Energy & Climate Desk
Grid watch, barrel report, transition monitor, carbon desk, and weather-risk voices on the daily energy and climate corpus.
AI-generated analysis from Apprised's automated desks, synthesized from cited sources and editorially accountable to J.A. Watte. How we report · Corrections.
← Energy & Climate Desk (latest)
Chart auto-generated from this brief's structured fields. See methodology for how the underlying data is collected.
A projectile struck an oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz on August 25 as commodity vessel transits fell to a three-month low, while the U.S. simultaneously launched 'Operation Economic Outcast' sanctions targeting Iran's oil trade — with WTI at $86.48 and Brent at $95.29, the physical chokepoint risk has not yet repriced into paper markets.
Bias-reviewed: LOW Independently rated by Kimi for political-lean, source-diversity, and framing bias before publish. Final orchestration and the published call are made by Claude, a U.S. model.
Grid interconnection queue — MISO
- 221,772 MW active in the queue, but only 2.8% has reached an advanced study stage.
- 79.7% of all resolved megawatts withdrew rather than reaching service.
- Of 562 completed interconnection agreements, 271 have not started construction and 92 are generating — a signed agreement is not a power plant.
- Queue entry to an executed agreement runs 3.3 years (n=388); queue entry to actually in service, 3.1 years (n=90).
Today’s Snapshot
Hormuz tanker strike + Iran sanctions + Canada power threat define a multi-front energy risk day
An oil tanker was struck by a projectile in the Strait of Hormuz off Oman's coast on August 25, with commodity vessel transits through the strait falling to a three-month low according to Kpler shipping data. Simultaneously, the U.S. State Department launched 'Operation Economic Outcast,' imposing sweeping sanctions on Iranian military activities, cyber operations, and illicit oil trade. In North America, Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to cut electricity exports to the United States if the Trump administration continues its trade war escalation. Nevada filed suit against the federal government over a Trump administration Colorado River water plan it calls catastrophically damaging. And Los Angeles braced for days of 100°F heat with Southwest fire risk growing, even as Hawaii's parametric coral reef insurance was triggered for the first time by Hurricane Lala.
Synthesis
Points of Agreement
Barrel Report reads the Hormuz tanker strike and three-month-low transits as a physical market stress event running ahead of WTI pricing; Grid Watch reads Canada's electricity threat as the North American structural analog — both agree that cross-border energy flows are being weaponized simultaneously and that current market prices are not fully reflecting the risk. Carbon Desk and Barrel Report agree that Energy Major 10-K novelty scores (XOM at 72.8%, COP at 69.1%) reflect genuine repricing of legal and operational exposure to the Iran-Hormuz complex, not routine disclosure updates. Weather Risk and Watershed agree that the West is the dominant near-term stress region — acute heat and fire risk in LA (Weather Risk's lane) overlaying chronic Colorado River structural deficit (Watershed's lane) — though they maintain distinct framings of the same geography. Transition Monitor and Grid Watch agree that the 5.53% renewable share is an operational constraint, not a policy accomplishment, and that the grid cannot be assumed to deliver electrons that don't yet exist at scale.
Points of Disagreement
Barrel Report's physical-market framing treats the Brent-WTI spread as the primary Hormuz risk signal and is optimistic that Dangote refinery's sevenfold export growth provides Atlantic Basin buffer; Grid Watch is less sanguine about buffers, emphasizing that no domestic substitute for Canadian hydro imports can be ramped quickly in the Northeast if Ford acts. Carbon Desk's read of XOM's 72.8% 10-K novelty as a stranded-asset and liability signal is an interpretive claim that Barrel Report would contest — Stahl would argue that rewritten risk language is a legal hedge, not an operational capitulation, and that majors are still deploying capital into upstream. Watershed frames the Colorado River lawsuit as a structural carrying-capacity reckoning; Weather Risk's actuarial lens would price it as an acute-to-chronic transition event with quantifiable insurance implications for Las Vegas real estate and municipal bonds — neither is wrong, but the policy implications differ sharply.
Pivotal Question
If Iran retaliates to Operation Economic Outcast by escalating Hormuz disruptions beyond a single vessel strike — closing or severely restricting transit — does the Brent-WTI spread widen enough to force CAISO and Northeast grid operators to activate emergency demand response, and does that event finally force Congress to treat Canadian electricity imports as a national security dependency rather than a trade bargaining chip?
Bias Flags
- Barrel Report: Physical-commodity bias may underweight the financial flow dimension: speculative positioning and algorithmic response to the Hormuz headline could move WTI $3-5 before any barrel is actually diverted; Stahl's 'barrels tell the truth' framework lags the paper market in fast-moving geopolitical events.
- Transition Monitor: Deployment-curve optimism on copper supply from Sierra Gorda's reserve expansion may underweight the permitting and community-opposition friction that routinely delays Chilean mining expansions; a reserve estimate is not a production schedule.
- Carbon Desk: Finance-first lens on 10-K novelty scores interprets legal disclosure rewrites as investment signals; this framework is strong on identifying risk language shifts but cannot distinguish between genuine strategic repricing and defensive legal boilerplate added by outside counsel under new regulatory pressure.
- Weather Risk: Actuarial framing of the LA heat event as an insured-loss story flattens the human cost: the households most exposed to 100°F heat in the Inland Empire and border communities are disproportionately uninsured, and the uninsured loss is structurally larger than the insured headline.
- Watershed: Scarcity lens on the Colorado River lawsuit may underweight water-efficiency technology and agricultural water trading as partial substitutes; Nevada's existing water recycling infrastructure is among the most sophisticated in the U.S., which does not dissolve the structural deficit but changes the political economy of the cuts.
- Grid Watch: Engineering framing of the Canada electricity threat focuses on megawatts and reserve margins; the political economy of whether Ford actually executes the cut — versus using it as a trade negotiating lever — is outside the operational framework and materially changes the probability-weighted reliability risk.
Routing
Voices seated: Barrel Report, Grid Watch, Carbon Desk, Weather Risk, Watershed, Transition Monitor
The Hormuz tanker strike, Iran sanctions, Canada electricity threat, Colorado River lawsuit, LA heat wave, and Dangote refinery story collectively activate all six desks; the Hormuz-Iran-oil nexus anchors Barrel Report and Carbon Desk, Canada's electricity threat routes to Grid Watch, the Colorado River lawsuit routes to Watershed with Weather Risk secondary, and the LA heat event plus Hawaii coral reef insurance payout routes to Weather Risk with Transition Monitor taking the renewable-share and mineral signal from Sierra Gorda.
Analyst Voices
Barrel Report Conrad Stahl
One vessel struck, Kpler counting a single commodity transit through Hormuz on Monday — the lowest since May 7 — and Iraq's SOMO alongside QatarEnergy are already bidding oil for loading inside the strait under unusual terms. That is not narrative; that is physical market stress presenting itself in real time. WTI sits at $86.48, Brent at $95.29, a spread of nearly $9 that reflects the seaborne risk premium already embedded in the European benchmark. The 30-day WTI move is down $5.26, which tells you paper was pricing a de-escalation path that the tanker strike just invalidated.
Operation Economic Outcast is Washington's most comprehensive Iran sanctions package to date, targeting military activities, cyber operations, and the illicit oil trade. The transmission mechanism is well-established: China absorbs more than 80% of Iran's seaborne crude, and secondary sanctions against Chinese buyers are the real pressure point. Iraq depends on Iranian gas for up to 40% of its electricity generation, and Turkey imported 4.5 bcm of Iranian gas in the first half of this year alone. Tighten those flows and you tighten Gulf regional supply chains in ways that ripple immediately into tanker routing and crude availability.
The Dangote refinery story from EIA deserves a beat here: Nigerian seaborne petroleum product exports have grown sevenfold since 2023. That is a genuine structural shift in the Atlantic Basin product market, absorbing some of the supply cushion from constrained areas. It does not offset a Hormuz closure scenario — nothing does — but it reduces the severity of a partial disruption. The physical market is tighter than the WTI futures curve is currently admitting. Watch the Brent-Dubai spread in the next 48 hours; that is where Persian Gulf risk reprices first.
Physical Hormuz signals — a tanker strike, three-month-low transits, and inside-strait loading bids — are running ahead of where WTI paper is currently priced, with Brent's $9 premium over WTI the only market variable currently admitting the risk.
Bias flag — Physical-commodity bias may underweight the financial flow dimension: speculative positioning and algorithmic response to the Hormuz headline could move WTI $3-5 before any barrel is actually diverted; Stahl's 'barrels tell the truth' framework lags the paper market in fast-moving geopolitical events.
Grid Watch Lena Hargrove & Sam Okafor
Ontario Premier Doug Ford's threat to cut electricity exports to the United States is not a theoretical escalation — it is a statement about a real electron flow that crosses the U.S.-Canada border every hour of every day. The Northeast U.S. and parts of the Midwest depend on Canadian hydro imports as a baseload resource, not a supplement. If Ford acts on this, the regions most exposed are New York, New England, and the upper Midwest: markets where Canadian imports routinely backstop grid reliability during peak demand and where replacement capacity from domestic sources would take hours to ramp or simply does not exist at the necessary volume.
The NOAA degree-day snapshot adds operational context the Canada story cannot ignore. Cross-metro totals show 1,421 HDD and zero CDD for the week of August 17-23, with San Francisco registering 149.3 HDD over seven days. That is a late-summer heating signature in the West, not a cooling load. The critical load signal today is not from the NOAA data — it is from the Insurance Journal's report that Los Angeles faces days of 100°F heat as the Southwest fire risk grows. Southern California's grid does not heavily rely on Canadian imports, but the fire-driven transmission risk and the air-conditioning surge are real. CAISO will be the watch desk for the next 72 hours.
Conrad on the Barrel Report desk is flagging Hormuz physical stress. Grid Watch notes the connection: if Iranian gas disruptions tighten supply into Iraq (40% of Iraqi electricity generation is Iranian gas-dependent), that is an analog for what happens when a major cross-border fuel supply gets weaponized. Ford's threat is the North American version of exactly that dynamic. The policy assumes electrons — and gas molecules — that continue to flow under political duress. The grid cannot make that assumption.
Ontario's threatened electricity export cut would directly impair grid reliability in New York and New England, where Canadian hydro backstops baseload supply with no rapid domestic substitute — a risk compounded by the simultaneous 100°F heat event driving CAISO load in Southern California.
Bias flag — Engineering framing of the Canada electricity threat focuses on megawatts and reserve margins; the political economy of whether Ford actually executes the cut — versus using it as a trade negotiating lever — is outside the operational framework and materially changes the probability-weighted reliability risk.
Carbon Desk Henrik Lindqvist
Virginia's potential re-entry into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, analyzed today by Resources for the Future, is the kind of carbon market signal that gets buried under Hormuz headlines but matters structurally. RGGI is the only functioning compliance carbon market in the U.S., and Virginia's return would add a significant industrial electricity load back into the cap. The RFF affordability data tool framing — centered on electricity price impacts — is the politically honest way to pitch it: carbon pricing is a bill, and ratepayers know it. The question is whether the price signal is large enough to actually move investment, or whether it just moves political opposition.
Zambia's National Carbon Registry launch is a separate but telling data point. Voluntary carbon market infrastructure is expanding into sub-Saharan Africa, with BioCarbon Partners' CEO explicitly citing transparency and accountability as the value proposition. This is the market responding to the credibility crisis in voluntary offsets — building registry rails before the credits, rather than after. Whether that sequencing holds under commercial pressure is the real test.
On the Energy Majors SEC filing front, XOM's 10-K Risk Factors section shows 72.8% novelty on the latest cycle — the highest among the five majors diffed, with a net sentence count of +116 added and -163 removed. COP is at 69.1% novelty, CVX at 64.5% with 445 sentences added. That is not routine disclosure hygiene. When energy majors are rewriting their risk language at that velocity while physical Iran sanctions escalate and Hormuz transits hit three-month lows, the stranded-asset and liability exposure language is almost certainly what is driving the MD&A rewrites. I would read CVX's 445 net-added sentences alongside the Hormuz story, not separately from it.
XOM's 72.8% and COP's 69.1% 10-K Risk Factor novelty scores — the highest among energy majors in this filing cycle — signal that upstream producers are materially repricing their legal and operational exposure precisely as Iran sanctions and Hormuz physical stress escalate simultaneously.
Bias flag — Finance-first lens on 10-K novelty scores interprets legal disclosure rewrites as investment signals; this framework is strong on identifying risk language shifts but cannot distinguish between genuine strategic repricing and defensive legal boilerplate added by outside counsel under new regulatory pressure.
Weather Risk Dr. Maya Castillo
Two distinct regional stories today, and the protocol requires naming them separately rather than merging them. In the West: Los Angeles faces days of 100°F heat as a weather system that already cooked Texas expands westward and strips moisture from Southern California terrain. Heat alerts run from Santa Barbara to the U.S.-Mexico border. This is fire-weather setup territory — low humidity, elevated temperatures, and thermally driven wind potential. The Insurance Journal is tracking this for good reason: the insured loss from a fire event in this corridor would be catastrophic, and the uninsured loss — to uninsured households, small businesses, and public infrastructure — would be larger still. The West is the dominant weather risk signal for the period ending August 25.
In the Pacific, Hurricane Lala has already triggered Hawaii's parametric coral reef insurance — the first payout since the Nature Conservancy purchased the United States' first such policy four years ago. Parametric triggers are set at physical thresholds, not loss assessments, so the payout is confirmed structurally by the event itself, though only Artemis.bm is reporting the execution of the specific payment. Separately, Tropical Storm Moke brought rain to Hawaii, and two Atlantic tropical waves are being watched for development, though neither poses an immediate U.S. threat per Yale Climate Connections.
In the Southeast: the Atlantic system is waking up, but no immediate threat has materialized. The relative risk is comparatively weaker than what the West is absorbing this week. A Minnesota severe thunderstorm watch (NOAA SPC Watch 625) covers Clay, Kittson, Marshall, Norman, and adjacent counties — a Midwest operational event, not a national catastrophe signal. The regional discipline holds: West is the story, Southeast is the watch.
Los Angeles faces a multi-day 100°F heat and fire-weather setup that represents the dominant near-term insured-loss exposure in the U.S. energy system, while Hawaii's parametric coral reef insurance payout — triggered by Hurricane Lala — marks the first real-world test of that financial instrument.
Bias flag — Actuarial framing of the LA heat event as an insured-loss story flattens the human cost: the households most exposed to 100°F heat in the Inland Empire and border communities are disproportionately uninsured, and the uninsured loss is structurally larger than the insured headline.
Watershed Dr. Tomás Iqbal
Nevada's lawsuit against the Trump administration over the Colorado River plan is the structural water story of the week, and it arrived three days after the plan was released. Nevada holds the smallest legal allocation of any of the seven basin states, and water managers are describing the proposed cuts as potentially 'catastrophic' for Las Vegas. Strip away the legal language and you have the Colorado River's overallocation crisis reaching its enforcement phase: the paper rights negotiated a century ago cannot be delivered by a river that no longer carries that volume, and whatever the federal plan designates as cuts will be litigated by every downstream claimant who can afford a lawyer. This is not a single lawsuit — it is the opening volley.
Kenya's drought-driven plan to import maize as key growing areas fail is a parallel structural signal at the food-security layer. A poor harvest in Kenya puts pressure on maize supplies and maize flour prices for millions of households — and drought-driven import dependency is how food-export bans start in other exporting nations. The UNCCD COP17 in Ulaanbaatar, where IOM is calling for greater investment in land restoration and drought resilience specifically to reduce displacement risks, frames the generational stakes: land degradation and chronic water stress are driving migration before the climate models predict they should.
Dr. Castillo on Weather Risk is correctly flagging the LA heat event and the West's acute conditions. My lane is what happens when the acute becomes chronic: the Colorado River basin has been in structural deficit for years. Nevada's lawsuit is not a weather story — it is a carrying-capacity reckoning. Las Vegas exists in a desert at the end of the longest straw on a drying river. The legal fight over how to apportion scarcity does not create new water; it redistributes who bears the shortage.
Nevada's lawsuit over the Colorado River plan — filed three days after its release — marks the formal legal phase of the basin's structural overallocation crisis, with Las Vegas facing cuts its water managers call catastrophic on a river that can no longer physically deliver its century-old paper commitments.
Bias flag — Scarcity lens on the Colorado River lawsuit may underweight water-efficiency technology and agricultural water trading as partial substitutes; Nevada's existing water recycling infrastructure is among the most sophisticated in the U.S., which does not dissolve the structural deficit but changes the political economy of the cuts.
Transition Monitor Dr. Amara Osei
The renewable share of U.S. generation sits at 5.53% as of May 2026 per EIA data — a number that requires immediate context: this is the EIA's weekly power sector snapshot, which tends to undercount behind-the-meter solar and represents a single-week slice, not the annual blended figure. It does not contradict the overall deployment trajectory, but it is a reminder that the grid's instantaneous renewable share varies enormously by season, time of day, and region. Grid Watch's Lena and Sam are right to treat it as a binding operational constraint rather than a policy aspiration.
South32's 61% boost to Sierra Gorda's ore reserve estimate in Chile's Antofagasta region is the kind of critical mineral story that quietly reshapes the transition supply chain. Sierra Gorda is a copper-molybdenum operation, and copper is the metal the energy transition cannot substitute away from — every solar panel, every EV, every grid upgrade wire runs on it. A 61% reserve expansion at an operating mine is a real supply signal, not an exploration promise. The Antofagasta region of Chile already hosts some of the world's densest copper production; this deepens that concentration, which means geopolitical risk to the Chilean operation is also deepened.
Thailand's consideration of private-sector roles in SMR development, per the Bangkok Post, is a single-source planning discussion at proposal stage — not decided policy. But the framing matters: Thailand is explicitly positioning SMRs to replace aging fossil-fuel small power producers. That is the transition pathway argument for nuclear that is gaining traction across Southeast Asia, and it runs parallel to the deployment-curve conversation in a region where grid reliability and base-load needs are not optional. The supply chain for SMRs doesn't exist at scale yet, which is where the 2030 target meets the 2035 reality.
South32's 61% Sierra Gorda reserve expansion deepens both the supply signal and the geographic concentration risk for copper — the non-substitutable metal at the center of every grid, solar, and EV deployment pathway — at a moment when the U.S. renewable share sits at 5.53% and transition demand is accelerating.
Bias flag — Deployment-curve optimism on copper supply from Sierra Gorda's reserve expansion may underweight the permitting and community-opposition friction that routinely delays Chilean mining expansions; a reserve estimate is not a production schedule.
Simulated Opinion
If you had to form a single opinion having heard the roundtable, weighted for known biases, it would be: today's energy risk is a multi-front simultaneity problem, not a single dominant crisis — and markets are underpricing the compound effect. The Hormuz tanker strike and three-month-low transits are the acute signal, but the U.S. financial sanctions architecture assumes China will capitulate on Iranian crude purchases; it almost certainly will not in the short run, which means the oil supply disruption will be partial and slow rather than sharp and immediate, giving paper markets an excuse not to move. Canada's electricity threat is the more underappreciated near-term grid risk for U.S. consumers: Northeast and upper Midwest ratepayers have no rapid substitute for Canadian hydro, and the political dynamics of the U.S.-Canada trade war make this threat more credible than OPEC bluster. The Colorado River lawsuit is the slow-motion version of exactly the same dynamic — overcommitted resource, legal battle over who bears the shortage, no mechanism to create new supply. The energy majors rewriting their 10-K risk language at 55-73% novelty rates while all of this unfolds is the financial market's honest acknowledgment that the stranded-asset reckoning is arriving on multiple vectors at once. The transition is real but the 5.53% renewable share and the copper supply concentration in Chile both confirm that the supply chain is not yet capable of replacing what geopolitical disruption could remove. The prudent position: take the Brent premium seriously, treat the Canada electricity threat as a grid reliability event rather than a trade headline, and watch whether the Colorado River legal fight accelerates water-market pricing reform or simply redistributes scarcity without creating resilience.
Independent Cross-Check — Kimi
Consensus 9 Contested 2 Developing 3
U.S. announces major expansion of Iran sanctions under 'Operation Economic Outcast' Consensus
Oil tanker struck by projectile in Strait of Hormuz off Oman Consensus
Canada/Ontario threatens to cut electricity exports to U.S. over trade war escalation Consensus
Nevada sues federal government over Trump administration Colorado River water plan Consensus
U.S. sanctions Iranian cyber actors; UK discloses power plant cyberattack Contested
Hurricane Lala triggers Hawaii parametric coral reef insurance payout Developing
Iraq's SOMO and QatarEnergy offering oil loading bids inside Hormuz Developing
Pakistani military chief meets Iranian leadership; Iran demands U.S. tone change Consensus
Thailand may allow private sector role in small modular reactor projects Developing
South32 boosts Sierra Gorda ore reserve estimate by 61% Consensus
Norway's Supreme Court opens hearings on climate-disputed oil permits Consensus
U.S. DOE and SBA launch SBIC-E initiative for energy small business investment Consensus
Commodity vessel transits through Hormuz Strait drop to three-month low Consensus
Vox reports Supreme Court revived Trump's election law executive order Contested
Watch Next
- Brent-Dubai spread movement in next 24-48 hours as the primary market signal for whether Persian Gulf physical risk is repricing after the Hormuz tanker strike
- Ontario Premier Doug Ford's follow-up statements or actions on the electricity export threat — any formal regulatory or operational step would trigger immediate NYISO and ISO-NE reliability assessments
- CAISO emergency alerts or demand response activation as Los Angeles 100°F heat wave develops through the week
- Federal court response to Nevada's lawsuit against the Trump administration Colorado River plan — any temporary restraining order would freeze implementation and signal judicial appetite for intervention in the basin allocation crisis
- China's official response to U.S. Operation Economic Outcast secondary sanctions — specifically any announcement of continued or expanded Iranian crude purchases, which would be the primary test of whether the sanctions can actually tighten physical oil supply
- EIA weekly petroleum report for the period ending August 22, which will confirm or contradict the 4,405 kbbl crude build reported for August 14 and provide the first inventory signal post-Hormuz-strike
Historical Power Lenses
Napoleon Bonaparte 1799-1815
Napoleon's Continental System — the 1806 attempt to strangle Britain economically by closing European ports to British trade — is the closest historical analog to Operation Economic Outcast. Like Washington's Iran sanctions, the Continental System was theoretically total but practically leaky: neutral parties and smugglers routed around the blockade, and the effort to enforce it required Napoleon to overextend militarily into Spain and Russia. The parallel is precise — China's continued absorption of 80%+ of Iran's seaborne crude is the 21st-century equivalent of the Baltic neutrals who kept British goods flowing. The lesson Napoleon learned too late: an economic siege that cannot be enforced at the physical chokepoint becomes a political liability before it becomes an economic victory.
J.P. Morgan 1837-1913
Morgan's 1907 intervention — personally orchestrating the recapitalization of failing trust companies to prevent systemic collapse — is the framework for reading Canada's electricity threat against the U.S. grid. Morgan understood that interconnected financial systems create mutual dependencies that cannot be unwound in a crisis without destroying both parties; the Northeast U.S. grid's dependency on Canadian hydro is precisely that kind of embedded mutual dependency. Ford's threat is the equivalent of a major creditor threatening to call its loans: the leverage is real, but executing it destroys the creditor's own position in the clearing system. Morgan would have identified the dependency as a structural fragility to be renegotiated from a position of preparation, not reacted to under duress — which is exactly the conversation U.S. grid planners have avoided for two decades.
Andrew Carnegie 1835-1919
Carnegie's insight that vertical integration from ore to finished steel eliminated the vulnerabilities embedded in each hand-off in the supply chain applies directly to the copper concentration story flagged by Transition Monitor. South32's 61% Sierra Gorda reserve expansion deepens the energy transition's dependence on a single geographic node — Chile's Antofagasta region — for a non-substitutable input. Carnegie's vertical integration strategy in Pennsylvania was explicitly about eliminating that kind of geographic and counterparty risk. The energy transition's supply chain has done the opposite: it has become more vertically disintegrated and more geographically concentrated at the mineral layer simultaneously. Carnegie would recognize the structural fragility instantly and move to either acquire upstream or build redundant sourcing before the leverage point was used against him.
Genghis Khan 1206-1227
The Mongol Empire's control of the Silk Road chokepoints — particularly the passes through Central Asia that all overland trade had to traverse — is the geopolitical template for what Iran possesses in the Strait of Hormuz. Genghis Khan's genius was understanding that controlling the route was more valuable than controlling the cargo: whoever set the terms of passage extracted rent from every transaction. Iran's playbook in the Hormuz — from tanker strikes to loading bid disruptions — is chokepoint rent extraction under military threat, the same logic applied to maritime geography. The Khan's counter to rival chokepoint control was always speed and simultaneity: hit multiple nodes before the defender can concentrate. Washington's Operation Economic Outcast is trying to do the financial version of that — sanction the buyer, the shipper, and the seller simultaneously — but the Mongol lesson is that this only works if you can actually enforce at every node at once.