Denmark: DR1

20260915 08:30 UTC · 00:30:59 · 530 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 465 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:00Yes, it's the same thing, that one follows very closely, presumably has
00:00:04contacts with other countries to
00:00:07inform about what has happened, uh, and see and
00:00:11hear how they view the situation, and then the
00:00:15Russian ambassador will, as said, go to
00:00:18a meeting at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this typically takes place with
00:00:21the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where it is made
00:00:24clear that this is completely
00:00:27unacceptable, uh. And then
00:00:30one probably also considers if there are other things one
00:00:33should do, anything else one can do.
00:00:37And Christine, what kind of signal is it to ask the Russian
00:00:41ambassador to come for a
00:00:44the Russians are provocative, they are meeting?
00:00:46Well, it's a diplomatic
00:00:49step, uh, that one can use. There is such a
00:00:52diplomatic ladder, you can also start
00:00:55expelling diplomats, you can, if it's the really big
00:00:59scale, break off diplomatic relations with
00:01:02a country, and this, this is still quite low
00:01:06on the scale,
00:01:09but it's a diplomatic way to make it clear that
00:01:12this is unacceptable, that
00:01:15uh, that one is dissatisfied with what is happening, uh, so it's, it's
00:01:19such - one of the lower steps in the
00:01:22diplomatic handbook, and it's not something you can send an
00:01:25answer key for this, but still, some people probably
00:01:29think:... Hmm, where, where on the scale are we with
00:01:33such a conversation? Who, uh, who decides
00:01:39what the government is doing right here is that? So, it's usually always
00:01:43the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs who
00:01:46handles these types of conversations, it's
00:01:49not, it's not Lykke herself, it's not the Foreign Minister, it's at
00:01:52an official level, but of course the
00:01:55highest official in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who
00:01:59normally conducts these types of
00:02:02conversations, uh, and it, it is, yes, it is such
00:02:06a diplomatic step, which is a
00:02:09marking that Denmark will not tolerate
00:02:13this, and the situation as the government sees it
00:02:17with Russia is that they are constantly
00:02:20trying to provoke NATO
00:02:23countries, that there are many
00:02:26hybrid attacks, not all of them we hear
00:02:30about, not all of them succeed, but that there
00:02:33is a constant
00:02:36provocation from
00:02:39say, their finger on the trigger, I mean, they are Russia, which they are now trying to respond to in this
00:02:41way, and how serious a political situation is
00:02:44that?
00:02:48Well, I think at least the government and many of
00:02:52the parties in parliament see the whole situation with the
00:02:55way Russia is acting now as very serious
00:02:59and... potentially even more dangerous than what we are experiencing
00:03:03now. You can also hear from the parties that there is
00:03:07very, very strong support for the government and for the way
00:03:10the government is acting, and in such foreign policy
00:03:14situations, security policy situations, it is usually
00:03:18a sign that people take it very seriously, so
00:03:21seriously that the parties do not feel the urge to make
00:03:25politics out of this. Yes, we have also heard from the various
00:03:29politicians - all morning, all
00:03:32forenoon, that they support the government's line.
00:03:35Christine, this is also a balancing act for
00:03:38politicians, because they have to deal with the seriousness, which we also hear from
00:03:42experts, as it is, but still,
00:03:46one should not talk the population into
00:03:49worry, what kind
00:03:50of balancing act is that?
00:03:54Well, it's difficult with everything that's happening right
00:03:57now, that you, you want
00:04:01Danes to be aware of how serious the situation
00:04:04is, also to ensure continued
00:04:07support for the very massive aid to
00:04:10Ukraine, which the government and many parties
00:04:14see as a shield against
00:04:17Russia, that one starts, uh, meaning if
00:04:21Russia wins, it goes on, and now the politicians are coming
00:04:25out, we'll hurry over to them, won't we, Christine, let's see if we
00:04:28can get one of them to talk. Were you less worried than when you went in? No,
00:04:32the situation is, uh, just as serious as it has been all
00:04:36along, uh, it's clearly an
00:04:39escalation from the Russian side, but it doesn't end there,
00:04:43that the way we have handled it from a military
00:04:46professional point of view, we are very confident, and you are also confident in the way the Danish helicopter acted, yes, so it is
00:04:50purely a Russian provocation, this
00:04:53is, so my own analysis is that Russia is currently in the process
00:04:57of moving on what is called normally. And that
00:05:00means that they strive for
00:05:04NATO countries to start lowering
00:05:06their guard when aggression occurs, it is then
00:05:10simply important that we are ready. And we have close cooperation
00:05:13continuously both in the Nordic countries, in Europe and of course also in NATO, but you are
00:05:17not more confident after you came out of this, so the seriousness is the
00:05:21same, and what this briefing was about was solely a
00:05:24military professional briefing, and where did it take place, the
00:05:28incident itself? Well, I have nothing substantive to
00:05:31add.
00:05:33How, in relation to whether it was a
00:05:37poorly manned crew, or whether it was a deliberate action from Russia's side, that is,
00:05:41Putin's side? Yes, so purely military professional
00:05:44assessments, I have nothing to contribute
00:05:48with. We have spoken with an expert who says that it is clear that
00:05:51the Russians react when the Danes provoke by
00:05:55sending a helicopter to take pictures. What do you think about that?
00:05:58Well, it's completely normal that we, uh, have
00:06:02helicopters out and photograph military
00:06:05vessels, and the helicopter is allowed to be there, the Russian vessel is allowed to be
00:06:09there, but it cannot be perceived as a provocation to fly over and
00:06:13take pictures of a frigate, no, what happened here is an aggression, it's completely
00:06:17normal, also for that particular vessel, that
00:06:19we, uh, encounter it and photograph it, so
00:06:23it is a, uh, a Russian escalation that one
00:06:27actually shoots at a military helicopter, but they
00:06:31don't shoot, they just react, meaning they send up some
00:06:33warning flares, couldn't it be
00:06:36like that?
00:06:39Inger Støjberg, Inger Støjberg, you have just been to a
00:06:42military professional assessment or briefing here in the Ministry of Defense, are you
00:06:46less confident than when you, or more confident than when you went in? I feel exactly
00:06:50the same as when I went in, that I think the government is acting completely correctly in this
00:06:54matter, uh, and that it simply proves
00:06:57that we must continue to arm, it proves
00:07:01that we must stand together in Parliament, and there must not be a
00:07:05piece of paper to put between
00:07:07the parties in Parliament when it comes to our
00:07:11rejection of Russia, uh, and that it also
00:07:15means that we must continue to support Ukraine, because
00:07:19Ukraine's fight for freedom is also our fight for freedom, but is it a viable
00:07:23path we are on right now, when we see these Russian provocations or attacks again and
00:07:26again? Excuse me, is it a viable path we are
00:07:29on, I mean, now we see a Russian provocation again, and it
00:07:33is becoming, there are more and more of them, we see them all over Europe, how can it be the
00:07:37right way to go, that we should just summon an ambassador in Ny? Yes, but it
00:07:41is not just summoning an ambassador, it is
00:07:45one of the tools in the toolbox,
00:07:49and it gives the opportunity that if the situation becomes
00:07:52more serious, then there are also more
00:07:56tools in the toolbox, so I believe that it is completely proportionate and completely
00:08:00correct what the government is doing, yes, other sanctions could, or other things in reverse,
00:08:04could be sanctions, is that what you see being used next? Well,
00:08:07that's not where we are with this incident,
00:08:11but, uh, but one cannot say that in the future, I mean, the only thing we can
00:08:15say with certainty is that the Russians are aggressive, and they
00:08:19are also constantly becoming more aggressive, and that they are always
00:08:22trying to see where the limit is before
00:08:25NATO reacts uh,
00:08:28harder than this, so but I think it's the absolutely
00:08:32right way the government has handled this case. Yesterday it was a signal flare that
00:08:36was sent towards a Danish
00:08:38military helicopter,
00:08:41do you see it as a provocation or do you see it as an
00:08:43attack? I see it as a
00:08:47provocation in reality,
00:08:50and what we can see with the Russians at the moment is
00:08:54that they are becoming more and more intrusive, uh, we saw it
00:08:57here a few days ago, also very close to the
00:09:01Polish border, uh, and there have also
00:09:04been other similar incidents elsewhere,
00:09:08uh, so there is no doubt that the Russians
00:09:12are... uh, I mean, they are aggressive and they are
00:09:15testing us, and that's also why, when we are tested by
00:09:19an aggressive party, uh, and a
00:09:22malicious party like Russia, well, then we must also stand together, and that's
00:09:26of course also why I fully and completely support the government in this. You've said a lot of
00:09:30times that we must stand together, and stand together with the government in this, is it also
00:09:33to send a signal to the Danes that they shouldn't be worried about this?
00:09:37Well, that's what it is, too, I mean, but now it's also
00:09:40addressed to the parliamentary parties, that it is absolutely crucial
00:09:44that there is no, that there are no questions raised about
00:09:47our distancing from the
00:09:50Russians. What did you learn about the incident in there
00:09:54today? For good reason, I cannot say anything about what we learned about the incident, but
00:09:58I think we got an excellent briefing about it, and I
00:10:02am fully satisfied with what the government has presented. We have
00:10:05spoken with an expert on TV2 who says that it is clear, yes, and Alexandersen, whom
00:10:09we are now going to hear from, probably can't go into more detail. But let's just
00:10:13hear how he perceived
00:10:15the briefing. Alexandersen, what kind of
00:10:18briefing was this? It was a briefing about the incident that happened
00:10:22yesterday, where a uh. Fenec
00:10:26uhm helicopter, uh, I can also
00:10:28do this, what came out of this briefing for you? I came out of the briefing, we
00:10:32were informed that a Russian
00:10:35frigate had fired signal flares at a
00:10:38helicopter, and if they had hit, the crew might have been in
00:10:42danger onboard the helicopter, and that is of course not acceptable, it is being
00:10:45communicated, and we will strengthen surveillance, we
00:10:49will not back down, that is an important signal, and it is also important to
00:10:52say that we are not activating article four and five.
00:10:56"And in the Danish People's Party, we agree with the government not to do that, and why
00:10:59is that? Because we
00:11:02are, it's too violent
00:11:06a reaction, but
00:11:09aggressive, and we don't know if the
00:11:13captain overreacted, or if it's part of a larger
00:11:16aggression from Russia, we don't know. Is it
00:11:20your impression that the Danish helicopter did what it was supposed to do, I mean
00:11:24can this?" "No, the Danish helicopter has done what it
00:11:28always does, and what we always do, and what is done internationally, when a
00:11:31vessel arrives, one monitors it. In this case,
00:11:35they were closer due to technology, it's completely
00:11:38common maritime law, so it is the Russians who overreacted, and they will be
00:11:42told that by the government. The last
00:11:45question, can't we just keep talking, I mean, shouldn't there be a
00:11:49harsher reaction at some point towards a Russia that goes further and further? Yes, but now
00:11:53you're talking about a harsh reaction.
00:11:55"There will also be a reaction, the Russian ambassador will be
00:11:58summoned, and we will strengthen surveillance, we will
00:12:02not back down, and that is an important signal to send, but we
00:12:06should of course not go to war with
00:12:08the Russians because of some signal flares sent up by an aggressive
00:12:12Russian frigate captain, that's not acceptable, and they will be told that, and now we are strengthening
00:12:16surveillance.
00:12:18And we shall hear from Markus Knutt from the Conservative People's Party,
00:12:21Defense Spokesperson,
00:12:24Markus Knutt. A briefing that you were keen on when you went in, what came out of
00:12:27it? Well, the most important thing for me was to express support for the
00:12:31government's line regarding summoning the Russian ambassador, but also that
00:12:35what we have requested, that on the one hand, article four or five is not activated,
00:12:38but that in addition to that, a conversation is held
00:12:42with our NATO allies, consult them, inform them,
00:12:46uh, so that this is not a unique Danish
00:12:49event, but something that should be seen in a larger
00:12:53context with the activities that have, among other things, happened in Germany at the Polish
00:12:56border and so on, but isn't that what article 4 is about? No, article 4, that's where you
00:13:00formally summon the member states to uh, to a
00:13:03consultation, and why is that too much? We believe we are not
00:13:07there yet, and it is also important for us to maintain calm and not escalate towards
00:13:10the Russians, but that parallel to that, we have informal
00:13:14conversations with our NATO allies - both to
00:13:17express their support, but
00:13:21also to have a dialogue about what we do
00:13:24together, I think that's the right level, of course there are many things you can't say, which we probably learned in there,
00:13:28what more can you say about what you learned about the Danish reaction to this,
00:13:31also in defense terms? Well, I think the Danish reaction, also from
00:13:35the defense side, has been the right one, you don't escalate
00:13:38unnecessarily, you also protect our soldiers who are out there, that is very, very
00:13:42important, so I think the defense has acted completely correctly here, uh,
00:13:45and what I have, as I said, requested, that we also have an informal dialogue with our
00:13:49partners without activating Article 4, I can then learn
00:13:52this morning from the minister that they are also doing that. What is your
00:13:56impression of what caused this situation to arise? I mean, is it
00:14:00a Russian, a Russian ship that shoots
00:14:03unprovoked, is it a Danish helicopter that does something it shouldn't? I mean, what is your impression of what really
00:14:07happened here? My impression is that the Danish defense, the Danish
00:14:10helicopter acted completely according to the international guidelines and according to
00:14:14the custom and routine that has been in place for many years in
00:14:17the area, but that the Russians, for one reason or another, choose to
00:14:21escalate very, very aggressively, and it is difficult not to also
00:14:25see it in the light of the incidents that have occurred at the Polish-Ukrainian border with
00:14:28drone attacks against trains, the incidents that have occurred in Leipzig in Germany, but that
00:14:32is of course just an observation I can make, now you have become a little wiser here in
00:14:35the ministry, do you see this as an attack from the Russian side? It is at least
00:14:39a very, very strong provocation, and these
00:14:42flares could very easily have hit this helicopter, which, as I
00:14:46understand it, was flying with the door open, and to get such a huge
00:14:49fireball inside, it could have resulted in fatalities, so
00:14:52it - it's hard not to see this as a very, very.
00:14:57Why won't you call it an attack? They're shooting fireballs through the air at a Danish
00:15:00helicopter? I don't think I'm the right person to say whether it's
00:15:04an escalation or an attack, I mean, this is by its very
00:15:08nature a distress flare used to signal that a ship is
00:15:11in distress at sea. But
00:15:14if it hits a target, it can do a lot of damage, and that's why it's
00:15:18serious. Last question from my side here, how close is your impression that it was,
00:15:21I mean, we hear they shot at this helicopter, how close is your impression
00:15:25that they were to hitting it? Yes, I can't say how close they were to actually
00:15:29hitting it, but they were certainly close enough that it wasn't just a random shot
00:15:33in the air, I mean, the helicopter flew at a distance that it
00:15:36has flown many times before, this was
00:15:40a routine flight, and they were close enough to
00:15:44hit it that this is a very, very serious incident. Yes, that's what Markus Knutt said, and of course there are
00:15:47details that he doesn't tell
00:15:51about, and we hope to hear from Defense Chief Michael Hylgaard,
00:15:55and the Defense Minister, we are of course trying to catch them to learn
00:15:59more about these details. For Niels Fastrup, when you sit back and
00:16:03listen to the few details that the politicians come out with, what would you like
00:16:06to have an answer to? Well, it's clear, I mean, this question of how,
00:16:10what exactly happened in the situation, what kind of Russian ship was it, where exactly
00:16:14was it, and how did the Danish helicopter fly, or
00:16:18did it not, and then of course also, I mean, as also emerges
00:16:21here, have the Russians, the Russian naval ships, have they received a new
00:16:25order of conduct from their, from their supreme
00:16:28commander, their headquarters, stating that they must now escalate when these
00:16:32incidents occur, and for example use this, this distress
00:16:36signal flare. Step, I mean, if someone comes and wants to take pictures of
00:16:39them, is there a change in the picture out there? I think that will also be really interesting
00:16:43for, but is it something we can ever be
00:16:46100% clear about if they
00:16:49have it? It is, it is something that some people have insight
00:16:53into, uh, and I mean, they get that kind of information, whether such
00:16:56new orders come to the Russian fleet, and then there is also, if it
00:17:00happens again, or if something even more violent happens next time, uh,
00:17:04that, that is also something I will certainly be following, or. And this in itself,
00:17:08and if there is a little more calm, even though the
00:17:11background, as I have also said earlier, is of course that the situation in
00:17:14the Baltic Sea, including in the Danish straits, is very tense at the
00:17:18moment. It was a military professional briefing,
00:17:22so I assume that Michael Hylgaard definitely
00:17:25spoke. What would you like to have an answer
00:17:29to? If you were at that briefing, Mads, what would you like to have an answer
00:17:32to? I would really like to know if there was anything at all in
00:17:36uh, so to speak, the operational pattern of both
00:17:39military units that stood out, meaning that was unusual. What could
00:17:43that be? For example, if the Danish helicopter came
00:17:47to fly a little closer than usual,
00:17:50uh, it doesn't sound like that from what we can hear
00:17:54the politicians say, uh, we hear at least
00:17:57some of them say, well, it happened exactly as
00:18:01usual, there was no, there was nothing that stood out, but
00:18:03still, uh, we also know in hindsight that...
00:18:07experiences from before, that the Russians, they sail around also in
00:18:11Danish waters, with, uh, I was almost about to
00:18:16vigilant, partly because of shadow fleets, but also because the Russians
00:18:20have learned the hard way that they can be attacked by drones, so to
00:18:24speak, anywhere, and we have also seen that they have fired
00:18:27warning shots at a buoy in the English Channel, so
00:18:31one knows that one should not get too close to Russian naval ships,
00:18:35has it happened here anyway by a far? Maybe there's no indication of it, but we're not
00:18:39completely clear yet, uh, completely
00:18:42clear, sorry, about the actions. Can we
00:18:46ever get that clarity, because now I'm thinking, is there simply
00:18:50video material, image material, just like a plane has a black
00:18:53box, can we in any way, uh, become clear about
00:18:56the specific incident?
00:18:59I mean, I would say, no, uh, maybe, we don't know, but
00:19:03given that it was a Fenec helicopter that was out, Fenec helicopters usually
00:19:07don't have permanently mounted video equipment
00:19:11or infrared cameras, uh, Seahawk
00:19:14helicopters, for example, do, some of the large rescue helicopters can also
00:19:18have that, it is equipment that records
00:19:21video, so you would typically be able to find video recordings of
00:19:24it, given that we hear the head of the air force say that they were sitting and taking
00:19:28pictures out of an open door, and given that I know that usually Fenec
00:19:31helicopters don't have permanently mounted equipment, it was probably
00:19:35a regular handheld
00:19:37camera, uhm, whether it was a video camera or a still camera,
00:19:41I don't know, but looking at the helicopter type, I don't think
00:19:45we should expect to get a video recording of this,
00:19:49and this is the Fenec helicopter we see
00:19:52pictures of here, this is from an exercise, it's archive, that's also why we
00:19:56always write it up in the corner there, so
00:19:59that one doesn't think that this is a direct picture or doesn't think that it is from
00:20:03the incident yesterday, the incident, which I still
00:20:06lack a clear answer to, whether it happened in the evening,
00:20:10when we actually got the message from the Defense Command, I believe it
00:20:14was, or whether it was in the afternoon, there is some doubt about that, I will certainly
00:20:18uh say so as soon as we know, the word "they"
00:20:21is constantly used, Niels Fastrup, so I assume there was
00:20:25more, of course there was more than one person in the helicopter, there was both someone to
00:20:29pilot, there was of course also someone to take pictures, do we know anything about how many are
00:20:32normally, uh, normally in such helicopters when they
00:20:36uh fly around? around and take pictures,
00:20:39I mean, that's exactly the kind of question we should probably ask my good colleague Mads Korser, who
00:20:43has a deeper military professional knowledge of
00:20:46that kind, I certainly don't know, maybe Mads knows. So
00:20:50normally there are two crew members, there's a
00:20:53pilot, and then there's an assisting pilot or a
00:20:56navigator, uhm, and then it can be
00:20:58configured in different ways, it could easily be that there was another
00:21:02observer in the back seat, maybe even two observers, when they
00:21:06when they fly out, I mean, uh, so they open the
00:21:10rear side door, as we can see there, someone sitting there waving, uh,
00:21:13you can open it like that, and then point a camera out, so I would say,
00:21:17roughly between two and four onboard. Normally, they can
00:21:21manage with two onboard, they can also profile into
00:21:23it. Niels, uh, or
00:21:27Mads, do you know what the other Nordic countries do, do they
00:21:30also have helicopters of that kind, where they simply, uh,
00:21:34yes, fly around and move into those pockets, as
00:21:38you also talked about before, meaning away from their own waters, but
00:21:41uh, the pockets between their own waters and
00:21:45international waters, do they operate in the same
00:21:47way?
00:21:49I would say, probably, I mean, we know that there is increased
00:21:52activity in the Baltic Sea, uh, we know
00:21:56that NATO has been engaged in, and still is,
00:21:59still, still is engaged in an operation called
00:22:02Baltic Sentry, also in the form of such fixed
00:22:06surveillance capabilities, they test some, some, some
00:22:09drone equipment, they also patrol the air,
00:22:12uh, naval ships patrol around, so there is heightened
00:22:16vigilance, it happens in different ways with different tools. And
00:22:20it can be ships, it can be planes, it can be helicopters, it can even be drones, I think
00:22:23we can venture to say that, yes, I mean, all
00:22:27the Scandinavian countries do it to some extent, whether it happens exactly
00:22:31in the same way, I mean, a
00:22:34helicopter out, taking images, we don't know that, but
00:22:37one wants to physically have a rope and visually look at what kind of ships they are,
00:22:41so one, one, one, uh, one doesn't trust
00:22:44radar images alone, one especially doesn't trust
00:22:48these various Marine traffic surveillance sites, because
00:22:52the Russians typically don't appear there. Niels, does one
00:22:55have reason to be surprised about such a Russian frigate that
00:22:59is located in international
00:23:02waters? It could be that they were just on their way from A to
00:23:06B? Well, one does, at least in this way, that,
00:23:09according to my information, the Russians have,
00:23:13I don't know exactly when they started,
00:23:17but within a few years or within a few months,
00:23:20they started a new naval operation in our
00:23:23nearby waters, which aims to patrol and
00:23:27deter Denmark and other European countries from boarding
00:23:31the shadow fleet tankers, and there they have divided, among other things, the Baltic Sea, also the
00:23:34Danish waters into so-called patrol zones, that is what
00:23:38the Russians have done, and in each of these patrol zones there is a
00:23:41Russian warship, more or less permanently, which
00:23:45has the task of deterring Sweden or Germany or Denmark
00:23:48or Great Britain or France from boarding these uh,
00:23:52Russian, uh, excuse me, Russian shadow fleet tankers, and this
00:23:56military operation that Russia is conducting now, such a
00:23:59naval operation, is something new, that is, and something
00:24:03unusual, and a form of escalation,
00:24:06uh, and I think, without being sure, I could imagine that this is the
00:24:10context in which this incident should be seen, and just to be
00:24:14completely clear, when you say shadow fleet, what does that cover,
00:24:17well, these are these uh, typically old uh
00:24:21tankers that Russia operates and that Russia uses
00:24:25to sell, sail oil out of through the Danish straits to
00:24:29the world market to finance, among other things, the war in Ukraine. See, now we have
00:24:33again been in the archive. We like
00:24:35that archive, of course, when there is something relevant. Now I can't sit and point out
00:24:39what this is, these are Russian frigates, but it is at least
00:24:42relevant archive material, so what are we to
00:24:45imagine when Russia has a, a shadow fleet
00:24:49in place? Well, it's because the EU and
00:24:52other countries have introduced sanctions on Russian oil trade and have tried to
00:24:56shut down Russia's ability to sell oil and make money in that
00:24:59way, so Russia has launched a huge operation, where
00:25:03they have, I don't know if they have purchased or otherwise acquired
00:25:06hundreds of old
00:25:09oil tankers, which they now operate from the Russian side through
00:25:12shell companies in a way that bypasses these sanctions from the European
00:25:16side, so there are always tankers sailing in and out of
00:25:20the Baltic Sea loaded with oil to the world market, and that is the
00:25:24way Russia earns a very, very large part of the money right now, which they use for
00:25:28the war in Ukraine, and that is, in turn, also, so Russia has a
00:25:32strategic interest in these ships being able to sail, and
00:25:35conversely, Europe and NATO are also trying to shut this down, so
00:25:39that generates a very, very tense situation in the Baltic Sea and also
00:25:42in Danish waters, and it could be something like what we see here,
00:25:46now we are not very close to it, but well. so it
00:25:50could be Niels, that was actually the question,
00:25:53Niels, it could be, yes, that, that, those are some,
00:25:57some, some tankers, as we see here, large, large
00:26:01tankers, I don't know, 200, 250 meters long, uh, typically a little
00:26:04older, that sail up through Storebælt almost daily, I would
00:26:08think, uh, that is, and which Russia wants to sail and which
00:26:12NATO, from the European side, wants to shut down, and that generates some tension,
00:26:16without me being able to say for sure that the incident yesterday is
00:26:19related to it, it is at least a context around what is happening
00:26:22now, we certainly can't say
00:26:25at all, now we go to Christiansborg to my good colleague Anja
00:26:29Westvald, because you have caught - is it conservative? Mona
00:26:32Jul,
00:26:35It's the conservative Mona Jul, what's happening here at Christiansborg is that
00:26:38the parties are going to group meetings, that's where you get the most
00:26:42up-to-date information about what's going on in Danish politics, and one must say,
00:26:46that the most important thing today is last night's incident, Mona
00:26:49Jul, uh, you have received a briefing, your defense spokesperson has received
00:26:52a briefing over at the Ministry of Defense, maybe you have too, what do you say about the way
00:26:56Denmark has reacted, have we been sharp enough by
00:27:00summoning the Russian ambassador for talks. Yes, I think
00:27:04it's a very serious situation, we see Russia trying to intimidate
00:27:07us, and we must not let that affect us in any way, but we
00:27:11also recognize that there is a pattern now,
00:27:14Leipzig Halle, uh, we had a
00:27:17plane over Litown recently that was supposed to shoot down a drone, we
00:27:21had the train between Ukraine and
00:27:24Poland, and now we see this with Flares, which
00:27:28are enormously dangerous, and shooting up, you can't be very
00:27:31precise, but it could of course have destroyed a helicopter
00:27:35and created a very, very serious situation,
00:27:38fortunately that didn't happen. I think
00:27:42to make sure to address it at the level that needs to be addressed in the
00:27:46first instance, and that is the Russian ambassador, who needs to have a
00:27:49really thorough talk with the Danish government, because we certainly cannot keep
00:27:53watching this. He has already been in talks several
00:27:56times at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs about various previous incidents. Is
00:27:59it good enough when one now sees something that resembles direct attacks from
00:28:03a military vessel on a military
00:28:06helicopter? Well, in this situation, that is exactly what
00:28:09is needed, but it is clear that we also have a clear expectation that there
00:28:13will be cooperation, a dialogue across NATO countries, it's good that we are
00:28:17members of NATO, it's good that we are members of the EU, so we have someone we
00:28:20can talk about this with, with whom we can stand together, and possibly also return
00:28:24together about it. Um, we have, as you
00:28:28say, seen a number of cases around Europe, and most recently here
00:28:32in Denmark, but isn't it time that NATO says,
00:28:35now we must activate some of these
00:28:38solidarity clauses we have, for example the one that says we must
00:28:42react collectively and significantly, not militarily, but in the form of collective
00:28:46protests, but there is no doubt that what we are trying to
00:28:49avoid, I imagine, is to avoid activating precisely some of these
00:28:53pacts, because then you also escalate the situation, and what is really important
00:28:57now is to hit it precisely, and I think the government is doing that here by
00:29:00bringing in the ambassador, but it's not like we should keep
00:29:04watching as we receive threats, and something very, very serious
00:29:08could actually have happened here, we cannot keep watching that. We are in full swing with an
00:29:12arms build-up in Denmark, buy, buy, buy, said the Prime Minister, we still
00:29:15lack a large number of purchases, for example at sea, do
00:29:19you think it's going too slowly with us getting started with our arms build-up?
00:29:23Yes, I think it is. I think everything has gone too slowly, there is
00:29:26no doubt that the intentions have been there. I think we stand together in the
00:29:30Danish Parliament, most of the parties fortunately, that we must arm
00:29:34Denmark, but there is also no doubt that patience is wearing
00:29:38thin from some of our sides. I usually say that there is
00:29:42nothing that anyone can propose that we don't want faster and more of, and that is precisely
00:29:45the situation with the Danish defense still. Is this something,
00:29:49do you think, that calls for accelerating and you, who are
00:29:52in the defense committee, pushing for some of this to be implemented
00:29:56faster, for example frigate purchases,
00:29:59well, you can't just buy a frigate unfortunately, I mean. it takes
00:30:03years, and therefore one must find out what else we need to
00:30:06do, but there is no doubt that the pressure that the Conservative People's Party
00:30:10is putting on this government, as we did on the previous one and the one before that and
00:30:14many years ago, is to strengthen the Danish defense, it is
00:30:17truly the eleventh hour, we need to gear up on that. Good, so
00:30:21when do you expect something concrete to happen,
00:30:25that means that next time we have such an incident, we will be
00:30:28perhaps better able to respond in some way instead.
00:30:32you can't attack a Russian frigate, but are we well
00:30:35enough equipped to react in the situation? Well, I
00:30:39think the Danish defense, with the means and resources available,
00:30:43has an understanding of what needs to happen, also in
00:30:46concrete situations, also this dangerous situation we have just
00:30:49experienced, so I am not worried about that, everyone knows what they need to
00:30:53do, but I am worried that the Russians will continue to
00:30:56make threats against us. That.
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.