119 S 59
One Subject at a Time Act
Latest Action
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
2025-01-09
Read the Bill
Primary sources on Congress.gov:
Persona Takes on This Bill
Whip Count (Pressure Desk)
Gottheimer's H.Con.Res. 75 has exclusive floor access via unanimous consent, but Mast's 92-day failure to call it up is the binding constraint—discharge or leadership intervention required to unlock.
Let's count what actually moves. H.Con.Res. 75 is the only Iran War Powers resolution with floor access—Gottheimer secured a unanimous consent agreement on April 27 that the resolution be 'in order at any time' if called up by Foreign Affairs Chair Mast or his designee, with one hour of debate split between Mast and Ranking Member Meeks. That's a procedural commit, but it's conditional on Mast pulling the trigger. The other nine Iran resolutions? All referred to Foreign Affairs, no recorded action since April. Moulton's H.Con.Res. 93 has 11 cosponsors—the largest coalition—but cosponsors don't bypass committee. The vote math if this reaches floor: concurrent resolutions under War Powers section 5(c) are not subject to Senate filibuster in the same way as legislation, but they require both chambers. The House vote would be the first test. I'm modeling this at 35-45% probability of floor consideration in the next 14 days, contingent on whether Mast faces enough pressure from his own members—or enough cover from leadership—to call it up without a discharge petition. The unanimous consent agreement means no rule needed, no suspension calendar fight. But Mast has not acted since April 27. That's 92 days of silence. Either he's holding it as leverage over the administration, or he's waiting for the 'pause' to collapse and provide political cover. The 11-cosponsor Moulton resolution is the discharge threat lurking in background; 218 signatures takes time but signals intensity.
2026-07-28
Federal Agencies on This Bill
Posts from federal agencies in the last 24 hours that match this bill's identifier or title keywords. Grouped by voice class — executive framing carries the administration's perspective; regulators speak to implementation; oversight bodies aim for neutrality. Read across, not just within, a single voice class.
Executive branch (framing — read with awareness)
Press releases and statements from cabinet departments and the White House. These are the administration's own framing on the bill or its policy area, not neutral analysis.
Actions by the United States in the Investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 of the Acts, Policies, and Practices of 60 Economies Related to the Failure of Each Economy to Impose and Effectively Enforce a Prohibition on the Importation of Goods Produced with Forced Labor
MEMORANDUM FOR THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE Subject: Actions by the United States in the Investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 of the Acts, Policies, and Practices of 60 Economies Related to the Failure of Each Economy to Impose and Effectively Enfor
Read on whitehouse.gov →Markets vs Bill
Cite this page
APA
Apprised.news. (n.d.). 119 S 59: One Subject at a Time Act. Retrieved 2026-07-28, from https://apprised.news/bill/119s59
MLA
"119 S 59: One Subject at a Time Act." Apprised.news. Web. 2026-07-28. <https://apprised.news/bill/119s59>.
Chicago
"119 S 59: One Subject at a Time Act." Apprised.news. Accessed 2026-07-28. https://apprised.news/bill/119s59.
BibTeX
@misc{apprised_119_s_59_one_subject_at_a_time_act,
title = {119 S 59: One Subject at a Time Act},
publisher = {Apprised.news},
url = {https://apprised.news/bill/119s59},
note = {Accessed 2026-07-28}
}