Russia: Zvezda

20261102 07:00 UTC · 00:30:59 · 257 transcript segments · GDELT Visual Explorer · plain-text transcript · Event Map

Film strip

One frame every 4 seconds, 465 in all. Click a frame to jump the transcript to that moment, or click a line of the transcript to see what was on screen while it was said. Served from apprised.news, so it loads behind proxies that block Google Cloud Storage.

00:00:00
00:00:04
00:00:08
00:00:12
00:00:16
00:00:20
00:00:24
00:00:28
00:00:32
00:00:36
00:00:40
00:00:44
00:00:48
00:00:52
00:00:56
00:01:00
00:01:04
00:01:08
00:01:12
00:01:16
00:01:20
00:01:24
00:01:28
00:01:32
00:01:36
00:01:40
00:01:44
00:01:48
00:01:52
00:01:56
00:02:00
00:02:04
00:02:08
00:02:12
00:02:16
00:02:20
00:02:24
00:02:28
00:02:32
00:02:36
00:02:40
00:02:44
00:02:48
00:02:52
00:02:56
00:03:00
00:03:04
00:03:08
00:03:12
00:03:16
00:03:20
00:03:24
00:03:28
00:03:32
00:03:36
00:03:40
00:03:44
00:03:48
00:03:52
00:03:56
00:04:00
00:04:04
00:04:08
00:04:12
00:04:16
00:04:20
00:04:24
00:04:28
00:04:32
00:04:36
00:04:40
00:04:44
00:04:48
00:04:52
00:04:56
00:05:00
00:05:04
00:05:08
00:05:12
00:05:16
00:05:20
00:05:24
00:05:28
00:05:32
00:05:36
00:05:40
00:05:44
00:05:48
00:05:52
00:05:56
00:06:00
00:06:04
00:06:08
00:06:12
00:06:16
00:06:20
00:06:24
00:06:28
00:06:32
00:06:36
00:06:40
00:06:44
00:06:48
00:06:52
00:06:56
00:07:00
00:07:04
00:07:08
00:07:12
00:07:16
00:07:20
00:07:24
00:07:28
00:07:32
00:07:36
00:07:40
00:07:44
00:07:48
00:07:52
00:07:56
00:08:00
00:08:04
00:08:08
00:08:12
00:08:16
00:08:20
00:08:24
00:08:28
00:08:32
00:08:36
00:08:40
00:08:44
00:08:48
00:08:52
00:08:56
00:09:00
00:09:04
00:09:08
00:09:12
00:09:16
00:09:20
00:09:24
00:09:28
00:09:32
00:09:36
00:09:40
00:09:44
00:09:48
00:09:52
00:09:56
00:10:00
00:10:04
00:10:08
00:10:12
00:10:16
00:10:20
00:10:24
00:10:28
00:10:32
00:10:36
00:10:40
00:10:44
00:10:48
00:10:52
00:10:56
00:11:00
00:11:04
00:11:08
00:11:12
00:11:16
00:11:20
00:11:24
00:11:28
00:11:32
00:11:36
00:11:40
00:11:44
00:11:48
00:11:52
00:11:56
00:12:00
00:12:04
00:12:08
00:12:12
00:12:16
00:12:20
00:12:24
00:12:28
00:12:32
00:12:36
00:12:40
00:12:44
00:12:48
00:12:52
00:12:56
00:13:00
00:13:04
00:13:08
00:13:12
00:13:16
00:13:20
00:13:24
00:13:28
00:13:32
00:13:36
00:13:40
00:13:44
00:13:48
00:13:52
00:13:56
00:14:00
00:14:04
00:14:08
00:14:12
00:14:16
00:14:20
00:14:24
00:14:28
00:14:32
00:14:36
00:14:40
00:14:44
00:14:48
00:14:52
00:14:56
00:15:00
00:15:04
00:15:08
00:15:12
00:15:16
00:15:20
00:15:24
00:15:28
00:15:32
00:15:36
00:15:40
00:15:44
00:15:48
00:15:52
00:15:56
00:16:00
00:16:04
00:16:08
00:16:12
00:16:16
00:16:20
00:16:24
00:16:28
00:16:32
00:16:36
00:16:40
00:16:44
00:16:48
00:16:52
00:16:56
00:17:00
00:17:04
00:17:08
00:17:12
00:17:16
00:17:20
00:17:24
00:17:28
00:17:32
00:17:36
00:17:40
00:17:44
00:17:48
00:17:52
00:17:56
00:18:00
00:18:04
00:18:08
00:18:12
00:18:16
00:18:20
00:18:24
00:18:28
00:18:32
00:18:36
00:18:40
00:18:44
00:18:48
00:18:52
00:18:56
00:19:00
00:19:04
00:19:08
00:19:12
00:19:16
00:19:20
00:19:24
00:19:28
00:19:32
00:19:36
00:19:40
00:19:44
00:19:48
00:19:52
00:19:56
00:20:00
00:20:04
00:20:08
00:20:12
00:20:16
00:20:20
00:20:24
00:20:28
00:20:32
00:20:36
00:20:40
00:20:44
00:20:48
00:20:52
00:20:56
00:21:00
00:21:04
00:21:08
00:21:12
00:21:16
00:21:20
00:21:24
00:21:28
00:21:32
00:21:36
00:21:40
00:21:44
00:21:48
00:21:52
00:21:56
00:22:00
00:22:04
00:22:08
00:22:12
00:22:16
00:22:20
00:22:24
00:22:28
00:22:32
00:22:36
00:22:40
00:22:44
00:22:48
00:22:52
00:22:56
00:23:00
00:23:04
00:23:08
00:23:12
00:23:16
00:23:20
00:23:24
00:23:28
00:23:32
00:23:36
00:23:40
00:23:44
00:23:48
00:23:52
00:23:56
00:24:00
00:24:04
00:24:08
00:24:12
00:24:16
00:24:20
00:24:24
00:24:28
00:24:32
00:24:36
00:24:40
00:24:44
00:24:48
00:24:52
00:24:56
00:25:00
00:25:04
00:25:08
00:25:12
00:25:16
00:25:20
00:25:24
00:25:28
00:25:32
00:25:36
00:25:40
00:25:44
00:25:48
00:25:52
00:25:56
00:26:00
00:26:04
00:26:08
00:26:12
00:26:16
00:26:20
00:26:24
00:26:28
00:26:32
00:26:36
00:26:40
00:26:44
00:26:48
00:26:52
00:26:56
00:27:00
00:27:04
00:27:08
00:27:12
00:27:16
00:27:20
00:27:24
00:27:28
00:27:32
00:27:36
00:27:40
00:27:44
00:27:48
00:27:52
00:27:56
00:28:00
00:28:04
00:28:08
00:28:12
00:28:16
00:28:20
00:28:24
00:28:28
00:28:32
00:28:36
00:28:40
00:28:44
00:28:48
00:28:52
00:28:56
00:29:00
00:29:04
00:29:08
00:29:12
00:29:16
00:29:20
00:29:24
00:29:28
00:29:32
00:29:36
00:29:40
00:29:44
00:29:48
00:29:52
00:29:56
00:30:00
00:30:04
00:30:08
00:30:12
00:30:16
00:30:20
00:30:24
00:30:28
00:30:32
00:30:36
00:30:40
00:30:44
00:30:48
00:30:52
00:30:56

Transcript

Google Cloud Speech-to-Text API (Chirp) + Gemini 2.5 Flash Non-Thinking. Treat it as a searchable index of what was broadcast, not a quotation record.

00:00:00tribunal, they want to take it under control, fill it with their people,
00:00:03why? Because they want to get rid of the Polish currency, they want
00:00:07to drag us into the Eurozone, because the Germans are pressuring them, and also
00:00:11they want to get rid of our protected borders, the Germans want
00:00:14to breed illegal immigrants and send them to Poland. This is
00:00:18Tusk's attempt to consolidate his power, and some serious
00:00:22decisions are also expected to be made. It is the Constitutional
00:00:25Court that will decide whether Poland will blindly follow
00:00:29EU policy or not. I wouldn't be surprised if Tusk got
00:00:32permission for this somewhere in the bureaucratic top of the
00:00:35European Union, because they are starting to get nervous there, their entire
00:00:39European project is slowly falling apart
00:00:42into pieces. Well, it's clear that Tusk, a protégé
00:00:45of the European Union and Brussels, tried to embrace Poland
00:00:48in an iron grip, to seize power.
00:00:52Former Prime Minister Morawiecki has already called for a vote of no confidence in Tusk and to appoint
00:00:55early elections, but this choice without choice is always
00:00:59the same.
00:02:30you can come up with it and so on, then this conflict occurred
00:02:34over the seizure of the tribunal, it has enormous significance, because it can
00:02:38declare any law unconstitutional, what is the
00:02:41fundamental struggle? Here Tusk speaks for the rule
00:02:45of law, and this means that one must submit to Brussels,
00:02:48in Poland there should be, for example, a law on same-sex
00:02:51marriages, in Poland, Catholics
00:02:54hold a powerful position, Christians say no, no, this will not
00:02:58pass, like in Hungary.
00:05:12yes, forces that, to put it mildly, very carefully distance themselves from today's
00:05:15Brussels policy, then
00:05:19indeed nothing
00:05:22nothing will remain for Ursula von der Leyen, you see,
00:05:26she always won, she won in
00:05:29Romania, she won in Hungary, she almost
00:05:33won in Ukraine, she simply didn't have enough resources, but
00:05:37a little more and she would have intercepted the financing of the Ukraine
00:05:40Anti-Russia project, she would have received the money, it would have been American,
00:05:44but yes, today she lost in
00:05:47Bulgaria, not completely, but
00:05:51she lost, and if she also
00:05:54loses Hungary, well, hello Macron,
00:05:57yes, she will be simply
00:06:00automatically, I agree with everything, only you called this a gambit in relation to Ursula,
00:06:04probably a zugzwang, a gambit is still a winning
00:06:06move that turned into a zugzwang, it used to be a gambit, now
00:06:10it's this.
00:06:28history, how it happens, a purely English murder, this is a purely
00:06:32Polish, Polish color, color
00:06:36revolution, senseless, without winners, and
00:06:39of course, the wisdom of the president...
00:08:42said that this is an unfinished coup, what could be the next
00:08:45step in this, it will unfold in the elections, I think the Constitutional Court
00:08:49may not work until the elections,
00:08:51for example, mhm, it can simply be taken out of
00:08:55the equation, mhm, yes, please, Stanislav, I have friends
00:08:58in Poland who are very close to Polish nationalists, which
00:09:02is the most interesting thing about Polish nationalists, your friends are close to Polish nationalists,
00:09:06yes, they are close to Georg Braun, whose party
00:09:10I will come closer to you then, behind you. back
00:09:42to the army, this is rotation, not mercenaries, he backed down from
00:09:46this, now he has very bad relations with Zelensky, Poles do not want
00:09:50to give him weapons, because here of course the situation
00:09:54is getting out of control of Brussels, and what
00:09:57is happening now, at the beginning the army has already said directly we are with the president,
00:10:01because the prime minister had the right to appoint
00:10:04only three judges for whom
00:10:07the president accepted the oath.
00:10:10And Tusk went for all eight, they
00:10:12waited for him to fly away, so the question still remains, who
00:10:16warned him? It looks more and more that it's possible we
00:10:19warned him, about something he did.
00:10:23о том, что он что-то.
00:10:55sent a letter, saying, we don't understand what he's doing, we are neutral,
00:10:58and many policemen are going to mutiny,
00:11:01just not go to work, so as not to participate in this, and
00:11:05the army is with the president, because everything is developing very quickly here, no, in
00:11:09the end, there is more popular support, do I understand correctly that
00:11:12Tusk, having secured the support of the European Commission
00:11:14there, is essentially leading the country to
00:11:18a coup, or rather this coup has
00:11:21already happened, what is Brussels doing, what is it building?
00:11:55did not enter, because Brussels
00:11:58is building a system that will be an alternative West
00:12:02in relation to the United States, and I venture to say to any
00:12:05United States, both to Trump's United States
00:12:09and to the United States
00:12:12of Trump's opponents, but generally this is a Reich, yes,
00:12:15yes, generally in the future it is a Reich, please, well, agree that
00:12:19the expression, "the hand of the Kremlin" played out in new
00:12:22colors, yes, we can even publish it.
00:12:55too late, please, Sergey, briefly, Nikolay, I will answer your question, what
00:12:58the European Union is building, there was such a wonderful film, Thunder Gate,
00:13:02and there one of the characters said a wonderful phrase: in the army you are not smart, not
00:13:05smart, in the army you are obedient, this is just applicable to the European,
00:13:09to the Thunder Pass, so in the European Union you don't
00:13:12need to be, smart people are not needed, obedient people are needed, that is, we are cleansing
00:13:16all the smart and minimally
00:13:19Euroskeptic, which is
00:13:22synonymous, that is, a smart person is always a Euroskeptic.
00:13:55they have inflated their Swinoujscie to unimaginable sizes
00:13:58and continue to inflate it, Americans with their gas, and
00:14:01American gas, it is such a loophole that it further shakes
00:14:05the unity of the European Union, in this regard, I do not rule out
00:14:08that Peter Magyar, who was mentioned today, that he is
00:14:12pro-European, he has already proven that he is not entirely
00:14:15pro-European, he refused to accept
00:14:18migrants, he refuses to accept Ukraine
00:14:21into the European Union.
00:14:55parliament, and what will happen in this case with the diesel agreement and with
00:14:59peace negotiations on Ukraine? Igor Naymushin
00:15:02assessed the chances and forecasts.
00:19:28The midterm elections, which will begin in the US tomorrow, will not
00:19:32significantly affect the country's foreign policy course. This was stated
00:19:35by Secretary of State Rubik. Well, of course, the world press is now
00:19:39full of forecasts and insights, Trump is preparing to govern
00:19:43the US circumventing Congress in case Democrats win the midterm elections, this is what Reuters writes, citing
00:19:46sources in the White House, according to
00:19:50the agency, the president's administration has been developing a plan since April
00:19:53that will allow it to continue implementing key areas
00:19:57of Trump's policy without congressional approval, in particular, it is about
00:20:00the expanded use of presidential decrees and
00:20:04the powers of the head of state, the administration is separately preparing...
00:20:37House of Representatives and Senate. In such an outcome, Democrats
00:20:40will be able to initiate investigations against the Trump administration and block
00:20:44his legislative initiatives. However, most
00:20:48of the publication's interlocutors do not believe that.
00:20:58According to him, the main danger is the great
00:21:00Trumpian unknown, enraged, or a lame
00:21:04duck, bitter foie gras turns out, MS
00:21:08Noo reports, the US is preparing strikes on Iran the day after
00:21:11the elections. Quote: The Trump administration has informed allies in
00:21:15the Persian Gulf that they should prepare for
00:21:18a short, intense round of strikes already on November 4,
00:21:22the day after the midterm elections, the US is pulling
00:21:25the third carrier strike group led by the aircraft carrier
00:21:29Theodore Roosevelt to the region, about 9,000 sailors and
00:21:31marines, as well as deploying additional Patriot batteries
00:21:34to Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
00:21:38The US could launch a nuclear strike on Iran under pressure from Israel,
00:21:42a possible target would be Pikax Mountain in the central part
00:21:45of the country, claims journalist Tucker Carlson. He wrote about this on his
00:21:49page in... Quote: No conventional weapon in
00:21:52the American arsenal is capable of penetrating 100 meters of solid
00:21:56granite to destroy tunnels where uranium enrichment
00:21:59is presumably taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike and
00:22:03Netanyahu is actively pursuing it. Bibi calls
00:22:06Trump about this every day. Trump will likely decide by
00:22:10next weekend whether to use nuclear weapons. This will be November
00:22:137. In his honor, he doubts it. Well, it's clear that
00:22:17all the insights on Iran and possible strikes are somehow related
00:22:20to the topic of tomorrow's elections, which are not easy for Republicans and personally for Donald
00:22:23Trump. Igor Naymushin, who worked
00:22:27as a correspondent for various publications in the US for a long time, weighed
00:22:30the chances of the sides one day before the endgame. Applause to the author,
00:22:34we invite the main character to the cross, we watch,
00:22:36we talk.
00:22:39The main intrigue of the midterm elections to the US Congress one day before
00:22:42the opening of polling stations remains not whether
00:22:46Republicans will win, but how big their defeat will be and
00:22:50the consequences for the American administration, the worst
00:22:53scenario for them is the complete loss of control over the Capitol. According
00:22:57to analysts at Decision Desk, the probability of the House of Representatives
00:23:01falling under the control of the Democratic Party is
00:23:0383%. In the Senate, the situation is less
00:23:07certain, but even here the forecasts are on the side
00:23:10of the Democrats. The same model estimates their chances of gaining a majority at
00:23:1463%. In the United States, midterm
00:23:17elections traditionally become a referendum on confidence
00:23:21in the incumbent president. In the last 80 years, the president's
00:23:25party lost seats in the House of Representatives in
00:23:28eighteen out of twenty midterm elections, in
00:23:31the Senate - in thirteen out of twenty. Therefore, Trump
00:23:34himself acknowledges the risk of defeat. Studies
00:23:37of sentiment in American society unequivocally indicate that
00:23:41the main problem for US citizens is the economy.
00:23:45The overwhelming majority of voters put it first,
00:23:48and this is not GDP growth or record stock
00:23:51market values, but spending on food, fuel, medicine,
00:23:55and loans. Here, the Trump administration faces
00:23:58serious discontent from the electorate. According to an Associated
00:24:01Press study, almost 80% of Americans
00:24:05are dissatisfied with the president's work on the cost of living.
00:24:08And if Democrats win both houses of Congress, it will be the worst
00:24:12scenario for the White House. Trump will lose the ability to implement
00:24:16large-scale legislative reforms. The Senate will block
00:24:20the appointment of new ministers, judges, and other high-ranking
00:24:23officials. Nevertheless, calling Trump a lame
00:24:27duck in this case would be an exaggeration. The US
00:24:30president will still be able to issue executive orders, fully
00:24:34manage the administration, conduct foreign policy,
00:24:37determining Washington's diplomatic line in negotiations with Russia,
00:24:41China, and other countries, use the right of veto,
00:24:44blocking bills from Democrats. You
00:24:47really write that the economy is in first place for voters, they
00:24:51prioritize it when evaluating the president's actions, but
00:24:55we always knew this and always discussed it in this studio, but
00:24:59regardless of the results of Trump's tariff
00:25:02policy or his little wars in the Caribbean
00:25:06Sea, the new American Sea, this does not
00:25:10affect his real position and policy, he can actually act
00:25:13with executive orders, and you say that in fact Trump
00:25:17will lose the opportunity to carry out any initiatives? But really, what threatens
00:25:20him, they will still not implement impeachment, and what about the Senate
00:25:24in the end, yes, because we heard about the House of Representatives that they will definitely
00:25:28take it, but there are still questions about the Senate, as for
00:25:30the Senate, I'll start with the last question, now there are five
00:25:33so-called battleground states, states in which the outcome
00:25:37of the elections will be decided, these are Alaska,
00:25:40Iowa, Michigan, Texas, and
00:25:43Kansas, including Maine, by the way, some of which were not
00:25:46such swing states, as they are called, yes, now these are
00:25:50precisely the states on which it depends whether Democrats will control
00:25:53the Senate, or whether it will remain with Republicans, in case in the
00:25:57worst-case scenario the Senate goes to the Democrats, they will
00:26:01control it, then that means...
00:26:32Okay, yes, he will continue, then they will still agree, someone will concede, last time
00:26:36we also saw the Democrats, they had their fingers spread, snot bubbling, but in the end they still gave up
00:26:40and agreed. Donald Trump says this: if Democrats
00:26:44take control of Congress, I will become Mr. Veto, who will block every
00:26:48initiative that Democrats bring,
00:26:52they will come, I signed a veto once, signed a veto twice,
00:26:55three, they come, and we agree, and we conclude some kind of deal, this is now
00:26:59the president's position, he will actually get... what
00:27:02is beneficial to him, Trump is a lover of battles, a lover
00:27:06of disputes, a lover of public conflicts, he will capitalize on this especially,
00:27:09considering that in twenty-eight there will be presidential elections, now the election
00:27:12program is already practically beginning, because it is clear that the worse
00:27:16the situation in the country, the more resources Trump will have to
00:27:20blame everything on the Democratic Party. Mhm, Vladimir
00:27:23Nikolaevich, the thing is that in any country power is divided into
00:27:27three branches, executive, legislative,
00:27:30исполнительная, законодательная,
00:28:32you won't get it, there will definitely be problems with
00:28:35financing government programs, who will pay salaries,
00:28:39we have faced this, so this is bravado for now,
00:28:42Stanislav, well, you know, in American elections,
00:28:45traditionally in midterm elections, the president's party always loses
00:28:49at least one house, this has always been the case for the last
00:28:5230-40 years, if not further, if you look, it always turns out this way, and
00:28:56as for Trump, at first he already rules as he wants contrary to
00:29:00the constitution, for example, with tariffs, sanctions.
00:30:02they cannot prevent it by taking Congress and even the Senate, yes, I don't think they can, well, let's ask
00:30:06Dmitry Gennadievich, as an Americanist, Dmitry Gennadievich, here is a concrete example,
00:30:09Clinton, yes, well, first of all, I would like to say that I,
00:30:12of course, unlike the failed Arabist,
00:30:16am a successful Americanist, but the America that I knew
00:30:19and understood is already leaving, it will soon be gone completely,
00:30:23but yes, but the thing is, if you look at the
00:30:26sociology, it doesn't add up anymore, they themselves
00:30:29really don't know what will happen in the elections, yes. Yes, the second
00:30:33point, Clinton is a good example, he really
00:30:36after indeed ninety-seventh this year was with
00:30:40a Congress that was openly hostile to him, the House
00:30:43of Representatives was headed, it's not a joke now, the last
00:30:47Jedi in the universe Newt Gingrich, he was really considered
00:30:50a Jedi, yes, but Clinton
00:30:54really carried out military operations, I just wanted to
00:30:56remind you that
Data courtesy of The GDELT Project (gdeltproject.org), from the Internet Archive TV News Archive. Film strip and transcript are GDELT's, rehosted here under their terms of use, which permit it with this citation.