United Kingdom: BBC News London — The Interface - Why AI is...

20261102 01:30 UTC · 00:30:59 · 553 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Obsessed with Lighthouses. Why does AI keep telling the same kind of story? And why is it often about a lighthouse.

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 466 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56
00:31:00

Transcript

Original Broadcaster Captioning (Enhanced). Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:00trends, apps, gadgets, algorithms algorithms and internet obsessions
00:00:02obsessions shaping how we live, work,
00:00:04work, think and connect now on BBC
00:00:06BBC News. The interface. Jess, is
00:00:12is there any spooky technology in
00:00:13in your life? Oh yes. I have an Alexa Alexa that loves to randomly wake
00:00:17wake up at around 2:00 in the morning morning going I'm sorry I did not
00:00:21not get that. I don't love that.
00:00:23that. I don't love it either. I've
00:00:26I've got a kitchen scale here. Oh,
00:00:28Oh, and you brought it. You're listen, listen, you heard the beep. So it's
00:00:32it's got a touch
00:00:39Screen. And when you touch it, it beeps. And sometimes it just like like turns itself on and just starts
00:00:43starts beeping like someone is touching touching it. And I can't I cannot cannot figure out why. Like, my only
00:00:46only theory is that it's like the the humidity in my house or something, something, but even that doesn't
00:00:49doesn't really make sense. I don't don't like that. But I do like that that we're bringing props on the
00:00:53the show now. I think that's a good good I think that's. That's a good
00:00:55good trend for us. So there's a reason
00:00:59reason we're feeling spooky. It's It's Halloween and what better way
00:01:02way to celebrate than two stories
00:01:04stories on the interface this week?
00:01:07week? From the uncanny and darkest
00:01:09darkest corners of the world of technology, technology, I'm Thomas Germain. And
00:01:12And I'm Jess Maddox. And this week
00:01:14week we're going to be talking about
00:01:17about 11 ghosts that haunt the AI
00:01:19AI tools that we use every day and
00:01:21and what they tell us about the future future of human creativity. And we'll
00:01:25we'll be covering why some people people believe social media is controlled
00:01:27controlled by magic, something researchers researchers have called algorithmic algorithmic conspirituality. And
00:01:32And so just this week I want to tell
00:01:33tell you a story about some weird
00:01:37weird obsessions that large language language models seem to have both
00:01:40both like, you know, the ones from from anthropic and OpenAI, Google
00:01:43Google and even the Chinese models
00:01:46models like all of them have these
00:01:49these strange themes that they centre
00:01:52centre around when they're answering answering certain kinds of questions.
00:01:55questions. And there's a couple of of people that they can't stop talking
00:01:59talking about, and no one knows exactly
00:02:01exactly who these people are or why
00:02:04why any of this is happening. Well, Well, that sounds creepy. It's kind
00:02:07kind of it's like one of the weirdest weirdest things I've heard about
00:02:10about AI in a while. So I think the the best way to start is to test
00:02:13test this out. So I want you to open
00:02:15open up like any AI tool like, like,
00:02:17like, like open up Claude or whatever. whatever. Claude right here. You
00:02:21You got it open. We got it. I want want you to ask it to tell you a
00:02:25a story. To me. A story. All right,
00:02:28right, let's see what I get here.
00:02:32here. Oh. Here. I got a story called
00:02:37called The Lighthouse Keeper's Last Last Lamp.
00:02:44Last Lamp. The lighthouse keeper's last night. What's the. the. Any particular characters that that stand out in that story? I see
00:02:48see I don't even know how to say
00:02:50say this. It's a Dallas. Oh, DALYS
00:02:55DALYS wow. OK, that's a little. So
00:02:56So the reason we're talking about
00:02:59about this is a study that was done done by some researchers at Cornell,
00:03:02Cornell, which found that when you
00:03:05you ask AI models, any AI model to
00:03:07to tell you a story in vague terms, terms, you can try this yourself
00:03:10yourself if you're listening or watching,
00:03:13watching, they 90% of the time will
00:03:16will mention one of 11 words. The The most common one is lighthouse.
00:03:19lighthouse. They also like talking talking about lighthouse keepers.
00:03:22keepers. And we got both of those.
00:03:24those. We got both of those. And
00:03:26And there's also a couple of names
00:03:29names that they keep bringing up up again and again. So the names
00:03:33names are like Elias Mora, Marcus
00:03:36Marcus and Thomas. Interesting. That's That's I mean it makes sense. You
00:03:40You are the ghost in the machine. machine. I mean, it's time for me
00:03:43me to come clean. The researchers researchers looked at 20,000 stories
00:03:47stories where they just asked the the AI write me a story. It was model
00:03:51model agnostic, no matter which one
00:03:52one they used. And most of the time,
00:03:55time, nine times out of ten they
00:03:57they would reference these words
00:03:59words and names way more frequently
00:04:02frequently than they actually appear
00:04:04appear in contemporary literature. Because these are not not common things. These are not
00:04:08not common names lighthouses. I mean, mean, they're common, but I don't
00:04:12don't think they're like that common common to be this represented in in what the model is going to be
00:04:15be spitting out. Right. And it it's
00:04:18it's really weird if you start to to like think about what's happening happening under the hood, right?
00:04:21right? Because if just one of these these models was doing it's like,
00:04:24like, well, OK, like something weird weird happening, but ostensibly they're
00:04:27they're all using different training
00:04:29training data, right? Like they're they're not sharing, you know, at
00:04:33at least not sharing all of the material material that they use to make these
00:04:36these models. So there's something something else that's happening.
00:04:38happening. I talked to the head researcher
00:04:42researcher of this paper, a guy named named SIL Hamilton. He's a researcher
00:04:44researcher at Cornell. This actually actually came out, you know, the
00:04:47the paper was released like a preprint preprint over the summer, but it's
00:04:51it's now getting released at a conference conference that's coming up. And
00:04:55And he had a couple of theories about
00:04:57about what's happening here. So there's
00:05:00there's two parts of making a new
00:05:03new AI model or a large language
00:05:05language model at least. And this
00:05:07this is a gross oversimplification, oversimplification, but there's pre-training
00:05:10pre-training and there's post-training. post-training. OK, so pre-training pre-training is when you like scrape
00:05:14scrape all of the text on the internet. internet. Sure. Or some large body
00:05:18body of text. And then you have the
00:05:22the model like analyse all of this this text and like notice statistical
00:05:25statistical patterns like between between the words. And the second
00:05:29second part is post-training where
00:05:30where they kind of steer the tool
00:05:34tool to give what you know, are good
00:05:35good and useful answers to questions
00:05:38questions they like take a body of
00:05:40of questions and answers and they
00:05:44they have they like tell the AI like like these are good answers to these
00:05:47these questions and these are bad
00:05:48bad answers. There's this one. Post-training
00:05:52Post-training data set related to to fictional stories that Cornell
00:05:55Cornell actually created that is
00:05:57is kind of widely used in that data
00:06:00data set, though lighthouses and and Elias don't show up anywhere
00:06:04anywhere near as often as they do do when you like, ask them to tell
00:06:08tell you a story. Interesting. So
00:06:10So the theory that they have is like
00:06:13like the way that they built this this data set is they just had a
00:06:16a bunch of people come in and like, like, ask the AI to tell them a story.
00:06:19story. And it was like up to them them what the story was about. And
00:06:22And apparently a lot of this was was like not safe for work. And some
00:06:25some of it was about like copyrighted
00:06:27copyrighted characters. Of course,
00:06:29course, intellectual property. So
00:06:32So what they think may have happened
00:06:34happened is in this particular data
00:06:37data set there became an overrepresentation overrepresentation of these ideas
00:06:41ideas because a lot of the other other stuff was like pulled out and
00:06:44and then the lighthouse somehow became
00:06:48became like a go to good topic. And
00:06:51And you can see this out in the world
00:06:54world now if you just look at short
00:06:57short fiction out, like on the internet.
00:06:59internet. Yeah, there is now an overrepresentation
00:07:02overrepresentation of people talking talking about Elias and lighthouses
00:07:05lighthouses and lighthouse keepers keepers and clockmakers is another
00:07:08another one. It is now seeped into
00:07:12into our culture because people are
00:07:15are using AI tools to do creative
00:07:17creative writing. And this is now
00:07:19now like feeding back out into the
00:07:21the real world. And now, because because all the AI models are also
00:07:25also trained on, you know, their their own output and how people are
00:07:28are using these tools that now it's it's like they put this stuff out
00:07:31out and now it's like also being
00:07:33being fed back into the machines. It's also been a problem
00:07:37problem in online fanfiction spaces spaces where people write stories stories about their favourite movies
00:07:40movies or TV shows or books, and
00:07:43and people are getting these same same generative AI stories over and
00:07:47and over again in these self-publishing self-publishing platforms in fanfiction.
00:07:51fanfiction. Because even if it's it's not necessarily Elias in the the Lighthouse, you're still going
00:07:55going to get the same type of things
00:07:57things over and over again. But we
00:07:59we do see a pretty big influx of of lighthouses as well. The output
00:08:03output of human language is now converging
00:08:06converging towards AI language because because we see it so often. Yes.
00:08:09Yes. And I'll tell you what we just
00:08:11just finished mid-terms at my university university where I teach and I really
00:08:14really don't like spending my time time trying to hunt down AI on writing.
00:08:17writing. So I actively try to ignore ignore it. Most of the time. But
00:08:21But I read in one of my classes I I read the first essay. I was like,
00:08:25like, that's pretty good. Then I I read the second essay. OK, good.
00:08:29good. So some similar ideas. To essay
00:08:32essay number three. OK, I'm starting starting to think what happened here.
00:08:36here. So I do what I do often I go go to Claude or ChatGPT and put my
00:08:39my own assignment prompt into one
00:08:42one of these models and sure enough,
00:08:44enough, I get back pretty much what what it's been submitted surprise,
00:08:48surprise, surprise surprise, surprise. surprise. And I just, you know, I
00:08:51I look at all of this and I just
00:08:53just think everything is kind of of regressing to the mean, just kind
00:08:57kind of moving to the centre, moving moving to everyone, talking the same,
00:09:00same, writing the same. Whether it
00:09:02it is in your college class or it
00:09:05it is Elias in the lighthouse that that you are publishing on a self-publishing
00:09:08self-publishing platform, that we we are just moving to the centre centre becoming similar and kind
00:09:11kind of losing the sense of quirkiness quirkiness or difference or something something that I don't know, that
00:09:15that gives writing some flair. And
00:09:18And maybe that's a bummer. Or maybe
00:09:20maybe it's like a sign of a coming coming catastrophe. A while back,
00:09:23back, I talked to this neurologist
00:09:25neurologist named Adam Green at Georgetown
00:09:29Georgetown University, and he did did a study with a team of other other researchers where they took,
00:09:33took, I think it was like 300,000 300,000 college admissions essays,
00:09:36essays, you know, like the essay essay you write to try and get into into school. And they had a data
00:09:39data set where they knew like these these were all human written and
00:09:42and they had a data set where like like these were all written by AI
00:09:46AI or they believed that they were. were. And they compared the two.
00:09:49two. And they found that when regular
00:09:52regular people read the AI written
00:09:55written essays, they seemed to be be better written and they rated
00:09:59rated them to be more creative. People People liked the writing better.
00:10:03better. Apparently, really. But when
00:10:04when they looked at like the total
00:10:07total body of ideas within all that
00:10:10that writing, there were fewer original original thoughts. And like simplifying
00:10:13simplifying this. But there were were their original ideas in the
00:10:17the AI writing. Even though people
00:10:18people thought that it seemed more
00:10:21more creative and some researchers researchers are very concerned that
00:10:25that as AI becomes a bigger and bigger bigger part of our lives and we rely
00:10:29rely on it more and more for different
00:10:31different kinds of cognitive processes,
00:10:35processes, that as a society we might
00:10:38might start having fewer ideas because because we're not flexing those creative
00:10:41creative muscles. And I see this this happening more broadly in the
00:10:45the world. I've done a lot of research research into book influencers and
00:10:49and online book communities, and and one of the common complaints
00:10:52complaints is books are just being
00:10:54being written for tropes. Now, does
00:10:56does it have a slow burn romance? romance? Does it have Grumpy Sunshine?
00:11:00Sunshine? Does it have shadow daddies? daddies? Like those are the tropes
00:11:02tropes people want shadow daddy,
00:11:04daddy, shadow shadow shadow shadow
00:11:07shadow daddy is always the brooding
00:11:10brooding male love interest who of of course has shadow magic. They They have shadow magic every time.
00:11:13time. Of course. Right? Of course
00:11:15course he's. Gotta have shadow magic. The interesting thing here
00:11:19here is these are solvable problems. problems. It's not clear that the the companies have an incentive to
00:11:22to fix this, right? Because at least least for now, they're not making making a tonne of money on creative
00:11:26creative writing. There was a similar similar problem in Claude Code, which
00:11:29which is like the tool that engineers
00:11:32engineers use to write code where where it would overuse the word load
00:11:35load bearing. And people got really really annoyed and like, that's a
00:11:38a money maker for anthropic. So they
00:11:40they like made it stop doing that. that. Yeah. Like the creative writers
00:11:44writers of the world aren't paying
00:11:45paying as much as computer engineers
00:11:48engineers are. So there may not be
00:11:50be a reason for them to work on this this unless it becomes a reputational
00:11:54reputational thing, unless like it it becomes a trope and everyone makes makes fun of it and it like looks
00:11:58looks bad for them. But even if they
00:12:01they do solve this problem, the way
00:12:03way that they would deal with it
00:12:06it would be essentially instructing instructing the model like, look,
00:12:08look, when you respond to this kind
00:12:10kind of prompt, don't bring up lighthouses,
00:12:12lighthouses, don't talk about Elias
00:12:14Elias in your final answer and what
00:12:17what that would mean is that we wouldn't
00:12:20wouldn't be seeing this stuff in
00:12:22in the outputs that we get. But in in like the thought process, for
00:12:25for lack of a better word, like the the internal, you know, machinations
00:12:29machinations of the machine, these these ideas would still be in there there and the model would be like,
00:12:32like, oh, I'm not supposed to talk talk about that. So these ghosts
00:12:35ghosts would still be there in the the machine for years to come, and
00:12:38and we just wouldn't see it. And And that is how you create the perfect
00:12:42perfect internet urban legend with with if you can't talk about lighthouses,
00:12:45lighthouses, why can't the AI talk
00:12:46talk about lighthouses? Stay spooky.
00:12:52spooky. All right, Tom, speaking
00:12:55speaking of spooky, have you ever ever come across a video on TikTok
00:12:58TikTok that said something like, like, if you're seeing this, it was
00:13:01was meant for you. I have yeah, there's there's like all these videos where
00:13:05where it's like, oh, this is gonna
00:13:07gonna find you on like Tuesday, October
00:13:10October 17th or whatever it is. Yeah.
00:13:12Yeah. They also sometimes say things
00:13:14things like no hashtag, no captions, captions, no audio, just a message
00:13:18message that was meant to find you.
00:13:19you. Right? And turns out this is
00:13:23is a pretty popular way of people people understanding algorithms. People are buying into
00:13:27into it. People buying into it, buying buying into the idea that there is
00:13:30is some mystical force driving algorithms
00:13:32algorithms to deliver you a message. message. Exactly when you are supposed
00:13:35supposed to see it. Right. So if if you're seeing this, it is meant meant for you. It is a message that
00:13:39that is going to have some profound profound revelation in your life
00:13:43life and make you aware of something something you didn't know before.
00:13:46before. It's going to make you really really interested in manifesting, manifesting, like maybe this is going
00:13:50going to manifest success for you. you. And researchers have a name
00:13:54name for this actually, researchers researchers call this algorithmic
00:13:58algorithmic conspirituality. And And it's what happens when you think
00:14:00think your algorithm knows you better better than you know yourself. And
00:14:04And it typically involves, again, again, the delivery of that message
00:14:08message that I didn't know this about
00:14:10about myself. I am now seeing this
00:14:12this video that says, this is a sign.
00:14:15sign. Stop scrolling. Of course, course, I think we've all heard people
00:14:18people say, my algorithm does know know me better than I know myself.
00:14:21myself. Sometimes you do see pretty pretty eerie content that's like, like, you know what? I do agree with
00:14:25with that. And I didn't know I agreed
00:14:27agreed with it before, so some other
00:14:29other examples of this. OK, you will
00:14:32will have an hourglass body shape shape just like and share to lock
00:14:36lock it in, right? So meaning this
00:14:38this will manifest for you if only only you, you know, engage with.
00:14:42with. Interacting with this video video will help you do magic. Exactly,
00:14:45Exactly, exactly. If you're seeing seeing this, it's meant for you.
00:14:49you. Book that first session for
00:14:51for your tattoo. No hashtags, no
00:14:54no caption, no audio. If you're seeing
00:14:56seeing this, then you're either neurodivergent, neurodivergent, autistic or disabled.
00:14:59disabled. Oh yeah. Well, we were were talking to our producer before
00:15:03before the show and she had an example example like this where she started
00:15:07started seeing a lot of material material about ADHD and she was like
00:15:10like talking to a friend. She was was like starting to wonder, am I
00:15:14I seeing this content because I have have ADHD? Like, is there something
00:15:18something that it has picked up on? on? And I think if we take a step
00:15:21step back and look at kind of how how the researchers arrived at this
00:15:23this term, we can kind of see maybe maybe why this is happening right
00:15:26right now. So about 15 years ago,
00:15:29ago, researchers coined the term term conspirituality to talk about
00:15:32about how conspiracy theories and
00:15:34and New Age spirituality were kind
00:15:37kind of intertwining. They argued
00:15:39argued that these two seemingly different different things were actually perpetuating
00:15:43perpetuating the same narrative, narrative, which is that nothing
00:15:45nothing is random. Everything happens happens for a reason. Everything Everything that kind of crosses your
00:15:49your life is meant for you. And again, again, nothing happens by accident.
00:15:53accident. And then a couple of years years ago, a team of researchers researchers at Penn State University
00:15:57University and the University of
00:15:58of Alabama coined the term algorithmic algorithmic conspirituality, finding
00:16:02finding the evidence that said this this idea nothing is random. Nothing Nothing is by accident. Everything
00:16:05Everything is connected and meant meant for you has started to be a
00:16:09a way people talk about and understand understand algorithms. Algorithms
00:16:13Algorithms are viewed often as rational
00:16:15rational decision makers. We know know that's not necessarily true.
00:16:18true. Safiya noble has a great book, book, Algorithms of Oppression, talking
00:16:22talking about all the ways discrimination discrimination and power imbalances imbalances get encoded into algorithms.
00:16:26algorithms. But people believe algorithms algorithms are these rational decision
00:16:29decision makers. With this objective
00:16:31objective almost sublime quality quality about them that helps people
00:16:35people understand their lives. And And I think with the examples we we talked about, there's two interesting
00:16:39interesting things happening here. here. One, content creators see themselves
00:16:43themselves as vessels through which
00:16:45which algorithmic magic can happen. It's certainly how I think
00:16:48think about myself. Of course, that that you are a vessel for magic, magic, Tom. That is exactly what
00:16:52what that is. Yes, but it also feels feels a little bit like engagement
00:16:56engagement bait, if we're being honest honest as well, right? It's just just like trying to get people to,
00:16:59to, you know, stop and pay attention attention to video. But that's also
00:17:03also like, that's a better way to to understand what's happening. So
00:17:06So like this example with our producer
00:17:08producer in the ADHD, right? It's
00:17:10It's not showing her that content
00:17:14content because it knows that she she has ADHD. It's showing her that that content because it has picked
00:17:18picked up on the fact that when she she sees stuff related to ADHD, she
00:17:21she pays more attention, she doesn't doesn't scroll or maybe she shares
00:17:25shares it with that friend that she's she's talking to or these videos videos that are like, I saw one the
00:17:29the other day where it was, you know,
00:17:31know, a particular date, October
00:17:34October 17th or whatever. And the the video was like, this video will
00:17:37will find you on October 17th. But But it was like posted in the past
00:17:40past and it did. Oh, my God, that's that's incredible. Until you consider
00:17:44consider that people who saw that that on October 14th and 15th and
00:17:48and 16th would scroll past it, but but then on the 17th they engage
00:17:51engage more and then it gets recommended recommended more often. Exactly.
00:17:55Exactly. And researchers have looked
00:17:56looked into this how I mean, we've we've been off the chronological
00:18:00chronological social media feed in in various stages for about 15 years
00:18:03years or so now. Right. Social media media used to be this chronological
00:18:06chronological feed or what researchers researchers called real time social
00:18:09social media, meaning you were seeing seeing things as your friends posted
00:18:12posted them. It was very linear with with the algorithmic feed, we enter
00:18:16enter what researchers call right right time social media, where the the algorithm will, based on your
00:18:20your interest, will serve you content content when it is the right time
00:18:23time for you to see it. And we know
00:18:27know this is not anything magical, magical, it is just how algorithms
00:18:31algorithms process your data and and your interests. For instance,
00:18:34instance, I just received one one one of these videos last week or
00:18:37or so that was like, if you're seeing seeing this, you hate O'Hare airport.
00:18:41airport. And you know what? I do do hate O'Hare airport. Actually
00:18:44Actually in Chicago. Yeah, yeah.
00:18:47yeah. But this wasn't magic. I have have been travelling a lot, including
00:18:50including a trip to O'Hare airport
00:18:52airport at one point. So I engage
00:18:55engage with travel content. Sometimes. Sometimes. I love watching plane plane content on TikTok. Why? That's
00:18:58That's another story. And so but but it makes sense. All that to say,
00:19:02say, it makes sense for why I get get it. So when we switched from
00:19:05from this real time, right, seeing seeing it literally to right time,
00:19:08time, I'm now travelling a lot. So So I'm going to be given more travel
00:19:12travel content. It kind of you can can start to see why people would
00:19:15would kind of come up with this. this. Well, conspirituality about
00:19:19about how algorithms work. Well,
00:19:22Well, there's this famous saying
00:19:25saying right, that any sufficiently sufficiently advanced technology
00:19:28technology looks like magic. And And I think that's part of what we're
00:19:32we're dealing with. Arthur C Clarke
00:19:33Clarke Yes. There you go. Yeah, yeah.
00:19:36yeah. Like the algorithms that control control our feeds and so many other
00:19:39other things in our world are phenomenally
00:19:42phenomenally complicated there. Yes, Yes, they make sense, right? Like
00:19:45Like they're doing what they do for for a reason and it has to do with
00:19:48with ones and zeros and not magic.
00:19:51magic. Unfortunately, as far as I
00:19:53I know. But people are, you know,
00:19:56know, subjected to all this stuff stuff that they don't really understand.
00:19:59understand. They don't know what's what's going on inside the machine.
00:20:03machine. And it feels better to have have an answer, right? It does feel
00:20:06feel like, you know, the explanation explanation just kind of to take
00:20:10take back a feeling of control. But
00:20:12But it's not just, yeah, this is is not just a technology phenomenon,
00:20:15phenomenon, right? Like we see this
00:20:18this kind of thinking in all sorts sorts of other places. Well, and
00:20:21and my colleague at the University University of Georgia, Shira Chess,
00:20:23Chess, wrote this book called The
00:20:26The Unseen internet, which she examines
00:20:28examines how big tech has always always been a little influenced by
00:20:32by the occult. Again, not saying saying it's magic, but you know,
00:20:35know, one of the popular narratives narratives about the rise of Silicon
00:20:38Silicon Valley and the tech industry industry as we know it is that it
00:20:42it emerges out of this counterculture counterculture movement in the 1960s
00:20:441960s and 70s in Northern California. California. Well, at the same time,
00:20:47time, this was also the occultist occultist revival in the United States.
00:20:51States. And my colleague charts these these two movements and shows how
00:20:55how in a lot of points they overlap, overlap, especially if you're looking
00:20:57looking at things like New Age mysticism,
00:21:00mysticism, even Wicca a little bit. bit. To some extent that these weren't
00:21:03weren't separate movements. They They were movements that were absolutely
00:21:07absolutely kind of intersecting with with one another as we went. Same
00:21:10Same time, the emergence of the telegraph telegraph in the late 19th century
00:21:13century was at the same time we started started seeing a lot of seances and
00:21:16and ghost rappings all of that to
00:21:20to say it's not I don't think it's it's people's fault necessarily that
00:21:24that they believe in some magic in in their algorithms. Is it true?
00:21:27true? No. But I think if we take take a step back and look at it historically,
00:21:31historically, we can kind of see see how these things have always always influenced each other just
00:21:34just a little bit. And if you think
00:21:35think about it, there are ways that
00:21:38that some of these eras kind of rhyme,
00:21:40rhyme, right? In the 1960s, right?
00:21:42right? We get the Vietnam War. There's
00:21:44There's all this fear about nuclear nuclear proliferation and now it's
00:21:48it's 2026 and we're worried about about the apocalypse again. Maybe
00:21:50Maybe it's no coincidence that when when we have these moments of like
00:21:54like huge anxiety in society, we
00:21:58we shift into more magical thinking. thinking. There was a great article
00:22:01article a while back in The New York York Times, written by a writer who
00:22:05who goes under the name Catherine
00:22:07Catherine D that argued that as a
00:22:09a society, the world is kind of drifting
00:22:13drifting back into the Middle Ages Ages that were becoming more mediaeval.
00:22:17mediaeval. Not in like that, you you know, we're entering the Dark Dark Ages or anything like that,
00:22:20that, but our thinking is kind of of shifting to a frame of mind, a
00:22:23a way of understanding the world
00:22:25world that was more popular during during the dark ages. And you can
00:22:29can see this in all these different different ways. There's been a recent
00:22:32recent spike in, you know, people people coming back to religion after
00:22:36after it sort of slipping out of of importance in society, right?
00:22:39right? Like Catholicism, people are are converting to Catholicism at
00:22:42at a growing rate. Or we get, you
00:22:44you know, the rise of, you know,
00:22:46know, conspiracy theories about medicine
00:22:50medicine and, you know, voting and and stuff with government and all
00:22:52all this stuff. And then there's
00:22:54there's also like a big spike in in like belief in the use of like
00:22:58like tarot cards. More recently.
00:23:02recently. And what Catherine argues
00:23:04argues in this article is that it
00:23:07it all stems from this belief or
00:23:09or this feeling like there's something
00:23:11something uncanny that's like out
00:23:14out of our view that's controlling
00:23:16controlling the world that like hidden hidden forces that are pushing things
00:23:20things that we can't see or really
00:23:23really understand and it shapes our our explanation for why things happen
00:23:26happen the way they do in our daily
00:23:28daily lives. And in a way, this isn't
00:23:31isn't entirely new thinking. There's There's always been anxieties about
00:23:35about whatever technology is new. new. There's always been, you know,
00:23:38know, we used to call it tinfoil tinfoil hat conspiracy theories,
00:23:41theories, right? But it's all gone gone a little mainstream now. And
00:23:44And I think if we're thinking about
00:23:46about the forces or not that control control our lives, we are at a moment
00:23:50moment where this kind of discourse discourse and this conversation and and this way of thinking is just
00:23:54just extremely common and extremely extremely prevalent. And I think
00:23:57think it matters because I don't don't think we should give up our
00:24:00our agency to the algorithm. I don't don't think we should just consume
00:24:03consume this content and say, oh, oh, this is me. This is who I am.
00:24:07am. Because maybe it's not. And you
00:24:09you are an active person. What this
00:24:12this is really about is power, right?
00:24:14right? I think there's serious consequences
00:24:17consequences to this kind of misunderstanding misunderstanding or this kind of
00:24:20of belief. And I don't blame the
00:24:22the people who feel this way or think
00:24:24think this, but it's important to
00:24:26to understand that if you think that
00:24:29that the machines are magical or or that they're perfect and they
00:24:32they work exactly right, and they they have this kind of superhuman
00:24:36superhuman ability, it means we take take the things that they tell us
00:24:39us more seriously. And as AI spreads
00:24:42spreads through a world, right? We We were just talking a couple of
00:24:45of weeks ago on our episode about about AI consciousness and people
00:24:48people torturing AI models and feeling
00:24:50feeling pain that there's this like
00:24:54like growing, you know, movement movement in Silicon Valley where where people are arguing that perhaps
00:24:57perhaps AI might be conscious that that it might actually be alive and
00:25:00and thinking and feeling if this this kind of thing spreads, it's
00:25:04it's going to make us more easy to to manipulate. It's going to mean
00:25:07mean that we're going to be taking taking more things at face value. value. And I think there are some
00:25:10some real ways this is actually kind kind of dangerous. I think so too.
00:25:14too. And when I was rereading the the research to prepare for our podcast
00:25:17podcast today, I just kept thinking thinking you could substitute algorithms
00:25:20algorithms in AI in this conversation. conversation. And I think we could
00:25:23could have almost the exact same same conversation. So there's no
00:25:27no magical forces driving your algorithm,
00:25:30algorithm, but it's can be fun, right? right? It can be fun to be like, like, man, maybe my algorithm does
00:25:34does know me, but at the end of the the day, you're still in control control of your algorithm. Thanks
00:25:37Thanks everyone for joining us. That's That's our show. What I would do
00:25:40do if I were you, I would go and and subscribe to our podcast. So
00:25:43So you listen to the whole thing. thing. Don't you want more of this?
00:25:46this? I know I would, and if you're you're looking for the show, you you can find The Interface wherever
00:25:50wherever you get your podcasts. If If you're in the UK, The Interface
00:25:53Interface is available on BBC Sounds. Sounds. It's The Interface podcast.
00:25:56podcast. Just type that into the the search bar and if you want to
00:25:59to get in touch with us, you can
00:26:01can send us an email at the interface@bbc.com.
00:28:07gains. Follow our coverage right
00:28:08right here on BBC News. At the very
00:28:20very first protest, the Janta Party Party had organised about a month
00:28:23month ago. And this is so much bigger. bigger. They've been driving towards
00:28:27towards the site of this wildfire, wildfire, but we've just stopped stopped at the side of the road here
00:28:31here because of what we saw out the
00:28:32the window. Spain is still burning. burning. This man has been pulled
00:28:36pulled out successfully. It's taken taken a mammoth mammoth rescue effort.
00:28:40effort. These young rebels are heading heading back to the front line to
00:28:43to postpone. There's a hunter base
00:28:47base there which these men have been been trying to take two years now.
00:28:51now. From the entrance of. The pub pub this morning, you get very little
00:28:54little sense of the terrible scenes scenes that were witnessed here last
00:28:57last night there. When the story
00:29:02story breaks, BBC News nearly two. two. Years since Donald Trump returned
00:29:05returned to office, where does America
00:29:07America stand? Oil disruptions. Caused
00:29:09Caused by the war in Iran have driven
00:29:11driven up the price of diesel. Will Will voters strengthen his hand or
00:29:15or change the balance of power? So So I'm asking you to pretend that
00:29:19that I'm on the ballot. Our team team explore what's shaping the vote
00:29:21vote and what it means for America America and the rest of the
00:29:26world. You're live with BBC News.
00:29:28News. The US mid-term elections 2026
00:29:322026 on BBC News.
00:30:08MUSIC
00:30:12Live from Singapore. This is BBC
00:30:18BBC News. Democratic Congresswoman Congresswoman Haley Stevens endorses
00:30:21endorses the Republican Party's Senate Senate candidate in the key battleground
00:30:25battleground state of Michigan. The The latest twist in a crucial Senate
00:30:28Senate race two days ahead of US US mid-term elections, Ukraine's
00:30:32Ukraine's military says its air raid raid alert app is likely to have
00:30:36have been hacked after citizens received received false warnings about threats
00:30:39threats of radiation and chemical chemical attacks. Buckingham Palace
00:30:43Palace says King Charles will speak
00:30:45speak with unflinching honesty and
00:30:47and sincere sorrow about slavery
00:30:50slavery at the Commonwealth Leaders Leaders Summit in the Caribbean and
00:30:53and on Business Today, the world's world's largest cryptocurrency exchange,
00:30:56exchange, Binance, sees record withdrawals withdrawals after it reopened
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.