Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.
00:00:00because that advocation was
00:00:03banned among us since the
00:00:06constitution, there is no vocation,
00:00:10vocation among equals, your
00:00:12Excellency's robe is equal to mine, your Excellency is the president, I am
00:00:16more modern, therefore, of lower symbolic
00:00:19hierarchy, but your Excellency's robe is
00:00:21equal, why is it equal? Because this is a court of
00:00:25equals, being a court of equals, we have to
00:00:29follow the... rule that governs the relationship between
00:00:32equals, what does this rule say?
00:00:36In no court in the country, none, it's
00:00:39not just in the supreme court, a president can dismiss a
00:00:43rapporteur,
00:00:46because if he does, Mr. President, look at the responsibility of
00:00:49those who wear robes and
00:00:52I know all sides, this is not a place for those who seek
00:00:56applause, this is not a place for those who seek...
00:01:00popularity, this is not a place, my friend Nelson
00:01:03Jobin used to say, to write biographies, this is a place to do
00:01:07justice, justice due process of
00:01:10law, if we accept avocacy,
00:01:13Mr. President, we will be opening an avenue of
00:01:17authoritarianism, of despotism, of tyranny
00:01:19in the courts that no one will
00:01:23control anymore, your Excellency is an
00:01:27purpose in the honest man, I have told you this many times and...
00:01:30here your Excellency is an honorable man, an honest man, well
00:01:33intentioned,
00:01:35but well-intentioned people also make mistakes, there is a famous song by
00:01:39Chico César about this, what
00:01:42protects us, your Excellency, me and everyone, the
00:01:45imperfect beings that we are, from error, the collegiate
00:01:49body, the law, imagine, Mr. President, if your
00:01:53Excellency is an honest man, I repeat, but if
00:01:56we admit avocacy, we
00:01:59will go to... who knows at this
00:02:02point with so much corruption, in fact, I have never seen so much corruption in the Brazilian
00:02:06justice system, I mean, it is the most
00:02:08corrupt moment in the history of the judiciary
00:02:12in Brazil, and I say this with the authority of someone who has exercised
00:02:16judicature since
00:02:171994,
00:02:20unfortunately, which proves that there are
00:02:22errors, because there is so much talk about corruption in
00:02:26Brazil, corruption only increases.
00:02:30happened the it's this, that, this
00:02:33other, corruption only increases, in politics
00:02:37too, Minister Toffle worked in
00:02:41Congress, he knows what parliamentary amendments were, what they are
00:02:44today, so in this era of corruption we have
00:02:48to be firm in fighting
00:02:50dismissed, but he wasn't, it's here on the corruption, firm within the terms of the law, what happens, if
00:02:54we admit avocacy, Mr. President, your
00:02:57Excellency and this court will open an avenue of
00:03:00corruption, an avenue of trade in the
00:03:03courts, here the president of the
00:03:07OAB, I have the greatest respect for the OAB and for your
00:03:10Excellency, just as there are
00:03:13dishonest judges, dishonest politicians, there are
00:03:16dishonest lawyers,
00:03:19there is no sale of sentences without a lawyer
00:03:21buying,
00:03:24there is no passive corruption without active corruption, and look, to
00:03:28be fair, I even saw one. who was the party that bought directly, but
00:03:32usually it's a lawyer in the middle, now, if a
00:03:35president of a court can dismiss a
00:03:38rapporteur at his
00:03:41discretion,
00:03:43besides being inappropriate in light of the constitution, of the
00:03:47loman, of the code of criminal procedure and of the rules, the
00:03:51result is a disaster,
00:03:53Hobbs, Mr. President, Hobbs, war of all
00:03:57against all, the rapporteur of the... of the
00:04:01INSS drawn is Minister André
00:04:03Mendonça, I even disagree with
00:04:07his conduct, as your Excellency said at the beginning, but
00:04:10I disagree in the records, I cannot take
00:04:13his process, neither I nor your Excellency, he is the
00:04:17rapporteur, natural judge, Mr. President,
00:04:19pre-constituted, it's in the constitution,
00:04:23so we have a principled question here, it's not a
00:04:27question of opportunity.
00:04:30What do the rules say, Minister Gilmar just said I wrote to him,
00:04:33in a situation of
00:04:36conflict, Minister André told the
00:04:40PF director to leave, I
00:04:43had two operations underway, Dark Ross Congressman
00:04:46Sezinha Amadureira, and I considered
00:04:49in the
00:04:52records that these operations would be frustrated, if Minister André's
00:04:55provision were carried
00:04:58out. He made a decision. also another, your Excellency could
00:05:02have intervened, not only could, but should and did
00:05:05well, he said this in the presidency, because I don't have two faces, I only have
00:05:09one, but the situation we are
00:05:13in here is different, Mr. President, there are no conflicting
00:05:16decisions,
00:05:18there was a decision by your Excellency so broad that your
00:05:22Excellency paralyzed an administrative process in the
00:05:25Attorney General's Office,
00:05:29of external control of police activity that is up to the Public Ministry to be
00:05:33prevented,
00:05:36see the danger that this means, because your Excellency
00:05:39emanates examples of...
00:05:42jurisprudence, so let's imagine tomorrow a president
00:05:46of a court requested, let's be kind, at the
00:05:49request of a politician, a prosecutor
00:05:53from a district, initiates a proceeding, the
00:05:57president of the court cancels ex officio, without a
00:06:00request,
00:06:04I think, I am one of those who think that
00:06:07corruption does
00:06:09not justify - fighting corruption with
00:06:13corruption, and here I am not referring, I repeat, in the
00:06:17sense of improbity, but in the Aristotelian
00:06:19sense, corrupted forms of exercise of
00:06:23power, and that is the reason, Minister Gilmar, why I brought
00:06:26the
00:06:28point of order to your Excellency, with all conviction, nothing personal against your
00:06:32Excellency, your Excellency will pass, I too, your Excellency
00:06:36can be
00:06:39eh, judge for 50 years, will pass. "I can be
00:06:43judge for 60, I will pass, of course, but we have to look
00:06:47at the whole, the forest, because
00:06:49with anxieties disasters occur
00:06:52and with
00:06:55eh this principled reason why
00:06:58I emphasize this, we have a
00:07:01judgment that your Excellency grants a part of the party with the
00:07:05permission of the minister who was voting,
00:07:08Mr. President, of course, I just want to conclude my
00:07:11proposal." What is the proposal of the point of order? The proposal
00:07:15of the point of order that Minister Gilmar will address is not that
00:07:19we suspend the judgment, but that we comply with the
00:07:22rules. What do the rules say, Mr. President? The
00:07:25rules say that your Excellency, when
00:07:28supposedly invoking a case, let's call it that, has to
00:07:31redistribute, it's written in article 67 of the rules,
00:07:34it's there and the rules say that your Excellency does not
00:07:38participate in the distribution, it's written in the rules, it's written
00:07:42to exclude. and from the president,
00:07:45so there is no avocacy, there is no self-designation of
00:07:48rapporteur, there is redistribution, in fact, it's in the code of civil
00:07:52procedure that Minister Fux helped to write,
00:07:55distribution, there was no distribution, there is no published
00:07:59agenda, the rapporteur was
00:08:02agenda, rapporteur ALM, André Luís Menonsa, it's
00:08:06him, so, Mr. President, I think we
00:08:09should, eh, I will return of course, before... coming your Excellency,
00:08:13of course, eh, but I will return to Minister Gilmar, I think we have to
00:08:17consolidate these cases, because your Excellency
00:08:20said that the cases are connected, your
00:08:23Excellency said, it wasn't me, it was your Excellency, in the
00:08:27dispatch that your Excellency,
00:08:31in inverted commas, invoked, your Excellency uses as
00:08:35justification for the
00:08:37invocation, eh, the
00:08:40connection.
00:08:42And to my surprise, your Excellency applies the institute of
00:08:46connection and does not apply the institute of
00:08:48connection, in the terms of the code of criminal procedure, it's
00:08:52there, 76, 77, 78, 79, just
00:08:56look at 79, the connection implies unity of process and
00:08:59judgment, comma, except, it's
00:09:03there, so if your Excellency
00:09:06split without justification and without being the judge
00:09:09of the case, we have to... and this is the
00:09:13objective of the point of order, to consolidate the cases for the 23rd,
00:09:16your Excellency did not schedule for the 23rd to judge Minister
00:09:19André, eh, so we
00:09:22consolidate in the terms of the code of criminal procedure, in the
00:09:26rules, your Excellency redistributes, because it's in the
00:09:29rules, your Excellency redistributes the cases, applies the
00:09:32rules, redistributes and we appreciate them together, next
00:09:36week, because I repeat, if we admit these
00:09:40practices, Mr. President, it's...
00:09:42one of the biggest mistakes in the history of the judiciary in Brazil,
00:09:46the return of avocacy,
00:09:48the power of eh monocratic, I'll call it that, of the president
00:09:52to self-designate rapporteur, something that
00:09:55jurisdictionally does not exist, and this here is jurisdictional matter, it is not administrative
00:09:59matter, but I listen Mr. President and I thank your kindness
00:10:03then of course I return to Minister, thank you very much Minister Dino, let's
00:10:06debate this topic and I believe
00:10:09that we have some questions. of
00:10:12points of view that are common your Excellency who
00:10:16is much younger than me, I was a young boy in
00:10:191978
00:10:21when I attended a conference.
00:10:25at the seventh national conference of the OAB on the rule of
00:10:28law by Minister
00:10:31Evandro who argued
00:10:35precisely this, with which we agree:
00:10:38avocacy is indeed an instrument of
00:10:41authoritarian and arbitrary regimes,
00:10:44therefore eh, even because of my
00:10:48trajectory,
00:10:51I would recommend some caution in qualifying...
00:10:55an act as an avocacy, there
00:10:57is no decision whatsoever on my part
00:11:01invoking the records, the records were forwarded
00:11:04and I read in the report, your Excellency heard from the
00:11:08rapporteur minister to the presidency, and
00:11:11why did I conclude, and I may be mistaken,
00:11:15because the natural judge to judge this matter is the plenary
00:11:19and it is being charged
00:11:23and we are going to... decide this, if we can
00:11:27get there, eh, I hope we do, we are going to decide if
00:11:30what Minister André did
00:11:34by requesting that report from the police is correct or not
00:11:38correct, therefore,
00:11:41your Excellency refers it to the presidency so that the natural
00:11:45judge can report on this matter
00:11:48which obviously has in the terms of item
00:11:52one of article 5, the plenary as its...
00:11:55natural, therefore, Minister Dino, if we agree
00:11:58that it is necessary to follow the rules, as
00:12:02Stephen Holmes wrote, in a study that
00:12:05was successful at the time of the pandemic, the protocols
00:12:07save, the method saves, in this we agree,
00:12:11I just don't have the same
00:12:14perception as your Excellency of
00:12:17doing, I'm not saying your Excellency did, but doing an
00:12:20ad hoc hermeneutics, because I at
00:12:25no point designated
00:12:28any rapporteur, your Excellency assumes that I
00:12:32invoked the maximum rapporteurships of the cases, well, for us to understand this rapporteurship issue better, I'll talk now
00:12:35with the lawyer, I'll talk again, right, with the
00:12:39specialist lawyer in higher courts, Max
00:12:42Telesca, Doctor, this rapporteurship issue that
00:12:46Minister Flávio Dino just pointed out, for us to understand
00:12:50better, could it stay with the president of the court
00:12:53or not, would it have to have
00:12:55redistribution?
00:13:01In my understanding, Minister Faquim, he
00:13:03can, yes, eh, they are using a word called
00:13:07avocacy, which is an old action that was used in the Supreme Federal Court
00:13:11before the 1988 Constitution, which was considered an arbitrary
00:13:15instrument, a an
00:13:18undemocratic instrument, because
00:13:21it caused the president to interfere with the competence
00:13:25of another judge, but it is not about that, in my understanding,
00:13:29in my understanding, Minister eh Edson
00:13:32Faquin, due to the internal rules
00:13:35providing that the allegation of suspicion
00:13:38against a minister is reported by the
00:13:42president, as well as any
00:13:45unlawful act in the presidency in criminal
00:13:49matters that may have occurred,
00:13:53if there is a suspicion that the
00:13:56infringement of criminal law may have
00:14:00occurred in the Supreme Federal Court, it is also up to the
00:14:03presidency to open an inquiry
00:14:06into this matter, so
00:14:09I believe that, yes, Minister Faquim did not use
00:14:13an undemocratic
00:14:16instrument, he is within his own
00:14:19competence and he did so, now it is a question to
00:14:23be resolved, an important question that Minister Flávio Dino
00:14:27and Minister Gilmar Mendes are raising, they are important
00:14:29jurists with with a lot of knowledge,
00:14:33but I believe that Faquim is acting within his own
00:14:37competence. Doctor, at this moment, Minister André
00:14:40Mendonça speaks, let's listen for a bit, then we'll come back to analyze
00:14:43here with Doctor the quality of rapporteur, upon
00:14:46identifying that the messages among them referred
00:14:50to a minister of the court, I understood
00:14:54that neither. this moment was more at stake the court's own
00:14:58prerogative, in second place, based
00:15:02on article
00:15:0443 of the
00:15:07rules,
00:15:11because this court has understood over the last few years
00:15:14that not necessarily eventual
00:15:17practice of an illicit act that
00:15:21affects the court does not necessarily within the...
00:15:25it is not up to the president, article
00:15:2843 says: if a criminal offense occurs at the court's headquarters or
00:15:32premises, the president shall initiate an inquiry, so I understood
00:15:35that in light of the... action that had been
00:15:38taken until this moment in the
00:15:41court that other issues that directly
00:15:45impacted the court,
00:15:47could have a connotation of criminal
00:15:50offense, it would be up to the
00:15:52president, this one by himself, or
00:15:56delegating to another minister, just to clarify
00:15:59the reasons also to make here a defense in relation to
00:16:03Your Excellency. I conclude the gentle part.
00:16:07which with the acquiescence of Minister Gilmar, Minister Dino
00:16:11granted me, please, therefore,
00:16:14eh, to make this precision in terms of the
00:16:18facts, your Excellency was also loyal regarding
00:16:21the fact that
00:16:24Minister André Mendonça had decided something
00:16:28in relation to the position of the Director General of the Federal
00:16:31Police and your Excellency had decided the
00:16:35opposite. Therefore,
00:16:39in this area there were indeed conflicting decisions by
00:16:42two ministers and in the specific area that
00:16:45we are trying to start to
00:16:48examine, God knows if we will be able to
00:16:51advance, but we are trying to just examine, doctor,
00:16:55I would like your assessment now on the following, at this
00:16:58point in the championship, is it possible that the
00:17:02rapporteurship eh on the case that is being
00:17:05considered today in relation, for example.
00:17:16it will only return to Minister André Mendonça if there is the
00:17:20acceptance of the point of order, notice that Minister André
00:17:24Mendonça just commented exactly what I said
00:17:26earlier, that since there is the infringement, the
00:17:30possible infringement of criminal law, that is,
00:17:33the basis of the fake news inquiry is precisely this,
00:17:37there was an... expansion in that case so that
00:17:40there would be eh the appointment of a
00:17:42rapporteur and not the free distribution,
00:17:46in this case there is no need for an expansion
00:17:50of the norm that exists within the internal regulations, but
00:17:53the application of the norm itself, that is, there is a
00:17:57suspicion that an infringement of criminal
00:18:00law may have occurred in the Supreme Federal
00:18:04Court, therefore the competence belongs to the president of the
00:18:08Supreme Federal Court, based precisely on
00:18:11the article that gave Minister Toffle the possibility to
00:18:15appoint Minister Alexandre de Moraes as rapporteur for
00:18:18the fake news inquiry. So, doctor, for us to always translate for those who are
00:18:22watching at home, who often don't understand, right,
00:18:26these legal procedures, what is being discussed at this moment is a
00:18:30point of order from the minister raised by Minister
00:18:34Flávio Dino about today's rapporteurship, if it is appropriate.
00:18:43there are many legal concepts, we are talking here
00:18:47about competence, we are talking about jurisdiction, we
00:18:51are talking about an old action called
00:18:54avocacy that was and was eradicated, it
00:18:58no longer exists in the Brazilian legal system, but what is important for
00:19:02our eh viewer to understand is that
00:19:06the competence is being defined... who has the competence to judge
00:19:10the master bank and
00:19:12specifically, that is the point, who has the
00:19:16competence to judge the
00:19:18request for an investigation of a minister of the
00:19:22Supreme Federal Court also the allegation of
00:19:25suspicion of another minister of the Supreme Federal Court,
00:19:28that is what is being decided at this moment, a point of order, the point
00:19:32of order precedes the debate, it
00:19:35precedes, it needs to be a... preliminary, it, it, it needs to be
00:19:39decided, the point of order needs to be decided before the merits
00:19:43of the question are judged, which is the removal or not eh, of a
00:19:46minister. And who speaks at this moment is Minister Gilmar Mendes.
00:19:50Let's hear a snippet.
00:19:54Director of the Federal Police.
00:19:57Case placed at 10 am for
00:20:00judgment. Asked for a view at 10
00:20:03and 1.
00:20:07Unless I'm mistaken, at 10:04 Minister
00:20:10Castro had already voted, it was 22 pages of
00:20:13reasoning, at 10:06 Minister Fux had already
00:20:16voted,
00:20:21no problem, with the
00:20:24experience of a seasoned magistrate of so many years
00:20:28I knew something would happen
00:20:32that this could not happen, that it was even
00:20:36because any citizen who has a minimum
00:20:39notion of what the Federal
00:20:43Police means, which is an armed body, subject to
00:20:46hierarchy, would not remove
00:20:50a general director of the police, it's like removing the director, the president
00:20:54of
00:20:54NASA,
00:20:59or
00:21:01removing the commander of the army, it's not
00:21:05done, the person has to handcuff themselves
00:21:09before doing this kind of thing, when they have
00:21:12temptation, they have to ask God to intercede
00:21:15and not
00:21:16do it,
00:21:19because in... in fact to subject an institution
00:21:23that already lives all the problems it
00:21:26has,
00:21:31to this kind of shame is a lack of
00:21:35understanding of a
00:21:37seriousness that I have never seen,
00:21:40but let's proceed, let's proceed,
00:21:44regarding your Excellency, allow me a
00:21:46moment, please, I am the president of the second... of the panel,
00:21:50first to greet your Excellency, to greet your
00:21:54Excellency, our senior judge, to greet our
00:21:58senior judge, Minister Camin Luça, to greet,
00:22:01to greet the Prosecutor General of the Republic, the other
00:22:04members of the court, Mr. President
00:22:08eh the second panel
00:22:12perceived a series of deviations
00:22:15of
00:22:17actions of the director.
00:22:20of the federal police, this is even part of a very
00:22:23expressive passage of our manifestation.
00:22:27At that time, then, it was verified
00:22:31that we have the greatest admiration for the Federal Police. Your
00:22:35Honor has been a judge for 50 years. The federal justice has always worked
00:22:38in favor of the judiciary. What the federal justice cannot do, the
00:22:42federal police cannot work against the judiciary.
00:22:45To instrumentalize
00:22:48people to
00:22:50sustain positions against the judiciary,
00:22:52just this sending of this
00:22:55anonymous document
00:22:58is already an example
00:23:01significant of these deviations practiced by the federal police
00:23:05and for this reason we understood
00:23:06and if I remember correctly, your
00:23:10Excellency went to the presidential palace to say that they were
00:23:14responsible for this, because he allowed the federal police crisis
00:23:17with the supreme court to occur.
00:23:20No one ever imagined the federal police defying a minister of the Supreme Federal Court
00:23:24and that was what was happening, without prejudice
00:23:27to them instrumentalizing positions to
00:23:31degrade the court, everything started
00:23:34there and we understood that we should
00:23:38take a stand to stop this, as Minister
00:23:41Gilmar expressed himself before the
00:23:44presidential palace, your Excellency said this, it was
00:23:47your fault for not stopping this crisis. of the federal police
00:23:51against the minister, your Excellency has been a minister for more
00:23:54than 20 years, I have been a minister for
00:23:5716 years, I have never seen the federal police defy a minister of the Supreme
00:24:01Court, we understood that that represented an anomaly
00:24:04and would contaminate all judgments
00:24:08regarding serious facts reported, even
00:24:12more so, a proper agency
00:24:15was created there that would dedicate itself to
00:24:18wiretapping while minister. federal court, so what we
00:24:22did, out of our own conviction, not challengeable by any
00:24:25minister, there is no man in this world who will challenge
00:24:29my independence, I, as president of the panel, at the request of the
00:24:33rapporteur,
00:24:36I scheduled the process, what
00:24:40happened? We had this
00:24:43conviction in the panel, what happened? Who, who
00:24:46cast the first vote? I saw him asking for a... view to stop
00:24:50the judgment, if we had this objective, it was
00:24:54evidently that we should maintain the coherence of our
00:24:57decision and that is what happened,
00:25:00exactly because, recalling Minister Gilmamente's stance that he would never
00:25:03accept the federal
00:25:07police defying him and he did not admit it, I was already in the
00:25:10court when your Excellency crossed
00:25:13here the Avenue and went there to ask for the resignation
00:25:17of a director of the Federal Police.
00:25:21You remember the director there, right? Wasn't
00:25:24that what he asked for from those who had the right
00:25:26to do so? He decided in the right way, but
00:25:30wait a moment, let me just conclude then
00:25:33you don't have to tie anyone up to do this you have to have
00:25:37judicial responsibility you continue to follow
00:25:40this historic trial in the supreme federal court within
00:25:44the ora news with Pedro Salgado thank you for listening see
00:25:48you later.
00:25:55Hello, good afternoon to you who are live here with us on Record News
00:25:58following the STF session that analyzes the report
00:26:02of the federal police on the relationship between Minister
00:26:05Alexandre de Moraes and Daniel Vorcaro. Hora News will take a
00:26:08quick break and soon will return in full with this
00:26:12session. See you soon!
00:26:26On Alerta Brasil, you follow the main news to start the
00:26:30day well informed.
00:26:38From Monday to Friday here on Record
00:26:41News. Now let's talk about Red Silver,
00:26:44a pan that doesn't need oil and doesn't stick. Take a look
00:26:48at these images. Red Silver Pans are the solution for your
00:26:52daily life, because they make all kinds of food in a healthier
00:26:55way without using any type of oil. Coated with
00:26:59ultra resistant non-stick material that doesn't stick.
00:27:02Food slides and no residue is released, they are
00:27:06sophisticated, light, strong and have an
00:27:09elegant design, the perfect combination
00:27:12for your kitchen, folks, it doesn't need oil, doesn't stick
00:27:15and goes on all stoves today there's a
00:27:18promotion, the standard kit with four pans plus four
00:27:22lids like this one costs only 12 installments of R$
00:27:2562.25
00:27:28with free shipping and for just R$ 10 more per installment,
00:27:31just... R$ 72.25
00:27:35you get the Family kit which includes
00:27:37a baking pan and this 28 cm pan with
00:27:41lid and you also get this set of five
00:27:44stainless steel knives with red silver coating and
00:27:48precise cutting as a gift. Used for 30 days, didn't like it, you
00:27:51get 100% of your money back. Buy now using
00:27:55this QR code here below or access
00:27:57redsilver.com.br/tv.
00:28:01If you prefer, buy. via whatsapp 11
00:28:0497661 8704 I'll
00:28:07repeat 11 97661
00:28:108704.
00:28:16Orbia Carrão is the launch of Diálogo right next to the Futura Estação
00:28:20Guilherme George, land with more than 6,100 m2, two
00:28:23independent towers, spacious apartments from 79 to
00:28:27137 m2, leisure with more than 30 items and
00:28:30take advantage of launch conditions with... monthly payments from R$ 2,700,
00:28:34visit the decorated apartment on Avenida Osvaldo Gomes Barreto 155 in Vila Carrão,
00:28:38access dialogo.com.br.
00:28:42I never know how my day will end, so it needs to start in the
00:28:45best way, a tapioca from terrinha, healthy, practical
00:28:49to make, very tasty. My family and I don't
00:28:52go a day without terrinha tapioca, it's good for breakfast,
00:28:56for an afternoon snack, with olive oil, banana and honey,
00:29:00red fruits, mmm. Tapioca da
00:29:03Terrinha, much more practicality without neglecting
00:29:06health, available in the main supermarkets,
00:29:10try it.
00:29:12Now let's talk about Red Silver, a pan that doesn't need
00:29:15oil and doesn't stick. Take a look at these images. Red Silver
00:29:19Pans are the solution for your daily life, because they make all
00:29:23kinds of food in a healthier way and without using any type of
00:29:27oil. Coated with ultra resistant non-stick
00:29:30material that doesn't stick. Promotes. food slides
00:29:33and no residue is released, they are sophisticated, light,
00:29:37strong and have an elegant design, the
00:29:41perfect combination for your kitchen, folks,
00:29:43it doesn't need oil, doesn't stick and goes on all
00:29:46stoves today there's a promotion, the standard
00:29:50kit with four pans plus four lids like this one
00:29:53costs only 12 installments of R$
00:29:5562.25
00:29:57with free shipping and for just R$ 10 more per installment,
00:30:01just 12. of R$ 72.25
00:30:04you get the Family kit which includes
00:30:07a baking pan and this 28 cm pan with
00:30:10lid and you also get this set of five
00:30:14stainless steel knives with red silver coating and
00:30:17precise cutting, used for 30 days, didn't like it,
00:30:21you get 100% of your money back, buy now
00:30:25using this QR code here below or access
00:30:27redsilver.com.br/tv,
00:30:31if you prefer, buy via whatsapp 11
00:30:339761 8704 I'll
00:30:36repeat 11 97661
00:30:408704 from Monday to Friday at 10
00:30:44PM, here you stay well
00:30:47informed about all subjects, technology advances
00:30:50more and more, the challenge is not just to live longer
00:30:54but to ensure quality of life in this extra
00:30:57time, know everything that is happening in Brazil and in the
00:31:01world in one place. Several Brazilian actors are having their careers take off
00:31:05on the international scene in a way.