Pakistan: Pakistan TV

20260920 23:30 UTC · 00:30:59 · 502 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 465 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56

Transcript

Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp). Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:01we have to keep in mind certain structural
00:00:03issues, um, there may be
00:00:06significant agreements announced on the
00:00:08in margins
00:00:09of the UN general assembly meeting,
00:00:13there may not be, there may be very important discussions that take
00:00:17place that initiate processes that only result in
00:00:21significant announcements
00:00:22in of progress, weeks or months later, so we won't see them
00:00:26of this week, at the same time, there are going to be "there are
00:00:30negative headlines that have already been pre-written in newsrooms around the
00:00:34world, there are going to be stories about about President
00:00:37She
00:00:38of choosing to skip this event, although he's just
00:00:42200 miles down the road in in Washington and
00:00:46could very easily attend and and give address. um, there are
00:00:50certainly going to be stories about President
00:00:53Trump's presentation, whatever that may be, but I'm guessing
00:00:57that that is not going to be good news for the..." UN um,
00:01:01but at the same time, to the extent that there's there's positive
00:01:05progress,
00:01:05in we may not see it immediately this week. On
00:01:09AI, um, I'm very
00:01:11skeptical that significant progress can be reached in
00:01:15light
00:01:16of of the the very extreme and erratic public
00:01:20of position that's been taken over the past week by the president
00:01:24of the United States opposing virtually any
00:01:27sort of guard rails on the text. analogy,
00:01:31but again, I'm I'm prepared to be positively
00:01:34surprised,
00:01:38in but let me go to Stephanie and I'll come back to you. Stephanie, with the
00:01:41UN facing questions, do you think that there is
00:01:44space for other bodies, for
00:01:47example,
00:01:49you know,
00:01:49or or you know space for for perhaps something to
00:01:53replace, a
00:01:56you more know, effective,
00:01:57or let become me, let me phrase it that way, a more effective sort
00:02:00of body because we are looking at you know so many issues
00:02:04at this time, so many conflicts at this time, and
00:02:07you know where of course we are looking at students of law, questioning
00:02:11might is right, questioning whether there's any real role for international
00:02:15a law or these kind of systems, if I can say
00:02:19that, do you think that there is space for something
00:02:23else, perhaps to to
00:02:26a to of you, body that can become more effective, have better...
00:02:30schools
00:02:30a have better systems, do you think that what are your thoughts on
00:02:34that? i think it's a very important
00:02:37question,
00:02:38in because it is tendency that we're already seeing, so
00:02:42we are seeing countries prioritizing like
00:02:46minded venues that might have
00:02:49of a smaller membership, but that might be easier to
00:02:53navigate for them when
00:02:55a it come to multilateralism. the problem with that is
00:02:58that the united nation is the only venue that
00:03:02really has this convening powers of 193
00:03:06countries, so as much as the United Nations has its flaws
00:03:10and it we are seeing that there is lot that it's
00:03:14unable to do a lot of crisis, and we've even seen other
00:03:17of platforms being more successful than the UN at solving
00:03:21of some issues, the UN remains the only place
00:03:25where diplomats from all over the world can meet,
00:03:28and so for example,
00:03:30a "there's a tendency, experts have been saying that
00:03:34leaders from India, for example, China, they they
00:03:37appear content with what they they've achieved at the Bricks meeting,
00:03:41so
00:03:42of maybe that is why they're not attending the UN general assembly
00:03:45of at the highest level, um, and that is fair,
00:03:49maybe that is tendency that we're seeing, but that being
00:03:52said, on some other issues, even if they're not there
00:03:56at the
00:03:57of higher level, that doesn't mean that the meetings that these - representatives
00:04:01are taking, they're not achieve, they're not achieving
00:04:04on important topics, they're not being successful, so
00:04:08I think the UN is
00:04:10has has that convening power on so much more than just peace and
00:04:14security, if we're talking about climate, if we're talking about space, if we're talking
00:04:17about again AI, um, so ultimately, while
00:04:21the UN is failing um on peace and
00:04:25security, um, it is still a
00:04:28of venue that has an offering that is unique
00:04:31diplomatically. Right, thank you, thank you for being with us,
00:04:35of Stephanie, of
00:04:35a
00:04:35of thank you for your very valuable input. Paul, when
00:04:39at European and
00:04:41a Geneva based diplomatic perspective, what role can
00:04:45countries that are not directly party to these
00:04:48in conflicts play in
00:04:51of facilitating dialogue and deescalation under the umbrella for example of even
00:04:55the UN, well countries who are not
00:04:59party to... conflicts often play an essential role
00:05:03in trying to promote dialogue, conflict
00:05:06resolution and reconciliation, we've seen this in
00:05:10the case
00:05:11of the conflict between
00:05:12the United states and and Iran, um, we've
00:05:15seen Oman play a role prior to the conflict in in
00:05:19trying to facilitate a nuclear agreement, we've seen Pakistan play a
00:05:22role in trying to broker cease
00:05:26fire and and a lasting peace deal, but very
00:05:30often um countries that are
00:05:33are not directly involved um can serve as honest brokers
00:05:37and and can uh provide forum and and facilitate
00:05:41dialogue. fair enough, let me also
00:05:45include Alan Ayer, who is the distinguished
00:05:48diplomatic fellow middle east institute, former state department, senior
00:05:52policy maker joining us, and from a
00:05:56former US policy makers perspective,
00:06:00what can UN diplomacy realistically accomplish in your
00:06:03opinion, when we're looking at Washington and other major
00:06:07powers, for example have competing strategic
00:06:10interests. Well, normally UN general
00:06:14assemblies can potentially accomplish lot. I think
00:06:18this time with this in US administration, probably lot
00:06:22less, because this US administration is not used to,
00:06:26nor particularly good at uh doing diplomacy and
00:06:29multilateral fora, it prefers bilateral
00:06:32relations, but in terms of conflicting national
00:06:35interests, um, in this case, pretty much
00:06:39the whole world is unified. that this war
00:06:43needs to stop, so competing national
00:06:47interest is not as prominent in the case of trying to find
00:06:51a way to end this Iran war so that the straight
00:06:55of hormos and the babal mandab are fully
00:06:58open. Right, fair enough, let me let me go
00:07:02to Paul and then I'll come back to you. Paul, do you agree with
00:07:06what allen is saying, when we look at you,
00:07:10overall the kind of response. that you of course we would
00:07:14like the kind of effectiveness as we earlier spoke we would like, but when we look
00:07:18at UN realistically accomplishing anything, do you
00:07:22think that there is, what is it going to take for the
00:07:25US and other other powers to turn to middle east for
00:07:29example and you know move towards
00:07:32deescalation? well, I think that's a key
00:07:35question, and I think again, we have to
00:07:39distinguish between what can be accomplished at the UN. GA and
00:07:43what can be accomplished by the UNGA? I think the
00:07:47forum is there, the right actors are there to engage in
00:07:50dialogue on the margins, but ultimately the question
00:07:54is always going to be whether the United States and Iran um
00:07:58can come to some sort of mutual
00:08:01understanding that results an end to this
00:08:04conflict. um, we thought we were
00:08:08close to that with the Islamabad memorandum of understanding
00:08:12that... brokered by Pakistan, but it turned out that the two
00:08:15sides um had fundamentally different understandings of what they had
00:08:18agreed to uh so um in some respects we're
00:08:22farther apart now than we were then, but uh
00:08:26certainly the general assembly uh
00:08:29provides uh a good forum where
00:08:33um enough the key players are there uh that this
00:08:37there can be attempt to push dialogue
00:08:39forward right let me come back to
00:08:43um, Mr. Are looking back at the intense
00:08:47geopolitical gridlock between Washington and
00:08:50Tehran, um, that that leading up to
00:08:532010, long before of course a formalized
00:08:57digital, negotiated framework was even on the
00:09:00table, how can diplomacy realistically serve,
00:09:04do you think it can serve at all as a
00:09:07you know primary vehicle for this kind of a strategic breakthrough, because there's a
00:09:10host of history. "and
00:09:13you know, in in and and of course it's a deeply rooted
00:09:16conflict. well, what I always say is not
00:09:20everything can be solved with diplomacy, but nothing can be solved
00:09:24without it. it's not a magic wand. for example, at this
00:09:27point, I think given what's happened in the last year and a half,
00:09:31it's going to be very hard, even for a US
00:09:34administration, which is good at diplomacy, which this administration
00:09:38is not, to use diplomacy to find a solution."
00:09:42It's too late for that, had it started earlier with more
00:09:46vigor in seeking diplomatic solution with Iran, that
00:09:50might not have been the case, so as I said, diplomacy is
00:09:54limited at this point, I think the president
00:09:58Trump and the US administration will be a listening
00:10:01mode, and I think it's up to the rest the world to include and perhaps
00:10:05especially the countries in the region, the
00:10:09GCC countries to find a way to stop the...
00:10:25will either say yes or no, how
00:10:28should the international community really approach the Gaza question if
00:10:32the objective is a durable political
00:10:36settlement of course rather than any kind of a temporary
00:10:39pause? the Gaza problem is not soluble,
00:10:43it's again you talk about it being too late, the first step
00:10:47any attempt to to put bandade
00:10:51on the massive strategic mess that is gaz.
00:10:55is to get Israel to stand down and back off, not just in
00:10:58Gaza, but in the west bank, and this US
00:11:02administration isn't going to do that, so
00:11:05we'll have to wait until the elections happen in Israel, I
00:11:09assume whoever wins in the as prime minister
00:11:13will by and large continue the same
00:11:16policies, but absent US pressure on
00:11:19Gaza, nothing is going to change for the better, I
00:11:23mean US pressure on Israel. "nothing is going to change for the better, pardon
00:11:26me. Paul to agree with what
00:11:30uh, Allan is saying, is it as
00:11:34as mystic, I mean, of course, or or is this the only
00:11:38realistic view to take at this time? I, I do
00:11:42agree very much so, and particularly in light the fact that the
00:11:46Gaza problem is no longer just a Gaza problem, it's a West Bank problem,
00:11:50it's a southern Lebanon problem, um, and in the
00:11:53run up to..." Israeli elections next month, I don't
00:11:57think that there's much prospect for compromise coming from
00:12:01the Israeli side. So I think these are
00:12:05issues that are going to be very much still with
00:12:09us after the Israeli elections after the US elections in
00:12:12November. Fair enough. Thank you so much
00:12:16Paul, thank you for joining
00:12:17us. Alan, what
00:12:21are the principal obstacles to reviving a credible?
00:12:25two state political pathway at this
00:12:28stage? well, one problem: israel, Israel has
00:12:32given up on the two state solution, it was traumatized by
00:12:36October 7th, much like the US was after
00:12:389/11 and is now bent on on destroying whatever
00:12:42it sees is opposition, and unfortunately that includes
00:12:46Palestinians and West Bank and Gaza, so the two state
00:12:49solution, I don't even know if the US administration has used
00:12:53that phrase, this current. US administration,
00:12:57so the two state solution was something that people
00:13:01talked about in the US, though they really didn't believe it,
00:13:05and at this point, given that so few people actually believe it's
00:13:08possible, given current Israeli politics,
00:13:12I don't think, I
00:13:12mean it's certainly not a staple the US regional
00:13:16policy at this point, but can
00:13:20UN even play a meaningful role in your opinion or or do you think
00:13:24that, as far as as stabilization,
00:13:27reconstruction is concerned, or or that, like you also
00:13:31said that ultimately it will depend on the major powers and of
00:13:35course the regional states also. I think the UN
00:13:39can play a role in the sense that the United States in the last
00:13:43couple of years has forfitted its desire,
00:13:47given up its desire to work collaboratively with
00:13:50traditional allies and multilateral fora, and so US
00:13:54global... leadership is absent, and even worse, it's
00:13:58inconsistency, this administration
00:14:01sides with Russia, with China has turned its back on
00:14:05traditional allies such as NATO, so I think
00:14:08unfortunately, the rest the global community is
00:14:12trying to envision a world where they cannot look to the
00:14:15US for responsible, stable,
00:14:19sustained leadership, it's a transitional phase, and
00:14:23so I think places like the U.S. where world leaders can get
00:14:26together and try to find a new, different and better path
00:14:30forward, seems to be the option, and in the US
00:14:34case again, this administration has taken
00:14:37this principle of America first and made it
00:14:41America alone, and that's not going to work for the US or for the
00:14:45world. when you
00:14:48look at, you mentioned this
00:14:51administration, the current administration the US, do you think that? "you no,
00:14:55this is perhaps unique to this
00:14:57administration and and things may change in the
00:15:01future when we look at you know how the US
00:15:05reacts or or chooses to take
00:15:08part in the UN, considering that
00:15:12you know we've seen a lot of lot more
00:15:15perhaps you know blatant remarks come like
00:15:19you said also at times there is lot of
00:15:23erratic commentary also. so so you know in that
00:15:26sense you think that that is a temporary phase possibly?
00:15:30well things always changed and certainly this administration is unique,
00:15:34you know what I've said is
00:15:36not a partisan comment, "I worked in the government for 40 years for Republicans and
00:15:40Democrats. All previous
00:15:42administrations believed in diplomacy,
00:15:45believed in furthering the national interest in a collaborative manner, cooperative
00:15:49manner with our allies. Um, this one
00:15:52doesn't, and will that change? One would hope so, I as a
00:15:56US citizen hope so, but whatever happens
00:16:00in the next administration, whatever happens in the
00:16:04midterms, what this administration has shown..." is
00:16:08that America can do things like
00:16:11this, can go sideways, can go off the rails, can adapt
00:16:15a totally new foreign policy, 180
00:16:19degrees opposed to previous administrations, so
00:16:23that essence of us
00:16:26stability throughout administrations has been
00:16:30sundered, has been broken, so yeah, things can get better with
00:16:33subsequent administrations, but this administration has
00:16:37committed what, many have called superpower
00:16:40suicide, and that's going to be hard to undo in terms
00:16:44of getting back to where we were before, but we can indefinitely
00:16:48improve the situation over the way
00:16:50it is now.
00:16:52so so if if like you to use your word, superpower
00:16:55suicide, do you think that there is there is a way back in the sense that you think there
00:16:59is going to be some kind of a calculated move
00:17:03towards sort of checking superpowers in the future?
00:17:07future there can be, you think mechanisms, you
00:17:11think
00:17:11that there is at least some kind of talk about divising these kind
00:17:15of mechanisms possibly? i don't think so.
00:17:18international law is almost an oxy mororon, it's much
00:17:22weaker now that it was years ago. i think that we're not going to get
00:17:26back to the way it was before this administration. this
00:17:29administration has essentially broken a complex
00:17:33system in the middle east with the Iran war and in terms.
00:17:37the US alliances, and though, as I've said, things can get
00:17:41better, and one hopes they will, you can't go back to the
00:17:45way it was before. Now, if you're asking, will new
00:17:48regional and international alliances get
00:17:52stronger as result of this administration? I think so, we're
00:17:55already seeing it. You know, will the situation in the Middle
00:17:59East, where our Gulf allies realized that the US
00:18:02security umbrella has holes in it, will that change? It
00:18:06already has. as result of this war, so things
00:18:10can get better, they just can't return to where they were before
00:18:14February 28th, and a larger sense before the
00:18:18events of October 7th, 2023, with the terrorist Hamas
00:18:22attack and Israel's response, which
00:18:26destabilized, ongoing response, destabilized the whole
00:18:28region. As far as the interests of for example,
00:18:32Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states are concerned, where do they intersect with
00:18:36Washington's? approach to regional
00:18:39deescalation? i think obviously the
00:18:43GCC countries to include the kingdom and the Emirates didn't want this war
00:18:47to happen, once it started, they were hopeful that since the US
00:18:51had started this, they could finish it and get rid the
00:18:55threat, the regional threat, the very real regional threat that
00:18:59Iran poses to the GCC countries and to
00:19:02Israel, but I think it's clear now to the Saudis and to
00:19:05others that the U.S. cannot
00:19:09engage in regime change and bring about a more
00:19:13benign, more user-friendly Iranian regime, nor can
00:19:17it defang or or get rid the threat that
00:19:20Iran poses. I think the best possible case right now
00:19:24for the region is that the straight of hormose be reopened as
00:19:28much as possible, as quickly as possible, because not just the
00:19:32constrained straight of hormos, but also the boble mandad is causing
00:19:36serious economic and...
00:20:07because it's not their products that are being bottled up and can
00:20:10either go out the straight or go out the boble
00:20:13mandab, but in terms of diplomatic
00:20:17channels, could they realistically reduce tensions
00:20:21between when we look at Iran and the US, I mean I know
00:20:24that countries like Pakistan also and other countries have tried and we've
00:20:28seen the mediatory efforts, we've seen a lot of back door diplomacy, but what
00:20:32are your thoughts on the success of that kind of
00:20:36diplomacy? I know you've mentioned what your thoughts on
00:20:40generally diplomatic uh the success of diplomatic
00:20:44efforts is, but at this point when we see the kind of commentary that
00:20:48happens between the US and Iran "do you think that the chances of getting
00:20:52back on the table are still rampant? i think there's
00:20:56still a chance. i think that the US administration has a large sense
00:20:59outsourced its diplomacy, which would have been traditionally done
00:21:03by experienced high-level advisers to the
00:21:07president, has outsourced
00:21:08it to countries like Pakistan or to Qatar or to the other countries
00:21:12in the region, and seeing if they can find a solution, but at the end
00:21:16the day, communication is not a problem." "the
00:21:20problem is the US has certain red lines, has certain
00:21:23minimal demands of Iran, Iran has certain minimal
00:21:27demands the United States and there's
00:21:30a lot of distance between the two. when we did the nuclear agreement with
00:21:33Iran from 2010 to 2015, we were able to find
00:21:37an intersection set, something where both sides
00:21:41could agree to work within, where Iran accepted constraints
00:21:45its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions
00:21:48relief." That hasn't happened yet
00:21:52with this with Iran and this administration.
00:21:56Do you think it's a correct statement to make that the red
00:21:59lines, that the US red lines continually
00:22:02change, or you know, when we look at of course what the
00:22:06president the US has been saying in terms of what the goals
00:22:10are, and what they hope to achieve and what it started with,
00:22:13as far as Iran is concerned. Well, certainly
00:22:17the reasons for starting the war. have changed
00:22:20continuously, we might not ever know why the US
00:22:24decided
00:22:25to attack Iran, certainly it wasn't because Iran was any
00:22:29way an imminent threat, but the red lines that the
00:22:33US has still seem to be the same,
00:22:37which is Iran must not be allowed to enrich
00:22:40uranium its own soil, it must export
00:22:44all 440 kilograms of its highly enriched
00:22:47uranium, now it must reopen the street
00:22:51without Iranian administrative control the way it was before February
00:22:5528, those seemed to be the key red lines, so there could be other
00:22:59red lines like dismantling its whole nuclear
00:23:02program, not supporting proxies, getting rid of
00:23:06its missiles even more maximalist, but those
00:23:10US red lines, I just mentioned the straight of hormose, no indigenous
00:23:14enrichment, getting rid the HEU, the highly enrich eranium, they haven't
00:23:17changed since the war started, and Iran still unwilling to
00:23:21accept any of those. um,
00:23:25just one last question, if we look beyond this year's
00:23:29speeches, what concrete diplomatic
00:23:32outcomes, are there any that you can expect from the
00:23:36UNGA81, and that would convince the international
00:23:39community that, perhaps they are closer to reaching
00:23:43some kind of resolution on the main conflicts the world is
00:23:47at this time facing? well, I think that again as I
00:23:51think you this US administration really doesn't put lot of effort
00:23:55into these general assemblies much like they used to, not a lot of state department people
00:23:59going there. President Trump's speech will mostly be for the domestic US
00:24:03audience leading up to the mid-terms, but I think countries like China,
00:24:06and there'll be a bilateral summit between the head of China and then President
00:24:10Trump later this week, um, they
00:24:14can not put pressure, but make
00:24:17clear to President Trump and the key people. 'who who go with
00:24:21him, the stab, the stakes involved here in
00:24:25terms of how bad the US economy is,
00:24:28how bad
00:24:29the global economy is in terms of loss of resilience and the adverse
00:24:33consequences of letting this war drag on, or even
00:24:36worse escalating, because we are seeing signs
00:24:40that the US might actually escalate militarily in the near future,
00:24:44so again, I think if the rest the world are the key
00:24:48countries that
00:24:49are at least countries president Trump listens
00:24:53to, stress this main point, that might be successful
00:24:57outcome
00:25:00for this. right, thank you so much, thank
00:25:01you for joining us, thank you for being with us, it was an absolute pleasure as far as the
00:25:05UN is concerned, perhaps it's time to reflect on whether it's
00:25:09still important in today's
00:25:12landscape of conflicts and can this years UNGA
00:25:16actually help resolve major wars and
00:25:20difference to the international disputes
00:25:22that that face the world faces, the human cost these
00:25:26conflicts that the people today
00:25:31redundant of of phase, or whether it's it's concept or or perhaps just a
00:25:34place of meeting
00:25:37and
00:25:38you know speeches. thank you so much for joining us today on
00:25:41perspective.
00:26:11Modi regime is employing strong arm tactics to stifle free
00:26:15media in occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
00:26:19Journalists in occupied region are harassed and booked in
00:26:22fabricated cases for reporting truth. The
00:26:26victimization of journalists in occupied Jammu and Kashmir has
00:26:29increased manifold since 5th August.
00:26:322019. Modi regime is using
00:26:36notorious agencies like Nia and Sia to raid
00:26:39journalists homes in occupied Jammu and
00:26:42Kashmir. International community must act to
00:26:46protect independent media in occupied Jammu and
00:26:49Kashmir.
00:27:05good evening and welcome to the school. how is barbarazam supposed to cats a team like that?
00:27:09i think personally Barbarazim should look back at himself and look back at him as a
00:27:13player and be focusing on how he himself is going to score runs.
00:27:17but it shouldn't be a mismatch in the way that it's playing out. i think that's been very
00:27:20frustrating to watch on the pitch to see these players we know are capable of
00:27:24so much more. razal as a primer example that there's so much raw talent in
00:27:28Pakistan. mean you know the way he played the way he's b.
00:27:32coming on, suddenly flying into the country, not being used to these conditions, taking
00:27:36four wickets, as I was able to carry Pakistan flag for
00:27:40almost, yeah 20 years there, and uh hopefully
00:27:43inshallah now being the president can see some
00:27:47Pakistani representing Pakistan in the near future at the open as well again
00:27:50inshallah and we'll show the fans that we are in control and we are making
00:27:54big decisions um, but this this is
00:27:57this is not a positive thing for Pakistan cricket, it's amazing things
00:28:00on and off the beach. shown respect, he has shown
00:28:04resilience, he has shown excellence, just for voting
00:28:08for him, which is pure corruption at
00:28:11the, but it doesn't have to be like this, it have to be more rules into it,
00:28:15explain it to ethical matter, leak by arsenal
00:28:19through
00:28:20michel teta, but again it was luck last season whereby the they
00:28:23secured their victory and the tried to change and i
00:28:27have
00:28:28no more knowledge than referee who's older than me who's supposed to judge my fight, come
00:28:31on It's supposed to educate you as well at the same time, exactly, he's supposed to keep me
00:28:35safe,
00:28:42before the whistle blows, before the final bell, there is the
00:28:45conversation, it's a language understood by every
00:28:49stadium on every street corner, it's a moment your
00:28:52heartbeats with million others,
00:28:56it's a roar of crowd, the silence of
00:28:59anticipation, it's a trimeful cry. of a
00:29:02champion, it's more than a game, it's a
00:29:06connection
00:29:12speaks to the
00:29:13world, before
00:29:17the whistle blows, before the final bell, there is the
00:29:20conversation, it's a language understood by every
00:29:24stadium on every street corner, it's a moment, your
00:29:27heartbeats with million others, it's
00:29:31a roar of... for crowd, the silence of
00:29:34anticipation.
00:30:07Hello good morning and welcome to Pakistan TV with the news of this hour, I'm
00:30:11Zenab Bukhari, let's have look at the
00:30:12headlines.
00:30:25Security forces skill eight Indian sponsored Kavarage and hangu
00:30:29operation, to officers and four soldiers imprace. shahat
00:30:33during intense fire
00:30:34exchange.
00:30:42World leaders gather in New York this week for the in general assembly
00:30:46to discuss the middle east war. Russia, ukraine conflict, artificial intelligence
00:30:50and other major clarable issues on the
00:30:52agenda.
00:30:57Pakistan's un envoy Assim says.
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.