Google Speech-to-Text API Automatic Transcription (Chirp). Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.
00:00:00supposed to grow up, sleep safely in his mother's arms.
00:00:03Here his seven-year-old brother left and slowly discover the world around
00:00:07him. Instead, his life lasted just 20 days.
00:00:11During a US- Israeli air strike on Tehran,
00:00:14a residential building in the Majidia area was strike. Muhammad Ali,
00:00:18his mother, his seven-year-old brother and several other family members
00:00:22were killed while visiting relatives at their home. The
00:00:25explosion was so powerful that the baby's body was
00:00:29a thrown out
00:00:29of the house. He was only 20 days
00:00:32old, he was not a soldier, he was not a
00:00:35politician, he carried no weapon and had no role in the conflict, he
00:00:39was true cost of war is not measured only by
00:00:42in numbers, sometimes
00:00:44it is measured by
00:00:45a silent cradle, by
00:00:47a tiny piece of clothing that will never be worn, by
00:00:51room where a baby's cries will never be heard
00:00:55of again, that is why the story of Muhammad Ali is
00:00:58of more than the story of one victory. It forces
00:01:01a simple question: when war reaches baby's room,
00:01:05what happens to our ideas of security, humanity and the value of
00:01:09human life. For many Iranians, Muhammad Ali's name carries
00:01:12even deeper meaning. In Shia Muslim tradition, the name
00:01:16Aliaskar recalls the
00:01:18of youngest son of Imam Hussein a baby who became one
00:01:21of the most powerful symbols of innocence and suffering during the
00:01:25tragedy of Karbala, centuries
00:01:27of separate Aliaskar from Muhammad Ali. different
00:01:31of wars, of different times, different places, but the image
00:01:35is painfully caught in violence. he did not choose, caught in
00:01:39violence, he did not choose and could never understand. for many
00:01:42Iranians, muhammad ali became modern reminder of that
00:01:46same innocence, a child who had not even had the chance to
00:01:49discover what life was before war took it away. he was
00:01:53born into war
00:01:55a and he died in it. his entire life lasted 20 days. that is
00:01:58why his name should never disappear into a list of casualties,
00:02:02for his memory to survive, his story must be told for years to
00:02:06come. 20 days of life, lifetime of
00:02:10remembrance.
00:02:17of
00:02:21of
00:02:21a
00:02:35Tonight on expose we begin with mainstream digital media where the New York Times
00:02:39and the Hill reveal turmoil at the highest levels
00:02:42of the
00:02:43me Trump administration. From the
00:02:45me of resignation
00:02:48of of the army secretary to military descent over the war against
00:02:49of Iran. Then in social media we turn to the explosive criticism confronting
00:02:53Washington over its increally apologetic alignment with
00:02:56Zionist Israel. In fake news CNN's framing. Iranian
00:03:00retaliation comes under scrutiny while the
00:03:04of independent offers a remarkable glimpse into the fallout surrounding an overstretch
00:03:08US military and in figures we follow the numbers to
00:03:12Jordan examining the economic, security and human cost
00:03:16of hosting US forces. finally in voices,
00:03:19Peter Benard and John
00:03:21of Stewart challenge a deeply entrenched narrative about power
00:03:25and victimhood. welcome to expose, the award winning show
00:03:29that leaves no stone.
00:03:31of
00:03:37from CNN's headline flipping the chronology of Fus Iran escalation
00:03:41to the independent exposing the extraordinary precautions
00:03:45surrounding thousands of years sailors. Today's stories reveal how
00:03:49media framing and military conduct can tell two very
00:03:52different tales. Here are the headlines. CNN headline
00:03:56War Iran blamed for retaliation as US strikes get
00:04:00buried, 500 sailors, 200 days at sea, why
00:04:04pataya is preparing for more than a military
00:04:06visit?
00:04:13as western media
00:04:15of scrumble to frame Iran's retaliation as aggression while overlooking what
00:04:19triggered it, and as another story exposes the darker side of an
00:04:23overstretched US military, we
00:04:25a examined the narratives behind the headlines, joining us a broadcast media
00:04:29expert for.
00:04:33so US Thank the machine you
00:04:34media Farah, is hyped
00:04:34thank once you, again as Iran retaliates
00:04:38to relentless by targeting
00:04:41US aggression, US assets in Arab countries, arab countries that appear unwilling to
00:04:45acknowledge
00:04:45a simple reality, the reality is that allowing Washington to use your
00:04:49territory and to use your bases to attack the Islamic Republic
00:04:53can make you legitimate targets and can make your territory part
00:04:55of the battlefield, so our first example from CNN with the
00:04:59head. Iran attacks Jordan, Bahrain and Kuwait, defying
00:05:03Trump's warning, so notice the wording, Iran
00:05:06attacks, but the reality described inside the report of course tells a
00:05:10different story, so let's watch. Okay. "the
00:05:14US military also says it strikes across the country were
00:05:17responding to Iran's recent attacks on US troops in the
00:05:21region and commercial shipping in the straight of hormoz. Iran
00:05:25quickly defied President Trump's warning to not retaliate and
00:05:29launched ballistic missile attacks on Jordan, as well as we
00:05:32see here, Jordan saying it intercepted 10 missiles
00:05:36from Iran and another three fell in remote areas.
00:05:39Kuwait and Bahrain say they intercepted. drone attacks from
00:05:43Iran. CNN's Kevin Liptach is joining us right now from
00:05:47the White House. What are you hearing Kevin this morning from the
00:05:50administration? Well, President Trump certainly does not sound
00:05:54like a man a hurry to get this conflict over with, despite
00:05:58uh the spike in oil prices and despite concerns from many of his republican
00:06:02allies that this could hurt them in the mid-term elections. You
00:06:05know, this latest round of tensions began on Sunday
00:06:09when the US attacked Iranian positions on Larach. island that
00:06:13it said we're preparing to launch uh mines into the straight
00:06:17of hormous, that prompted Iranian retaliation, which prompted us
00:06:21retaliation, which prompted Iranian retaliation back to this
00:06:24familiar pattern of back and forth strikes that has drawn in
00:06:28almost every country in the region that houses those tens
00:06:32of thousands of US
00:06:34troops.
00:06:38so the headline places Iran at the beginning the chain of aggression, but if you
00:06:41listen... to CNN's own reporter, you hear the contradiction.
00:06:45Yeah, actually, Kevin Liptach, CNN's reporter,
00:06:49acknowledges actually that the sequence began with the US attacking Iranian positions on
00:06:53Larak Island, and which was followed by Iranian retaliation
00:06:57and followed by then another US retaliation, so even CNN's own
00:07:01reporting is contradicting the simplistic framing of Iran as
00:07:05the initiator. Okay, which makes the headline particularly
00:07:08revealing, seem, I mean the um audiences or...
00:07:12sees Iran attacks Jordan, as forad is highlighting,
00:07:16Bahrain and Kuwait, but the report itself describes the cycle
00:07:20triggered by a US attack, the contact is buried
00:07:23beneath the headline in the story, and this is actually,
00:07:27miraculously how propaganda can continue to operate without inventing facts,
00:07:31so you selectively frame them, the words that are spoken during the report tell one
00:07:35story, but the headline its own is priming viewers to
00:07:38absorb another, even if you're present those reality, which is let's say the US inissue.
00:07:43Yes, uh, so now let's move from war narratives to
00:07:47another remarkable story, actually, the independent published Thailand
00:07:50issues prostitution warning as 500 US sailors arrive
00:07:54after 200 days at sea, so the story reports that thai authorities
00:07:58basically prepared additional patrols and conducted raids ahead the
00:08:02USS Abraham Lincoln's arrival in pataya, detaining 40 to
00:08:0650 people over suspected prostitution, so let's watch
00:08:09that.
00:08:52You know it's actually ironic that uh, it's just ironic like
00:08:56foreign city preparing and police patrols because thousands
00:09:00of US sailors are arriving uh after more than 200 days
00:09:04at see, yes I mean indeed, sema when a military visit requires
00:09:07authorities to prefer specifically for a prostitution
00:09:11crackdown, "it raises uncomfortable question about
00:09:15the conduct and reputation accompanying America's
00:09:18global military footprint which they're very proud of. yeah, I mean, this
00:09:22dates back a long time, but perhaps this is another measure of you, further
00:09:26imperial decline uh, not simply losing influence abroad, but
00:09:30increasingly exporting the social and moral baggage and decay
00:09:34of an overstretched military presence. okay, so from distorted
00:09:37headlines about who started a war to the extraordinary
00:09:40precautions surrounding. military report visit today's stories show
00:09:44how media narratives and military culture can reveal far
00:09:48more than their headlines suggest. Fuad and thank you again,
00:09:52both
00:09:54of you.
00:10:00From resignations at the army's highest levels to explosive
00:10:03revelations of military descent over the war against the Islamic Republic of
00:10:07Iran. Cracks are widening across the Trump administration's national
00:10:11security establishment. Here are the headlines: the
00:10:15army in turmoil Hexeth clashes trigger resignation at
00:10:19the top pentagon in uprore. Classified leak exposes
00:10:23military descent over.
00:10:32As storm deepens inside the Trump administration, new reports
00:10:36are raising serious questions about leadership, military command and
00:10:40growing descent over the war against Iran. Joining us again our digital
00:10:44media expert, and analyst, welcome
00:10:48back, we start with you, thank you, so actually things appear to
00:10:52be taking a turn for the worst in the Trump administrator. with the army
00:10:56secretary Daniel P. Drisco, handing in his
00:10:59resignation, and simultaneously the Pentagon is erupting over this
00:11:02classified leak exposing military descent over the war on
00:11:06Iran. So let's begin with the New York Times with this article that they've
00:11:10published titled army secretary resigns after clashes with Hegseph over
00:11:14firings by Helen Cooper and Greg Joff, so this title alone tells us
00:11:18that disagreements over how the military is being run have actually
00:11:22reached the highest levels in a long time, so the... Article
00:11:25reports, army secretary Daniel P. Drisel, the services
00:11:29top civilian leader who classed repeatedly with defense secretary
00:11:33P. Texas over
00:11:34the Auster of a swath of key combat tested leaders,
00:11:38handed in his resignation on Monday, according to administration officials, so the
00:11:41resignation comes amid a series of firings and feudes that have left the army
00:11:45essentially rudderless as it struggles to deal with the threat posed by cheap
00:11:49deadly drones and missiles that have pounded US bases in the middle east. So
00:11:53the article continues, army has not had a chief of staff,
00:11:57the services top officer since Mr. Hegsaf fired Jen Randy
00:12:00George without explanation back in April, and there are no signs that he is
00:12:04close to filling the position, officials said, so Hack Seth has
00:12:08forced out at least three senior officers who had been viewed as potential
00:12:12successors to General Randy George, and when senior
00:12:16generals is being removed, while the army lacks a
00:12:19permanent chief of staff, um, this goes beyond an
00:12:23internal political uh dispute, actually it raises major
00:12:27question, sema about command and also about
00:12:30control, at the moment when American forces are facing actually two
00:12:34things, an active and expanding regional
00:12:37conflict, exactly, and you have experience commanders being pushed out,
00:12:41senior positions remaining vacant, and strategic disagreements
00:12:45basically reaching the top the chain of command, so this is a really dangerous
00:12:48combination during wart specifically, yeah, and the term does not stop at the
00:12:52army, actually, so the hill reported also an article that was titled pentagon
00:12:56erupts over classified leak of Iran war descent that top
00:12:59military leaders warned against extending these large
00:13:03scale operations as they call them against Iran
00:13:06so the article says the warnings appear in the August 14th edition the
00:13:10Secretary of Defense Orders Book SDOB detailed by the heads the Army
00:13:14Navy and Air Force and the four star commanders overseeing US operations throughout
00:13:17Europe Asia and Latin America. It continues people familiar with the
00:13:21classified assessment prepared for Hegs have told the Washington. that
00:13:25several combatant commanders have advised the defense chief that prolonging
00:13:29operations against Iran is unsustainable and it risks weakening the
00:13:33US's ability to address threats elsewhere, including on US
00:13:36soil. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnel condemned the
00:13:40report saying publishing highly classified assessments from the secretaries orders
00:13:44book is a crime. It's a betrayal the forest, and he added that the Pentagon
00:13:48wants candid advice and that disagreements are common. But if
00:13:52military commanders themselves actually are warning that prolonging
00:13:56this war is unsustainable um that suggests actually that
00:14:00this agreement may be far more consequential than
00:14:03ordinary internal debate, don't you agree for? yeah, that's right, and when
00:14:07descent, leadership, perges and classified leaks emerge
00:14:10simultaneously, the bigger story is institutional strain, and the question is
00:14:14whether political leadership is listening to its military professionals or
00:14:18overriding them. okay, so also therefore, from resignations at the top to
00:14:22military leaders warning against prolonging the... war, the reports
00:14:26point a Pentagon under extraordinary pressure, semant for. Thank you
00:14:30so
00:14:30much.
00:14:38From explosive clashes with reporters, the controversial statements
00:14:42on Zianus Israel, top Trump administration officials are
00:14:45facing mounting scrutiny online over whether Washington's foreign policy
00:14:49is really serving American interest. Here are the headlines.
00:14:53America first or... design is first. Social media takes
00:14:57aim at Trump officials Washington
00:15:00under fire. The Trump administration's Israely entity
00:15:04allegiance parks online.
00:15:06Fury.
00:15:14As American politicians increasingly appear to speak for Zionist
00:15:18Israel rather than the American interest. Social media users
00:15:22are asking just how far this alignment can go. joining
00:15:25us to examine the controversy is social media exper and
00:15:29analyst welcome to you both thank you so
00:15:33netics have been frantic actually this past week over the all
00:15:37facious way that senior figures in the Trump administration are speaking about
00:15:41Zionist Israel and US policy with Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of
00:15:45War and the Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the center of this criticism, so
00:15:49let's begin with a post that's questioning the priorities of America's military
00:15:52leadership,
00:15:53and it's controversial actually, because Americans are asking whether US
00:15:57forces should be serving US interests first, maybe, yes,
00:16:01so JBC press wrote,
00:16:05Pete Hexeth exploded in anger at reporter. asked him why our military
00:16:08serves Israel first, so let's watch that video
00:16:11together. the American people also want to know what they're
00:16:14sending their men and women to war for, are is
00:16:18there a concern of this spiraling into a longer war and then one for the
00:16:22chairman when you're done? did you not hear my
00:16:25remarks? we're ensuring the mission gets
00:16:28accomplished, but we are very clear eyeed as the president has been unlike other
00:16:32presidents uh about the foolish policies the
00:16:36past that.
00:16:53and that question goes directly to the heart the controversy, mean who
00:16:57exactly is Washington accountable to, that's right, and the reaction is very
00:17:01significant because dismissing the question doesn't make the underlying concern
00:17:05disappear, it reinforces the perception. that criticism the
00:17:09US-Israeli relationship itself is becoming politically unacceptable,
00:17:12yes, yeah, there's a reason for that. yep, the next post actually focuses
00:17:16on Rubio and a disputed account of how Washington became involved in the war on
00:17:20Iran, so for Americans the controversy lies in whether their government is
00:17:24being transparent or not about the decisions that could send them
00:17:28to war. so Morgan J Freeman, MJ Free
00:17:31wrote, porter says, he told us wrote porter
00:17:35says, he told us yesterday that Israel was going to... strike Iran, which says, "that's
00:17:39not true. were you there yesterday?" and then the reporter says, "yes, I asked you the
00:17:43question. let's take a look at that video.
00:17:44yes. yesterday you told
00:17:48us that Israel was going to strike iran and that that's why we
00:17:52needed to get involved. today the president said that Iran was going to get.
00:17:56yeah, your statement is false. so that's not
00:17:57what i was asked very specifically. were you there yesterday? yes,
00:18:00question. wait a minute, there
00:18:04absolutely was an imminent threat, and the imminent threat was that we knew that..." Iran was
00:18:08attacked and we believe they would be attacked, that we knew
00:18:11that if Iran was attacked and we believe they
00:18:15would be attacked that they would immediately come after us. Now did you, were
00:18:19you the one that cuz somebody asked a question, did we, were you the one that cuz somebody asked a question
00:18:23answer, did we go in because of Israel,
00:18:25and I said, you answer, I told you this had to happen anyway, the president made
00:18:29decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to systematically
00:18:32destroy this terroristic capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very
00:18:36clear on that answer. "this was a question of timing of why this had to happen as a joint
00:18:40operation, not the question the
00:18:41intent. the exchange raise
00:18:45much bigger even question that what we're trying to analyze about
00:18:49accountability, for example, when decisions involving ward
00:18:53are being challenged even publicly, exactly, and social media
00:18:57magnifies that confrontation because millions can see how officials are
00:19:01being directly questioned and judge the answers for themselves.
00:19:04yeah, definitely, and our third post actually..." even more
00:19:08disturbing, presenting the statement attributed to an Israeli
00:19:11entity minister addressing soldiers before entering Gaza, because of this content
00:19:15actually it has triggered outrage online and
00:19:18internationally, so Mo Abu Salah, a
00:19:22historical scandal that the whole world must see, the Israeli minister
00:19:26addresses the Israeli soldiers before entering Gaza saying, grab the babies in Gaza and
00:19:30smash their heads on the rocks, so let's watch
00:19:33this.
00:19:37ספת לטובת המאמץ המלחמתי של החטיבה הפרולה
00:19:41חתיבת גיבתי היות וקיבלתי כל פעם הערות
00:19:45לגבי תחום הציונות אנחנו מתחילים שתחילת התדריך אנחנו היום עושים
00:19:49ציונות בהפתעה אני הולך להתקשר עכשיו באיזשהו סר
00:19:52מהכנסת עושים לו טלפון
00:19:54בהפתעה אנחנו עושים פה ציונות בהפתעה אתה
00:19:58שומע יפה יש לי פה סתכל חבורת
00:20:02לוחמים מדהימה הולכת להילחם להיכנס פה
00:20:06בשיא הכוח אני צריך. 30 שניות של ציונות, יש לך על
00:20:09השעון, אני פותח השעון, 30 שניות, שר בהפתעה, זה נקרא,
00:20:13אין בעיה, שומעים אותי, שומעים אותי, נוחמים יקרים
00:20:17וגיבורים, לא רק עיני עם ישראל מפורות
00:20:21אליכם, אלא עיניהם של דורות על גבי דורות, שעוקו
00:20:25והושפנו, נרמסו ונהרגו מבלי היכולת שלהם להגן על
00:20:28עצמם, הם קיבו וחלמו שיום אחד יקום עם מעפר
00:20:32יאכות בנשקוב ויקב, אשרי שיאכז ונפט
00:20:36את הליך אל הסלע.
00:20:50whether Washington is drawing a line between criticizing the Israeli
00:20:54regime and criticizing the United States itself, yes,
00:20:57so Marco Rubio officially, now is this a GBC press
00:21:01again, that anyone who dares to criticize Israel will not be
00:21:04granted a US visa, by the way, this doesn't apply if you
00:21:08criticize the US itself, so let's
00:21:10watch, under president Trump, the
00:21:14United States will stand with the Jewish people,
00:21:18we have implemented a vigorous new visa policy that will prevent
00:21:22foreign nationals from coming to the United States to foment hatred against
00:21:26our Jewish community. We are holding international organizations and
00:21:30nations accountable for rhetoric against Israel that resurfaces in the
00:21:33manifesto of monsters like Yoron and Sarah's
00:21:37Killer. But we do see eventual light at the end of this long
00:21:40tunnel of suffering. One can imagine a middle east and which the
00:21:44Abraham accords eventually reign. So thank you for the
00:21:48opportunity to address you.
00:21:54so these posts actually collectively are reflecting ever growing
00:21:57online argument over whether US foreign policy is being driven by US
00:22:01interests strictly or of course by this unwavering
00:22:05loyalty that we've seen develop over the years to zionist Israel.
00:22:09okay, well as social media continues challenging Washington's official
00:22:13narrative, the real question is whether American citizens are still
00:22:16being allowed to question the policies carried out in their
00:22:20name seam and thank you
00:22:22very
00:22:30much from missiles raining over Jordanian territory to soaring coast and
00:22:33battered tourism sector, the numbers tell a story of a country
00:22:37paying the price for hosting America's military footprint in the region.
00:22:41Here are the headlines. Jordan pays the price,
00:22:45119 projectiles, 14 injured and
00:22:49economy under. pressure, America's war, Jordan's
00:22:52bill, the hidden cost of hosting US
00:22:55forces.
00:23:03As Jordan absorbs the economic and security fallout the US
00:23:07zinist aggression against Iran, the numbers reveal the price of
00:23:11allowing foreign military operations to be launch from its
00:23:15territory. Joining us is senior researcher Miriam Sharabati and
00:23:18analymayim, welcome to you both. Miriam: Thank you, Farah,
00:23:22the figures tell a very striking story of a country caught between the
00:23:26dependence on Washington and the consequences of Washington's regional
00:23:29wars. Now, Jordan has faced 119 missiles and
00:23:33drones launched toward its territory during the escalation with its air
00:23:37defenses intercepting the fast majority, but interception
00:23:41does not mean there is no cost. Falling Debris and shrapnill
00:23:45have caused 14 reported injuries along with localized damage and
00:23:48disruption. military installations hosting US forces, including
00:23:52the airbase and have become
00:23:56targets and then comes the economic price, right,
00:24:00right, tourism, which accounts for nearly 15% of Jordan's
00:24:04GDP, has been badly hit, fuel and gas
00:24:07prices rose by roughly 11% after the complicated
00:24:11complications of trade and investment prospects around,
00:24:14okay, so obviously Jordan is effectively paying a
00:24:18price for hosting the military. structure that makes it part
00:24:21the conflict, and as you're highlighting, medium, while it's
00:24:24economy is deteriorating according to your article,
00:24:28absolutely, and there this is where the political responsibility cannot be
00:24:32ignored, right? Jordan remains heavily dependent on Washington,
00:24:36receiving up to two billion annually in US military and economic
00:24:39assistance, yet when missiles and drones begin reaching
00:24:43Jordanian territory, that relationship does not necessarily shield
00:24:47ordinary jordanians from the constituence. It's a painful contradiction
00:24:51actually, because Jordan is still benefiting from the strategic relationship with Washington, but at
00:24:55the same time this relationship is exposing it to retaliation and which is connected
00:24:59to a war that it did not initiate. Absolutely, and
00:25:02this kind of brings us back to the responsibility the Jordanian regime
00:25:06itself, it if it permits US forces to use
00:25:10Jordanian territory as a platform for operations against
00:25:14Iran, it also has responsibility to protect its
00:25:17population from the consequences, for sure. "the public should not be expected
00:25:21to absorb the risks of American and Israeli entity regional
00:25:25adventures while receiving litter protection from the follow and
00:25:28the uh 90 119 projectiles that you are
00:25:32actually highlighting make the risk intangible, miriam because
00:25:36this is no longer simply geopolitical
00:25:40calculation taking place on maps every now and then it is reaching
00:25:43jordanian communities affecting the economy as you previously highlighted,
00:25:47infrastructure and also livelihoods, yes precisely and these figures that you're
00:25:51presenting are exposing this imbalance, Jordan is bearing the immediate security and
00:25:54economic costs, and then at the same time it's dependence on Washington is making
00:25:58it very difficult to pursue any kind of independent course, exactly so... we're
00:26:02talking 14 injuries, 119 incoming missiles and
00:26:06drones, 11% rise in fuel and gas
00:26:09prices, and tourism sector representing 15% of
00:26:13GDP under pressure, all point to a country paying the
00:26:17price for its strategic and uncalculated, and as the
00:26:20regional war expands, the question becomes whether Jordan
00:26:24will continue absorbing the consequences of foreign military presence
00:26:28its soil. medium and sema, thank you.
00:26:38and a striking conversation on the daily show two Jewish voices
00:26:42confront the devastating transformation of power challenging
00:26:46the familiar David and Goliath narrative in the context of
00:26:49Zianis Israel's war of genocide on
00:26:52Gaza. Peter Benard, editor at large at Jewish
00:26:56currents, author the Benart notebook on substack
00:27:00and professor at the newmark. school of journalism joins host
00:27:04John Stewart for a conversation that cuts through political
00:27:08tabues. Let us watch
00:27:10it together. What happens when
00:27:13David becomes Goliath, and the
00:27:17responsibility there, is that what troubles
00:27:20you? Yeah, I mean, our responsibility is to
00:27:23remember, is to remember what was done to us, to remember
00:27:27what we would have wanted people around the world. I'm not saying
00:27:30that what's happening in Gaza is the equivalent the holocaust or any. like that, but with
00:27:33happening in, it may be slow. i
00:27:36saw an article in the times, bret stepens, i think, and his argument
00:27:40was, this can't be
00:27:41a genocide, because Israel's so strong they could kill them much quicker,
00:27:45right? and i thought, well, that's the most cynical description of a
00:27:49military siege and a purposeful starvation that i've ever seen in
00:27:53my life. right, mean even Israel's leading human rights organization, but salom has just
00:27:57come out with report saying they believe this is genocide, so it
00:28:01seems to me if if we want
00:28:02to remember our history, if we want to honor those in our own families
00:28:06and of our people who were slaughtered and who were genocided, who
00:28:10were starved to death while nobody in the world cared, our obligation is
00:28:14to care, our obligation is to risk something,
00:28:18listen man, this
00:28:22has this has rocked my, i feel like crazy person, i
00:28:25feel like i'm watching something
00:28:27that is so
00:28:29self-evidently inhumane,
00:28:33and horrific and to be told that I have
00:28:37to shut up because I
00:28:40risk the Jewish state by speaking out, I would
00:28:44say the opposite, I think not, I think they're putting the
00:28:48likelihood
00:28:49of a surviving Jewish state much more at risk with this
00:28:53type of action, I think they're the
00:28:55ones that are that are being
00:28:58anti if you want to define the definition of.
00:29:02antisemitism would probably have to bomb himself. I
00:29:06mean,
00:29:10ladies and gentlemen, with that we conclude our expos for tonight right here on Press TV,
00:29:14until next week, question the headline, trace the source and never surrender your
00:29:17judgment.
00:29:42Keeping you up to date with world news every half
00:29:46hour on press
00:29:48tv
00:29:55comic revolution guard force says is shot down and destroyed another
00:29:58American MQ1 drone over the straight of hormos.