France: France 24

20261105 13:30 UTC · 00:30:59 · 345 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 466 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56
00:31:00

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:17Il est 14h30 à Paris, bienvenue dans votre rendez-vous derrière l'image, on prend le temps de
00:00:21décrypter l'info à partir d'une photo, je vous ai déjà vendu la mèche, on va partir parler encore
00:00:38et de de l'alaska mais bon peu importe ça va absolument rien changer pour ce stade c'est
00:00:41plié pour les démocrates je parle beaucoup trop là on est dans derrière l'image normalement on regarde une photo un
00:00:45cliché que vous avez choisi alors on va le regarder et puis vous allez nous expliquer pourquoi ce choix et oui
00:00:49parce que ça peut paraître un peu bizarre cette photo et bien il s'agit de Chris Papas qui a donc été
00:00:53elected in New Hampshire and he holds his hand in a sign of
00:00:56victory to his
00:00:59husband, and in that sense, it's historic, why? Because Chris Papas
00:01:02becomes the first American senator to be
00:01:05openly gay and to be elected to this
00:01:08position, and why did I choose this photo? I chose this photo because
00:01:12he didn't talk about it during his campaign, and that's what I find
00:01:16absolutely remarkable, meaning he did his entire campaign with his
00:01:19husband by his side, and he campaigned on issues that
00:01:23interested the residents of New Hampshire, others
00:01:26spoke for him, meaning he was introduced by young people, for example, on stage
00:01:30where they said, "Listen, if he were elected, he would be, etc.," but he himself didn't
00:01:33talk about it, and what I find extraordinary and interesting about this is the fact that if
00:01:37we had been in 2016, that would have
00:01:40been his main campaign theme, he would have said, "Vote for
00:01:43me, I will be the first openly gay senator in the history of the
00:01:47United States," and now we are in 2026, 10 years later,
00:01:50and he doesn't say a word about it, why? Simply because I
00:01:53think, and this is my theory emerging from this election, that
00:01:57we have exited a cycle of extremism and
00:02:01political violence in the United States, that this cycle began
00:02:05Republican party that needs to take stock of the during Barack Obama's second term, and what we
00:02:08have seen with this blue wave is
00:02:12the end of what is called in the United States identity politics, that is to say
00:02:16this way Democrats had of systematically saying "perfect, we
00:02:20need we absolutely need to
00:02:22serve each minority individually,
00:02:26our program must be based on that, our candidates must be...
00:02:30I don't know, gay, or women, or from
00:02:33minorities, and that it has become the alpha and omega of a certain
00:02:37American left, and it seems that this has passed, and
00:02:41I think this is a strong symbol, so it's not an isolated case, but this is what
00:02:44makes it so that politicians like Chris Papas were
00:02:48elected, he's gay, it's not a big deal, ultimately it bothered no one,
00:02:52he was elected in New Hampshire, I visited it, by the way, I wonder if we weren't together at the time,
00:02:56it's a rural state, while it's
00:03:06a place where people ice fish, it's a rural place, completely north of
00:03:10the state of the United States, and
00:03:14if we go back a few years, remember well, this state made this choice
00:03:17left-wing candidate who managed to without... I'm going to ask you a question, James, because we were talking about it earlier off-air, it's true that you have a very
00:03:22opponent, who was from the optimistic view of things, the end of a cycle of political violence in this
00:03:25case, isn't it simply the Democratic party that decided to
00:03:29focus the cursor? on the priority of Americans, namely purchasing
00:03:33power, whereas before we could afford the luxury of talking about other things, now
00:03:36they have absolutely put everything on that, oh no, purchasing power is
00:03:40obviously absolutely crucial, now I think what we need to see clearly is that purchasing
00:03:43power is not the first time it's been the central theme of the campaign,
00:03:46remember the 2020 campaign where everyone was talking about
00:03:50what? the price of eggs, remember, at the time it was Joe Biden, it was the
00:03:54bidonmix, there was a massive inflation in the United States
00:03:58and there was an absolute denial of others.
00:04:00and to a certain extent, that's what helped Donald Trump be brought to
00:04:04power again, so it's true that Donald Trump very
00:04:06clearly does everything he can to drive up prices in the country, we're obviously
00:04:10thinking of his tariffs, we're thinking especially of the war in Iran and its impact on
00:04:14fuel prices, and let's be clear, JD Evans, for
00:04:18once, I agree with him, yes, they lost this election largely because
00:04:22of fuel prices and this war in Iran which is deeply unpopular, it's good
00:04:25to say it now, but it would have been good to say it before, right? Yes,
00:04:28Vince, yes. He said it, but well, he was against it, and
00:04:32by the way, yes, but now he's distancing himself in a
00:04:36Trump administration, it's going to be war, James, no? spectacular way, we'll get to that later when we talk about the Republican party, but in any case, no, what I think is that the Democrats understood
00:04:40that that didn't work, it's true that I think because we've been observing the
00:04:43United States for years now, that we
00:04:47saw the cursor go too far on everything that was
00:04:51societal and to the left with the Democrats and a figure like
00:04:54AOC who was
00:04:57re-elected in New York, she said it, she said in an
00:05:00interview with ABC, we remember, it caused a lot of ink to flow, it was in August,
00:05:04"woke one was crazy," that is to say, went too far into
00:05:07wokism, she who had gone so far as not to want to use the word
00:05:10woman, since she said "people who menstruate," that was the literal translation of her
00:05:14way of referring to women at the time, we had gone very, very far and very clearly, in any
00:05:18case, I think so, that's what brought Donald Trump back to
00:05:21power, a first time and then a second, and I think that in fact what is happening,
00:05:25but this is also valid for the Republican party, it is today a kind of refocusing, that is to say,
00:05:29where there had been an extremely violent pendulum that had first gone completely to the left to
00:05:33the point that many Americans no longer recognized themselves
00:05:36in what was happening, and now it has completely gone, it had completely gone
00:05:40to the right to the point that there too, and... we see it also with these results, many
00:05:44Americans, including hard-line Republicans, were saying, "But this is
00:06:00time being, so a point for the Democrats, the hardest part may
00:06:04be yet to come, I want to say, it's an extremely
00:06:07divided party, what does it mean to be a Democrat today, what does it mean to be on the left
00:06:11in the United States? That will be a big question and there's a real risk for the
00:06:14party in the coming months, ah, this party is torn,
00:06:17it's torn, it's lacking leaders, by the way, it's interesting because we see some who
00:06:21will undoubtedly emerge after these elections, we saw personalities stand out, very
00:06:25interesting personalities, by the way, but in the polls to know who was the
00:06:28favorite for the 2028 presidential
00:06:32election on the Democratic side, just before this election, we were told
00:06:35that it was Kamala Harris, meaning when we saw the
00:06:39result last time, it was perhaps not the best solution. And so, yes, of course,
00:06:43they are torn, they are torn between this rather centrist wing that would be represented, we can
00:06:47say, by James Stalarico, James
00:06:50Stalarico, who is this Democrat who won
00:06:54in Texas, which is extraordinary, he won for several
00:06:58reasons, first he had a catastrophic opponent in front of him, an extremist, Ken
00:07:01Paxton, who was also perceived as quite corrupt, but he won
00:07:05because he said: "Come on, we have to work with Republicans, we have to serve Texans, we
00:07:09have to stop tearing ourselves apart, I'm ready to work with... others,
00:07:12and I am not a dogmatist." The same thing
00:07:16in Kansas, there too, an absolutely
00:07:19remarkable victory, Kansas where a Democratic
00:07:22senator, pardon me, was elected for the first time since 1932, he
00:07:26says, "My father is a Republican, I can get along with Republicans, we need to go back to the
00:07:30center, we need to stop being too ideological." And on the other
00:07:33side, indeed, Abdullah al-Sayed, who for his part is a
00:07:37representative completely of this other Democratic wing who also
00:07:41wins but who... who wins a seat that already belonged to the Democrats,
00:07:45the nuance is extremely important in Michigan, and Abdullah Al-Sayyad,
00:07:48who is of Egyptian origin, who is the
00:07:52first, he has a lot of history in this election, the first
00:07:56Arab-American senator and, above all,
00:07:59Muslim senator in the history of
00:08:02Congress. So he is progressive, he is willingly
00:08:06on the fringes of the Democratic Socialists of America, which is this
00:08:09new very left-wing movement that is
00:08:12gaining momentum. But the counter-example of El Sayed is what happened in
00:08:16Florida with Mrs. Nixon, who actually lost, and
00:08:20what's interesting in this story is that if we rewind to the time of the
00:08:23Democratic primaries in
00:08:26Florida, well, she's a very
00:08:29win that primary even though she was less funded than her
00:08:35party establishment, well-funded, well-supported, rather centrist.
00:08:38Ultimately, it's Mrs. Nixon who wins
00:08:42that primary and who then loses in this midterm election, and
00:08:46that had already been predicted at the time by the pollsters who said she was too far to the left to
00:08:49rally the center, so that's going to be the question, you have to see that Joe Biden
00:08:53was rather a centrist and there too saw the result, but in
00:08:57all cases, yes, the Democratic party will have to choose, will have to
00:09:01choose if it is more Talarico, if it is
00:09:03more Alexandria Ocasio
00:09:07Cortes, and it's rather to the left, what's
00:09:10interesting is that, and we see it in this election, the Republican
00:09:13party had managed to monopolize being the party of the common
00:09:17people, of the workers, of the disadvantaged classes, and it seems that the
00:09:21Democrats have managed to regain ground in
00:09:25this demographic group, and that's going to be very important for
00:09:282028, so they're going to have to find a line and find
00:09:31leaders, and it's going to be interesting to observe how that's going to
00:09:35happen, who have obviously started to
00:09:37emerge, obviously, especially during this
00:09:41election. We're going to have a cohabitation between the
00:09:45Democrats and the
00:09:48So, is it going to be war? That's obviously the first thing we say,
00:09:51but everyone said, "Oh no, Donald Trump will refuse the election results,
00:09:55he'll contest them, he'll..." First reaction on the phone: "Well, congratulations, guys,
00:09:59you ran a good campaign, I lost,
00:10:02I don't see why I would contest the results." It's quite wonderful to hear Donald Trump say
00:10:06that, it was on the phone immediately
00:10:08after on Fox News,
00:10:12Donald Trump who says he's ready to work with Democrats and who says,
00:10:16"You know, I have a lot of friends among Democrats." In short, he's
00:10:19perhaps worried. Well, I think there are several things. I think first,
00:10:23the first thing is that the results are so clear that it would be completely ridiculous to go to
00:10:26court to contest them. That's the first point. I also think, having
00:10:30gone to Wyoming for a report with
00:10:33my colleague Sylvain Rousseau for 15 days,
00:10:37that he has lost his base, that is, this famous MAGA base that was
00:10:41unwavering, and well, today it has turned away from
00:10:44him, especially because of the war in Iran, and so he knows that no one else
00:10:48is going to go take the Capitol for him, and I prove this by the fact
00:10:52that we went to this state, which is the reddest of... all the red states, where we
00:10:56interviewed people who were absolutely
00:10:59convinced Trump supporters. You have to know that they voted more than 70%, or even more than 70%,
00:11:03for Donald Trump in Wyoming, and there we met
00:11:06Republicans, members of the Republican party, who were pure
00:11:09and hard-line and who said, "No, we can't take it anymore, he betrayed us, he's waging war in Iran
00:11:13even though he promised he wouldn't, he's raising fuel prices, he's
00:11:17bringing in foreign beef, which is destroying our
00:11:20incomes," since there are a lot of ranchers, we see the images behind me, so there's a real
00:11:24real exhaustion, and what we noticed
00:11:28during this filming with Sylvain is that in fact, there's an
00:11:31old guard, as he calls it, Republican, who has put money back on the
00:11:35table, who is restocking, who is saying, "Wait, the Republican party
00:11:39is not this extremist Donald Trump party, it's a party
00:11:42that was John McCain's, that was Ronald Reagan's, that was a
00:11:46pro-business party, not necessarily
00:11:48entrenched on immigration, on the contrary, it was rather pro-
00:11:52immigration, and it's not at all the party that Donald Trump
00:11:56ultimately took in this kind of hostile takeover of
00:11:592016. So it's interesting to see if this current within the Republicans will return to
00:12:03power or not, but in any case, Donald Trump finds himself
00:12:06with a masterful defeat on his hands, a very
00:12:10important admission, and a situation where he cannot contest this election. So the next
00:12:13step is that he also said during the same phone call, "I'm going to be Mr.
00:12:17Veto, and we're going to negotiate the new cascade." We saw the new cascade,
00:12:21exactly, the famous "Make America Great Again" has disappeared from
00:12:25his vetoes, so that still gives us an idea of what could be next, this
00:12:30Trump era, turn to the future, it has deep
00:12:34divisions, you just mentioned them, we still have the impression that America today
00:12:38is making a 180° turn, we saw
00:12:41these Americans from Texas, just to name a few, wake up to discover the
00:12:45results on television, I don't think they've quite recovered yet, they're probably still
00:12:48digesting the victory, that's a concept, digesting a victory,
00:12:52uh, what does that tell us today about American
00:12:55political culture, this turnaround, anything is possible?
00:12:59So first, I want to say one thing: I find it magnificent for American democracy, which still functions
00:13:02in an exceptional way, and it's
00:13:06always magical to see it in action, meaning that in
00:13:092016, a billionaire from nowhere came and won
00:13:13the election, so we saw the consequences, but it was still incredible to
00:13:16see that no one had
00:13:20impression that the administration
00:13:24was all-powerful, that it led this country by terror, and that ultimately,
00:13:27no, once again, the citizens expressed
00:13:31themselves, and the result was respected. It also says
00:13:34that it's not the first time we've seen 180° turns in the United States, because
00:13:39Barack Obama's election, we still have an America that voted twice
00:13:43for George W. Bush, which we often forget, it's funny, he now looks like an old
00:13:47sage, but George W. Bush was still
00:13:51the intervener in the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan.
00:13:55It's all the measures we know, you remember, it was Edward Snowden, it was
00:13:58mass surveillance, it's incredible everything that happened under Bush, the least we can
00:14:02say is that he wasn't a choirboy, and then boom, they elect Barack
00:14:06Obama, the first black progressive president of the
00:14:09United States in an election in 2008,
00:14:12and they have two terms of that, and boom, they give us Donald Trump, so
00:14:16I want to say, well, it's still
00:14:18possible, as they say, they like it to shake things up, so to speak,
00:14:22and so that's what they did again this time. The question is, what's going to
00:14:26happen now? Because what we could also have, the Democrats, and you're right, I'm
00:14:29optimistic, but maybe I'm wrong, the Democrats could also get into what
00:14:33we could call revenge politics, which is what Donald Trump
00:14:36wanted to do, he wanted to make those who hurt him
00:14:39pay. And in my opinion, they would be wrong to do it, because I spent
00:14:4315 days in the United States and people are tired, they don't want it, but they
00:14:47could embark on an interminable cycle of hearings, trials,
00:14:50of attacks, of attempts to
00:14:53impeach different officials and Donald Trump
00:14:56himself, which will be a temptation, let's be
00:14:59clear, and well, we'll see if the Democrats restart a new cycle of violence or
00:15:03démocrates un nouveau cycle de violence ou
00:15:18politics, I think we will have a lot to say in the coming
00:15:22weeks, thank you for following us, this is the end of behind the image,
00:15:26the news continues on France
00:15:2724.
00:15:44It is on this roundabout at the foot of the Arlington military
00:15:46cemetery that Donald Trump wants to erect a 250-foot
00:15:50arch, nearly 76 meters, to celebrate
00:15:53the 250th anniversary of American
00:15:55independence.
00:15:58A project strongly contested by many veterans like Shawn
00:16:02Burns, a Vietnam
00:16:04War veteran.
00:16:07It will obstruct the view of the Lincoln Memorial and the Memorial
00:16:10Bridge, erected to symbolize reconciliation
00:16:14and reunification of the country after the Civil War.
00:16:16Shawn believes that the 250th anniversary
00:16:18of the United States is just a pretext to justify a
00:16:21narcissistic initiative by the American president. He has therefore decided
00:16:25to sue the government alongside two other
00:16:29former combatants.
00:16:31combattant.
00:16:34I am a decorated veteran of the Purple Heart, it's a
00:16:37combat, Trump avoided
00:16:39conscription,
00:16:42the idea that he could erect a gigantic monument to his own
00:16:45glory, which would overshadow the graves
00:16:49in this cemetery, this sacred place, deeply
00:16:53revolts me.
00:16:57If a monument were to be erected for the 250th anniversary of our country,
00:17:01something many people would never have considered before, it should
00:17:04celebrate the accomplishments of our people.
00:17:10A few days ago, the District of Columbia and the State of Virginia also
00:17:13filed a lawsuit in federal court in the hope of blocking the
00:17:17project. Donald Trump had already tried to put his name on the
00:17:20Kennedy Center before a judge forced him to remove it last
00:17:24May.
00:17:29Since his return to power, the president has been multiplying
00:17:32initiatives to reshape the American capital in his own image,
00:17:36which is angering part of the
00:17:38population.
00:17:41However, the White House is not worried, in his arch
00:17:44project, Donald Trump is simply awaiting validation from the National
00:17:48Capital Planning Commission this November
00:17:495th.
00:17:57A commission where the American president has appointed several loyalists
00:18:00and which had already pre-validated the arch in
00:18:02July.
00:18:38an organization that mobilizes Americans over 60 around the defense
00:18:41of democracy.
00:18:44People are angry for many reasons, and in my
00:18:48eyes, all of them are legitimate, the chosen location, the dimensions of the
00:18:52monument, its cost, and the fact that the project is being carried out without
00:18:55congressional approval, it's
00:18:57illegal.
00:19:01We cannot let this happen. Unfortunately, as
00:19:04we have seen lately, the president always gets his way.
00:19:09If the project is approved, work would begin
00:19:12immediately. The administration has already presented a schedule
00:19:16according to which the construction site would operate 20 hours a day, all year round
00:19:19for 2 to 3 years, a prospect that raises questions
00:19:23about air safety.
00:19:27One of the points that could pose a problem is that we don't yet know if the monument
00:19:30will be equipped with decorative lighting to highlight it at
00:19:34night.
00:19:37distance, such lighting could distract pilots, or even cause
00:19:41glare for those who want to
00:19:43proximity.
00:19:48Thomas Lintner spent 30 years with the
00:19:51FAA, the federal agency in charge of civil aviation,
00:19:54which concluded in September that the arch would not pose a danger to
00:19:58aircraft. But for the former air traffic controller, the question
00:20:02of helicopter traffic remains. Nearly
00:20:0590 flights are recorded every day in the Washington
00:20:08area.
00:20:11Helicopters use marked air corridors,
00:20:14listed on maps that indicate the presence of
00:20:18fixed obstacles and allow them to navigate along the
00:20:21Potomac.
00:20:24But these itineraries do not require them to fly on a precise side of the
00:20:28river. Only altitude limits are set, not
00:20:31lateral trajectories.
00:20:34With this 76-meter arch, a new obstacle comes.
00:20:50meter, which became, even before its construction, an eminently
00:20:53political
00:20:54symbol.
00:21:03immediately your program with Crédit Mutuel, to all those who make
00:21:06sport, Crédit Mutuel gives
00:21:08momentum.
00:21:15Your program with Parmigiano
00:21:17Regiano.
00:30:07and it's the start for, it's the start of your world tour on France 24, it's
00:30:103 PM here in Paris, welcome, very large processions this Thursday
00:30:14in France, the CGT counts 250 demonstrators at midday,
00:30:18this Thursday could be the high point of this social autumn,
00:30:21the parades are underway in Paris, as you can see live, purchasing power
00:30:25remains the main subject, we will find Mary Shuster in a
00:30:28moment, how this anger resonates beyond our borders.
00:30:33in other European countries, Generation Z also made its voice heard in recent
00:30:36weeks, can we draw parallels, particularly with the situation in
00:30:40Italy, questions and answers with a journalist who knows Rome as well as Paris,
00:30:43Alberto Toscano, hello Alberto, hello, we will also come back to these
00:30:46mysterious bomb threats, they concern planes flying over
00:30:50Europe each time, they are very numerous since the beginning of the week, several
00:30:54aircraft were diverted this Thursday, that's
00:30:58the main news.
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.