Croatia: N1 Croatia

20260917 18:00 UTC · 00:31:00 · 473 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 465 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:26Good afternoon and welcome to another AI central point show.
00:00:30We continue with a new series of episodes in the second half
00:00:33of the year. Today's topic will be AI agents, so when
00:00:37software stops waiting for commands, I have my guests with me in the
00:00:40studio today, Nenad Raca, Sio from Aduro
00:00:44Idea, and Krunoslav Kedmenec, program manager from
00:00:48due time. Thank you all once again for your Verso Altima. Hello guys, welcome to the show. First,
00:00:51a quick question, until yesterday or even today, we asked artificial
00:00:55intelligence something and it gave answers. This year,
00:00:58we are starting to give it tasks. Are you ready to
00:01:02let software do something on your behalf,
00:01:06maybe even without asking you beforehand? Yes,
00:01:09we are, it's already safe enough, ready enough.
00:01:12Okay, great. We'll come back to that. Kruno, yes, we're doing
00:01:16that right now. You're already doing it, that will be very interesting, I think, for many
00:01:20listeners who are thinking about it. So, we already have people in Croatia who
00:01:24without problems, with full confidence,
00:01:26use agents. I actually wrote some articles about agents
00:01:30even two years ago and predicted that 2024, 2025
00:01:34would be the year of agents. I miscalculated a bit, it seems it's only
00:01:372026. And today everyone is talking about agents,
00:01:41uh, but what are agents really? What is it really, and how would
00:01:44Nenad describe the difference between a chatbot, automation, and
00:01:48actually a true AI agent? In fact, that is the most important difference, a chatbot
00:01:52answers a question, mhm, automation always does the same
00:01:55established job and there are no changes, and an agent
00:01:59"thinks" in quotation marks, it thinks, makes decisions, knows when it can
00:02:03do something and when it needs to hand over that job to a human. So, it has a certain
00:02:07level of responsibility and decision-making in all of that, mhm, mhm. Is
00:02:10an agent actually a new technology or is it
00:02:14a new level of trust we have in an already developed technology? How much
00:02:18has that change happened? That's actually the most important part, that new level of trust.
00:02:21The technology is not that new, all these parts that we are inserting
00:02:25have already existed for several years, but now we have shaped them so that we can
00:02:28truly trust them. That is, to establish mechanisms
00:02:32of trust and verification of all these agents. In fact, with
00:02:35agents we are opening a new dimension where they actually become our new digital
00:02:39employees, mhm, mhm, well yes, an agent should be seen
00:02:43as another interface between a human and
00:02:46a computer, mhm. So you no longer have a keyboard, or if we go to
00:02:50a higher level, you no longer - you write a specification
00:02:54then someone translates it into computer language, no, you now directly
00:02:57communicate with the computer and directly give it... a task. So, that's
00:03:01your intern. How did that process actually go
00:03:05in Versus Altima, and did that moment happen where you said, "Okay, this is no longer
00:03:09just a tool, this is already an agent with a certain level"? Did
00:03:12that happen? Was it a process that lasted? Uh, well, in principle,
00:03:16last year we started individually using
00:03:19AI for something we were dealing with, for some documents, for
00:03:23some review of some contracts, similar things, but those were
00:03:27islands, it was exclusively communication.
00:03:30With this
00:03:33LLM, then we analyzed what it needed to
00:03:36be, and for us, Aduro, when we
00:03:39went to try if we could use
00:03:42AI for cyber, they were the first to come
00:03:46with an agent, and it was like, "Wow, it works!" And that was the
00:03:49moment, that was even before Anthropic released it commercially.
00:03:53And the moment Anthropic released a personal
00:03:57agent, that's when it became real.
00:04:09where agents within the company already did the work from beginning to
00:04:13end, so redesign of some corporate pages, but can
00:04:16you walk us through what the agent did, what the human did? That's really
00:04:20a beautiful example where almost anyone can do it.
00:04:23Agents really like
00:04:26uh examples, mhm. This is great, you take an agent and say:
00:04:30"These are our corporate pages, this is how I'd like them
00:04:33to look." Great, then an interaction begins, which is, let's
00:04:36say, more or less something like a chat, ideas
00:04:40are developed and the agent makes a plan on how
00:04:43we will implement it. Okay, that's given to another agent,
00:04:46it codes it, then it's transferred to WordPress.
00:04:50That was very interesting, because a colleague gave the agent to transfer it to
00:04:54WordPress, but it wasn't right. Then he kept reporting, "No, this is not
00:04:57good, change this," and then he got frustrated.
00:05:12business. Perhaps it's also worth mentioning that we're organizing an artificial intelligence conference
00:05:16for entrepreneurs in Rijeka. As an entrepreneur,
00:05:19I'd like to know how long that process with agents took, for example, and how long it would have taken without
00:05:23agents if only people had worked. What's the time saving?
00:05:27Even more than 10 times, I would say that
00:05:30days are minutes and weeks are hours.
00:05:34Aha, so what you used to need to do for several weeks,
00:05:37have meetings, talk to people who would create
00:05:41graphics for you, you would make... icons, you would check all
00:05:44texts, that literally took a few days, maybe, maybe the biggest
00:05:48benefit isn't just time, but the fact that we suddenly have the capacity
00:05:52to, instead of just working, to talk a lot and decide what to do,
00:05:56we make those five versions, look at which one is the best, and practically choose immediately from
00:05:59some choices that were made very quickly and efficiently, which are complete, which are not
00:06:03theoretical ideas, meaning they are not prototypes but practically functional, in this
00:06:06case, websites. So, I say, I think many UGP members
00:06:10will be more interested in hearing this.
00:06:12And about that, Nenad, let's go back to Aduro Ideje. So, it has experience and has been working
00:06:16with agents and actually with agent operational
00:06:20centers for some time. Uh, what is that actually? How do you explain
00:06:23it to someone who is not from IT, and again, let's go back to some of your
00:06:27examples, 10 times is a huge saving, so practically 90% of time is
00:06:30saved. Does that match your experiences? Well, my experience is actually a bit less,
00:06:34but because of this part of playing around, where suddenly everyone has the opportunity to play around, or I don't know,
00:06:38sometimes when we were developing software, we always talked a lot at the beginning before we started
00:06:42doing something. And now we allow ourselves to
00:06:45start working on different versions and see which one will be the best for us. So, we have a bit
00:06:49more wasted there, but the improvement is still significant in that
00:06:52whole story. What you mentioned about what
00:06:56an agent system is, that's actually perhaps best explained if
00:06:59we consider agents to be digital employees, mhm. The entire operating system for
00:07:03them is actually their building within which they work, with their rules,
00:07:07like every company has its own additional company for
00:07:10digital people, for digital agents, who work for it, in
00:07:13which physical people can enter, can supervise it, can see what
00:07:17works, how it works, and create new agents in it,
00:07:21mhm. That's maybe now such a thing, until now we all looked at who has what
00:07:25employees, how many employees they have, how they are organized, now we will
00:07:28have a new sector that will look at how many employees there are,
00:07:32what they are like, how they are organized, how they work, how efficient they are, how
00:07:36accurate they are. Yes, I mean, that part sounds fantastic, although it still seems
00:07:39a bit abstract to a very large number of people in Croatia. So we will definitely come
00:07:43back to that. But here's a question for you, and possibly for Kruno.
00:07:46So, where is an agent used in an average
00:07:49Croatian company, or where can it be used to be actually
00:07:53most efficient, and where are these not some spectacular applications? Well,
00:07:56I mean, there are a lot of these trivial ones that everyone pushes first, like customer
00:08:00service, those are something that are very easy to explain to everyone,
00:08:03easy to understand how it works, but maybe there's that part that everyone
00:08:07forgets, they use it very often, that's the part of some kind of advisor
00:08:11in some decisions. "Aha, where we start inserting some
00:08:14documents, we are actually creating a new
00:08:17advisor with whom we can discuss some topics where
00:08:21sometimes people in the company may not have the right interlocutors, so they sometimes looked for them
00:08:25outside, now with an agent they can have an interlocutor with whom they can do that,
00:08:28analyze documents, analyze decisions, try out some
00:08:31scenarios or any such things. A concrete example, you have
00:08:35a big project with many subcontractors, main
00:08:39contracts, contracts with subcontractors, give..."
00:08:42the agent to read all those contracts and say:
00:08:46"Here you covered, this you didn't transfer,
00:08:49so no, that's not, that's not a lawyer, but it
00:08:52immediately gives you insight, especially agents are very good when it comes to
00:08:56compiling information from different sources, and of very high quality.
00:08:59We actually had an episode on artificial intelligence in
00:09:03law some time ago, and people who work on specialized systems for artificial
00:09:07intelligence in law also testified to us. So, we can always refer
00:09:10to that episode. Some people complain again, so I have to ask you,
00:09:14are we at a stage where agents save us time, as you said, or do they somehow
00:09:18create new work for us in the sense that someone still has to supervise those
00:09:22agents? Uh, I don't think that supervision is the problem
00:09:26because it's in principle like, uh, how would I say, when we had
00:09:29computers, when they came, we all became
00:09:33secretaries, everyone, we all started doing that administrative work, and
00:09:36actually, the jobs of secretaries didn't disappear, but we all became our own
00:09:40secretaries. What we are becoming now,
00:09:42we all are actually becoming managers, because we all now get our digital teams
00:09:46that we start managing. So, when you look at it that way, it's not
00:09:50taking away jobs, but it's actually defining some new roles for people
00:09:54who perhaps weren't ready for them until now. Yes, no, the question is whether it creates new
00:09:58work, because now you have to control some agents that you didn't have
00:10:01to control before. But my experience is that the scope of
00:10:05work around that has not increased, that overall we are gaining, the type of work has changed, because
00:10:08we are doing more work than controlling someone or some people who are doing
00:10:12the work for us. And people who have uh, managed
00:10:16infrastructure until now, first they managed infrastructure at
00:10:19their company, now they manage the cloud, those same people will manage
00:10:23the agent infrastructure. They will make sure everything works, that not too many
00:10:27tokens are spent, that everything functions. But we can imagine,
00:10:30building on what Nenad said, so an AI agent as
00:10:34an advisor to the board, for example, someone who will help in decision-making, I think
00:10:38that's a very interesting part and I agree, often, often neglected, but
00:10:41potentially very good. But okay, mm, I would like to
00:10:44ask Kruno one more thing, you have a very interesting project,
00:10:48so AI for Cyber is a research and development project for
00:10:51specific cybersecurity. A topic very dear to me, that's why we had
00:10:55one episode specifically dedicated to it. So, it
00:10:58is carried out with European Union funding, you managed to get that. What problem did
00:11:02you want to solve with agents? The problem is, so one of the things that
00:11:06Verso Altima does is cybersecurity,
00:11:09mhm. This is not just about IT systems,
00:11:12but also control systems for smart cities
00:11:15and control systems for industry and similar things. And
00:11:19there you have today's software, today's
00:11:22methodology is pattern recognition. Mhm, you constantly
00:11:26maintain uh a database
00:11:29of patterns of some events, it
00:11:32recognizes and gives it to an expert for evaluation to see
00:11:36if a reaction is needed. Unfortunately, there are a lot
00:11:39of false alarms, a lot of things
00:11:42where a pattern is recognized, but we know that someone is testing something.
00:11:46What we saw, as I said, that "wow"
00:11:49moment, we gave the then cobbled-together
00:11:53agent just to go, mhm, into a bunch of logs and it started
00:11:56spitting out things we hadn't even thought about.
00:12:00So we are moving from pattern recognition to anomaly
00:12:04recognition, mhm. Is something happening that doesn't usually
00:12:07happen? Have I started logging in at two
00:12:11in the morning and missed my password 10 times? Mhm, mhm, I have to
00:12:14ask right away, actually, it reminds me of some examples from other industries,
00:12:18how much time was actually lost until now on sifting through those
00:12:21false, you know, false alarms?
00:12:25And actually, how much did an agent then accelerate that and
00:12:28save time? The approach actually changes here, because the previous
00:12:31approach was to look for something, and here
00:12:35the agent looks for anomalies in everything that behaves. And the most
00:12:39important thing is that maybe people, when they looked at it,
00:12:42there was always a problem that we looked at certain different sources. Here, with agents, we can already
00:12:45look at the connection between totally different sources that occur at a certain
00:12:49time, which may have some cause-and-effect relationships. So,
00:12:52when something is hidden or concealed within
00:12:55some other events, I assume it's more efficient. Yes, for example, another
00:12:59big project we are working on is the use of agents for
00:13:02monitoring huge telecom networks. Aha, you have very
00:13:06trivial situations where somewhere in Split you have one
00:13:09device that has an old version of
00:13:12firmware. And how do you find that? So, you look for what Nenad said, you look for
00:13:16a pattern, no, you just let the agent go, tell me what's wrong, and
00:13:19it will just say in Split there's a device
00:13:22that has old firmware. Do you want
00:13:25me to upgrade it? Yes, that's what now, will you let
00:13:29the agent do it? Today he asks, today he asks you. I think that
00:13:33example will interest many companies, like where do we all have to upgrade companies, no.
00:13:36Yes, absolutely. Great, Nenad, but what happens, let's
00:13:40go back to that topic for a bit, if attackers use agents for some
00:13:44cybersecurity problems, does the speed of the attack actually change,
00:13:48how important is human defense there, does a human even have time to react or not? It's not even
00:13:52a question of maybe how fast it is, but how inventive it is, mhm.
00:13:56Right? A new level, that's a new level, because until now, that part of
00:13:59invention was special specialized people who had a gift for finding
00:14:03such things, and
00:14:06now with agents, or swarms of agents, that means we are no longer talking
00:14:10about one agent, we are talking about hundreds of them who can
00:14:14act simultaneously, who communicate with each other, who can carry out
00:14:17very simultaneous and diverse attacks and diverse
00:14:20testing of different things. So, uh, we currently in the company know
00:14:24how to use uncensored models to
00:14:27test the security of our applications. So, instead of doing
00:14:30the traditional testing of applications to see if they are secure enough and
00:14:34all that, we let an agent who has permission
00:14:38to attack the application, to test what it can do on the application, because
00:14:41simply, a new pattern will happen here and new patterns are happening, new things that
00:14:44they do. Yes, that innovativeness is always a specially interesting
00:14:48question. It's interesting to mention in this context that just these days, information came out from
00:14:52Open AI that with the latest model, they managed to solve one of
00:14:56extremely difficult mathematical problems,
00:14:58and in that way, again, to suggest a completely new type of
00:15:02innovativeness and knowledge, so let's hope it won't reflect in all these
00:15:05cyber security and other problems. I think
00:15:08it will, right? My colleague, a physicist who
00:15:12uses AI in this whole story, he said just recently that
00:15:15he was getting
00:15:19such solutions, meaning he uses AI very intensively in his work,
00:15:22meaning that he gets solutions where he sometimes
00:15:26has to think hard about the approach that AI took, and which in the end very often
00:15:29turns out to be very good, but at first it wasn't visible to him at all, mhm, that's the
00:15:33thing, how AI helps us find inventive approaches
00:15:37to something, anomalies in fact. Let's then stay on that risk for a second.
00:15:41So, today still a small number of companies use agents, but I'm sure
00:15:44that will increase, especially after they hear you, a larger and larger number, but
00:15:48then we ask ourselves, what is that part of the risk, because if we use some agents, we have given them
00:15:52access to our data, to some decision-making, how risky does that actually become
00:15:56for us, is that something companies should be afraid of?
00:16:00I mean, they should be afraid of it like anything else, uncontrolled,
00:16:03unorganized access brings problems. If it's approached
00:16:07intelligently, organized, so that you know what you're doing and what
00:16:11you're managing, what rights are given, because it's not a problem if
00:16:14the agent has the right to do what it needs to do, but if it
00:16:18doesn't have the right to do what it needs to do, it won't do the job. If it has too many
00:16:22rights, it might do too much. So it's the same thing as
00:16:25people, you need to look at its experience, gather experience in
00:16:28management and then accordingly give rights, manage rights. Fire
00:16:32is a good servant, a bad master, the same
00:16:35applies to agents. If... "As Nenad says, you know very well
00:16:39what you're doing, how you're doing it, what rights you're assigning, there are no problems. If
00:16:43you just let it go, you've thrown a match on dry grass and everything
00:16:47is gone. Okay, but who's to blame for example if an agent deletes
00:16:50the wrong email or sends the wrong offer or so on? The organization
00:16:54and those who defined the processes. The software cannot be
00:16:57blamed, because the software does what it is allowed to do. So no agent will ever
00:17:01do anything outside of what it is allowed to do and what is defined
00:17:05as its task, but it will try with all its might to complete
00:17:09those incidents that are talked about a lot. It was given the task to
00:17:13do it and they watched how it would do it. It surprised them, it surprised them
00:17:16how it did it, that's the speed, that means the speed
00:17:20at which it can happen, that's the inventiveness and speed at which it can
00:17:23be created. Yes, I think that's a special question that we probably
00:17:26won't go into today, but for example, when we have many agents on both sides,
00:17:30well, maybe it's not a bad context for my next question. So we researched
00:17:33human in the loop, hopefully an article will come out soon
00:17:37on this topic, when a human is important in the loop, when they are necessary, and when they are actually
00:17:41unnecessary or impossible to do, because as a human approving something,
00:17:44we can do, look at 10 things or maybe 100 things or a few hundred, but
00:17:48if it's about 10 thousand, 100 thousand, a million cases that we have to, the
00:17:52human brain simply cannot process it. Uh, what are
00:17:55your thoughts on this? Well, you need human in the loop, that is, a human in
00:17:59the loop, meaning where the human is, I mean, purely so that we don't have them just for formality, that is,
00:18:03that's important, you don't have them for formality, but really where they are needed, so really tasks
00:18:07where the crucial thing is that something happens, that
00:18:10something is done, but there must always be some mechanism so that
00:18:14it is done, because there are many cases when a human will be
00:18:18put in the loop just to perhaps avoid some legal
00:18:21responsibility, so it's like he will be to blame, he didn't look, but if he clicks 10 times
00:18:25he will click 11 and 111 and 1011 then the human
00:18:28will become an automaton, he will become automated, we have actually made a robot out of
00:18:32a human, mhm. What I say is, last week I
00:18:35was talking to colleagues, I pointed out where the bottleneck
00:18:39is in using AI. Yes, I
00:18:42can no longer keep up with how quickly it can analyze,
00:18:46suggest, ask a ton of things from
00:18:49different aspects, I physically can no longer
00:18:53keep up with it. So not just approving, but also the work itself with
00:18:56an agent that is too fast for us. I've heard that from multiple sides, exactly
00:18:59that experience. Then the question arises, so on
00:19:03one side we have an AI that requires human supervision, and then
00:19:07we ask ourselves, is that feasible in practice or is it just some words on paper where I was
00:19:11told that a human is responsible on paper but actually
00:19:14doesn't have the ability to do it because it's a bottleneck? Yes, but again, for that we need to know how it works,
00:19:18so there again we come back to the standard thing, enough testing, where again
00:19:22AI agents can help us because we can use AI agents to test AI agents.
00:19:25So what we said, if they can do some attacks, they can
00:19:29do anything else. An AI agent can test an AI agent and
00:19:32find ways, or problems, in behavior, points
00:19:35where it is necessary to insert truly justified human
00:19:39supervision, and you learn from it as you work with it. So all this that
00:19:43I'm saying, I can't keep up with it, but every iteration it understands better and better,
00:19:46in the end it no longer needs me. That's it, that's the
00:19:50moment when I let it do what I assigned
00:19:53it to do, but we solved it until then. My experience is that it takes
00:19:57about a week of talking and changes. Yes, I think that's the crucial
00:20:01part, that agents actually learn from us, and my experience lately is that I'm
00:20:05playing with an AI second brain, so it's a system that's developing, that has multiple
00:20:09agents connected, it constantly learns from me, collects data, so I assume that will
00:20:13also be one area that I plan to, let's say,
00:20:16deal with educationally, meaning helping people create all their
00:20:20second brains that will help them, that will learn from them and actually help them be
00:20:2410 times more efficient or even 100 times more efficient. But here we need to take into account,
00:20:27these are personal agents, right? A second brain and such things
00:20:31serve me personally. If we move to a corporate level for
00:20:35company use, then that approach no longer... because then
00:20:38uh, we cannot, we must not let someone, you know, "contaminate" the memory, the memory must
00:20:42be controlled. So access to memory in the corporate world and in
00:20:46the private world is totally different, and that is the one thing that I hope people won't
00:20:50make the mistake of trying to use private agents
00:20:53and what works well privately in corporate environments. That is good, it means separating my second brain and
00:20:57as an agent as my private multiplier of my efficiency, which
00:21:01is a fantastic thing, and corporate agents that are made and
00:21:05controlled differently and so on, great, that's an important thing for, yes, that's my
00:21:07experience, I have to separate private
00:21:10things, so if I'm looking for LED lighting for an aquarium, that shouldn't
00:21:14be part of the AI for
00:21:17Cyber project, those are two different contexts, because at the beginning, until I hadn't mastered
00:21:21those skills, then I would get strange answers, then I realized, well, yes,
00:21:24I asked it something silly within the same context and now it
00:21:28concludes that I need an aquarium for AI. Great.
00:21:31Great, let's then give one more, maybe, practical advice to
00:21:35viewers. A company comes and says, "I want an agent," we got
00:21:38interested, that sounds great. What do they first need to have, how do they start that process,
00:21:42that maybe has nothing to do with artificial intelligence? Well, first they need to have a clear idea of what they want to
00:21:46do. Okay, the second thing is they need to make a decision that they want to change the way
00:21:50they want to work, because implementing AI into
00:21:53a company without changing the way the company works is doomed to
00:21:57fail, mhm. So those are all projects that fail, they fail because
00:22:00the basic work process hasn't changed. The basic work process
00:22:04must change, because AI is not an addition to the process, it's
00:22:07an evolution of the process itself that starts working immediately after that. Then only
00:22:10then do we move on to technology and everything else.
00:22:12That's perhaps the most important message. So my background is IT, but
00:22:16AI doesn't belong to IT, yes, it's clear, did you manage
00:22:19to change processes and mindset within the company? My advice is to get
00:22:23a personal AI agent that will guide you through this process that Nenad
00:22:26talks about. I know some people who have done that and are very satisfied with it, I must
00:22:30say, even at the level of personal development, what insights
00:22:33they gained about their functioning and behavior. How much does it cost to get into
00:22:37such projects at all? How much does it cost to get into it if you approach it smartly, how much
00:22:41does it cost if you approach it the wrong way? Let's start with this one, if you approach it the
00:22:44wrong way, there are those penalties that are there for GDPR European Air.
00:22:48act, that's how much it costs to enter. in the wrong way, that means that's the
00:22:51ultimate price to pay in all that, plus lost time, plus
00:22:55lost reputation, plus everything else, to enter in a smart
00:22:58way, we can already for a few thousand euros, mhm,
00:23:02meaning these are not some abnormally expensive projects, abnormally expensive projects, meaning the important
00:23:06thing about it is that these are no longer projects, meaning it's not something that is
00:23:09created from scratch, there are ready-made things that exist, that work, that
00:23:13can be tested, because uh, I don't know, in our approach we always
00:23:17give people access so you can... try it, you can
00:23:20get a demo, you can see how that thing works before you decide
00:23:23to implement it, we don't have to enter into risky projects, let's enter into
00:23:27something small, a small process, but we provide support
00:23:30on how to redesign such things, not just, let's
00:23:34push AI into the process and then everyone who does something will have their own
00:23:37AI assistant who will ask something, because realistically, then they haven't sped up their work, I hope you
00:23:41entered that project wisely, uh, of course, first
00:23:45start with something you know well, mhm, mhm, so you can
00:23:49assess. whether what the agent writes to you, whether
00:23:52that I often pretend to be stupid when
00:23:56I talk to him, I deliberately won't tell him I want to test how he understands
00:24:00and I want to see what all I have to tell him, explain what
00:24:03documentation I have to give him so that he gives me a quality answer, so that
00:24:07he can determine the job, meaning start with something known,
00:24:11that's why I said websites
00:24:13issuing invoices review whether there are any unpaid
00:24:16invoices in the entire Excel database. you have some
00:24:20unpaid invoices, financial analyzes, some automatic reports
00:24:24so there's a whole range, super, great, we will continue to explore this,
00:24:28but for example, you are definitely, and the companies you work with, and the clients, you are
00:24:32some early adopters. We always have those who need a little more, who are skeptical
00:24:36about uh what is happening, what is developing, what would you say to a
00:24:39director who says let's wait another year for
00:24:43it to settle down a bit, then we'll see and maybe introduce an agent.
00:24:46Uh, the biggest, biggest problem you can make in business
00:24:50is not following what's happening, or waiting
00:24:53too long, mhm, and not trying things out. So, nobody says
00:24:57companies have to absolutely implement it in their business right now, but
00:25:01they have to start using it, but not in a way where we ask the chat and
00:25:05the chat answers something, but let's try to test some processes,
00:25:08see, we have the opportunity to learn. The technology is
00:25:12new, there's still no one who uh can say with this technology you can
00:25:15definitely do this, this, this, and you definitely can't do this. We're all
00:25:19trying things out here. So it has to be tested, we're all testing, we're all trying, so all
00:25:22the time spent delaying is wasted learning time.
00:25:26Those who start in half a year have already lost half a year of learning,
00:25:29those who start in a year have lost a year of learning, because transforming
00:25:33a company, what I mentioned, changing the way a company functions
00:25:37is a prerequisite for implementing AI, or
00:25:40AI agents, or digital employees, opening new departments, new
00:25:44things in the company itself, how it will work digitally, meaning these are no longer
00:25:48digital software, these are... digital employees, meaning he gives
00:25:52complete work and results, has control and supervision over him,
00:25:55super, similar processes as it was with,
00:25:58office digitalization, when we switched from paper.
00:26:02mm to computers, to printers, to networks, meaning
00:26:06to make a transformation that you know, you have to see what the
00:26:09possibilities are, as Nad says, learn what you can do with
00:26:12agents, then make decisions, hey great, an agent would help us
00:26:16greatly here and start there. Oh, great, I can only
00:26:19say how lucky we are who deal with education in artificial intelligence.
00:26:23Uh, guys, thank you very much, we will continue this conversation in the AI second point which will
00:26:27be broadcast on YouTube. I will conclude
00:26:29this broadcast about agents, they are an extremely interesting
00:26:33topic, mm, we will surely return to it, and we plan to cover
00:26:37other interesting topics such as artificial intelligence in marketing or artificial
00:26:40intelligence in the defense industry, and artificial
00:26:43intelligence, perhaps even in religion or journalism, but
00:26:47you will find out about all that in
00:26:50attention until the next AI Central Point
00:26:52broadcast!
00:27:20Every new school year is a new beginning. Let this
00:27:24one be a little more carefree, with Telemah Kids Watch with
00:27:27audio and video calls and precise GPS location.
00:27:31Stay connected. Smart kids' watch and junior
00:27:35tariff for less than 10 euros per month, no cheap
00:27:38slogans, just a good offer.
00:27:41Telemah. The global economy is entering
00:27:44a new era. Geopolitics, technology
00:27:47innovations create a new map
00:27:50of capital. Where are the opportunities for Bosnia and Herzegovina
00:27:53and the region? Answers and new perspectives. We are looking for them through
00:27:57ideas, investments and partnerships. New
00:28:01economic reality. Horizons of Capital, Asa
00:28:05Bank in cooperation with Forbs Adria, October 1,
00:28:082026. Swissotel,
00:28:11Sarajevo.
00:28:14Do you think it's easy to get into Podravka
00:28:17products?
00:28:21You have to be much better than the competition.
00:28:24Congratulations, you got the role, but
00:28:26we admit, the most important thing is origin. Because
00:28:30with us, the main roles are only given to originals from
00:28:34Croatian fields. Domestic
00:28:36in the main role. Podravka.
00:28:40Let's go to school smarter. Choose Samsung Galaxy devices
00:28:44with the Unlimited tariff for a new school year full of learning
00:28:47new possibilities. For savings, use the "pay less then trade in"
00:28:51model and 30% discount on
00:28:54Google AI pro plan. Let's go to school smarter.
00:28:58Croatian
00:28:58Telecom.
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.