France: France 24

20261105 00:30 UTC · 00:31:00 · 426 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 466 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56
00:31:00

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:00not a single issue, that is, the single issue and I believe he says it in one of the passages of the
00:00:03book, he does not want to reduce this woman to
00:00:06tragic, and that gradually,
00:00:10little by little, we will
00:00:12open for Serbia, the door to rectify the era, but we will especially think of this woman's destiny which is
00:00:16extremely moving and more and more, the more
00:00:20delay in implementing the Court's we delve into her life, the destiny of women also and also the
00:00:22treatment by the police, in particular, of the investigation
00:00:26because she is a woman, he has a passage at one point.
00:00:30where he says that the commissioner, in fact, says well, she had breasts, I don't know
00:00:33how, and it's the only description he gives of this
00:00:37dead woman and at that moment Philip calls the
00:00:40descriptions of
00:00:41European Commission has proposed a reform of Maigret, in fact, of Simenon in Maigret and indeed in Maigret he
00:00:45quotes the senses in fact, it's very very astonishing
00:00:49and this play of mirrors with Maigret's investigations, he
00:00:52read all of Maigret and Maigret is one of the characters in the book
00:00:54uh creates, however, indeed
00:00:58a reflection on the... and especially what we have hopefully
00:01:02gained with regard to this view of the
00:01:05female condition, whether through
00:01:09yeah and his documentary work on it and archive is quite impressive to
00:01:12transcribe this era. So, Philippe Genada had in front of him
00:01:16Yannick Haenel for "The Solitude of Teachers Is Infinite",
00:01:19Clémentine Meloy for "Something I Thought I Had Lost" and Sylvain Prudhomme
00:01:23for "On the Other Side of the Lake". Well, I admit I had a slight preference for the latter, which took us into these
00:01:27mountain landscapes, there too for... an investigation, but something
00:01:31entirely different about our relationship with nature and the desire to live differently. Did
00:01:35you have a favorite from the bookstore? Well, in fact,
00:01:38we had, uh, after uh, a few rather
00:01:42tumultuous weeks, this literary season has been, we'll talk about it, eventful or
00:01:45rather eventful, we had arrived at a final that was actually very calm,
00:01:49very calm in the good sense of the term, since we had four authors with
00:01:53four good books that each
00:01:55had brought before the Court of Justice of corresponded to their own universes and truly particular universes.
00:01:58Uh, and it could have been any of the
00:02:01what it is... the primacy of Union four, in fact, the issue is not, there were four good books in the final and that was
00:02:05actually rather calm compared to that and for example,
00:02:08Yannick Haenel's is a very very beautiful book, also very
00:02:12well, and so, which is undoubtedly the most beautiful title of the season, "The Solitude of Teachers is Infinite."
00:02:15What a title, and with this resonance with current events, which
00:02:18necessarily attracts I imagine, readers, and we
00:02:22will note, however, that the laureate is again a
00:02:25man. In 124 editions, the Goncourt has crowned only 13
00:02:29women, either alone, at least once out of 10, and this rate has not
00:02:32changed much until today, while women, we remind you, have written 53
00:02:36% of the novels registered in 2025 by
00:02:39the legal deposit observatory of the National Library of France.
00:02:43Parity, we're not quite there yet at the Goncourt, it still
00:02:46has work to do. And since we're talking about figures,
00:02:49Stanislas, for 10 years, the books awarded the
00:02:53ambushed China, we are going to talk about Goncourt have sold at least 200,000 copies in the year of
00:02:56their victory. That continues in subsequent years, almost 500...
00:03:00for Laurent Mauvignier, so for last year, "The Empty House," you notice it, I imagine,
00:03:04also in bookstores, for
00:03:07readers, the red banner is really a
00:03:10disputes between states and EU guarantee of quality, this one in fact is the only prize that systematically
00:03:13multiplies, that is to say that even a very criticized competition, even a competition that is perhaps
00:03:16weak, it will be a sale, typically in
00:03:19the bookstore, a competition, well, it's
00:03:21prohibited any mention of 300 copies, he has very few books that I sell 300 copies a
00:03:25year in fact, so that means that even a
00:03:28competition not... not really important or one like that remains
00:03:32a very big sale and for example in recent
00:03:35years, Andrea Bescond's "Veiller sur elle," uh, it's coming back in
00:03:39January, we're very impatient, uh, sold
00:03:42250,000 copies, that's it, and after that, don't forget that there's the paperback
00:03:46release, there's the amplification of the paperback, we're talking about Mauvignier, Mauvignier
00:03:50still doesn't exist in paperback, we still sell it extremely well and I think
00:03:53at Christmas we're going to give it away a lot again, so it's really a
00:03:56upheaval for the author, it's an economic upheaval, we remind you that the prize
00:04:00is not endowed, that's right, only a small symbolic check of 10 euros,
00:04:04so when Philippe Genada hopes to find his quiet and isolated life again, it won't be
00:04:07for right away.
00:04:10We can tell him, we were just talking about it, it's true that the
00:04:14race for this Goncourt prize 2026 was marked by the
00:04:18controversy that is somewhat stirring up the
00:04:21publishing world right now, the one concerning the book by
00:04:24Tellison Aurélien, it was that of Mourir, which appeared on the lists of
00:04:28many literary prizes, the Canadian author... of Haitian origin who was accused
00:04:31of using artificial intelligence for
00:04:34the writing of this very noticed first novel, suspicions confirmed
00:04:37since by his Canadian publishing house who terminated his
00:04:40contract and his name was therefore eliminated from all the lists of all the
00:04:44prizes. Stanislas Rigo, what is your view on all that,
00:04:48is it also a concern in bookstores for
00:04:50readers? No, I think, well, it's a
00:04:54question, this affair, it's above all a great
00:04:57sadness, it's a great sadness because we loved this book so much
00:05:01in fact, and when I say sadness it's not that he was served, we
00:05:04don't know exactly what happened, maybe indeed, well, I'm
00:05:08willing to believe that the whole book was written by AI, but at that point, go ahead and
00:05:12write such a beautiful book, in fact, by pressing a
00:05:14button. And I loved this book so much,
00:05:17uh, I read it twice, I received the author, it
00:05:20really broke my heart, really. Should there be a mention,
00:05:23perhaps, written with AI? Is this something we could
00:05:27imagine, in fact, in all the crystallization of the
00:05:30debates, there have been so many debates about it, in fact, what has been very, very
00:05:34little heard is what is, however, one of the keys, in my opinion, to the problem of the
00:05:38book, which is that the book is not bad, the book is formidable, in fact, and it's
00:05:42that which... in fact, I can't recompose myself with respect
00:05:45to the attitude, me, the reader, it's a book that made me cry and
00:05:49uh, that doesn't happen to me very often,
00:05:51and so I don't know what to do with these tears
00:05:55now that they tell me that maybe it's not him, and so
00:05:59on, but we'll remember the quality of the book, the quality of the book,
00:06:02uh, one last word, we are in the middle of the literary prize season,
00:06:05so there's the Goncourt, the Renaudot prize was awarded shortly
00:06:09after to François-Henri Des Eras for Le Palais, the
00:06:12Medicis prize was for Philippe Vassé, a word because we both, I think,
00:06:16share a love for this book, for Hanne
00:06:19Godard's, "Nous aussi," published by Act Sud, she received the Prix
00:06:22Décembre, she was gradually eliminated from all the other prizes, but
00:06:26it's still a favorite, a very big favorite, and many of us have a big favorite for
00:06:30Hanne Godard's, read Hanne Godard,
00:06:33"Nous aussi," it's a magnificent book about
00:06:36family, it's carried by brilliant writing, it's at Acte
00:06:40Sud, it's in the sales, it's very, very high, although the author is little
00:06:43known, or not known at all, and it has been at the top of novel sales for weeks,
00:06:47and rightly so, it's a very great book and it's true that for me it was
00:06:50a great discovery of this literary season and
00:06:54I hope we will be able to carry it for a long time yet, yes, with this refrain
00:06:58around the use of the pronoun "on" which, well, encompasses these
00:07:02silences in the family and the violence also done to children, I won't tell
00:07:50Hello everyone, welcome to Ici l'Europe on France 24 and Radio
00:07:54France Internationale. With a disruptive American president like
00:07:58Donald Trump who challenges international law, an expansionist
00:08:02Vladimir Putin and an
00:08:05the rule of law in Europe, and for that we welcome
00:08:08the president of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
00:08:13Hello, this institution, I specify,
00:08:16European, is based in Luxembourg and interprets European
00:08:19legislation, settles
00:08:23institutions, but also sometimes those opposing individuals, businesses,
00:08:26NGOs to an institution that may have violated their rights. The Court of
00:08:30Justice is composed of 27 judges, 11 advocates general and it is
00:08:33presided over by you since 11 years, a Belgian, so CON
00:08:37Leenards, hello. Do you, globally, think
00:08:41that the rule of law in Europe is
00:08:45weakened and under attack right now? I believe
00:08:48that the rule of law in Europe is still
00:08:52very strong and very respected. In
00:08:54reality, the European Union itself is an
00:08:58expression of the rule of law. These are
00:09:01sovereign states in Europe, who have
00:09:04concluded treaties among themselves to
00:09:07jointly exercise parts
00:09:10of their own sovereignty.
00:09:13because they can do so more
00:09:17effectively and more efficiently, by
00:09:20this, I am already paraphrasing the profound
00:09:23meaning of the principle of subsidiarity, that is, what can be dealt with at the local level must
00:09:27be dealt with at the local level, what can be dealt with at the
00:09:31national level, at the national level, and at the European level, well,
00:09:34there we deal with it at the European level.
00:09:37Exactly,
00:09:39what can only be dealt with at that level. To be
00:09:43effective, that means at the lowest cost and
00:10:01celebrated by thousands of Serbs in the street. The list of students
00:10:05from civil society won the legislative elections with
00:10:08140 seats out of 250 against the ruling party.
00:10:25Tacos reacted after almost 2 years of demonstrations in favor of
00:10:28democracy, the rule of law and the fight against corruption, Serbs
00:10:32mobilized in unprecedented numbers, a new chapter can
00:10:37the EU is open and we are ready to move forward
00:10:40together. Canada is also continuing its negotiations
00:10:43with the EU. While some member states like France contest the
00:10:47associated member status which does not exist in European texts, all
00:10:51support this rapprochement. A summit took place on Thursday and Friday in
00:10:55Montreal to define the contours of this new strategic partnership,
00:10:58seen by both parties as an alternative to increasingly
00:11:02unstable relations with the United States. The
00:11:06the Frontex agency which would further tighten European migration policy,
00:11:10at stake, an increase in Frontex's budget and staff, but also
00:11:14the possibility of intervening outside the Union's borders to send
00:11:18people from third countries even before they reach the EU. This proposal
00:11:21raises serious concerns from human rights organizations. As a
00:11:25reminder, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in December
00:11:282025 that Frontex was responsible for guaranteeing the fundamental
00:11:32rights of individuals and the existence of written
00:11:35return decisions during joint return operations.
00:11:39Koen Lenaerts uh has
00:11:41indeed received referrals against certain countries, this was often the case against
00:11:45Hungary and Poland accused of authoritarian
00:11:47excesses. Poland now has the pro-European
00:11:51government of Donald Tusk and Hungary has also changed government. You have
00:11:55not missed it with Peter Magyar, do you have fewer
00:11:58referrals concerning them and above all, do you believe them capable of
00:12:01restoring a good rule of law? The good news
00:12:04here is indeed that we
00:12:07have fewer referrals, but above all, we have even had
00:12:11a case where the European Commission
00:12:15withdrew an action for infringement that it
00:12:20the European Union against Hungary because
00:12:23of the national sovereignty law
00:12:27that had been adopted during the previous government's
00:12:31mandate, the current government
00:12:35then
00:12:37approved by the Hungarian
00:12:41Parliament, a law that withdraws this
00:12:44former legislation, after which the European Commission
00:12:48withdrew the action, it was really a case of
00:12:51constitutional scope at the level of the entire
00:12:55European Union, and so it proves
00:12:58that finally the rule of law, the court
00:13:01can issue the boundaries of what
00:13:05the rule of law entails, but like any judicial
00:13:08decision, and this applies in all countries in the world,
00:13:12the implementation of judicial decisions is a
00:13:16task of the political, legislative
00:13:20and executive authorities. Let's take a concrete example, Mr. President, this year,
00:13:24precisely, uh... your Court of Justice of the European Union judged the law of
00:13:272021 intended to introduce severe measures against
00:13:31pedophiles and protect minors, but which de facto in Hungary
00:13:35restricted access to LGBT content in media and
00:13:38bookstores. The parliament with this new
00:13:41pro-European majority repealed this law which
00:13:46homosexuality, so jurisprudence moves the lines, right?
00:13:50Exactly, it's another example and I am
00:13:53grateful that you cited it. where therefore Hungary
00:13:56has adapted its legislation, so
00:14:00after our judgment, that is, to implement
00:14:02our judgment, all of this
00:14:05proves that the rule of law works in
00:14:09Europe, and that's why I also didn't
00:14:12speak of the rule of law in terms
00:14:15of conflict or in terms of conflict with
00:14:19our member states, no, the member states have all
00:14:22committed to respecting these common values that I
00:14:26cited, when a member state crosses the
00:14:29red lines, that is, the essential content of these
00:14:33values, the court must state it in its
00:14:36jurisprudence, and the member states, and the two
00:14:39Hungarian examples demonstrate the
00:14:42implementation of the Court of Justice's judgment. You have also been seized by the European Commission for
00:14:46infringement of the rule of law in the case of Slovakia under Robert Fico,
00:14:50who is a populist accused of dismantling anti-corruption measures
00:14:53and not giving access for defendants to a
00:14:57lawyer, uh, and if this state, since
00:15:01the government has not changed, does not comply with your binding opinions,
00:15:04what happens? In such a case, when the court
00:15:08finds the infringement, it is
00:15:10incumbent, in line with what I have just said, on the political
00:15:14power, both at the European level and at the national
00:15:17level, to implement the judgment. At the European level, it is
00:15:21the European Commission, the executive, if you will,
00:15:24which monitors the implementation of our judgment by the
00:15:28member state. If the member state were to
00:15:31remain in default of doing so, the Commission can
00:15:35launch a second infringement procedure before
00:15:38the Court of Justice with fines and demand
00:15:42exactly financial sanctions. These financial
00:15:45sanctions can be either a fine,
00:15:49technically it's called a lump sum, uh,
00:15:52accompanied by a penalty payment per day of
00:15:57judgment, and these financial
00:16:00sanctions really have an impact
00:16:04because, uh, they are collected by...
00:16:07afterwards by a withholding from the funds due
00:16:11by the European Union to the member state concerned, and
00:16:14so normally that is enough for the
00:16:18member state to comply with the rule of law here, that's what
00:16:22happened in Hungary, there was a yes but wait, these financial
00:16:25sanctions, these are the member states
00:16:28themselves who have foreseen this through
00:16:31successive modifications of the initial treaties
00:16:34in which there were no such fines,
00:16:38uh, so precisely to
00:16:41ensure that all member states implement the judgments
00:16:44of the Court of Justice because otherwise equality
00:16:48between member states and their citizens before
00:16:52Union law would no longer be ensured, that is what we are
00:16:55talking about when we talk about the rule of law. Let's also talk about some sensitive issues
00:16:59such as frozen Russian assets,
00:17:03especially in Belgium, they are through the clearing system.
00:17:06Belgium, which fears legal proceedings for its
00:17:10country by the Russians, does that seem
00:17:13to you, as a good jurist, a serious
00:17:16legal threat? In reality, the legal threats we are
00:17:20talking about are not played out directly before the
00:17:24courtroom of the Court of Justice of the European Union, that
00:17:28being said, all the decisions taken at
00:17:31the European level can be
00:17:34challenged before the Court of Justice of the European
00:17:37Union, so it is not excluded that a
00:17:41case, whatever the decision taken, will still
00:17:44reach us, so that's why on the specific case, I cannot
00:17:48comment, but the questions we have on the
00:17:52Russian sanctions are important, because these
00:17:55are generally Russian oligarchs who have
00:17:59been listed, as we say, so
00:18:02that is, included, uh, on a list of
00:18:05people against whom sanctions are in
00:18:09force, and these people obviously contest
00:18:13the legality of this, an example that concerns
00:18:16France in reality, it was Russia Today
00:18:19France which had been put already in
00:18:232022 on the list of EU sanctions and
00:18:27which attacked this decision before
00:18:30the Court of Justice of the European Union and so
00:18:34there Russia Today said, "Ah, I cannot be
00:18:37put on this list because I claim freedom,
00:18:41uh, of the press." So the Tribunal
00:18:44decided that freedom of the press has its limits
00:18:48when the media outlet is financed by a third
00:18:51country and is therefore an instrument of propaganda that
00:18:55incites hatred between peoples and
00:18:58war. So there you see again these values on which
00:19:02the European Union is founded,
00:19:04also frame the implementation of fundamental
00:19:07rights here, freedom of the press. So, precisely since we're talking about freedom, we're
00:19:11going to talk about another court, but this will interest you, the
00:19:15Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought was awarded to the International
00:19:19Criminal Court. When you see that a Trump
00:19:22administration, which is angry about the indictment of Benjamin Netanyahu concerning
00:19:25Gaza, brandishes sanctions and plans a freeze of assets in the United States and
00:19:29a ban on entry into the United States for all personnel of the International
00:19:33Criminal Court, does that frighten you, this desire to
00:19:36undermine the guarantors of international law, judges
00:19:40first? Fear is perhaps a tiny bit exaggerated,
00:19:43but it is a huge concern because
00:19:47since the Second World
00:19:50War, since the declaration of Robert
00:19:53Schuman on so
00:19:56the communal Europe as he saw it, concrete
00:19:59achievements that create a de facto
00:20:03solidarity, so in fact the relations
00:20:06between states in Europe have
00:20:09been based on rules, the rules of
00:20:13law that have been agreed between
00:20:16states that respect each other and are
00:20:19supportive. The International Criminal Court is an
00:20:23expression of the same idea but at the global
00:20:25level regarding the prosecution
00:20:29of the most heinous crimes which are
00:20:33crimes against humanity, and
00:20:35therefore I told you the...
00:20:37human is the first value of the European Union so
00:20:41yes the judges of the International Criminal
00:20:44Court are our brothers and sisters just
00:20:48like the judges of the European Court of Human Rights, so all
00:20:52these courts that strive to make
00:20:55the law prevail, the rule of law, to
00:20:58protect citizens against the arbitrariness of
00:21:01a power, of an authoritarian power, of an
00:21:05oligarchic power, those in power who
00:21:08make citizens believe that the rule of
00:21:12law is the opposite of democracy, it is in
00:21:16reality with a view to a
00:21:20capacity of judges who could limit
00:21:23arbitrariness in the exercise of their power, but if
00:21:27you look at the great powers in the
00:21:30world, the leaders in place
00:21:34are actually much more, uh,
00:21:37an exercise of personal power, in a sense,
00:21:40a personal power where the
00:21:44press is neutralized, judges are neutralized, political
00:21:47opposition is discredited, that is to say, all pluralistic,
00:21:51tolerant, inclusive democracy, in
00:21:55reality, isn't it? and therefore in fact neutralized.
00:21:59The European states that founded the European Union
00:22:02have therefore committed to this, and have even
00:22:05committed, it is Article 3, paragraph 5 of the Treaty on
00:22:09European Union, to respond to
00:22:12through their international relations
00:22:16with the rest of the world, the same values as...
00:22:23Uh, in France, you can see that we are on the eve of a presidential
00:22:26election, where the party leading the polls, the Rassemblement
00:22:30National, defends the primacy of national law over European law,
00:22:33uh, and therefore, that a
00:22:36state can decide alone on the rules
00:22:39without European supervision,
00:22:41indeed,
00:22:43what does that inspire in you? I take your question, uh, as
00:22:47an opportunity to express
00:22:51law and in reality it's very
00:22:54simple, when you make a
00:22:56contract,
00:22:59and this is what the member states have done with the other 26
00:23:02member states, each member state, France has concluded a
00:23:06contract with the 26 other member states
00:23:09uh of the European Union and we call this contract the
00:23:13treaties and all the rules made by the
00:23:16European Parliament and the Council of the European Union in co
00:23:19decision, the legislative acts of the Union,
00:23:23the primacy, it is quite simply
00:23:25the expression of a principle known since
00:23:29time immemorial in international law, pacta
00:23:33sunt servanda, we must respect
00:23:36our word, and that applies to France, to
00:23:39Germany, to Belgium, to Poland, to Hungary, to
00:23:43all 27 member states, and the reason
00:23:46is very clear, if a member state
00:23:50were to say
00:23:52unilaterally: no, I didn't understand
00:23:55it that way, I have to do
00:23:59what I choose now, in reality,
00:24:02that state breaks the contract to which
00:24:06it committed, just like a private person, as you know,
00:24:09we can't do that either, this primacy is
00:24:13the ultimate guarantee, once again,
00:24:16of equality among member states and their citizens.
00:24:20Citizens are equal before the treaty. National
00:24:23elections are also European elections, because they
00:24:27will determine how that member state will assert
00:24:30its point of view in the common exercise
00:24:34of those aspects of national sovereignty that have been entrusted
00:29:36Volunteers are trying to convince the rest
00:29:39of them.
00:29:44political and business leaders from 130
00:29:47countries.
00:29:52Today, the atmosphere is very different in
00:29:55the
00:30:01city.
00:30:22thank you for joining us in Strasbourg in a European Parliament, currently
00:30:26focused on Washington and holding its breath before the results of the
00:30:29midterms, the mid-term elections in the United States. which
00:30:32renews Congress. A majority of European leaders and parties
00:30:36quietly wish for a defeat of Donald Trump in this election and
00:30:39a weakening of his policy, which seeks to challenge international law
00:30:43and multilateralism. In recent weeks, the American president
00:30:46has once again worried Europeans by lifting sanctions against
00:30:50Russia and concluding an agreement to import Russian diesel to
00:30:54the United States, which significantly weakens Ukraine and its
00:30:57allies. Yes, so Donald Trump hopes.
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.