY TENDS TO FOCUS ON TWO THINGS, COST SAVINGS AND
01:44:32PROGRAM EFFICIENCY. WHILE IT WOULD NOT DIRECTLY IMPACT THE TRUST FUND COMPANY ON
01:44:37-- TRUST FUND, ONE PROPOSAL
01:44:41WOULD BIPARTISAN SUPPORT IS REFORMING THE ASSET LIMITS THAT
01:44:46PREVENT LOW-INCOME SENIORS AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES FROM BUILDING EVEN MODEST SAVINGS.
01:44:49THAT IS WHY I INTRODUCED WITH MY
01:44:50GOOD FRIEND OVER THERE, SENATOR
01:44:53CASSIDY, THE SSI SAVINGS PENALTY
01:44:55ELIMINATION ACT. THE BILL WOULD MODERNIZE ASSET
01:44:59LIMITS AND EMPOWER SSI
01:45:03RECIPIENTS TO WORK, SAVE, AND BETTER PLAN FOR THEIR FUTURE. MS. VALLAS, CAN YOU EXPLAIN HOW
01:45:06THE ACT WOULD IMPROVE THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE SSI
01:45:10PROGRAM, AND WHY IT IS IMPORTANT
01:45:12TO INCLUDE SSI IN THE BROADER CONVERSATION ABOUT STRENGTHENING
01:45:16SOCIAL SECURITY?
01:45:18MS. VALLAS: THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP ON THIS
01:45:22ISSUE, AND I ALSO WANT TO SAY, SENATOR LANKFORD, SENATOR
01:45:26CASSIDY, SENATOR WYDEN, EVERYONE ON THIS COMMITTEE WHO HAS SUPPORTED THAT PIECE OF
01:45:30LEGISLATION, THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP.
01:45:32THE LAST TIME THAT SSI'S ASSET LIMITS WERE INCREASED EVEN FOR
01:45:35INFLATION WAS 1984. THAT HAPPENS TO BE THE YEAR I WAS BORN.
01:45:39SO IT HAS BEEN A MINUTE. PEOPLE ARE NOT ABLE TO SAVE EVEN MODEST AMOUNTS OF SAVING, EVEN
01:45:44$2000 FOR AN INDIVIDUAL.
01:45:46IT IS TRAPPING PEOPLE AT A LEVEL WHERE DIGNITY ISN'T EVEN WITHIN
01:45:50REACH. WHAT THAT PIECE OF LEGISLATION WOULD DO -- AND I SHOULD NOTE OUR POLLING FINDS THAT MORE THAN
01:45:55TWO THIRDS OF AMERICANS ACROSS PARTY LINES SUPPORT RAISING MORE
01:45:59FOR EVEN ELIMINATING SSI'S SAVINGS PENALTIES.
01:46:02WHEN IT WOULD DO IS ADDRESS WHAT
01:46:07MY COLLEAGUE JASON FICKNER, WHO HELPED LEAD SOCIAL SECURITY UNDER PRESIDENT BUSH, HAS CALLED THE MOST PROGRESSIVE
01:46:11ANTI-SAVINGS POLICY IN FEDERAL LAW.
01:46:14IT WOULD ALSO BE A WIN-WIN FOR THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, BECAUSE IT WOULD
01:46:18RELIEVE A COSTLY,
01:46:22ADMINISTRATIVELY BURDENSOME RULE FOR THEM TO ACTUALLY RUN.
01:46:27THIS IS A COMMON-SENSE THING THAT NEEDS TO BE PART OF THIS CONVERSATION, AS WELL AS OTHER
01:46:31LONG OUTDATED RULES IN SSI THAT NEED TO BE UPDATED, AND I'M GLAD
01:46:33TO SEE THIS COMMITTEE START TO PAY BIPARTISAN ATTENTION.
01:46:37SEN. CORTEZ MASTO: MS. LEAMOND, YOU WOULD AGREE WITH THAT? MS. LEAMOND: WE SUPPORT THAT AS
01:46:39WELL.
01:46:45SEN. CORTEZ MASTO: THANK YOU. CONGRESS HAS NOT ACTED ON RECOMMENDATIONS OF A PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION SINCE
01:46:491983. 1983. AMERICANS WANT TO KNOW THEY CAN
01:46:52DEPEND ON THE SOCIAL SECURITY
01:46:55PROGRAM, AND YET WE HAVE GONE 43 YEARS WITHOUT PURSUING
01:46:58MEANINGFUL SOLUTIONS. WHAT BARRIERS HAVE PREVENTED
01:47:00CONGRESS FROM ACTING ON RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED BY
01:47:04COMMISSIONS?
01:47:07MS. LEAMOND: WELL, I THINK IT IS
01:47:09A VERY, VERY CHALLENGING ISSUE AND VERY HARD TO COME TOGETHER IN A BIPARTISAN WAY TO ADDRESS
01:47:13IT.
01:47:14WE ARE NOW AT A POINT WHERE I
01:47:19THINK WE ALL AGREE THAT THE TIME HAS COME WHEN IT MUST BE
01:47:21ADDRESSED.
01:47:25AND OUR PREFERENCE IS NOT A COMMISSION.
01:47:28IT IS TO COME WITH REGULAR ORDER
01:47:31TO THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE,
01:47:33HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE,
01:47:41DEBATE, REVIEW ALL OF THE PROPOSALS. THERE ARE MANY PROPOSALS TO MAKE SOCIAL SECURITY MORE SECURE. SEN. CORTEZ MASTO: THOSE
01:47:44PROPOSALS ARE BIPARTISAN, CORRECT?
01:47:46MS. LEAMOND: PARDON ME?
01:47:51SEN. CORTEZ MASTO: THEY ARE BIPARTISAN, CORRECT? MS. LEAMOND: MANY OF THEM ARE BIPARTISAN WITHIN THE CONGRESS.
01:47:56MEMBERS WHO HAVE COME TOGETHER AND WORK ON VARIOUS APPROACHES. SOME ARE NOT, BUT MANY ARE
01:48:00BIPARTISAN. SEN. CORTEZ MASTO: THANK YOU. MR. GOLDWEIN, THIS YEAR'S
01:48:03ANNUAL SOCIAL SECURITY TRUSTEE
01:48:07REPORT CITED HR 1 AS ONE OF THREE FACTORS THAT INCREASE TO THE ACTUARIAL DEFICIT OF THE
01:48:10SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND.
01:48:12IN FACT, THIS LAW, WHICH ALL BUT
01:48:17ONE OF MY REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES ON THIS COMMITTEE VOTED FOR, ACCOUNTS FOR 25% OF THIS
01:48:22INCREASE, THE LARGEST SINGLE-YEAR CHANGE IN ACTUARIAL BALANCE IN OVER 30 YEARS.
01:48:24MR. GOLDWEIN, CAN YOU TELL US
01:48:28WHAT HR 1 HAS DONE TO ACCELERATE SOCIAL SECURITY INSOLVENCY? AND WHAT THIS MEANS FOR
01:48:32BENEFICIARIES LONG-TERM? MR. GOLDWEIN: ONE SOURCE OF REVENUE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY IS
01:48:35THE INCOME TAXATION OF BENEFITS.
01:48:38I BELIEVE AARP SUPPORTED A
01:48:41PROVISION IN THE ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL THAT REDUCED TAXATION BENEFITS BY EXPANDING
01:48:46-- EXPANDING THE SENIOR DEDUCTION.
01:48:50THAT COME IN ADDITION TO THE LOWER RATES, MEANS WE ARE GETTING LESS MONEY COMING INTO THE TRUST FUND, WHICH BRINGS
01:48:58-- I KNOW MY TIME IS UP. WE NEED BIPARTISAN SOLUTIONS.
01:49:02WE HAVE TO FIX THIS. THAT MEANS WORKING TOGETHER.
01:49:06AND I KNOW WORKING TOGETHER,
01:49:10THERE'S A LOT OF GREAT IDEAS IF WE WOULD JUST MAKE THIS A FOCUS
01:49:12AND A PRIORITY, WE CAN GET SOMETHING DONE. THANK YOU ALL FOR STAYING IN
01:49:16THIS FIGHT. >> THANK YOU SENATOR CORTEZ MASTO.
01:49:22WE HAVE A VOTE.
01:49:25EXPECT ANY OTHER SENATORS TO
01:49:27SHOW UP BEFORE I WRAP UP THE HEARING TODAY.
01:49:30I WANT TO THANK OUR WITNESSES FOR APPEARING TODAY.
01:49:33WITH THAT IN MIND, I REMIND MY COLLEAGUES THE DEADLINE FOR
01:49:37SUBMITTING ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE
01:49:37RECORD IS 5:00 P.M. ON
01:49:42WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 12. WITH THAT, THE COMMITTEE IS ADJOURNED.
01:49:49-- SORRY, WE JUST ADJOURNED.
01:49:53>> HE STOLE MY GAVEL.
01:50:02>> C-SPAN'S WASHINGTON JOURNAL.
01:50:05OUR LIVE FORM INVITING YOU TO
01:50:07DISCUSS THE LATEST ISSUES IN
01:50:09GOVERNMENT, POLITICS, AND PUBLIC POLICY.
01:50:12FROM WASHINGTON TO ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
01:50:14SUNDAY MORNING, WE WILL TALK
01:50:17WITH THE HOST OF THE DINO BUT
01:50:19I'LL SHOW ON CAMPAIGN 2026, GROWING MOMENTUM OF DEMOCRATIC
01:50:23SOCIALISM, AND THE FUTURE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
01:50:27ALSO MORE ON CAMPAIGN 2020 SIX.
01:50:30DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS, THE IRAN WAR, AND THE NEWS OF THE WEEK
01:50:34WITH WASHINGTON EXAMINER EDITOR.
01:50:37AT C-SPAN'S WASHINGTON JOURNAL. JOIN IN THE CONVERSATION AT 7:00
01:50:41EASTERN SUNDAY MORNING ON
01:50:43C-SPAN, C-SPAN NOW, OR ONLINE AT C-SPAN.ORG.
01:50:51HOUSE SPEAKER MIKE JOHNSON SAID REPUBLICANS WILL GROW THEIR
01:50:54MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE IN THE MIDTERM ELECTIONS AND DEFY
01:50:58HISTORY FOR A SITTING PRESIDENT
01:51:00TO PICK UP SEATS FOR HIS PARTY. HE CRITICIZED THE DEMOCRATIC
01:51:04PARTY, CLAIMING IT WAS EMBRACING
01:51:06COMMUNISM AND SOCIALISM, AND
01:51:09WARRANTY ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES WHILE URGING VOTERS
01:51:11NOT TO LET THE COMMUNISTS TAKE OVER CONGRESS.
01:51:15HE MADE THESE COMMENTS TO REPORTERS IN ARIZONA WITH THE
01:51:17TREASURY SECRETARY AND ARIZONA
01:51:20REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN JUAN CISCOMANI AFTER TOURING A
01:51:24MANUFACTURING FACILITY AND PROMOTING REPUBLICAN TAX
01:51:28POLICIES.
01:51:53PATIENCE.
01:51:54WE JUST CONCLUDED A ROUNDTABLE
01:51:58WITH PEPSICO AND FRITO-LAY A
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.