Poland: TVP Info — Wykrywacz klamstw

20260914 15:42 UTC · 00:18:55 · 305 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Audycja demaskuje kłamstwa, półprawdy i manipulacje w debacie publicznej. Autorzy analizują wypowiedzi polityków i publicystów, rozkładając kontrowersyjne tematy na czynniki pierwsze. Formuła programu to felieton prezentujący temat i stanowisko przeciwnej strony sceny politycznej. W dalszej części odbywa się rozmowa z niezależnym ekspertem.

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 284 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:00it's probably still slippery. Monika Andrzejczak,
00:00:02thank you. And now that's all, but we will have
00:00:06more topics for you at 6 PM in the main edition of Panorama. And before
00:00:10us now is the lie detector.
00:00:22Is the government experimenting on Polish children? Truth
00:00:26or lie? What is healthier?
00:00:38A politician cannot, well, it is known that it depends on the benefits that
00:00:42he can achieve by promoting either one or
00:00:45the other. We start the lie detector, the only daily program on
00:00:49Polish television, in which we unmask lies and
00:00:52manipulations. Magdalena Pernet,
00:00:54welcome.
00:01:06The leadership of the Ministry of Education introduces ideological trends to schools
00:01:09and experiments on our
00:01:12children. Such an alarm is raised by representatives of the National Movement,
00:01:16Krzysztof Bosak's people. On the screens you can see
00:01:19a graphic that they shared
00:01:23on Platform X. It's about, attention, the
00:01:27planetary diet, about the fact that...
00:01:30from September it was introduced to school
00:01:33canteens. In reality, despite the suggestions
00:01:37of politicians of the National Movement. The diet is, the planetary diet
00:01:40is not an ideological invention
00:01:44of the ruling party, it is a nutrition model developed by
00:01:47scientists, experts in the field
00:01:50of dietetics. This is not a new
00:01:53topic, this is a topic that was published in
00:01:57a great journal, The Lancet. in
00:02:002019, as I mentioned, and it was
00:02:03created by 37 specialists from 16
00:02:07countries, that is, experts in the field of food and
00:02:11nutrition and dietetics.
00:02:14The planetary diet is based primarily on vegetables,
00:02:17fruits, legumes and nuts. It does not
00:02:21, however, assume a complete resignation from meat, fish, eggs or
00:02:25dairy, but a reduction in the consumption
00:02:28of these products. and this is what most outraged opposition
00:02:32politicians, among them Patryk Jaki,
00:02:35MEP of Law and Justice.
00:02:38I would like to brag to you that I practiced the planetary diet today,
00:02:42namely, first I ate a pork chop from planet Earth, then I jumped on
00:02:46my bike and went for another pork chop, also from planet Earth. I recommend such a
00:02:49planetary diet to everyone.
00:02:53Patryk Jaki, Doctor from the Faculty
00:02:55of National Security of the Academy of War
00:02:58Art. ridicules dietary recommendations
00:03:02developed by professors of dietetics, well, like
00:03:06that we won't get far.
00:03:09In the planetary diet, attention is paid precisely to ensuring
00:03:13that there are more products that are less processed, but
00:03:16also that there are more plant-based
00:03:19products, and we also know from various studies, these are
00:03:22recent publications, but also earlier ones, precisely using the
00:03:26planetary diet, that people who base their diet on
00:03:30a plant-based diet, who eat this way, live longer, and
00:03:34also get sick less often with various
00:03:37diet-related diseases, civilization diseases, but also this
00:03:40diet, ladies and gentlemen, allows for a greater degree of maintaining
00:03:44a healthy body weight, and as for our Polish
00:03:48children, there is also a lot to
00:03:50be done here. Patryk Jaki, instead
00:03:54of listening to experts and discussing on a decent level,
00:03:57prefers to do it just to spite, it's not clear who, and
00:04:01eat two cutlets, two dinners, and
00:04:04pork cutlets specifically
00:04:07in one day. This is, ladies and gentlemen, a serious politician,
00:04:11one of the leading representatives of the largest opposition
00:04:14party. Patryk Jaki is a hypocrite.
00:04:18Back in 2018, the politician promoted
00:04:21vegetarian dishes and you can see
00:04:24the evidence right now on your screens. At that time, Patryk Jaki was
00:04:28a candidate for the office of Mayor
00:04:30of Warsaw.
00:04:34For some, a sunny day is fuel for action, for
00:04:38others, morning coffee. But
00:04:41for Confederation politicians, unfortunately,
00:04:44Ukrainians who are trying to settle down in
00:04:47Poland are enough. Paweł Usiądek took on the issue of education
00:04:51for Ukrainian children and the fact that the Ukrainian
00:04:54minority establishes its own educational institutions
00:04:57in our country.
00:05:00Ukrainians are opening another school in Poland. A parallel society
00:05:04is emerging, which is the beginning of future problems.
00:05:08Let's compare this with the numbers. In Polish schools,
00:05:11246
00:06:08UPA, Bandera, and other scoundrels from
00:06:10the East.
00:06:14It probably won't surprise you, it won't surprise you, but
00:06:17I'll say it clearly: Mr. Usiądek manipulates the facts,
00:06:21the Poznań school he mentioned
00:06:23is not a Ukrainian school, but
00:06:27a Ukrainian-Polish one, which means that not
00:06:31only is Ukrainian culture and identity nurtured in it
00:06:34for students, but also conditions are created for their integration with
00:06:38Polish society. It is also not, at least for now, a facility
00:06:42It is that provides
00:06:45full-time education for children enrolled in it.
00:06:49a form of additional activity,
00:06:52supplementing classes in their standard
00:06:55school. We are currently in the process of creating
00:06:59and developing our areas of activity. The basis of our
00:07:02activity are creative classes and workshops on various
00:07:05topics, aimed at developing children, their abilities, and
00:07:08interests. We also cooperate with other foundations and organizations.
00:07:20They have the opportunity to use additional educational
00:07:23support, including individual classes and tutoring, as
00:07:27well as participating in art therapy classes and receiving psychological
00:07:31support.
00:07:33Even if it were a school providing full-time
00:07:36education, national and ethnic minorities in
00:07:40Poland have the right to... create and
00:07:43run such institutions, it's not a matter of recognition or
00:07:47goodwill, such a right is guaranteed by Article
00:07:5035 of the Polish Constitution. In such
00:07:53schools, representatives of a given minority have full
00:07:57influence over the curriculum, the language of
00:08:00instruction, and the teaching staff,
00:08:02but they must simultaneously meet the general requirements of Polish
00:08:06education law. This works analogously
00:08:09in, for example, Great Britain, doesn't it? and
00:08:13Polish children who live there benefit
00:08:16from it.
00:08:19OpenAI announces that its artificial intelligence model
00:08:23has solved one of the seven Millennium
00:08:26Problems, which means one of the greatest challenges
00:08:29of contemporary mathematics. I repeat, artificial
00:08:33intelligence was supposed to solve a problem that
00:08:36scientists had not been able to solve for
00:08:40decades. It sounds sensational, but
00:08:43at the same time terrifying. The verification
00:08:46of these reports is ongoing. What will change if OpenAI's
00:08:49theory is confirmed? Among other things, Witek Tabaka
00:08:53discussed this with Professor Piotr Sankowski, Director of the
00:08:56Idas Research Institute, at the Economic Forum
00:09:00in Karpacz. Hello, welcome from Karpacz,
00:09:03today my guest is Professor Piotr Sankowski, one of the leading
00:09:06Polish artificial intelligence researchers, a computer scientist from
00:09:10the University. Good day, Professor. Professor, let's start with this, with this
00:09:13information from the last few hours. OpenAI informs
00:09:17that with the help of artificial intelligence, one of the seven
00:09:20Millennium Problems has been solved.
00:09:24So, in order for us to know what
00:09:28we are talking about, let's start with these problems. Who established
00:09:31them, invented
00:09:34them? Who decided that for their solution there would be a million
00:09:38zlotys in prize money? And can we actually talk about
00:09:42some kind of solution here? That is, indeed, these are
00:09:45very important problems in mathematics or theoretical
00:09:49computer science, which were posed a few years ago, at the end
00:09:52of the millennium, when these billion-dollar, million-dollar
00:09:56prizes were designated, a million dollars for solving this
00:10:00problem. So far, it seems that one problem was solved
00:10:03by one of the mathematicians, now there is another one, where
00:10:07the statement that it was possible to solve it
00:10:09is put forward by OpenAI, which
00:10:12published a fairly long and complex paper
00:10:16on this topic, which is currently being verified by
00:10:20various people. Well, it seems to look very sensible
00:10:23indeed.
00:10:33differential equations, which have a very
00:10:37close influence on applications, i.e.
00:10:40physics, and it had been open for almost 100
00:10:42years. Mathematicians and physicists
00:10:46tried to solve this problem, so far unsuccessfully, but I have
00:10:49the impression that in trade media, let's say, in business media, for example
00:10:53on LinkedIn, we can read about both enthusiastic optimists who are
00:10:57happy that this great breakthrough has actually happened, and those who say
00:11:01that we are still very far from it. When will we know if
00:11:04this breakthrough has actually occurred or not? But a breakthrough with this problem
00:11:08or generally with this problem and whether with the
00:11:10help of OpenAI tools, this problem
00:11:14has been solved, well, we certainly have to wait, this verification
00:11:17always takes some time, but what
00:11:20we have been observing in mathematics for half a year or a year,
00:11:24well, also a very strong trend of formalizing proofs,
00:11:28for example in such a formal language as Lean, where
00:11:31indeed mathematical proofs, such as we normally see
00:11:34on a sheet of paper, can be formalized in such a
00:11:38programming language, one could say,
00:11:42which, and what is interesting, it is possible
00:11:45to compile this proof only when
00:11:48it is correct, so if such a proof can be compiled,
00:11:51well, that means its correctness. So,
00:11:55we are moving from verifying such
00:11:58proofs by mathematicians, who read these proofs,
00:12:02disagree, say something is missing, correct them, to
00:12:05such a model of mathematics, where at the same time, not yet in
00:12:09this case, but there are earlier cases where it was possible
00:12:13to solve some open problems, where at the same time or
00:12:16not much later, a formal proof also appears
00:12:19in the language of formal
00:12:21proof verification. So a computer is
00:12:25able to verify that the proof is correct. What we are observing right now
00:12:28is certainly a kind of race between companies dealing with artificial
00:12:32intelligence. To what extent, in your opinion, are these announcements that have recently appeared, not
00:12:36only from OpenAI, but many companies,
00:12:40a marketing race, to what extent can we actually talk about
00:12:43further breakthroughs in this field? I mean, we
00:12:46need to be aware that these future
00:12:49applications of this artificial intelligence or language models, well, they
00:12:52require such... I don't know,
00:12:55logical thinking skills, right,
00:12:58planning, performing complex operations
00:13:02or various complex reasoning, right? Well, if
00:13:05we run a company, then we need to plan a
00:13:08strategy, then execute it, it's like multi-month planning,
00:13:12or even if we run a research institute, right? Well, these aspects
00:13:16related to planning or logical planning of certain
00:13:19steps that follow each other, some of which may not succeed, so
00:13:23we also need to have some emergency
00:13:26plan of action,
00:13:29right? Well, the most basic test for doing this is
00:13:33mathematics, and that's what we see, right? This is
00:13:36this test field, such
00:13:39a testing ground for these models, which shows,
00:13:43proves, that well, these models
00:13:46understand this logic, they can plan, right,
00:13:49and they show that in the next steps,
00:13:53you can also engage models by, of course, including
00:13:57various data, right, because they can't do that yet. Mathematics is the easiest
00:14:00place to test various
00:14:04reasonings, right, because you can, for example, write this proof in
00:14:07formal language and automatically verify it.
00:14:11This shows that these applications
00:14:14will be coming, right, because these models
00:14:17can plan. OpenAI also presented the latest
00:14:21Astra model,
00:14:24allegedly already
00:14:26close to artificial general intelligence,
00:14:30right? So we can say that
00:14:32it's either at the level of the human mind or even
00:14:36sometimes better than the human mind.
00:14:39Do you think we have already reached this point? That is,
00:14:42in many aspects, these models have been
00:14:46surpassing humans for years
00:14:49in either average people, that is, well,
00:14:52of course, we use the concept
00:14:55of GI or other various benchmarks
00:14:59that we don't understand, but a concept that
00:15:02is much more measurable is simply putting
00:15:06these models to intelligence tests, that is, measuring their
00:15:10intelligence quotient, so we are not yet surpassing an outstanding person,
00:15:13so these models for
00:15:16a few years or, I don't know, half a year, it's not known how it will
00:15:20be, well, they achieve roughly 140, 150 IQ
00:15:23points, so
00:15:29because it's 100, so they operate at a level
00:15:32of solving logic puzzles, well, probably
00:15:36better than. 95% of people, right?
00:15:39So, of course, we will achieve
00:15:42AGI when this artificial intelligence is better than us in
00:15:45everything, better than all people, or when it's better than
00:15:4999% of people, right? We are indeed very
00:15:52close to that moment where it is
00:15:56simply comparable to the best
00:15:58experts in any field
00:16:02of knowledge or science. We will stop here. Professor Piotr
00:16:05Sankowski, thank you very much for this conversation. That's all for now from
00:16:08Karpacz.
00:16:12At the end of the lie detector, we return to the story of Kamil
00:16:15Kowalenko, an alleged councilman from Płock,
00:16:19an alleged politician of the Civic Coalition,
00:16:22of Ukrainian origin. This man does not actually
00:16:26exist. Nothing matches, neither the name, nor
00:16:29the function, nor the party affiliation. Someone
00:16:32used the image of a real person, used artificial
00:16:36intelligence and created a fake
00:16:39profile on the internet. Many people took this story
00:16:43seriously, which is why we addressed it before
00:16:45the weekend on the lie detector. This
00:16:49is this gentleman, or rather, no, not a gentleman, a fictitious
00:16:52character, generated. How
00:16:55to create such a character, is it super complicated?
00:16:58Exactly, a few years ago it was complicated, because you needed tools
00:17:02like Photoshop and you had to use the tools skilfully,
00:17:05you had to have
00:17:07knowledge. Nowadays it is enough to enter
00:17:11the appropriate command, i.e. a prompt, and it
00:17:15is practically free and very fast, and
00:17:18unfortunately easy. That is why generating such a person is a matter of
00:17:22moments. Some internet users
00:17:25criticized us for this verification, and an example
00:17:29of a critical post against us can be seen
00:17:32now on your screens. Accusations appeared that
00:17:35public television should not deal with such problems,
00:17:39such topics, that it is not appropriate, that we are dealing with
00:17:42unserious matters, but is this really
00:17:46a topic that is not suitable for the lie
00:17:49detector? We dealt with this matter because many
00:17:53people believed the story of the fake
00:17:57Ukrainian councilman of the Civic Coalition from
00:18:00Płock.
00:18:02Why isn't he on the front? He's a Bandera-face, send him to the front,
00:18:06right? The voters' ignorance, wake
00:18:09up, Poles, my grandfather told me
00:18:12that there would come a day when Ukrainians and Jews would emerge from
00:18:16the North and want to make Poland their country, their laws, and that is
00:18:20happening. Mr. Kalach,
00:18:23a user who ridiculed us for
00:18:26raising this topic, in another of his
00:18:30posts, himself noted that many people
00:18:33believed in the fake councilman, just
00:18:36an hour before.
00:18:50Mr. Kalach, what exactly is your point? Are you criticizing us just for the sake of it, because it's TVP, so
00:18:53you have to?
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.