Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.
00:00:00cleanliness will do
00:00:03that, that waste removal related to hospitals, kindergartens that
00:00:06Zagreb Electric Tram will do what it can and what is necessary and what is
00:00:10urgent, that is, transport for people with
00:00:13disabilities, school transport, however much there
00:00:16is, it will be done, but no one can say that going out,
00:00:20especially in today's time in a situation when
00:00:23citizens tried to turn around according to the mayor's
00:00:26statements interpreted in a way that shows them that... those with high
00:00:30salaries, not that these are individual cases, we will consider the responsible
00:00:34Mayor Tomašević and the management of Zagreb Electric Tram and
00:00:37Zagreb Holding, if it happens that any of
00:00:40our members, our workers get injured, if they are
00:00:44forced to do some work that is not necessary, this should
00:00:49ultimately taxes on have been taken into account through these collective negotiations, through the mediation process and from September 10
00:00:53to today, September 25, in 15 days we could
00:00:56sit down, talk, see, maybe we would find some middle ground, maybe
00:01:00something would or wouldn't happen in the end, but someone who is responsible and in charge of
00:01:04the proper functioning of the city should have found time,
00:01:07space, either to meet with the unions or to
00:01:11tell the managements of Zagreb Holding and ZET that talks should be resumed
00:01:14and not negotiations, but negotiations are over, so as far as ZET
00:01:18is concerned, on Monday, if I understood correctly, only
00:01:21school buses will run and emergency services will be transported,
00:01:25for example, people with disabilities will of course have security
00:01:28services working, of course they will. security guards, of course the fire department will work, but as far as
00:01:32transport itself is concerned, as far as transport itself is concerned, all members of the representative union
00:01:36don't have to do anything on Monday if we don't agree on necessary
00:01:39jobs, and it is certain that if you let a tram
00:01:42driver go into the city and he doesn't have half an hour, you can imagine what
00:01:46would happen to that driver in trauma, and our drivers have been telling us for the past
00:01:50three or four days that the pressure from passengers on them has increased after the publication
00:01:53of these lists where these individual cases were singled out,
00:01:57meaning they actually feel threatened. after all, well, you can
00:02:01imagine, now when someone tells you, go on strike, and you all have, of course, people
00:02:05like to simplify that, that's not everyone, I repeated that these are our workers with 200 hours
00:02:09of overtime, our workers who some live
00:02:12outside the city of Zagreb and get transport, who work in shifts,
00:02:16public's reactions, given who work weekends, who work four or five months, they have a large
00:02:19number of dependents, supported family members, so that's not
00:02:23the goal, that's not done by chance, that's done, of course, intentionally to
00:02:27provoke a revolt among people, and I say, we have increased.
00:02:30increased remarks from our traffic
00:02:33staff from of course not all passengers but
00:02:36of course from individuals, because this should not have happened,
00:02:40alright, and finally, uh, is it possible to avoid
00:02:43a strike at this moment, the weekend is ahead of us, did
00:02:46someone perhaps contact you this afternoon and if you get a call
00:02:50during the weekend, will you respond, you said you are open to radar, well we
00:02:54are, we communicated that publicly, we are communicating it now,
00:02:58we are communicating it today at the press conference.
00:03:00So what do we expect that we would consider
00:03:04abandoning the strike? First, we had today in Zagreb
00:03:07Holding 74%
00:03:09of workers declared that they support the union's action,
00:03:1278% in ZET it was that, so it would be a
00:03:16betrayal of our members, our workers if we were to go to
00:03:20talks with Figo in our pocket. Of course we are
00:03:23ready to talk about everything we were ready for two or three months ago,
00:03:27let's sit down at the table and see what those
00:03:30amounts are, but not in a way that we are offered to take it or leave it, but let's see
00:03:34what those amounts are that we can solve, let's see what those steps are that we can
00:03:38take and let's see some time steps, maybe we can't solve everything from
00:03:41September 1st, but we can, if we sign, maybe solve it from January 1st. For example,
00:03:45above, meaning if a call comes that the call is rational, that the
00:03:48call is a normal call, meaning that we are told in advance to come,
00:03:52we have a new proposal that we can discuss, that we are ready to discuss,
00:03:56we will discuss for 48 hours, no one's interest.
00:04:00So unions have never been interested in creating a circus in the city, anyone
00:04:04can say whatever they want, so we are responsible, we are serious people, we are employees of
00:04:08those companies after all, we are residents of the city of Zagreb in
00:04:11this whole story, but there must be good will on the other side to resolve
00:04:14it, like this, at every press conference we hear that our salary
00:04:18grew from an initial 4.5% to nine, today we hear that it's already
00:04:2214, so now we're looking into some kind of crystal ball to see what will happen
00:04:26from the new year, I think it's extremely incorrect, because that never happened, it wasn't even
00:04:30the subject of discussion, so I say, we always have time for normal
00:04:33conversations, sooner or later, whether we sit down at the table today
00:04:37or we sit down in 15 days at the table, that meeting
00:04:40must, when we talk about negotiations, that must be concluded and that must be
00:04:44finished, I think it's always better to do it while the situation
00:04:48is normal, but I say, with such statements, with such behavior, with
00:04:51such uh, well, in my opinion, strange and
00:04:54sad behavior, I think the doors to agreement are increasingly
00:04:57closed, Mr. Jović, thank you for this... appearance, well, Monday is
00:05:01near, but there's still more than 48 hours, so we'll see.
00:05:05Thank you for the invitation and thank you for
00:05:07coming.
00:05:21and on October 10th, on Ban Jelačić Square, the Voice of Entrepreneurs and
00:05:24the Save Small Renters association will gather for a
00:05:27protest. They have been expressing their dissatisfaction for a long time, and anchor
00:05:30prices are just the icing on the cake.
00:05:34So, anchor prices are not the only reason why we
00:05:37raised our voice, that there is such a big reaction on those
00:05:41networks, as you mentioned, that people want changes, we had
00:05:45examples with inspections during the summer which
00:05:49we consider and we have more and more evidence that they are
00:05:51disproportionate, that they are a bit
00:05:55not concerned enough about the success and
00:05:58sustainability of entrepreneurs, we had
00:06:01flat-rate taxpayers which is still not resolved, that is even the main
00:06:05reason why we are going into
00:06:08some kind of public
00:06:09protest.
00:06:22The new Maksimir stadium has not even started to emerge yet, opinions about
00:06:26it are absolutely lacking. The winning solution
00:06:29presented yesterday divided the public, for some it is modern,
00:06:33impressive, for others not special enough. Whatever the future
00:06:36stadium looks like, one thing is certain, everyone has an opinion
00:06:39about Maksimir. No, I don't like it.
00:06:42Why? Well, the previous old stadium also had
00:06:45gaps on the sides, right? Four, four
00:06:47separate stands and now it's the same again, it's prettier
00:06:51to see something like the Allianz Arena in Munich
00:06:55or I don't know some other stadium
00:06:58and I think the stadium
00:07:02is quite good, I like it especially when compared to the other
00:07:05five that were in the top five. right,
00:07:08I think this one somehow has the most Zagrebian
00:07:12flair, I see there were a lot of negative comments, how do you comment on that? Well,
00:07:16I think it's always like that when something that is very important to people, something that people
00:07:19hold dear to their hearts, then
00:07:23there are always divided reactions, I also believe
00:07:26that there are people who think it's good but they are not as vocal, and I also
00:07:30think that some kind of expectation
00:07:33was created originally
00:07:36that the stadium would look somewhat
00:07:40different, that's because of various renders. and, I think
00:07:43there is perhaps a slight discrepancy between people's expectations and
00:07:47what we actually got, but I think, that's a
00:07:50serious international architectural competition,
00:07:54I would leave such things to the experts, look,
00:07:58I've had enough of that stadium at home,
00:08:00and this new one, what do you
00:08:03think? We've been listening to Dinamo for 90 years.
00:08:07I can't say
00:08:10I like it or I don't
00:08:13like it, but it seems to me that Boban, what he said last night
00:08:17and this guy who led it, it seems
00:08:21to me that they are right, only when
00:08:24it's built will we actually see
00:08:27who's right. Thank you very much, well why
00:08:31let me just say, why wasn't there any discussion
00:08:34like this for Zagreb's stadium, well, I visit it almost
00:08:37every day and I know when
00:08:41they started demolishing it, I know what phase
00:08:45it's in now, I mean, it's completely different from what
00:08:49was painted there, therefore, we need to see it
00:08:53in space, that's what you mean, alive, we need to see it in space to see how it will all
00:08:56function,
00:09:00oh, what do I know, that now it could have been
00:09:02better, in terms of construction,
00:09:06in terms of appearance, it's a bit like a
00:09:09bone, it looks like a bone, and
00:09:13I mean, it's not bad, but it could have been better, what do you
00:09:17think, well, at least they claim that it wasn't intended to have an ordinary stadium, but
00:09:20one that would be recognizable, well, there's something to that, yes, probably,
00:09:24probably that's how it is, I think no one has such a stadium, so
00:09:27whatever it looks like in the end, people will go to it, that's right, that's
00:09:31right, that's right, whatever it is, people will go, that's right, whatever they build,
00:09:35the
00:09:37profession proposed it, let's give the profession some time, let them try
00:09:41to organize it. Citizens have their opinion
00:09:44on that, I think they channeled it well
00:09:47and we, as one of the participants, as one of the participants
00:09:51in that process, are listening to what is
00:09:54happening. I am subjective here because I am a fan of NK Rijeka,
00:09:57we have Rujevica which is very beautiful, although we have been waiting for Kantrida also
00:10:01for years, so I think that
00:10:05I would not venture to evaluate the NK Dinamo stadium,
00:10:09I leave that to the people of Zagreb, so I say, I am a bit
00:10:12subjective and in a conflict of interest, I think the one who builds it should listen to
00:10:16the citizens, so if the citizens want this or
00:10:19that, that's it, I'm a Hajduk fan and
00:10:22I think the question is not
00:10:25addressed to the right person, so a Hajduk fan should not
00:10:28comment on what the Dinamo
00:10:31stadium will look like. I think
00:10:34one should of course respect the experts, but one should listen,
00:10:38that is my general stance, those who will be at that
00:10:41stadium, who will cheer at that stadium, who will reside at that
00:10:44stadium, so their voice should also be heard.
00:10:48The competition was run by a jury in which, if I'm not mistaken, there are five or six
00:10:51architects, I hope that it will also
00:10:55explain that choice to the public, I cannot get involved in that
00:10:58sense because I have not seen other works and I think
00:11:02it would be, uh, completely
00:11:05unacceptable for me to say anything, what I can say
00:11:09in principle, I think
00:11:12that we, somehow, well not only
00:11:16us in the world,
00:11:18when some major changes or some
00:11:22very unusual interventions in space, as I call it,
00:11:25usually there is first a great
00:11:28resistance,
00:11:30we tried to ask the mayor today about the avalanche of opinions that fell on
00:11:34the stadium, but today there was no
00:11:36mood for that.
00:11:38Can I ask an off-topic question, just for the Maksimir stadium if a short
00:11:42comment is possible, this was a press conference about
00:11:45this topic, meaning the announced strike, and for everything else there will be more new days, thank
00:11:49you,
00:11:51thank you,
00:12:00And now we will go in front of the stadium, the one we still currently
00:12:04have in Zagreb, there is our colleague Mateo
00:12:07Keller, Mateo, so there is nothing missing in opinions since
00:12:11the solution for the stadium was presented yesterday, public
00:12:14interest not only in Zagreb, we must mention, but in the entire country
00:12:18is huge. Social networks are also burning on this issue,
00:12:21discussions do not stop, petitions are being signed against this...
00:12:25by those who are not inclined to it, is this solution final?
00:12:29Yes, Marinela, there were some very interesting
00:12:33witty remarks about the stadium, we gave a lot of space to both people and
00:12:37politicians, it seems it's a very important topic that is being
00:12:41discussed, I managed to talk to the experts today, that is, with
00:12:43Toma Plejić who is actually the main person responsible for the selection
00:12:47of this stadium which is now presented as a conceptual solution,
00:12:51we talked about why it's... the conceptual solution is the best, as
00:12:54I see it, I also asked him why the public
00:12:58has such conflicting opinions in relation to the experts, is it some kind of
00:13:02elitism, so it's best to watch what he said today
00:13:05in the conversation we had just
00:13:09before.
00:13:12Every reaction is good, both positive and negative, it means that there is something
00:13:15to talk about, something to debate about, that
00:13:19there is some active role for all sides
00:13:22and I think it's very good that architecture in
00:13:25some center of some cultural discourse
00:13:29is very important, so nothing surprised me,
00:13:32it's an emotional space in the city,
00:13:36people are attached to that space, a space that
00:13:39is rich with memories, rich
00:13:42with images, scenes, events, it's
00:13:46a complicated space, so reactions are very
00:13:49normal, very human, very
00:13:53real and should be discussed, on the other hand
00:13:57I am deeply convinced that it is by far
00:14:00the best work among all submitted in this international
00:14:03competition, 808 works, 20 countries and
00:14:07more, more continents, simply, it is
00:14:11a super modern arena, a futuristic
00:14:14arena, but conceived in a different way
00:14:18from predominantly some completely enclosed
00:14:21arenas, so
00:14:24reactions are always welcome, these reactions will
00:14:27give rise to
00:14:30some common stance,
00:14:31a common
00:14:34picture of everything, so I think it's all good
00:14:38and simply together we will build
00:14:41this new structure in
00:14:43Maksimir, well, can you just briefly explain what the original idea was, what was wanted,
00:14:47it was wanted to keep some idea of the old Maksimir in a new
00:14:51guise, can we say that? Well, in a way, it wasn't the intention
00:14:54of this competition, the competition
00:14:58was looking for a solution for a new stadium and out of 808
00:15:00works, this was the only one that drew a parallel with the old
00:15:04stadium, we actually, through
00:15:08the analysis of all these works, we realized that
00:15:11it was important, that it was a
00:15:14quality good one, and that that potential
00:15:18of that stadium
00:15:22which is a cult stadium of Turin.
00:15:26that potential still exists and can somehow
00:15:29be generated, reinterpreted into a new
00:15:32completely modern stadium in the context of that old
00:15:36stadium. In the end, it's a miracle
00:15:39that something like that happened, and in parallel, an interesting topic with
00:15:43Poljud, the topic of how Poljud was actually
00:15:47generated from the Maksimir stadium, so
00:15:51that this genesis
00:15:54of these sports facilities of these arenas
00:15:57is interesting and it's interesting how that one
00:16:01potential exists there that then echoes
00:16:05in different situations. different
00:16:07times, there is a terribly charged DNA,
00:16:11so that means that was not a condition,
00:16:15but this is a completely different work and we are all
00:16:18unanimously 100% for this
00:16:21project, because it is a reflection of a tradition, identity,
00:16:25a story, the Maksimir story, a Zagreb, Croatian
00:16:28story, that's what keeps
00:16:31us together, keeps us proud,
00:16:35keeps us -
00:16:38cultured and we have a
00:16:41line of thought,
00:16:45an authentic story, it is an authentic
00:16:48story, clearly, you say an authentic story, you say it will be a modern
00:16:52arena, most modern arenas today are enclosed, this one will
00:16:56be open, criticisms go in the direction that
00:16:58much is said about discomfort at Croatian sports
00:17:02venues, i.e. on Croatian football fields, do you think that here in that problem, will
00:17:06kidneys be draughty, as they say? Well, no, I don't think so,
00:17:09it's a well- balanced, well-
00:17:13designed arena, which is sufficiently protected, sufficiently
00:17:17covered and
00:17:19what's interesting about this project is that it's
00:17:23a reduced architectural
00:17:26language, reduced to the core, so there are no
00:17:29excesses, no additions,
00:17:33but pure essence, so
00:17:36uh... "this is a realistic
00:17:39proposal, a realistic proposal that it can be
00:17:42realized in the planned time, in the planned budget, and
00:17:46according to the latest standards,
00:17:49European, football and so on, so
00:17:52it will be a perfect facility for a
00:17:56perfect experience, clearly, I mean, regardless of what you
00:17:59are saying, there are still a lot of polemics, there is talk
00:18:03of a petition, there is talk of collecting signatures." about that
00:18:06another project should actually be chosen, is there
00:18:10a possibility for that and what in essence if that number of signed signatures
00:18:13is very high, well,
00:18:16listen, now uh,
00:18:19of course everything is possible, it's possible to give up everything, it's possible
00:18:22that
00:18:24something gets complicated for some
00:18:27reason, everything is possible, everything
00:18:30is possible, I don't believe that, I think it's simply
00:18:33the first some... flex, the first
00:18:37some shock, everyone, it's interesting with this topic
00:18:39that everyone feels the need to comment, what is
00:18:43simply, it's a part of us, it's something we
00:18:46feel, something we feel the need to react to, fiercely
00:18:49and strongly, that's very good and that brings us to a situation
00:18:53where we will all ultimately build that, we will build ourselves,
00:18:57we will build that structure, we will simply
00:19:00shape that dialogue among
00:19:03ourselves, so I don't believe in such a
00:19:06scenario, I think that
00:19:10uh, both the profession
00:19:13and the city and
00:19:16the state are confident that we are
00:19:20all actually uh convinced that
00:19:23this is a realistic, excellent project that
00:19:26gives, it offers great potential
00:19:30to be globally referential, recognizable,
00:19:33iconic, which was very important, this new stadium has a very iconic.
00:19:38message, that it is simply recognizable, that its
00:19:41silhouette is recognizable, that this is the specialty
00:19:45of this stadium and not a generic, simple,
00:19:49perhaps for some an expected, enclosed bowl,
00:19:52pot, some bucket and so
00:19:55on, in short, there will be no deviation from
00:19:59the idea, well, in my opinion, I don't see why we would deviate
00:20:03when this is a realistic
00:20:06reflection which is
00:20:10feasible according to the highest standards,
00:20:14fits the budget, fits our
00:20:17capabilities, I don't see why we
00:20:20would want to do something that we cannot realize, clearly,
00:20:24here's one more question for the end, the relationship between the profession and the public,
00:20:28we have talked a lot about that now, is it true that
00:20:31on the one hand, if most people claim that something
00:20:35is... perhaps not up to standard or they don't like it, on the other hand the profession claims
00:20:38one thing, does that convey some kind of elitism from that
00:20:42perspective that what is still for
00:20:45a majority and the majority goes to stadiums and it's still about the people, about
00:20:49the masses, how do you view
00:20:53interaction, well I don't imagine that, I don't
00:20:55think it's some kind of, that we
00:20:58are or the profession is or that architecture or architects are some
00:21:02elite category of
00:21:06autistic maniacs who have no reflection
00:21:10on the moment on
00:21:13uh the needs of society, on the contrary, I think we are
00:21:16altruistic, that we are actually empathetic
00:21:20and that we
00:21:23reflect the needs of the current
00:21:26moment and transpose that into some future
00:21:28time, so I think it's all good,
00:21:32that there is
00:21:35uh that, I mean, it's a shock, the public simply experienced
00:21:39a shock, it expected something, I think that with
00:21:42other projects the reaction would be similar, it would not
00:21:46be significantly different, but with this...
00:21:50"simply, the project situation is such that we are deeply convinced that
00:21:54this is a brilliant
00:21:56solution,
00:21:58a masterpiece that it is
00:22:02globally referential and
00:22:04relevant,
00:22:11yes, according to Plejić, this is a masterpiece solution, mm,
00:22:15I would still leave it to the public to give the final judgment, i.e. the profession and the public
00:22:18jointly m'. What is important to emphasize is that this
00:22:22calm of this project will actually, or calm, calm
00:22:25of this clear, or this
00:22:28concrete conversation and problems, we have been waiting for
00:22:31Maksimir itself for a very long time, years have passed, it turned out that
00:22:35generations and generations have
00:22:37been waiting for this construction to finally happen, it seems that this calm, as
00:22:41I said, the calm of the final idea and
00:22:44how it will look, we will actually have to
00:22:48wait a bit longer. Kranjčevićeva is progressing,
00:22:52it should be finished by 2027.
00:22:55by the beginning of 2027. After
00:22:58that, if all goes well, construction of Maksimir should
00:23:02begin, but given the
00:23:06what we heard from the experts and their, almost
00:23:09diametrically opposite view on the entire
00:23:13situation, it is probable that there could
00:23:16be delays in the start of works.
00:23:20That's all for now from Maksimir with expectations
00:23:23for the construction of a new stadium.
00:23:27Thank you, Mateo, one thing is certain, that the polemics and discussions about
00:23:31the long-awaited stadium will certainly not stop anytime soon.
00:23:50was sentenced to 40 years in prison for the murder of nineteen-year-old
00:23:54high school student Luka Milovac in Drniš in May of this year.
00:23:57The County Court in Šibenik found him guilty of all three criminal
00:24:00acts he was
00:24:02charged with.
00:24:06Kristijan Aleksić last entered the courtroom of the Šibenik
00:24:10court for the pronouncement of the final verdict. The accused Kristijan
00:24:14Aleksić is guilty. The court found him guilty of all three
00:24:18criminal offenses and sentenced him to a single prison sentence of
00:24:2140 years. For the criminal offense of aggravated
00:24:25murder, as stated in point one, based on Article
00:24:27111. A long-term prison sentence of
00:24:3140 years. For the criminal offense of unlawful
00:24:35possession, production, and acquisition of weapons and explosive substances as stated
00:24:38in point 2, based on Article 331, paragraph one
00:24:42of the Criminal Code, a prison sentence of two years.
00:24:46For the criminal offense of unlawful possession, production, and acquisition.
00:24:50acquisition of weapons and explosive substances as stated in point
00:24:53three, based on Article 331, paragraph one
00:24:56of the Criminal Code, a prison sentence of three years. The
00:25:00reasoning for the decision states a series of aggravating circumstances:
00:25:03the first is that he had previously killed, been reported and punished for theft
00:25:07and domestic violence, as well as for the possession and production of firearms.
00:25:11weapons. They also consider his behavior
00:25:14before and during the murder to be aggravating, and they believe that he
00:25:18treacherously killed nineteen-year-old Luka, who tried to earn
00:25:22some money by delivering. Also, he must pay the family compensation
00:25:25of 50,000 euros and cover court costs
00:25:29in the amount of 14,192
00:25:32euros. This cost includes the cost of transporting the victim's
00:25:36body to the pathology department, the cost of conducting biological
00:25:39expert examination, ballistic and
00:25:41combined psychiatric and psychological expert examination, as well as
00:25:45forensic expert examination, then performing
00:25:48an external examination and autopsy of the victim's body and court
00:25:51fees. The prosecution is satisfied with the verdict because
00:25:54they considered everything they asked for, which is the maximum
00:25:57prison sentence because he treacherously killed Luka.
00:26:01His confession was not influential in determining
00:26:05the criminal offense, and even if he had not confessed, the criminal
00:26:08offense would have been proven with
00:26:11the evidence obtained and collected during the investigation. Regardless
00:26:14of Aleksić's challenging the part where he is accused of ordering food six times before
00:26:18the act itself to give the impression that he was not
00:26:22dangerous, the defense expected such a decision. I
00:26:25don't think anyone was surprised by the decision
00:26:28on guilt or the decision on the punishment for the criminal legal
00:26:31sanction. Given that, as we know, the criminal law
00:26:35was changed because of this case, in such a way that long-term imprisonment was
00:26:39introduced into criminal legislation,
00:26:42this is a life sentence. I don't think anyone expected anything less than
00:26:46the maximum sentence. In this proceeding, the defense can
00:26:49appeal the decision, but it seems that they will not, because, as Aleksić
00:26:53himself said, he is 10 times better off in prison.
00:26:57Vesela Šegvić Kordić, N1
00:26:59Šibenik.
00:27:03Tomislav Horvatinčić was arrested again due to violating a security measure
00:27:07that was imposed on him along with the verdict for causing
00:27:10a tragic maritime accident. That measure refers to the ban
00:27:13on driving all motor vehicles for five years. It
00:27:16started to be applied in July last year after
00:27:20Horvatinčić served his sentence. The arrest
00:27:23came a few days after Index published a photo
00:27:27of Horvatinčić at the wheel of a SUV in Zagreb.
00:27:30Today he was taken for police interrogation, which ended.
00:27:46The Ministry of Environmental Protection published a comprehensive plan for the remediation
00:27:50of illegally deposited waste in Gospić after it was
00:27:53presented on September 22nd first to citizen initiatives and
00:27:57associations. The document, they say, details four
00:28:01phases of remediation, activities and deadlines, as well as the method
00:28:05of monitoring implementation. The presentation of the plan
00:28:07was also published on the ministry's website.
00:28:23And the case of illegal waste in Gospić reached a new level, as far as
00:28:26politics is concerned. The SDP launched an initiative to vote
00:28:30no confidence in Prime Minister Andrej. And
00:28:33they were supported by other opposition MPs. And while
00:28:36the opposition seeks responsibility for the case at the top of the government, the HDZ
00:28:40says that the parliamentary majority is stable, and that the proposal
00:28:43will not pass.
00:28:46The SDP submitted a proposal to the Sabor to vote no confidence in Prime Minister
00:28:50Andrej Plenković and his government.
00:28:53The request was signed by 54 representatives. The main
00:28:57reason they cite is the government's responsibility for illegally disposed waste in Gospić
00:29:01and the way the system reacted. In eight points, we
00:29:04explained why the responsibility starts with
00:29:07the Prime Minister, Andrej Plenković has been leading
00:29:10Croatia for years, he regulates supervision
00:29:14and chooses people at the head of institutions. Therefore, the Prime Minister
00:29:18must be held accountable for the way his government
00:29:20managed this problem and for
00:29:23the lack of timely protection of citizens. Along with the SDP,
00:29:27all representatives of the left signed the proposal. And
00:29:30the minimum is civil'. organizationally and politically,
00:29:34the one who is responsible for that system
00:29:37should resign, that is Andrej
00:29:40Plenković. Now it's the government's move, they must submit their statement
00:29:43within eight days, and the Parliament must
00:29:47debate and vote on confidence no later than 30 days. The HDZ
00:29:51says they are looking forward to the debate. In this ten-year
00:29:54rule of the Croatian Democratic Union led by Andrej
00:29:57Plenković, there have been many recall proposals,
00:30:00however. "none of them managed to
00:30:04pass, and it will be the same with this decree. Among
00:30:07the signatories are also representatives of Most, which is enough for the HDZ
00:30:11to accuse the SDP of using Most as a fig leaf.
00:30:15We must send a message as an opposition party that the government after
00:30:19such a situation must, must fall. We simultaneously
00:30:23have attacks from the left, we can
00:30:26move towards Most, and we also have
00:30:29attacks from the HDZ. They say that we are what..."
00:30:32they just said that we are a fig leaf, right? Well, this only
00:30:36shows us how much fear there is of both the globalist left and
00:30:40of the HDZ from the growth
00:30:43of Most. Only the representatives of the Croatian Sovereigns
00:30:46did not sign for the recall, but they say that does not
00:30:49mean they support the government. We will not jointly overthrow or build anything
00:30:53with the left. We did not sign, they signed, we
00:30:57will as an opposition party.